These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

[Rubicon discussion] What happened to the SoE battleship?

Author
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-11-06 17:54:36 UTC
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba wrote:
Give it a bonus to rhml and probe strength.
Keep it as armour but give it a much larger signature than other bs.
Also give it a bonus to anchoring mobile depots.
Maybe a bonus to armour repper drones.

Like some kind of mothership?

Dodixie > Hek

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#22 - 2013-11-06 18:45:31 UTC
Galphii wrote:
The power of the Stratios renders BS sized SoE ship irrelevant. If they wanted to do a BS, they would have limited the Strat to medium drones.


maybe you would like to take a few moments to consider the attributes of the Gila

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2013-11-06 18:51:07 UTC
Kitty Bear wrote:
Galphii wrote:
The power of the Stratios renders BS sized SoE ship irrelevant. If they wanted to do a BS, they would have limited the Strat to medium drones.

maybe you would like to take a few moments to consider the attributes of the Gila

*Applause*

Or the Vexor Navy Issue. JS.

Dodixie > Hek

Helios Aquiness
Perkone
Caldari State
#24 - 2013-11-06 19:08:44 UTC
It can be a rookie ship for all I care, I just wanted a Star Distroyer :(
Carebear? Im a brony, motherf***er.
Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2013-11-06 19:17:51 UTC
Would like to see an SoE battleship. I just feel that 125 mbps of bonused drones and a Covert Ops cloak should be mutually exclusive.
Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#26 - 2013-11-06 19:26:26 UTC
why should they be mutually exclusive

drones are a weapon system ... so deploying them whilst cloaked would be the same as shooting lazors/autocannon's whilst cloaked


a non-event.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#27 - 2013-11-06 19:33:25 UTC
Kitty Bear wrote:
why should they be mutually exclusive

drones are a weapon system ... so deploying them whilst cloaked would be the same as shooting lazors/autocannon's whilst cloaked


a non-event.

If anything, drones are the worst weapon system to combine with a covert cloak.

Every other weapon system is just fine if the pilot needs to warp off grid. Drones need to be recovered first, making the ability to warp while cloaked something meaningless unless you have extra time after a fight.

Add to that, they have about the slowest time between dropping your cloak and first application of DPS, making a surprise attack anti-climactic to behold. Add to that, the weaker tank is exposed longer to the opponent since your DPS needs to take this extra time.

Blasters, on the other hand, or smart bombs, make better use of the qualities a cloak brings to the table.
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2013-11-06 19:47:18 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
If anything, drones are the worst weapon system to combine with a covert cloak.

Every other weapon system is just fine if the pilot needs to warp off grid. Drones need to be recovered first, making the ability to warp while cloaked something meaningless unless you have extra time after a fight.

Add to that, they have about the slowest time between dropping your cloak and first application of DPS, making a surprise attack anti-climactic to behold. Add to that, the weaker tank is exposed longer to the opponent since your DPS needs to take this extra time.

Blasters, on the other hand, or smart bombs, make better use of the qualities a cloak brings to the table.

Or bombs. Blink

Dodixie > Hek

Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2013-11-06 20:42:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Antillie Sa'Kan
Hm, I suppose you may be right. I guess I am just very iffy about a Covert Ops cloak paired with a full flight of damage bonused sentry drones as it might step on the toes of several other ships. (Dominix, Ishtar, Navy Vexor, Navy Dominix, Rattlesnake) So maybe something like this:

Role Bonus: 50% bonus to Large Energy Turret optimal range
Role Bonus: 37.5% increase Scan Prob Strength
Role Bonus: +10 Virus strength for Relic and Data Analyzers

Can fit Covert Ops Cloaking devices

Amarr Battleship Bonus:
4% bonus to Armor Resists

Gallente Battleship Bonus:
7.5% bonus to Drone optimal range and Done tracking speed

Slot layout: 6H, 7M, 6L; 5 turrets, 0 launchers
...
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 125 / 500
...
Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 65km / 90 / 7
...
Cargo Capacity: 750

With the other stats (speed, fittings, ect...) left to whatever CCP feels is balanced.

