These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Intaki and the Federation

Author
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#161 - 2013-11-05 05:13:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Caellach Marellus
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:


Federal citizens commenting on threads involving State affairs on the IGS has resulted in the cries of "The Federation is meddling in our affairs" before now. You don't need to go to large political extremes to find a comparison.


As I've already stated, the Federation does in fact actively meddle in the affairs of foreign powers through political espionage and subversive actions. It is a legitimate claim to make and one that is based in fact and evidence. I'm still uncertain what Federal espionage targeting the State has to do with Federal foreign policy towards the Intaki Syndicate. Unless you're trying to defend some sort of Federal right to spying on others and meddling in the affairs of foreign powers that should never be questioned?


I don't know why you're trying to connect the two, I certainly wasn't. If you're going to invent an argument that never actually exist, then by all means I'm sure you can find a wall to have it with. Otherwise, if you don't mind going back and reading what I said, rahter than trying to put two and two together and coming up with five, I'll gladly continue this debate if you have something relevant to say. Trying to go off topic by arguing a made up point, one I never stated, isn't going to work with me, Gesakaarin.

That said if you want examples at the political leadership level, there's plenty of speeches from Heth's later days trying to villify the Federation, heck let's not forget that fantastic attempt at offering "condolences" to the Republic. Heth was essentially doing on a grand public scale what several State loyallists attempt to do now, sow seeds of discontent through utter bullshit.


Quote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:

This would be an almost acceptable theory, until you ask yourself who willingly would choose exile in such a vaste waste of space with small numbers when a chance to be with the people you supported, which was the cause of your exile, is an option?


In much the same way the Thukker would have willingly chosen an exile in a vaste waste of space with small numbers: frontier independence can have its own appeal for those that value their freedom and liberty.


The Thukker also have their presence within the Republic, as far as stations in the Metropolis area, even in high security space.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#162 - 2013-11-05 05:31:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Caellach Marellus wrote:


I don't know why you're trying to connect the two, I certainly wasn't. If you're going to invent an argument that never actually exist, then by all means I'm sure you can find a wall to have it with. Otherwise, if you don't mind going back and reading what I said, rahter than trying to put two and two together and coming up with five, I'll gladly continue this debate if you have something relevant to say. Trying to go off topic by arguing a made up point, one I never stated, isn't going to work with me, Gesakaarin.



Just as I don't know why you're trying to connect a tenuous assertion about Caldari citizens raising legitimate concerns about Federal spying and meddling in the affairs of the State which has little to any correlation with discussion on Federal foreign policies as regards the Intaki Syndicate.

In the end, what others may or may not say elsewhere has little relevance to the opinions I am presenting thus far.


Caellach Marellus wrote:


The Thukker also have their presence within the Republic, as far as stations in the Metropolis area, even in high security space.


And yet the Thukker still maintain their nomad caravans in the Great Wildlands just as much as the Intaki continue their own existence in the Syndicate. The difference with the Federation and the Intaki Syndicate being the Republic did not seek to coerce the Thukker to do as the Parliament pleased through coercive policies aimed at weakening Thukker autonomy. In this Caldari corporations and the Matari people may share an ability to respect those who decide to live their own lives, enjoy their independence, and retain their cultural and ethnic heritages.

This is more than can be said of the Federation in regards to its policies towards the Syndicate.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#163 - 2013-11-05 05:43:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Caellach Marellus wrote:

This would be an almost acceptable theory, until you ask yourself who willingly would choose exile in such a vaste waste of space with small numbers when a chance to be with the people you supported, which was the cause of your exile, is an option?


Supporting Caldari independence is not the same as wanting to go to war over it.

They weren't given an option to leave. They were exiled. Some joined the Caldari side in the war, later to become Mordu's Legion. Others chose not to fight, despite being forced from their homes. They became the Intaki Syndicate.

Katrina Oniseki

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#164 - 2013-11-05 11:12:30 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:


Kidnapping children for illegal pornography is necessary to eke a living in null sec now?



