These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CONCORD is a laughingstock..

Author
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#81 - 2013-11-10 04:14:52 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

If you think anything else, then to the Winds with you. I am done with you. I should have known better.


You may consider that mutual.


You may consider that official.


As stated already, "Noted and reciprocated."


Likewise.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Nicole Graves
Anshar Incorporated
#82 - 2013-11-10 04:15:12 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

If you think anything else, then to the Winds with you. I am done with you. I should have known better.


You may consider that mutual.


You may consider that official.


As stated already, "Noted and reciprocated."


Likewise.


Roger That.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#83 - 2013-11-10 05:01:45 UTC
Answering a call or not, is what makes difference between a soldier and a mercenary.

Mercenary would think, will he die or not. Mercenary will make sure, his money will be safe before partaking in risk operations and will turn around, when it will become hairy.

Professional soldier, instead, will jump into the fire, will warp to suicide trap, if will be ordered. Because, it is our duty, and it is our profession to die for others to live. We think how to survive after or during the execution of the orders, while coward mercenaries consider surviving by not executing the order at all.

This is what makes difference of Caldari and Gallente: we are ready to sacrifice our lives, we live for others, for our fleets, but not ourselves to succeed, while Gallenteans think only how to save their precious ships, how to save money or their lives.

Even if it looks like it is a suicide, our commanders have a greater plan. We could actually survive there. Or we won't, but our sacrifice will allow greater fleets, more important ships and peoples to pass and finish the task.

Unfortunately, among capsuleers there are not enough professional soldiers, but too many egoistical mercenaries.

Because of them, this battle was lost.

Shame on you, capsuleers.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Nicole Graves
Anshar Incorporated
#84 - 2013-11-10 05:25:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicole Graves
Diana Kim wrote:
Answering a call or not, is what makes difference between a soldier and a mercenary.

Mercenary would think, will he die or not. Mercenary will make sure, his money will be safe before partaking in risk operations and will turn around, when it will become hairy.

Professional soldier, instead, will jump into the fire, will warp to suicide trap, if will be ordered. Because, it is our duty, and it is our profession to die for others to live. We think how to survive after or during the execution of the orders, while coward mercenaries consider surviving by not executing the order at all.

This is what makes difference of Caldari and Gallente: we are ready to sacrifice our lives, we live for others, for our fleets, but not ourselves to succeed, while Gallenteans think only how to save their precious ships, how to save money or their lives.

Even if it looks like it is a suicide, our commanders have a greater plan. We could actually survive there. Or we won't, but our sacrifice will allow greater fleets, more important ships and peoples to pass and finish the task.

Unfortunately, among capsuleers there are not enough professional soldiers, but too many egoistical mercenaries.

Because of them, this battle was lost.

Shame on you, capsuleers.


No.

You see, Kim-haani, there is a difference between sacrificing one's self for a cause and being stood in front of a wall and shot by a firing squad. What happened during this Call-To-Arms is a massive dropping of the ball. Some basic fleet skills were sorely lacking at a Command Level and a terrible amount of common sense lacking from individual pilots.

What is happening in this thread is a mix up between 'You, pilots, are fools to jump into a well organised chokepoint without proper intel, fleet readiness or organisation of any sort' and 'You're a bad person for even attempting to volunteer yourself for service to CONCORD and/or respective Navies.'

We are not condemning people for joining the Call-To-Arms. We are condemning them following it through and losing lives despite knowing that the task force is scattered across twenty-odd jumps and other issues in the structure and integrity of the various fleets in the task force.

In short. No you aren't a bad Caldari for volunteering your serivces. You're a bad Pilot for not reading the situation and, Gods and Spirits forbid, using your brain to deduct that perhaps jumping was the best idea after all.

-Nicole Hakatain
#KaalakiotaSwag
#Pyre4life
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#85 - 2013-11-10 06:48:21 UTC
Nicole Graves wrote:

You see, Kim-haani, there is a difference between sacrificing one's self for a cause and being stood in front of a wall and shot by a firing squad. What happened during this Call-To-Arms is a massive dropping of the ball. Some basic fleet skills were sorely lacking at a Command Level and a terrible amount of common sense lacking from individual pilots.

There was 'firing squad' only in eyes of cowards and traitors.
Indeed, this was all because of catastrophic lack of sense of duty and command skills of capsuleers, that were gathering fleets. Our commander couldn't give order to jump, because he was afraid of a gatecamp.
Such cowardice and disregard to mission goals is unacceptable.

Nicole Graves wrote:

What is happening in this thread is a mix up between 'You, pilots, are fools to jump into a well organised chokepoint without proper intel, fleet readiness or organisation of any sort' and 'You're a bad person for even attempting to volunteer yourself for service to CONCORD and/or respective Navies.'

It was our duty to go there, disregarding threats and intel. We had our orders. Fools are those, who disregarded mission goal instead.
And those, who didn't attempt to... well, using your word "volunteer", simply don't understand, what does it mean to be Caldari, Citizen and Soldier.

Nicole Graves wrote:

We are not condemning people for joining the Call-To-Arms. We are condemning them following it through and losing lives despite knowing that the task force is scattered across twenty-odd jumps and other issues in the structure and integrity of the various fleets in the task force.

