These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Intaki and the Federation

Author
Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#121 - 2013-11-04 19:36:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Bryen Verrisai
I took Aelisha's survey and thought it was decent. I doubt it will reveal much particularly usable information, but I will admit that I am curious about the results and would very much like to see them when she is done polling.

My views on the discussion at hand fall very much in line with Andreus': that is to say, I do not believe this a discussion that necessitates the involvment of people not native to or living in the Intaki region, and that the IGS is the least likely place for constructive discussion of the issue to occur.

Ms. Scherazad notes that on this particular forum on all people have a right to make their opinions heard. She is very correct about that and it is not something I would change. But when discussing the future plans of a very specific group of people in a very specific place, not all opinions are equal. Most are just noise.

Take, for example, those who state that secession is a desire held by the majority of Intaki. These people are not just stating on opinion: they are attempting to propagate a laughable falsehood. And I mean that literally. If one were to bring up the idea of Intaki secession from the Federation in an average Intaki community, one could expect to be met with mocking laughter, pity-filled headshaking, quizzical looks, and patronizing smiles followed by a quick change of subject. Alternatively, if you bring the subject up with someone like my mother, you'll get a very, very long lecture on Intaki dignity, history, culture, and loyalty.

And even the more informed opinions presented by non-Intaki posters (that is to say, non-residents of Intaki) are still largely irrelevant to the discussion. I do not say this out of disrespect for the posters who choose to make their opinions known, but simply as a statement of fact: the future of Intaki is for the people of Intaki to decide. And while a few both without and within Intaki may like to have things differently, the fact remains that for now our people have shown zero willingness or desire on any meaningful scale to secede from the Federation.

I believe issues like these are for the affected people alone to discuss and decide. That is why I had very little to say about the Caldari's recent change in leadership and the events surrounding it, in spite of thinking quite a bit about it. And it is why I refrain from telling the Minmatar just what I think they should do about their own government's issues.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#122 - 2013-11-04 19:52:15 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Andreus, I think you might be mixing up the right to express an opinion with the right to hold a stake in the process.

Then you might kindly inform your kirjuunen of the difference between those rights, because some of them seem to be confused.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I have no pretensions to the latter, but fail to see why I cannot exercise the former - especially if it educates me on the situation.

If your intent is to be educated on the subject of the Intaki, then might I suggest that you might also kindly learn something from us? Because, with as much respect as I can give, the only person who seems to have learned anything in this thread is me, and all that I've learned is how every discussion about the Intaki inevitably gets turned towards the Federation's supposed failings.

People call me a "slave" of or a "shill" for the Gallente because I support Intaki membership in the Federation, yet none of you ever seem to consider the possibility that it is my heritage as an Intaki that makes me loyal to the Federation in the first place. If you want to learn something about the Intaki, about why seccessionalism exists but has never been that popular even at the worst times in Intaki history, perhaps you should ask an Intaki loyal to the Federation why he's loyal to the Federation.

I think I could suggest someone who could answer that question.


I have read opinions from numerous people on the subject in this thread. I've also had the opportunity to trot my opinion out and see how it fares under fire. Actually, I think I've read things that you wrote on Intaki history in this thread.

As for why Caldari are interested, I suspect it varies from person to person. No doubt there is a strong thread of Schadenfreude running through it - the pleasure at seeing another client race leave the big, bad, Federation - thus adding more validation to the decisions of our ancestors. That's maybe not the most noble emotion, but it is very human.

However, perhaps it's also the desire to be there for a seceding race in their hour of need, in a way that nobody was there for us when we needed that help. That's a much nobler perspective and, unless you subscribe to the theory that the State has no nobler intentions within it, it might be wise to show people the benefit of the doubt.

Also, why are you so loyal to the Federation? I'm sure people would be interested to know. I know I would be.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

TomHorn
Horn Brothers Holdings Inc.
#123 - 2013-11-04 20:00:15 UTC  |  Edited by: TomHorn
Quote:
However, perhaps it's also the desire to be there for a seceding race in their hour of need, in a way that nobody was there for us when we needed that help


Pieter Tuulinen when the Caldari broke from the Gallente Federation many Intakis sympathized with our cause came over to the Caldari, and enlisted into the Navy, and were put under the command of a Caldari officer named Muryia Mordu. They fought bravely and honourably for Caldari Independence against the Federation
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#124 - 2013-11-04 20:02:39 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
when discussing the future plans of a very specific group of people in a very specific place, not all opinions are equal. Most are just noise.


