These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Intaki and the Federation

Author
GoGo Yubari
PAK
#41 - 2013-11-02 12:47:53 UTC  |  Edited by: GoGo Yubari
Cosmo Cyrano wrote:
If Intaki is a low security backwater, its because the Assembly want it to be a low security backwater.

Yes, though we can argue about the wording.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

Cosmo Cyrano
October Country
#42 - 2013-11-02 12:52:14 UTC
GoGo Yubari wrote:
Cosmo Cyrano wrote:
If Intaki is a low security backwater, its because the Assembly want it to be a low security backwater.

Yes, though we can argue about the wording.


Yeah sorry, force of habit.

Point is, that whole 'low security' thing didn't actually mean much to the people planet side for years until that whole CEWPA train wreck happened. So to an extent its on the Assembly for not seeing it coming.

Or maybe they did. Perhaps someone thought its the closest they'll get to a mechanism for leaving the Fed.
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#43 - 2013-11-02 14:11:28 UTC
Andrea Okazon wrote:
I think the OP's history reminds us of something quite interesting, actually, which is that the Federation (as originally conceived) is an idea whose time has passed -- though I believe it is an idea whose time will come again.

I'm not talking about democratic liberalism, but about the idea of ecumenical interplanetary government. When the Federation was conceived, it was a "light touch" -- a very limited government intended to safeguard the interests of its members, who retained political autonomy (and who, to a significant extent, still do).

The idea that the Federation was destined to be a meeting place for all humanity was an expression of ignorance, not arrogance. We did not know that the Amarr had already returned to space. We had uncertain evidence that interplanetary forms of "identity" were even sustainable over the long term.

The transformation -- some would say corruption -- of the original minimally-interventionist, non-military Federation into its current form is the result of many things, but clearly the external pressure of a strongly centralized, expansionist and incommensurable interplanetary government (the Amarr) played a large part, even in the absence of open warfare.

Viewed from this perspective, the alliance between the Caldari and the Amarr has a certain unfortunate irony.


I missed this, but I think it deserves its own highlighting.
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#44 - 2013-11-02 17:41:55 UTC
So, Intaki secession is for the Intaki solar system alone?

Interesting. Considering that the Intaki homeworld is likely the most populated and culturally dominant in the region, one would expect them to have a pretty strong influence in the area through migration and financial agreements.

But maybe I am just thinking too much. Federate politics quickly ends up as a headache that way.

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#45 - 2013-11-02 19:26:17 UTC
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
Andrea Okazon wrote:
I think the OP's history reminds us of something quite interesting, actually, which is that the Federation (as originally conceived) is an idea whose time has passed -- though I believe it is an idea whose time will come again.

I'm not talking about democratic liberalism, but about the idea of ecumenical interplanetary government. When the Federation was conceived, it was a "light touch" -- a very limited government intended to safeguard the interests of its members, who retained political autonomy (and who, to a significant extent, still do).

The idea that the Federation was destined to be a meeting place for all humanity was an expression of ignorance, not arrogance. We did not know that the Amarr had already returned to space. We had uncertain evidence that interplanetary forms of "identity" were even sustainable over the long term.

The transformation -- some would say corruption -- of the original minimally-interventionist, non-military Federation into its current form is the result of many things, but clearly the external pressure of a strongly centralized, expansionist and incommensurable interplanetary government (the Amarr) played a large part, even in the absence of open warfare.

Viewed from this perspective, the alliance between the Caldari and the Amarr has a certain unfortunate irony.


I missed this, but I think it deserves its own highlighting.


The Alliance between the State and the Kingdom comes from some similarities in culture and aims. The alliance between the State and the Empire proper is far simpler - with the Gallente dragging the Minmatar into their war against the State, who else was the State to ally with?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#46 - 2013-11-02 21:12:17 UTC
It must be a very interesting view through your tinted glasses Tuulinen, because every day you continue to use the Federation as a scapegoat for almost everything that is at fault with the world today, you sound more and more like Diana Kim, but with less catchphrases and better sentence structure.