If you would condemn people for joining CTA, I would call you a traitor. But for condemning following orders to the end, I will call you a coward, not worthy to wear Caldari insignia!

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#86 - 2013-11-10 07:43:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Saya Ishikari
No, this HAS degenerated into nothing more than two sides flaming each other. On the one hand, you have the "You go, you stupid." Camp, on the other, you have the "You no go, you coward!" Camp...

Funny... I remember this little fleet action... Where Patriot and Liberal alike flocked... Straight into the heart of enemy territory, where said enemy had been preparing their counterattack for five years. How anyone thought that a bunch of "RAH RAH!" would have made any difference (goes for me too) is beyond reason. Still, they went. They made their fleets, flew in without intel and no cohesion beyond certain limited groups, and did it anyways.

Oh sure... There was "support" on both sides, for all the good it did... And enough unalighed capsuleers to max out the tracking capabilities of the entire system... How is that anything but a giant cluster looking for a place to happen? Still, we committed.

And the result was... We got our heads handed to us on a stick. Its this little planet called Home, otherwise known as Caldari Prime. Maybe someone's heard of it?

The kicker was... After force of arms failed, another method worked. And most everybody I know spent weeks speaking ill of the effort, when the alternative would have been; We lose. Completely.

Now, here we are again. CalNav said "fight"... And yeah, it was an obvious disaster in the making. Which is different from jumping into the heart of Fed space expecting "superiority" to carry the day how? And yet, there was no "you shouldn't have gone" in the aftermath by those who, through choice or chance, didn't...

Sure, it was a horrendous blunder. But its hardly the first and won't be the last. And nobody here is innocent of the "offense" of fighting for a cause that all sense says is ludicrous. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to take a good whiff of what they're shoveling at their so called opponents here, since its the same bull**** that they're already neck deep in.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Steffanie Saissore
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#87 - 2013-11-10 07:49:00 UTC
I believe this will be the last time I post on this particular thread.

Stop with the gods-damned back-biting and bitchiness. In the matter of hours I have witnessed what appeared to have been good friendships dissolve over nothing but stupid pride and contempt.

Is it so hard to accept that some pilots considered it their duty to respond to a Call to Arms or action by their nation's Navy? Put aside the disdain and contempt that you have for the bureaucracy of the empires and possible conspiracies or what not.

Those of you you spend all your time fighting a pointless war, why? Most of us don't sit back in our chairs and call you idiots for going out there and fight a war that means absolutely nothing except for hardship for those colonials caught in between. You do it because you claim it is your duty to fight for your nation and do it with pride. Fine. However, if you want to claim respect that you think you are due for going out and fighting the good fight, then SHUT THE HELL UP. Yes, I am **** pissed off with the lot of you. You sit there and ridicule those you felt that they were doing something to better the cluster.

Also, for most, they believed that they were being called upon to strike a blow against Sansha's Nation.

Take a good look at what you have said and the actions you have taken these last couple of days. Calling the pilots who answered this CTA idiots and fools does nothing except call into question your own worth as a soldier. You say you fight for your Nation or State, yet refuse their call for aid and then ridicule those that went. Under most circumstances, the lot of you would be branded traitors and exiled.

Think very carefully of how you define your loyalties. Most organizations frown on fair-weathered friends and though most of you claim that you have no need of CONCORD or the Navies, be careful of what you wish for because you will get it.

We travel in the dark of the new moon,

A starry highway traced on the map of the sky

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#88 - 2013-11-10 08:26:22 UTC
And now for my own, personal, final word.

Lines have been crossed here, today. General comments have been misinterpreted as personal attacks. Strawman claims have been proffered and clung to. Explanations and clarifications ignored. Conclusions have been jumped to. Personal and Corporate attacks have been made.

I am disappointed. Not in Diana Kim, who knows no better and is, at least, consistent in her opinions and manner of expressing them, but in the pair of you, Saissore and Ishikari. One of you flies for an organisation that was almost our twin just a month ago, eagerly participating in the struggle you now decry so scathingly and demeaningly. The other of you was someone I called kirjuun. Neither of you have acted as ally or comrade today.

You talk about back-biting? I lost crew in a CSAR operation attending Katrina Oniseki's distress call only days ago. I have drunk and sparred and killed with the Stormcrows for months. Ishikari, we've shared concerns and problems and dangers for all the time we've known each other.

Not one of you brought this to me in private before you acted publicly. The pair of you and Oniseki decided to go for the throat in public, in a way that basically demands I double-down and stand my ground. You know the assumptions that invites. The actions in response it demands.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Derek Quaid
Doomheim
#89 - 2013-11-10 08:42:44 UTC
You could've all been more discreet. When you decide to stop flapping your gums and instead put your money where your mouth is, give me a call. I know a guy.

CEO, Discreet Bounties In-game Channel: Discreet Bounties

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#90 - 2013-11-10 08:58:14 UTC
A wise man once told me, "Those that live like the wolf will learn to eat like the wolf."