For a man that speaks of spreading of ignorance, you do enough yourself.

The Intaki Syndicate is a working example of how the Federation uses punitive political and economic pressure to punish those who do not wish to be part of the Union. Any criminality that exists in the Syndicate is a direct result of Federal laws designed to deny the Intaki of the Syndicate any hope of creating a self-sufficient and strong society. Nothing has changed in over two hundred years, one needs only look at the thoughts of Mentas Blaque, who as a Senator actually advocated the invasion of the Syndicate. The greatest tragedy is that these policies of military intimidation, political oppression, and economic subjugation on the part of the Federation is not a unique suffering on the part of the people of the Intaki Syndicate -- it is the same that was suffered by the Caldari and being suffered by the Matari and the Republic.


And by the Caldari disassociated, and the Guri, and... ?

There must be a pots and kettles factory somewhere nearby or... I mean, so many of them.
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#165 - 2013-11-05 11:19:58 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:


I don't know why you're trying to connect the two, I certainly wasn't. If you're going to invent an argument that never actually exist, then by all means I'm sure you can find a wall to have it with. Otherwise, if you don't mind going back and reading what I said, rahter than trying to put two and two together and coming up with five, I'll gladly continue this debate if you have something relevant to say. Trying to go off topic by arguing a made up point, one I never stated, isn't going to work with me, Gesakaarin.



Just as I don't know why you're trying to connect a tenuous assertion about Caldari citizens raising legitimate concerns about Federal spying and meddling in the affairs of the State which has little to any correlation with discussion on Federal foreign policies as regards the Intaki Syndicate.

In the end, what others may or may not say elsewhere has little relevance to the opinions I am presenting thus far.


Except I didn't say that, I'm still not saying that, and you're trying to push that stance on me.

The Federation has been accused of "meddling in the affairs of the State" on many different levels on many different occasions, you're sticking with one example you self-provided that I didn't bring into this debate. You're creating a self-designed argument, and one I'm not going to take up for your pre-tailored debate no matter how hard you try to push it.

Either work with what I actually said, or don't waste my time.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#166 - 2013-11-05 12:01:52 UTC
What do you mean, accused, it's more or less a fact.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#167 - 2013-11-05 12:25:02 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:

Except I didn't say that, I'm still not saying that, and you're trying to push that stance on me.

The Federation has been accused of "meddling in the affairs of the State" on many different levels on many different occasions, you're sticking with one example you self-provided that I didn't bring into this debate. You're creating a self-designed argument, and one I'm not going to take up for your pre-tailored debate no matter how hard you try to push it.

Either work with what I actually said, or don't waste my time.


You're the one that raised the initial point here:



Caellach Marellus wrote:
You're a member of the State meddling in Federal affairs.

Something that when the shoe is on the other foot, you complain heavily about.


This is humourous, mainly because you've no explanation for such hypocrisy while you continue to shill your twisted perspective of the truth.


You began trying to discuss the relevance of meddling and hypocrisy as you see it, in a discussion about the Intaki Syndicate and the foreign policies of the Federation towards it. I can hardly put words in the mouth of someone else when they actually say it.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#168 - 2013-11-05 12:55:18 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:

Except I didn't say that, I'm still not saying that, and you're trying to push that stance on me.

The Federation has been accused of "meddling in the affairs of the State" on many different levels on many different occasions, you're sticking with one example you self-provided that I didn't bring into this debate. You're creating a self-designed argument, and one I'm not going to take up for your pre-tailored debate no matter how hard you try to push it.

Either work with what I actually said, or don't waste my time.


You're the one that raised the initial point here:



Caellach Marellus wrote:
You're a member of the State meddling in Federal affairs.

Something that when the shoe is on the other foot, you complain heavily about.


This is humourous, mainly because you've no explanation for such hypocrisy while you continue to shill your twisted perspective of the truth.


You began trying to discuss the relevance of meddling and hypocrisy as you see it, in a discussion about the Intaki Syndicate and the foreign policies of the Federation towards it. I can hardly put words in the mouth of someone else when they actually say it.