This is all of the projection and application of the Dominix but not all the damage and with one less low slot so tank and gank are in tight contention. The resist bonus helps make up for the lack of a low slot but I don't think it fully compensates as the hull bonus works out to be a free EANM where a Dominix would fit a rat specific hardener instead. Also like its smaller cousin a full rack of guns forces you to choose between a cloak or a probe launcher. Battleship lasers are cap hungry so running a full tank with top tier guns may be difficult depending on the capacitor stats without a cap booster.

Also if you want to fit drone link augmenters to make full use of sentry drone range you will need to make some choices in the hi slots and probably fit a sensor booster to augment targeting range. There are lots of mids for exploration but they will have to compete for mid slots with ewar, drone tracking links, sensor boosters, prop mods, and cap boosters.

Compared to the SoE cruiser it doesn't have as much raw drone damage (5 effective drones vs 6) so in a full exploration fit it wouldn't kill large rats as fast as I doubt that one extra stacking penalized drone damage mod would make up for the lack of a damage bonus on the hull. It would apply sentry done damage to small targets better but the cruiser can always switch to a damage bonused flight of light or medium drones. It would be able to pull range more effectively with an MJD and it has a bit more targeting range but would still need a sensor booster to snipe effectively. However being a BS it would be much slower and unable to speed tank rats so tank mods in the lows may be more important than on the cruiser unless you sacrifice guns to drone link augmenters so you can range tank.

Thoughts?
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2013-11-06 21:03:05 UTC
I kinda skimmed the thread but just wanted to add this quote from the recent dev blog.
Quote:
We hope you guys enjoy the new ships, and make sure to keep your eyes peeled following Rubicon, the Sisters of EVE may not be done giving us new toys quite yet…

- CCP Rise

Source: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/sisters-of-eve-faction-ships/

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#31 - 2013-11-06 21:41:59 UTC
heh .. I missed that last part.

I got side tracked by the shiny graph, and the lack of Sanctaury Corp LP's on it Big smile
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#32 - 2013-11-06 22:15:58 UTC
Onslaughtor wrote:
My feeling is that they will release the Nestor when they rebalanced the Blackops. Likely in the 1.1, 1.2, or the next expansion.




I think this is is the case as well.


SOE BS witht the current states of blops, redeemer and sin in particular, would just be a balance nightmare. This would limit blops to bridge only details.

Thye'd have of trend continued armout bonuses. This is something blops lack and has been asked for in the past. the rationale we get is t2 BS can't get t2 resists or they aren't pure combat vessels. Bring in SOE and we'd go...well wtf is up with this boat then.

While we can debate the issues of covert op cloak on blops as well (I happen to be against the idea in current state) we'd also go well wtf is up with this SOE boat as well.

But to sum up ccp I think is eyeing blops redo as even now unless you need its bridging most be better off running the tier 1 variety its based on for most everything else. SOE BS would be yet another reason to not fly them.

CCP has been here before. Inty's while not crap not great. AF's were lacking a bonus and generally "broken". To this mess ccp introduced dramiel. We were told inty's aren't dps ships in general, thats AF's role.. We were told AF's aren't meant to be high speed tacklers...thats inty's job. Then they gave us dramiel and many said well well now we are jsut confused ccp, this ship did both well.