It's too easy to fall into the habit.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Shiori Shaishi
Doomheim
#91 - 2013-11-10 09:44:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Shiori Shaishi
It strikes me as ironic that people so critically dependent on finding crew for an extremely risky job -- I've seen your statistics -- are so eager to loudly and publically denounce the virtues of sacrifice.

And that's the least I could say about this shameful display.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#92 - 2013-11-10 10:57:32 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Unlike the ones like Sami Okuuda ? That is good to know, I am pretty sure that the Caldari Navy appreciates.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
That choice is yours to make, but you needn't pile scorn upon those who lost their lives answering the call.


Suuolo, I thought you knew me better than that. I have heaped no scorn on those who gave their lives following the orders of their commanders. My scorn was reserved strictly for their immortal officers, who didn't have to share that sacrifice.

Now, I know I'm equally immune from that greatest of consequences, but I have tried to ensure that the loss of my crews has had meaning, at least.


Meaning? In that proxy war ?


I wish there were more meaning in the 'forever war' but it's the war we have - and whilst I'd prefer something with defined endgoals there really isn't anyone I've killed in the warzone that I regret killing.


With your crew dying endlessly for something you acknowledge having no meaning, except for killing people you do not appreciate.

I see.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#93 - 2013-11-10 15:56:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Lyn Farel wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Unlike the ones like Sami Okuuda ? That is good to know, I am pretty sure that the Caldari Navy appreciates.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
That choice is yours to make, but you needn't pile scorn upon those who lost their lives answering the call.


Suuolo, I thought you knew me better than that. I have heaped no scorn on those who gave their lives following the orders of their commanders. My scorn was reserved strictly for their immortal officers, who didn't have to share that sacrifice.

Now, I know I'm equally immune from that greatest of consequences, but I have tried to ensure that the loss of my crews has had meaning, at least.


Meaning? In that proxy war ?


I wish there were more meaning in the 'forever war' but it's the war we have - and whilst I'd prefer something with defined endgoals there really isn't anyone I've killed in the warzone that I regret killing.


With your crew dying endlessly for something you acknowledge having no meaning, except for killing people you do not appreciate.

I see.


We clear pirates out of Caldari systems and put a pricetag on FDU agression. I choose ships that minimise the crew risks. I won't argue that the war is being fought in the best way, but our sponsors clearly wish us to fight it and I would argue that at least we're doing so in an intelligent manner.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#94 - 2013-11-10 16:02:23 UTC
My point was that no matter how intelligent the manner it is fought is, if the end result holds the same meaning, then it does not make any difference, except maybe in cost, though I would argue that the human and material cost of that failure of an operation is probably completely insignificant compared to the cost that has spanned over these years of proxy war.

You have a point for pirates, though, even if being in militia often impairs a lot one's efforts to fight against them (especially the ones inside the militias).
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#95 - 2013-11-10 16:53:17 UTC
And you expertly missed it just to spread some more hot air over this channel.

Anyways, all is said and done. If your pride hurts so much that you're still hiding your failures behind the sacrifice of assets and manpower that makes questioning your decisions tactless and impossible then there's nothing left to be gained here.

Try flying smart next time, it usually makes for a much better plan than honour.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2013-11-10 18:12:33 UTC
Despite my allegiance to my Federation, there is a reason why I spend most of my time in Nullsec.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#97 - 2013-11-10 19:06:31 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
And you expertly missed it just to spread some more hot air over this channel.

Anyways, all is said and done. If your pride hurts so much that you're still hiding your failures behind the sacrifice of assets and manpower that makes questioning your decisions tactless and impossible then there's nothing left to be gained here.

Try flying smart next time, it usually makes for a much better plan than honour.


I encountered no failures, and sacrificed absolutely nothing, if ever you are addressing to me... I went there, assessed the situation, and decided not to take part, following the same advice that you gave.
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#98 - 2013-11-10 19:21:34 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
And you expertly missed it just to spread some more hot air over this channel.

Anyways, all is said and done. If your pride hurts so much that you're still hiding your failures behind the sacrifice of assets and manpower that makes questioning your decisions tactless and impossible then there's nothing left to be gained here.

Try flying smart next time, it usually makes for a much better plan than honour.


I think her point was, for those taking part in faction warfare, they probably have little ground to stand on when talking about meaningless sacrifice and pointless combat. If you're going to scoff at CONCORD's fleet efforts, you'll have to thumb your nose at the CEWPA legislated conflict as well. It's far more pointless and, cumulatively, far more costly.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#99 - 2013-11-10 20:22:33 UTC
Interesting, this is the cause for a decay of diplomatic standings. Here I was under the impression that Pyre was immune to criticism.

Egos are such fragile things, no?

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#100 - 2013-11-10 21:28:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
John Revenent wrote:
Interesting, this is the cause for a decay of diplomatic standings. Here I was under the impression that Pyre was immune to criticism.

Egos are such fragile things, no?


They are indeed, after all wounded feelings apparently provoked the attack from your diplomat and even brought you down off your mountain, Revenent. A day late to do any good and with nothing of substance to say, but at least you're here.

Clearly this was an idea whose time had simply come.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.