And at no point did I actually give the example of spying as a direct comparison.

You did.

And have been trying to push that direct comparison as the argument since.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#169 - 2013-11-05 13:02:49 UTC
Because of other activity in this thread, it took me a while to get to this.
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I have read opinions from numerous people on the subject in this thread. I've also had the opportunity to trot my opinion out and see how it fares under fire. Actually, I think I've read things that you wrote on Intaki history in this thread.

As for why Caldari are interested, I suspect it varies from person to person. No doubt there is a strong thread of Schadenfreude running through it - the pleasure at seeing another client race leave the big, bad, Federation - thus adding more validation to the decisions of our ancestors. That's maybe not the most noble emotion, but it is very human.

However, perhaps it's also the desire to be there for a seceding race in their hour of need, in a way that nobody was there for us when we needed that help. That's a much nobler perspective and, unless you subscribe to the theory that the State has no nobler intentions within it, it might be wise to show people the benefit of the doubt.

This language you're using here manages to be both extremely self-serving and incredibly insulting to both Federalist Intaki and non-Intaki Federals. This? This is why I find so much trouble debating most Caldari rationally. Even though it has perfecty legitimate grievances with the Federation, the State still manages to possess a towering combined hero-victim complex, and the way it projects that onto its dealings with other nations is honestly teeth-grinding.

You said earlier in this thread (or it may have been the other one) that the bombardment of Caldari Prime wasn't ancient history for the Caldari. Maybe not, but it's still history. It's still in the past. It happened. The vast majority of people who live in the Federation today don't approve of it. The vast majority of people who live in the Federation today weren't even alive when it happened. The people responsible for the decisions that led to it were imprisoned or exiled from the Federation. Yet State capsuleers still appoint blame for the bombardment of Caldari Prime as if people like myself had our fingers on the buttons. Our ancestors - and your ancestors - are forcing us to bear the burden of sins that never belonged to us.

You aren't "seeing another client race leave the big, bad Federation" or "being there for a seceding race in their hour of need." You're all projecting your own vendetta onto my people's struggles for prosperity and success within - or, in the case of the seccessionalists - without the Federation. Federalist Intaki certainly don't want your "help" and while I may not know everything about secessionalist Intaki they sure as hell aren't seceeding for you, they're seceeding for us, however misguided that sentiment may be. And trust me, if you wanted to score some sort of diplomatic point with either the secessionalists or the Federealists by bringing up a Caldari occupation of our homeworld, you ****ed up. Do the caldari want to score points with either faction of Intaki? Then stay the hell away from our homeworld, and the system it resides in. You want to call that Federal territory? Yeah, some might agree, some might disagree. But first and foremost it's ours. It belongs to the Intaki people, the Intaki Assembly (as a member of the Federation) and the Caldari have never, read never, had any claim to it, no matter what Heth's auction falsely claims.

Trust me, the Intaki people might not be thrilled that the Federation is at war right now, but anyone thinking that we're somehow becoming more sympathetic to a State which auctioned our planets to its own megacorporations is in for a massive, crippling disappointment. The absolute best the State could possibly hope for at this point is that we'll start despising both of you, but right now the State bears the brunt of it, because in a stroke of sheer lunacy you managed to become everything that you hated most, and we had to suffer for it.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Also, why are you so loyal to the Federation? I'm sure people would be interested to know. I know I would be.

This is a question that's going to take a while to answer. I'll have to consider how to write it up. It certainly won't fit in the remaining character limit for this post.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#170 - 2013-11-05 13:14:59 UTC
Please don't.
Being succinct is a skill.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#171 - 2013-11-05 13:15:59 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:


And at no point did I actually give the example of spying as a direct comparison.

You did.

And have been trying to push that direct comparison as the argument since.


