These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Nice Job CCP. Now Can We All Get 17m Free Skillpoints Also?

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#121 - 2013-11-08 23:04:54 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


Your petition was closed because this isn't about you. It never was and it never will be. If you spent time studying CCP's policies, which you should probably know a thing or two about before questioning them, you'll find that they're forbidden from discussing another customer's petition with you.


Under that theory, since Erotica also petitioned the incident, CCP should have been forbidden from discussing the incident with the alleged skillpoint loser. Clearly, that's not how it works, CCP felt free to respond to each person about the petition they made.



Darius JOHNSON wrote:
There's not much more in this world I could give less of a **** about than the CSM so best of luck I guess.


Well, you've made multiple posts about the CSM recently, so I'm sorry to hear you care so little about the world.
Lugalbandak
Doomheim
#122 - 2013-11-08 23:05:39 UTC
all my tengu losses sp pleae back P

The police horse is the only animal in the world that haz his male genitals on his back
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#123 - 2013-11-08 23:05:44 UTC  |  Edited by: ElQuirko
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
At least you managed to squeeze that sentence out without any glaring errors. Congrats bro you're learning!


Interesting. Besides my French grammar, pick me up on anything else, please? Your teachings are nectar, oh sweet master.

Dodixie > Hek
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#124 - 2013-11-08 23:06:28 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Honestly, y'all need to chill.

So some nub that Erotica managed to scam (or however he managed to get the API) got some SP. What's this guy gonna do, fit t2 mining lasers to his hulk? The SP is non-transferable.

Going over every tiny interaction CCP has with its player base will accomplish nothing, it will only deaden the communication channels that exist between the player base and the devs.


think you've pretty much missed the point.

No, I understand the point perfectly, and I agree that CCP shouldn't reward or compensate for stupidity (see my first post). I just don't think that it's worth picking this particular fight with CCP at this particular time.
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#125 - 2013-11-08 23:08:02 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


If you don't know CCP's policies well enough to know that they can't discuss this with you then perhaps you should spend more time understanding what you're mad about before you get mad about it and act the fool. The fact that as best as I can tell you're all lowest denominator eve bottom feeders only makes your apparent sense of entitlement more interesting.


Keep spewing out insults while calling everyone else mad, it's a good look.
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#126 - 2013-11-08 23:08:15 UTC
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


Your petition was closed because this isn't about you. It never was and it never will be. If you spent time studying CCP's policies, which you should probably know a thing or two about before questioning them, you'll find that they're forbidden from discussing another customer's petition with you.


Under that theory, since Erotica also petitioned the incident, CCP should have been forbidden from discussing the incident with the alleged skillpoint loser. Clearly, that's not how it works, CCP felt free to respond to each person about the petition they made.



Darius JOHNSON wrote:
There's not much more in this world I could give less of a **** about than the CSM so best of luck I guess.


Well, you've made multiple posts about the CSM recently, so I'm sorry to hear you care so little about the world.


It's not theory. It's policy. Perhaps they should be questioned for not following their own policy if that's what happened, but that's not how it was being presented and I haven't read any of the petitions nor do I really care to.

I don't even know what the hell that second bit is supposed to mean.
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#127 - 2013-11-08 23:08:19 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
I requested CCP speak to me before taking any action, but I did not receive a response.


Don't have anything else to say in this thread except who the **** are you that CCP should talk to you before dealing with another customer? Talk about having your entitled nose in the air.


PotatoOverdose wrote:


2) If you honestly thing that some group (e.g. CCP) needs to ask your (i.e. some random guy) permission before it talks to someone else (e.g. some other random guy), you need to get your head checked. That's not how the world works.

So..... /thread?


OP is stating CCP should have consulted with him to get both sides of the actual story, as the actual story leaves no room for reimbursement under CCP's own rules. Pull your collective heads out of your collective asses, you human bovine metaphors.

Birds of a feather, apparently.

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#128 - 2013-11-08 23:09:04 UTC
Well, I suppose now we all really do know how CCP feels.

Straight from the mouth of an ex-employee.

So, sad.






























Wait, let me grab my Ibis.

Monuments to shoot.

Be back.....

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#129 - 2013-11-08 23:09:20 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
At least you managed to squeeze that sentence out without any glaring errors. Congrats bro you're learning!


Interesting. Besides my French grammar, pick me up on anything else, please? Your teachings are nectar, oh sweet master.