I understand your desire for private and dignified self-determination - but that desire is obsolete. Like it or not the Intaki system is not just your territory now, it is my territory too. I await the news, daily, that the FDU infrastructure will fall, the system having been in a state of vulnerability for days.

Your space is swept by our guns. Your world potentially vulnerable to State loyal Dust Troopers. It is not only a good thing that I understand you, it is a necessary thing. It is vital.

Delving into the realm of the hypothetical, imagine that Intaki falls, once more. The Planetary districts cleared for assault and taken. Now marines under my command are taking over policing from your local paramilitaries. My men find themselves between a faction of separatists and a faction of Loyalists. How are we supposed to know who represents the true will of the people?

That knowledge is vital. On the public availability of it will hang a lot of policy. It could be the difference between an enlightened occupation and a bloodbath (although I think the downfall of the Provist bloc makes that eventuality a lot more remote). So, yes, I contend that more knowledge about Intaki is not just important for me, it's important for you, too.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#125 - 2013-11-04 20:19:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Bryen Verrisai
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
That knowledge is vital. On the public availability of it will hang a lot of policy. It could be the difference between an enlightened occupation and a bloodbath

Perhaps it's because it is late and I am tired, but I am not exactly seeing how. The only thing that makes a difference between a less oppressive occupation and a bloodbath is the discipline of a force's troops and the competence of its commander and officer staff. That, and the local population's willingness to engage in armed conflict.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#126 - 2013-11-04 20:42:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Scherezad
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
That knowledge is vital. On the public availability of it will hang a lot of policy. It could be the difference between an enlightened occupation and a bloodbath

Perhaps it's because it is late and I am tired, but I am not exactly seeing how. The only thing that makes a difference between a less oppressive occupation and a bloodbath is the discipline of a force's troops and the competence of its commander and officer staff. That, and the local population's willingness to engage in armed conflict.

Competence at a task is determined by several values, sir. Knowing the mind and heart of those people involved in the task remains one of the vital components of that evaluation. Quite often, the only difference between competence and incompetence is a knowledge of the terrain.
Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#127 - 2013-11-04 20:51:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Bryen Verrisai
I understand the premise of that belief, but am still unclear on how it applies to Mr. Tuulinen's specific hypothetical scenario. How, exactly, will knowing the details of a relatively muted, internal debate enable him and his troops to be any more successful at their invasion?

In case it is not clear, there is even less confusion among the Intaki about how they feel about Caldari invaders than there is about a pipedream of secession.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#128 - 2013-11-04 20:56:37 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
I understand the premise of that belief, but am still unclear on how it applies to Mr. Tuulinen's specific hypothetical scenario. How, exactly, will knowing the details of a relatively muted, internal debate enable him and his troops to be any more successful at their invasion?

In case it is not clear, there is even less confusion among the Intaki about how they feel about Caldari invaders than there is about a pipedream of secession.

I'm not entirely sure! My guess is that Tuulinen-haan is concerned that this muted discussion amongst your people woud become more active, and that his troops would be caught in the middle of it.

It is my hope that your peoples interaction with my own follows the Ishukone model which has brought the both of us great benefits.
Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#129 - 2013-11-04 21:10:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Bryen Verrisai
Scherezad wrote:
It is my hope that your peoples interaction with my own follows the Ishukone model which has brought the both of us great benefits.

I agree, to an extent. I'd like for our people to keep making the best of a bad situation as well, though if moving past that bad situation means extremely limited future Ishukone and Caldari interference in our affairs then I'm sure you'll understand if I support that.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#130 - 2013-11-04 21:23:49 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
That knowledge is vital. On the public availability of it will hang a lot of policy. It could be the difference between an enlightened occupation and a bloodbath

Perhaps it's because it is late and I am tired, but I am not exactly seeing how. The only thing that makes a difference between a less oppressive occupation and a bloodbath is the discipline of a force's troops and the competence of its commander and officer staff. That, and the local population's willingness to engage in armed conflict.


You don't see how a force going in with the understanding that they are temporary stewards of a population will behave differently than a force that believes it is liberating a population from opressive overlords?

I can assume you've not taken any training in paramilitary law enforcement?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#131 - 2013-11-04 21:28:10 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
It is my hope that your peoples interaction with my own follows the Ishukone model which has brought the both of us great benefits.

I agree, to an extent. I'd like for our people to keep making the best of a bad situation as well, though if moving past that bad situation means extremely limited future Ishukone and Caldari interference in our affairs then I'm sure you'll understand if I support that.


