EVE General Discussion

X, unless Psychotic Monk runs again or James 315 runs or something like that. Even then you will be high on my list.

I would of course also have an alt vote. Double the fun!

Hm, if I would be inclined to yes.
Also one small question that always bugs me about your bio. How on earth do you offer an obligatory service? Makes 0 sense and I always have been curious about it

Well I don't know. Do we need people desperate for attention as CSM? If so, she has my vote.

Erotica 1, you have stated that you would make an excellent advocate for all play styles, that you do not believe one play style is correct and another is incorrect. You said, in the press conference, that you believe all types of players need a voice. This included high sec miners, missioners, gankers, scammers and so on. A number of your core supporters, however, have expressed the view that certain play styles are invalid, as well as expressing the view that "some" people shouldn't even be playing EvE Online. On the other side of this are those players that feel your play style is invalid, or that you victimize unknowing players, specifically newer ones, for your enjoyment. Since you have stated that you would be an advocate for both of these groups, how do you plan on reconciling their vastly different opinions?

Erotica 1, some of your core supporters often express the opinion that Hi Sec should be removed from the game, denegrated into another segment of Null Sec or otherwise changed in a manner that would result in it no longer being Hi Sec. Is this your view as well? If it is, how do you reconcile that with your claim of being a fair representative of all players? If it is not your view, how do you intend to appease those core supporters that believe this is an integral part of "their" EvE while also maintaining the integrity of Hi Sec?

Your organization may be a dictatorship but don't expect everyone else to join your circle jerk.
The previous actions of a player is obviously the best way to judge them for candidacy therefore making any prior incident relevant and on topic.

Peace. X

This is getting to be much like the USA's political races. I can assume that for the 2015 CSM we will have candidates declaring in June of 2014.

Better the enemy you know

XXX For Erotica1!!!!

And CCP Falcon made it very clear in the original HR thread that the issues behind that incident are not to be discussed and that all who did would be directed to that post.

Are you another one who doesn't like following rules?

Is it my "dictatorship," or is it CCP's?

And for that matter, I am not even part of CODE.

So in other words, know what you are talking about before you actually post something.

Do I support their content creation?

Sure.

You have a problem, do as the original post says, and go create a thread about it.

Kthxbye.

Well of course posting a dissenting opinion in a thread such as this is to invite insults. I am, after all, posting in a thread supporting the candidacy of a scammer for CSM. What I was asking of you is clarity. You see, you first ignored the entire substance of one of my posts in order to focus on exaggerations made solely for dramatic effect and then later selectively quoted another post of mine so that you could refute an argument I never made. It becomes difficult to sift through the meanings of your statements as you provide no context. And to be clear, your insults have caused me no distress, I came here knowing that I would be called names at every opportunity. That fact, however, does not make them somehow not insults. Let me try to clarify. You have not insulted me, but you have twice leveled insults against me. I hope you understand.