Of course I did, because any amount of perceived 'meddling' a Federal apologist may bemoan when contrary opinion is presented as regards the Federal government and its policies it is nothing compared to actual meddling the Federation conducts in the external affairs of other nations and peoples through its espionage rings. As such, anyone at any time -- not just Caldari -- can make the legitimate point that the Federation is a meddlesome nation and it will be a factual statement I would say. So if the Federation and its lackeys enjoy meddling in the affairs of others, then they shouldn't be making tangential points about others meddling in what they perceive as their own affairs.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#172 - 2013-11-05 13:27:56 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
Please don't.
Being succinct is a skill.


As is literacy. Asking someone why they are loyal to their government is probably something that should be a detailed, complex answer. If it isn't, it implies you haven't put much thought into it. If you haven't, can you really be said to be loyal, or would you have not yet had the opportunity to be disloyal?

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#173 - 2013-11-05 13:32:14 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Desiderya wrote:
Please don't.
Being succinct is a skill.


As is literacy. Asking someone why they are loyal to their government is probably something that should be a detailed, complex answer. If it isn't, it implies you haven't put much thought into it. If you haven't, can you really be said to be loyal, or would you have not yet had the opportunity to be disloyal?


I might intercede here and say that my suuolo and I might share the opinion that our loyalty is proven by the blood we shed, and the lives we take in the defense of our Fatherland and not in the writing of soporific essays on the IGS about it.

Personally, I prove my loyalty to Kaalakiota and the State by doing **** and not just talking **** on the IGS, eh?

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#174 - 2013-11-05 13:46:38 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Desiderya wrote:
Please don't.
Being succinct is a skill.


As is literacy. Asking someone why they are loyal to their government is probably something that should be a detailed, complex answer. If it isn't, it implies you haven't put much thought into it. If you haven't, can you really be said to be loyal, or would you have not yet had the opportunity to be disloyal?


I might intercede here and say that my suuolo and I might share the opinion that our loyalty is proven by the blood we shed, and the lives we take in the defense of our Fatherland and not in the writing of soporific essays on the IGS about it.

Personally, I prove my loyalty to Kaalakiota and the State by doing **** and not just talking **** on the IGS, eh?

The question to Andreus was not "Can you prove your loyalty to the Federation?" it was "Why are you loyal to the Federation?".

Ms. Gesakaarin, if you can thoroughly display your reasoning for why you are loyal to the State strictly through the medium of carnage and gunfire, I will be quite impressed.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#175 - 2013-11-05 13:53:54 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
I might intercede here and say that my suuolo and I might share the opinion that our loyalty is proven by the blood we shed, and the lives we take in the defense of our Fatherland and not in the writing of soporific essays on the IGS about it.

Personally, I prove my loyalty to Kaalakiota and the State by doing **** and not just talking **** on the IGS, eh?

"Quick! Quick! Move the goalposts, or the Federals might score!"

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#176 - 2013-11-05 14:07:02 UTC
Oh look, anotherthread descending into the cesspool of gallente-caldari IGS warfare. Keep up the good work, ladies.


Anyway, on the original post regarding Intaki:
Where the initial post has proven to be interesting to read, it's a bit... lacking. For an analytical post, even one named 'Intaki and the Federation', it is either foolish or simply biased to take only those two entities into account. I believe a certain Caldari megacorp has already been brought up, so I'll extend that to the Intaki Syndicate as well, which is quite rarely mentioned.

I am aware some federals like to live in illusions of grandeur, but closing your eyes and pretending something's not there is not a viable thing when it comes to strategic analysis. Which brings me back to my point about foolishness/bias again - were you actually writing an analysis or a poorly disguised propaganda pamphlet?
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Darian en Chasteaux
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2013-11-05 14:38:12 UTC
altho being intaki has had its low points, and a struggle it was for me for awhile, I could enter into any political arena even thou I may be indirectly involved in it...

Intaki/Caldari affairs tho external as it may seem, is probly just that and we (or they I should say) just live their lives doin what they do best...probly political subversion ans I have not seen an ounce of clout coming out of Intaki space...