You're making the mistake of planning for the most tolerable circumstances, here. Given the mechanics of the CEWMPA and the inclusion of planetary districts into the mix, it is entirely likely that Planetary Districts on occupied worlds will change hands. When they do change hands and you start seeing Kaalakiota or Ishukone or Lai Dai police keeping order on the streets, this idea of limited involvement goes straight out of the window.

I am, yes, planning for the worst. Personally I hope that we stay out of Intaki security operations, but wishing to avoid hard work is a very bad basis for forward planning. Should it ever come to pass that we take a contract policing an Intaki planetary district I would like to think that we would do so sympathetically and competently.

And you must understand that understanding your internal politics is a big part of that. It touches upon many decision/action gates.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#132 - 2013-11-04 22:49:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Bryen Verrisai
Mr. Tuulinen, you raise very good points. Just not within this specific context.

The Intaki who advocate secession are an insignificant minority. And even among them, I imagine the idea of simply changing their "master" from the Federation to the State is not particularly appealing. So if you show up and start waving guns around, don't expect to be treated with much enthusiasm.

As a side note: as someone who always prepares for the worst, thinking that the Caldari would be greeted as liberators seems awfully optimistic.

EDIT: To add one more thing, my last message addressed at Ms. Scherazad wasn't so much within the context of the current political/military climate of the region, so much as a statement returning her own kind sentiments while also being clear on the point that I'm personally willing to sacrifice our current relationship with Ishukone and the Caldari for a more stable and safe Intaki.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#133 - 2013-11-04 22:50:09 UTC
Urisuma Insaiji wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
I seem to think... wait what ?


Your tone and the manner in which you replied to this conversation implied you too thought that Kaalakiota is in favour of war because it is a major arms manufacturer. As if Kaalakiota could not survive without war.

If that is not what you thought then I suggest that you approach this conversation in a manner which better defines your stance.


That is not what I implied. I made a remark about a particular point that tended to make your analysis on arms manufacturers more or less invalid. An analysis that I find interesting enough when properly defined with the clarification you then added and that I do not really disagree with.

Which does not mean that I am defending the opposite side of the argument... Is the world so black and white ?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#134 - 2013-11-04 23:03:16 UTC
Aelisha wrote:
This seems as good a time as any to state that AWEX is currently under taking a survey exploring the awareness and dispositions that individual capsuleers have to Intaki issues of note, particularly Syndicate, Placid, Waschi City (and State immigration of the Intaki people) and Federation integration.

This survey is not intended to push or promote any particular agenda and care has been taken to ensure that it is representative of the views of the respondents, NOT a pre-determined agenda. The survey itself is, as stated, intended to collect and present data through the lens of Issues pertinent to the discussion of the Intaki people in the capsuleer sphere.

THE SURVEY

I thank all respondents in advance for their participation and hope that this will at least give us some perspective with regards to Capsuleer views on this and other Intaki related subjects, no matter how small the initial sampling of topics may seem.


I would really like to help you on that survey, but I am unable to properly fill the second question...
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#135 - 2013-11-04 23:08:56 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Mr. Tuulinen, you raise very good points. Just not within this specific context.

The Intaki who advocate secession are an insignificant minority. And even among them, I imagine the idea of simply changing their "master" from the Federation to the State is not particularly appealing. So if you show up and start waving guns around, don't expect to be treated with much enthusiasm.

As a side note: as someone who always prepares for the worst, thinking that the Caldari would be greeted as liberators seems awfully optimistic.

EDIT: To add one more thing, my last message addressed at Ms. Scherazad wasn't so much within the context of the current political/military climate of the region, so much as a statement returning her own kind sentiments while also being clear on the point that I'm personally willing to sacrifice our current relationship with Ishukone and the Caldari for a more stable and safe Intaki.


I understand completely. One of the reasons why I doubt that the current interpretation of the CEWMPA will lead to much of anything fruitful and why I particularly despise the decision that put the Intaki homeworld into it. This peculiar set of circumstances means that seizing control of the Intaki system would make for a very lucrative asset redistribution operation and very little else - were it not for the long-term Ishukone deal.

Believe me, the status quo is one you should support, since the existence of that deal precludes a, how shall I put this, more short-term focused one. Nontheless I do need to wargame up a short-term occupation scenario and try to find a strategy that leads to victory for both sides.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#136 - 2013-11-04 23:31:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Fredfredbug4
Scherezad wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:


Of all the billions of Intaki, the amount that want to secede are less than 1%. Probably less than 1% of 1% if you really want to get to the math.