It should have been "Besides my French grammar have you picked up on anything else?". The poetry at the end was perfect however. It must be a French thing.
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#130 - 2013-11-08 23:10:00 UTC  |  Edited by: ElQuirko
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
I don't even know what the hell that second bit is supposed to mean.

Go back to school, take some English lessons. You don't seem to be able to comprehend much of what is said, despite its perfectly passable language.

Darius JOHNSON wrote:
It should have been "Besides my French grammar have you picked up on anything else?". The poetry at the end was perfect however. It must be a French thing.

Oh look, you understood. I guess the shield of "OMFG YOUR GRAMMAR IS NOT FLAWLESS" is just to hide the fact that your argument has totally and utterly collapsed? I would suggest you bow out now.

Dodixie > Hek
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#131 - 2013-11-08 23:10:24 UTC
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


If you don't know CCP's policies well enough to know that they can't discuss this with you then perhaps you should spend more time understanding what you're mad about before you get mad about it and act the fool. The fact that as best as I can tell you're all lowest denominator eve bottom feeders only makes your apparent sense of entitlement more interesting.


Keep spewing out insults while calling everyone else mad, it's a good look.


It's not an insult. It's a statement of fact. There sure are a lot of hurt NPC corp characters in this thread!
Kate stark
#132 - 2013-11-08 23:10:33 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
I just don't think that it's worth picking this particular fight with CCP at this particular time.


i disagree.

an issue is an issue. the date on a calendar isn't going to change that.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#133 - 2013-11-08 23:11:10 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
I don't even know what the hell that second bit is supposed to mean.


Go back to school, take some English lessons. You don't seem to be able to comprehend much of what is said, despite its perfectly passable language.


There was nothing passable about this sentence. Just stop.
Kate stark
#134 - 2013-11-08 23:11:24 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


If you don't know CCP's policies well enough to know that they can't discuss this with you then perhaps you should spend more time understanding what you're mad about before you get mad about it and act the fool. The fact that as best as I can tell you're all lowest denominator eve bottom feeders only makes your apparent sense of entitlement more interesting.


Keep spewing out insults while calling everyone else mad, it's a good look.


It's not an insult. It's a statement of fact. There sure are a lot of hurt NPC corp characters in this thread!


i've never understood the relevance of your corp in relation to forum posts.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
#135 - 2013-11-08 23:11:46 UTC
I like EVE.

Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!!
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#136 - 2013-11-08 23:12:03 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
I don't even know what the hell that second bit is supposed to mean.


Go back to school, take some English lessons. You don't seem to be able to comprehend much of what is said, despite its perfectly passable language.

There was nothing passable about this sentence. Just stop.

Let's play "spot the error".

Dodixie > Hek
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#137 - 2013-11-08 23:12:05 UTC
Tul Breetai wrote:

OP is stating CCP should have consulted with him to get both sides of the actual story, as the actual story leaves no room for reimbursement under CCP's own rules. Pull your collective heads out of your collective asses, you human bovine metaphors.

Birds of a feather, apparently.

The bolded part is where you're wrong. CCP doesn't need to consult Erotica1, myself, you, or the Mittani before doing anything.

You or anyone else can criticize anyone else's actions. And in this case, criticism is perhaps warranted. But no one needs to consult any random dude off the street before doing anything.
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#138 - 2013-11-08 23:12:25 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


If you don't know CCP's policies well enough to know that they can't discuss this with you then perhaps you should spend more time understanding what you're mad about before you get mad about it and act the fool. The fact that as best as I can tell you're all lowest denominator eve bottom feeders only makes your apparent sense of entitlement more interesting.


Keep spewing out insults while calling everyone else mad, it's a good look.


It's not an insult. It's a statement of fact. There sure are a lot of hurt NPC corp characters in this thread!


You may be crude and confused, but at least you follow orders well.
Kate stark
#139 - 2013-11-08 23:12:43 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
I don't even know what the hell that second bit is supposed to mean.


Go back to school, take some English lessons. You don't seem to be able to comprehend much of what is said, despite its perfectly passable language.

There was nothing passable about this sentence. Just stop.

Let's play "spot the error".


the whole thread, it would seem.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Anomaly One
Doomheim
#140 - 2013-11-08 23:12:48 UTC
Tollen Gallen wrote:
I like EVE.


best post in thread, 10/10 did read again