Granted you're not the only person who does it, but you do it with a Kim-like level of frequency. If you just deleted half the spaces in your posts and put "And this is why the Federation must be destroyed" at the end, it'd be hard to tell you two apart.


Yes this is a shot at someone's character rather than challenging another lack of source, high on emotional appeal content argument, but quite frankly I'm tired of constantly challenging people's skewed perspective posting and looking like a modern day Federal supporter. There's plenty of real criticisms regarding Roden, Blaque, the Senate, the political climate that people actually ignore, and go directly for the juicy skewed-perspective "let's blame it on the Federation" group like mentality.

The only exception seems to be slavery, which the Empire still suffers as a counter argument to everything, despite a lack of relevancy some time, but otherwise it's pretty much a free for all.


I mean sure, at times it serves the best interests of the State to blame the Federation for everything and try to sympathise with anyone who has the slightest gripe, and then expand it and blow it out of proportion, but then isn't the State the people who loudly, and consistently, vocalise about how they were tired of the Federation meddling in their affairs.. and yet here you are in just about every discussion meddling in theirs. Hypocrisy much?


Of course you'll find some skewed perspective to justify "Oh we're helping them" (when that's a direct line criticism used against the Federation when the same words are inferred) but let's face it, you're not working in their best interests, you're working in yours. The State benefits from the Federation getting weakened, it'd be exactly the same if there was a rift between the State and the Empire and the Matari suddenly gave a damn about the Megas, it's convenient for you, if it wasn't you wouldn't bother.


So for those people who prefer a TL:DR version of these things. Go find another faction to scapegoat on, and maybe try criticising the Federation for things they're actually guilty of doing today, because it'd be nice at times to not be the only person who actually criticises Blaque and Roden for the **** they actually do rather than this fantasy scenario where they probably also stole the cookies from the jar in your CQ.


Oh, and on a relevant side note, though I get the feeling this one is going to be impossible for people to follow, digging up the past, often irrelevantly, to "win" a modern scenario argument tends to just unfurl into a slanging match of who was more grieved, facts tend to often get lost and perspective tries to make the deaths of some people more relevant than the deaths of others, when pretty much people getting killed for things they didn't have a direct hand in (because someone will argue guilt by association of just being Amarrian/Caldari/Gallente/Minmatar) is a bad thing. All those arguments ever do is disrespect and degrade people who died simply for being what they are, well that and side track the actual debate.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#47 - 2013-11-02 21:28:52 UTC
Jowen Datloran wrote:
So, Intaki secession is for the Intaki solar system alone?

Interesting. Considering that the Intaki homeworld is likely the most populated and culturally dominant in the region, one would expect them to have a pretty strong influence in the area through migration and financial agreements.

But maybe I am just thinking too much. Federate politics quickly ends up as a headache that way.


I may be entirely wrong, but the understanding I've had is that the Intaki hold sovereignty over their namesake System, it's where they had the power to dictate the influence of Federal Navy assistance (or lack of as they preferred), and doesn't extend beyond the gate borders.

While the Intaki have indeed spread beyond the system into other areas of Placid (and the Federation as a whole) there's sovereign control or ownership of outlying systems. It's all part of the Federation, the same could be said of the Jin Mei claiming Lirsautton, the Mannar claiming Mannar (though this is unlikely considering the unfortunate state of Mannar VIII) and the Gallente with regards to Luminaire*.


All other systems are the sovereignty of the Federation and not to any entity within, as said, I may be wrong, but that's how I've always understood it.


*Caldari Prime and all local space patrolling it, of course.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#48 - 2013-11-02 22:26:21 UTC
Marellus your ability to imbue me with a level of malevolence towards the Federation never ceases to amaze. It seems I can't blame the Federation for anything without you leaping in to accuse me of unseemly bias - to hear you talk it would seem that the poor Gallente are the subjects of a cunning PR campaign from the State, masterminded by yours truly.

In truth, I work for a living. I don't have time to reimagine the whole cluster.