While I do my best to stay out of thse sorts of discussions, there are times my passion rises and I must intercede. This is one of those times, sir. The violence you do to statistics and to mathematics in the above is beyond the pale. If you wish to claim that Intaki secessionists number 0.01% of a population, sir, please state it as so - not as the more confusing and less clear "1% of 1%." Further, speaking with such precision, with such accuracy of significant digits, requires a very thorough and exacting methodology which should therefore be included with the statistic.

Were I not so sure of your character, sir, and the sterling nature of your disposition, I might be pressed into thinking that your statements were mere hyperbole to lend false credence to an otherwise unsupportable position. This is clearly not the case, as there are very good resons to hold your position. Perhaps in the future it may be a good idea to have a statistician vet your claims beforehand, if that sort of mathematics isn't to your interest? It's certainly not for everyone, and there's no shame in it.

I'm sorry for the outburst.


I find it rather comforting that apparently the only issue you had with my statement was my diction regarding statistics.

Simply put, using the Syndicate as a representation of the Intaki's will to secede would be along the lines, of using the Guristas as an example to say that most Caldari support piracy or the Blood Raiders to say that most Amarr follow the Sabik faith.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#137 - 2013-11-04 23:45:09 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:


Of all the billions of Intaki, the amount that want to secede are less than 1%. Probably less than 1% of 1% if you really want to get to the math.

While I do my best to stay out of thse sorts of discussions, there are times my passion rises and I must intercede. This is one of those times, sir. The violence you do to statistics and to mathematics in the above is beyond the pale. If you wish to claim that Intaki secessionists number 0.01% of a population, sir, please state it as so - not as the more confusing and less clear "1% of 1%." Further, speaking with such precision, with such accuracy of significant digits, requires a very thorough and exacting methodology which should therefore be included with the statistic.

Were I not so sure of your character, sir, and the sterling nature of your disposition, I might be pressed into thinking that your statements were mere hyperbole to lend false credence to an otherwise unsupportable position. This is clearly not the case, as there are very good resons to hold your position. Perhaps in the future it may be a good idea to have a statistician vet your claims beforehand, if that sort of mathematics isn't to your interest? It's certainly not for everyone, and there's no shame in it.

I'm sorry for the outburst.


I find it rather comforting that apparently the only issue you had with my statement was my diction regarding statistics.

Simply put, using the Syndicate as a representation of the Intaki's will to secede would be along the lines, of using the Guristas as an example to say that most Caldari support piracy or the Blood Raiders to say that most Amarr follow the Sabik faith.

I agree with your sentiment, sir, but will allow the revered Raata lord Hamenkainen to reply for me: the lie which glimmers with the patina of truth breaks as easily as the lie which shows itself unhidden. Beware your own sword's edge.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#138 - 2013-11-05 00:51:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Caellach Marellus wrote:


Kidnapping children for illegal pornography is necessary to eke a living in null sec now?



For a man that speaks of spreading of ignorance, you do enough yourself.

The Intaki Syndicate is a working example of how the Federation uses punitive political and economic pressure to punish those who do not wish to be part of the Union. Any criminality that exists in the Syndicate is a direct result of Federal laws designed to deny the Intaki of the Syndicate any hope of creating a self-sufficient and strong society. Nothing has changed in over two hundred years, one needs only look at the thoughts of Mentas Blaque, who as a Senator actually advocated the invasion of the Syndicate. The greatest tragedy is that these policies of military intimidation, political oppression, and economic subjugation on the part of the Federation is not a unique suffering on the part of the people of the Intaki Syndicate -- it is the same that was suffered by the Caldari and being suffered by the Matari and the Republic.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#139 - 2013-11-05 01:11:09 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Any criminality that exists in the Syndicate is a direct result of Federal laws designed to deny the Intaki of the Syndicate any hope of creating a self-sufficient and strong society. .


Yes, how evil of us to outlaw drug manufacturing and distribution, piracy, theft, terrorism, and all sorts of completely "legitimate" professions. Now the Intaki will be forced to take up horrid jobs such as doctors, engineers, and even presidents! Mwhahahahaha!

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#140 - 2013-11-05 01:41:27 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Any criminality that exists in the Syndicate is a direct result of Federal laws designed to deny the Intaki of the Syndicate any hope of creating a self-sufficient and strong society. .


Yes, how evil of us to outlaw drug manufacturing and distribution, piracy, theft, terrorism, and all sorts of completely "legitimate" professions. Now the Intaki will be forced to take up horrid jobs such as doctors, engineers, and even presidents! Mwhahahahaha!


How are any of those related to the baffling Federation ban on planetary colonization levied upon the Syndicate?

Katrina Oniseki