I dont want any part of it anyways...I question my loyalty to the Intaki...The Caldari need to be respected as a broot Navy force to be reckoned with...as for the political arena the Intaki need to leave it be and stay subversive...that is what little societies do now...that is all we can, and should do...

it only takes one drop to raise the sea...lets not create waves...go back home and rest for awhile...you will see the light...

GADS what am I saying...I been down here too long...

Darian
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#178 - 2013-11-05 14:53:03 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
a Federal apologist


Yeah my mistake, I actually thought you were here to have discussion and discourse, not to engage in rabid "stand your ground" Diana Kim esque blind zealotry.


You offer nothing to constructive discussion, using it as a disguise for point scoring, insults and self serving propaganda. I'm not going to entertain it any longer.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#179 - 2013-11-05 15:02:38 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Desiderya wrote:
Please don't.
Being succinct is a skill.


As is literacy. Asking someone why they are loyal to their government is probably something that should be a detailed, complex answer. If it isn't, it implies you haven't put much thought into it. If you haven't, can you really be said to be loyal, or would you have not yet had the opportunity to be disloyal?


I might intercede here and say that my suuolo and I might share the opinion that our loyalty is proven by the blood we shed, and the lives we take in the defense of our Fatherland and not in the writing of soporific essays on the IGS about it.

Personally, I prove my loyalty to Kaalakiota and the State by doing **** and not just talking **** on the IGS, eh?

The question to Andreus was not "Can you prove your loyalty to the Federation?" it was "Why are you loyal to the Federation?".

Ms. Gesakaarin, if you can thoroughly display your reasoning for why you are loyal to the State strictly through the medium of carnage and gunfire, I will be quite impressed.


1. Nowhere was Mr. Ixiris was mentioned as part or even in passing in the very text you have quoted.

2. I do not have to provide reason or rationale for my service to my Fatherland to foreigners and outsiders, either at length or in brief. My comrades in arms, my family, certainly I would elaborate to them if asked and they so desired. I personally see little value in expressing at length why you are loyal to a cause or a nation in public. For me it's a simple matter, I was born Caldari, I am loyal to my people.

Although if it's expression without words I suppose I'd prefer to express my loyalty through carnage and gunfire as opposed to what seems to be the Caillean norms of expression through limp-wristed interpretive dance.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#180 - 2013-11-05 15:12:10 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Desiderya wrote:
Please don't.
Being succinct is a skill.


As is literacy. Asking someone why they are loyal to their government is probably something that should be a detailed, complex answer. If it isn't, it implies you haven't put much thought into it. If you haven't, can you really be said to be loyal, or would you have not yet had the opportunity to be disloyal?


I might intercede here and say that my suuolo and I might share the opinion that our loyalty is proven by the blood we shed, and the lives we take in the defense of our Fatherland and not in the writing of soporific essays on the IGS about it.

Personally, I prove my loyalty to Kaalakiota and the State by doing **** and not just talking **** on the IGS, eh?

The question to Andreus was not "Can you prove your loyalty to the Federation?" it was "Why are you loyal to the Federation?".

Ms. Gesakaarin, if you can thoroughly display your reasoning for why you are loyal to the State strictly through the medium of carnage and gunfire, I will be quite impressed.


1. Nowhere was Mr. Ixiris was mentioned as part or even in passing in the very text you have quoted.

2. I do not have to provide reason or rationale for my service to my Fatherland to foreigners and outsiders, either at length or in brief. My comrades in arms, my family, certainly I would elaborate to them if asked and they so desired. I personally see little value in expressing at length why you are loyal to a cause or a nation in public. For me it's a simple matter, I was born Caldari, I am loyal to my people.

Although if it's expression without words I suppose I'd prefer to express my loyalty through carnage and gunfire as opposed to what seems to be the Caillean norms of expression through limp-wristed interpretive dance.


To be fair, it was Pieter who asked him. Whatever your views on how he chooses to answer the question, it isn't as if he wasn't solicited. The method of answering the question is completely at his discretion.

In return, you weren't actually asked why you are loyal to the state, he was simply being sarcastic and dismissive about your motives.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26