We got the cruiser and the frig I think because all in all these classes are decently squared away. I for example am not seeing any reason to not fly ishtars/gilas anymore after release. SOE has some tricks up it sleeve...but nothing that has me going ishtars are trash ships that will rot on the market since no one will want them anymore.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#33 - 2013-11-06 23:37:16 UTC
Antillie Sa'Kan wrote:
Hm, I suppose you may be right. I guess I am just very iffy about a Covert Ops cloak paired with a full flight of damage bonused sentry drones as it might step on the toes of several other ships. (Dominix, Ishtar, Navy Vexor, Navy Dominix, Rattlesnake) So maybe something like this:

Role Bonus: 50% bonus to Large Energy Turret optimal range
Role Bonus: 37.5% increase Scan Prob Strength
Role Bonus: +10 Virus strength for Relic and Data Analyzers

Can fit Cover Ops Cloaking devices

Amarr Battleship Bonus:
4% bonus to Armor Resists

Gallente Battleship Bonus:
7.5% bonus to Drone optimal range and Done tracking speed


The Sin is a full-flight-sentry-bonused ship with cloaking ability. The Redeemer is a cloaking laser boat. Both have the ability to use portal generators. If the Sin is balanced to be more like the Dominix (i.e.: drone range/tracking bonus as opposed to the Navy Domi with hybrid bonuses) there's room for another covert/black ops drone boat with combined drone/laser bonuses.

I agree with you that having such a vessel capable of using a covert ops cloak would be unbalanced, but only if none of the T2 Black Ops battleships are able to do the same. If all the black ops ships become able to use covert ops cloaks, I think the Nestor would fit in nicely as a pirate black ops ship with combined drone/laser bonuses.

The Gila has a full flight of heavy/sentry drones with damage bonuses, but it suffers compared to the Dominix or Eos due to less EHP, less tank and less fitting. The Myrmidon offers 4 heavy/sentry drones and an amazing active tank and so many high slots — a configuration which is happily exploited by solo/small gang PvPers. Sure, there's only a small population of dual rep / ancillary rep Myrm pilots out there, but from what I've read and watched, they're really enjoying that hull.

Of course if the Black Ops ships aren't being rebalanced at the same time, we might see the Nestor released as a covert ops drone boat with exploration benefits. It could still be balanced the same way as the Stratios, four large drones, large laser bonuses, etc. effectively providing a cloaky ship somewhere between Recon, T1 battleships and T2 black ops in terms of power & balance. Even that would be an amazing ship to bring along for black ops roams: all we need now is a cloaky ship with a large cargo or fuel hold to carry all the fuel required to take this fleet on tour :)
Antillie Sa'Kan
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2013-11-07 00:02:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Antillie Sa'Kan
Mara Rinn wrote:
The Sin is a full-flight-sentry-bonused ship with cloaking ability. The Redeemer is a cloaking laser boat. Both have the ability to use portal generators. If the Sin is balanced to be more like the Dominix (i.e.: drone range/tracking bonus as opposed to the Navy Domi with hybrid bonuses) there's room for another covert/black ops drone boat with combined drone/laser bonuses.

Yes but the Sin has 7.5 effective drones to my proposed SoE battleship's 5 in addition to damage bonused guns making the Sin much more gank oriented. As a trade off it cannot use a Covert Ops cloak but it does get a jump drive and the ability to make covert bridges. So it ends up being a far more specialized ship. This is what I would expect from a T2 hull. I think you could put an SoE battleship similar to the one I proposed into the game without encroaching on the role or natural strengths of the Black Ops battleships.

If you limit the Nestor to only 4 sentry/heavy drones I think you might end up conflicting with the Stratios a bit too much.

As to how to actually fix Black Ops, I don't really know, but it seems that being able to use the Covert Ops cloak wouldn't do it. I have seen ideas for some kind of bastion style "stealth field generator" kicked around though.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#35 - 2013-11-07 06:41:42 UTC
Probably a Pirate-Black Ops rebalance and a SoE addition in the next update.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Yummy Chocolate
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#36 - 2013-11-07 07:49:40 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Am I imagining something? I swear there was meant to be one.

Like many others, your imagination is running wild.

the SOE BS rumor spawned from the unmodeled GURISTAS BS found on singularity about a month or 2 ago.

Speaking of which, I need to update my sisi and check if it's still there and if it has a model yet.

Frostys Virpio > CCP: Continously Crying Playerbase

Felicity Love >... was thinking "moar popcorn"... but now, seeing the truly awesome contribution this thread is going to make to the Greater Glory Of EVE.... imagonnamakkadapizza....

Reiisha
#37 - 2013-11-07 09:01:39 UTC
Yummy Chocolate wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:
Am I imagining something? I swear there was meant to be one.

Like many others, your imagination is running wild.

the SOE BS rumor spawned from the unmodeled GURISTAS BS found on singularity about a month or 2 ago.

Speaking of which, I need to update my sisi and check if it's still there and if it has a model yet.


BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:
I kinda skimmed the thread but just wanted to add this quote from the recent dev blog.
Quote:
We hope you guys enjoy the new ships, and make sure to keep your eyes peeled following Rubicon, the Sisters of EVE may not be done giving us new toys quite yet…

- CCP Rise

Source: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/sisters-of-eve-faction-ships/

If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2013-11-07 09:46:49 UTC
Pollux 'Gemini wrote:
The Nestor, the theoretical ship in question had a description up on the test server a few builds back, what happened to it though I do not know if anyone knows. In reality it may have just been too difficult to balance a cloaky battleship, which is likely why the Black Ops have taken so long to come to rebalancing as well, my 2 cents.



When they eventually re think it. They should not give a covert ops cloak... just that. Give it a speed bonus while usign normal cloak like the black ops have...

And MAYBE add specially the capability of jumpign trough bridges.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Randy Wray
Heinous Peinus
#39 - 2013-11-07 09:56:50 UTC
Thing with covops battleships is they can hit MJD and then activate cloak, pretty much guarantees they wont be scrammed in time. Should make it so cloak interrupts mjd.

Solo Pvper in all areas of space including wormhole space. Check out my youtube channel @ http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd6M3xV43Af-3E1ds0tTyew/feed for mostly small scale pvp in lowsec/nullsec

twitch.tv/randywray

Malcolm Malicious
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#40 - 2013-11-07 11:19:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm Malicious
Role Bonus: 37.5% increase Scan Prob Strength
Role Bonus: +10 Virus strength for Relic and Data Analyzers
Role Bonus: 50% increase to Large Energy Turret optimal range

Cloak reactivation delay reduced to 10 seconds. 500% increase to cloak velocity.

Amarr Cruiser Bonus:
4% bonus to Armor Resists

Gallente Cruiser Bonus:
10% bonus to Drone hitpoints and damage, and +1 extra Drone controlled per level.

Slot layout: 6H, 6M, 6L; 5 turrets, 0 launchers
Defense: blah blah numbers to limit OPness
Fitting: same as above
Capacitor: same as above
Mobilty: Slow speed and good agility like the rest of SoE
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 100 / 500
Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 65km / 100 / 7
Sensor strength: 28
Signature radius: 420
Cargo Capacity: 750

Now we have a mini carrier that encourages the use of light and medium drones, maintaining dps in the 900-1000 range while increasing damage application to fill a support roll in clearing up anything below a BS. With 6 lows to balance tank/gank options and no covert ops cloak because this design would already be super powerful without a cloak. A drone boat that feels like a drone boat.

Benefits: Great support ship for taking out anything sub-capital, even when brick tanked - roughly same amount of DPS with 10 mediums and equal number of DDAs as a 125mbps Drone BS. Bonus to cloak velocity. Presumably very cool-looking.

Drawbacks: Unable to use cov ops cloak. Not able to utilize sentries to full potential so maximum drone damage application is delayed by drone speed. Probably just as expensive, if not more than an actual carrier. BS warp speed/acceleration post Rubicon.

Why: Because 10 drones on a subcap. Everyone these days flies cruisers. This, along with RHMLs add more incentive to take shiny moving bricks off undock and into the field. Think of all the High-sec carebears who believe this is the ultimate weapon in high-sec war decs, only to realize they've become a shiny killmail to a brick proteus gate camp. Now everyone can fly their very own Protoss carrier. That's probably what the final Nestor design will look similar to anyway.
Previous page123Next page