So rather than use that limited time and my limited words to try and prove something logically, I'll ask you why you think the State would ally with a gigantic, expansionist Empire that may well attack it in the future? Unless it is to protect itself from a gigantic, expansionistic Empire that is already attacking it?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#49 - 2013-11-02 22:43:09 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Marellus your ability to imbue me with a level of malevolence towards the Federation never ceases to amaze. It seems I can't blame the Federation for anything without you leaping in to accuse me of unseemly bias - to hear you talk it would seem that the poor Gallente are the subjects of a cunning PR campaign from the State, masterminded by yours truly.

In truth, I work for a living. I don't have time to reimagine the whole cluster.

So rather than use that limited time and my limited words to try and prove something logically, I'll ask you why you think the State would ally with a gigantic, expansionist Empire that may well attack it in the future? Unless it is to protect itself from a gigantic, expansionistic Empire that is already attacking it?


I don't need to imbue it, your consistent posting with often baseless arguments and over dramatisation of actual events speaks for itself.


It'd be fine if you actually blamed the Federation for the things it really does, but you don't even do that. There's a ton of material out there for you to go after, but it's just not as rage provoking (or **** stirring as some people put it) so you let it slide for more sensationalistic crap that is less grounded in actual realism.


Why ally with the Empire? Because of your two choices it was the better for commerce, trade, economical spending power, technological advancement.. y'know the things that help make the State expand and grow?

There's far more to it than simply "The Caldari dragged the Amarr into their war" to reverse as you put it, as an example to your over dramatisation. You have several times now worded it that the Federation is attacking the State, when it's a mutually offensive based war, without bringing up the fact the last few incursions into enemy systems were all done by the State. You word things with a very skewed slant, it's sometimes subtle, but you force a perspective other than one that is factually accurate.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#50 - 2013-11-02 22:57:57 UTC
No perspective is factually accurate - unless you can find someone that is wholly uninvolved and uninterested.

From my perspective the Federation is the first offender, is utterly unsympathetic to Caldari goals and needs, has dragged us into a war with the Minmatar that we never wanted and an alliance with the Empire, when our preference would be to remain unencumbered and trade with all parties.

I see the Federation as a preachy and hypocritical enemy that never ceases to twist and gnaw at the truth, spreading black propaganda about everyone else as it commits the basest of crimes and atrocities and sweeps them under the rug. If the State acted in a manner congruent with your stated opinions we would be nothing more than a client race of the Federation and, frankly, I just don't like the Federation enough to ever want to be close to it.

Now, that doesn't mean that I don't admire some things achieved by the Federation. It also doesn't mean that I can't like members of the Federation - because I do. I am not in the business of spouting propaganda, it's just that when I shower another day in the warzone off my body I find myself wishing I could do the same with my soul.

If you feel I am disparaging of the Federation then I must apologise, but the truth is that I do not see you at your best, Msr Marellus. I see you at your worst - every day - and I am not gaining as much satisfaction from killing these poor excuses of Federal Militia soldiers as I thought I would.

In my frustration I sometimes lash out.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#51 - 2013-11-02 23:10:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

From my perspective the Federation is the first offender, is utterly unsympathetic to Caldari goals and needs, has dragged us into a war with the Minmatar that we never wanted and an alliance with the Empire, when our preference would be to remain unencumbered and trade with all parties.



Suuolo, you know I greatly respect you, and you know my feelings on the Luminaire Blitz... but I have the point out the fallacy in your post.

We did not get 'dragged into a war with the Minmatar'. They were already allies of the Federation before we crossed the border. Heth tossed us into a war that necessitated our alliance with the Amarr to balance the odds, and we also happened to need the money from the Amarr as well.

As for the trade with all parties - you surprise me, dear friend. You almost sound like one of us! A Liberal.

Katrina Oniseki

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#52 - 2013-11-02 23:12:53 UTC
We crossed the border because a Gallente Admiral stuffed a Nyx into a station in the Malkalen system killing... well... I don't really need to finish that sentence, do I?

But really, trade is good, isn't it? Perhaps I'm not being the face of Kaalakiota as well as I should, but I am convinced that the rest of the cluster has things of value and interest for us. And people of value and interest for us, too.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#53 - 2013-11-02 23:20:31 UTC
Having an opinion and perspective is something, and each is welcome to their own. My personal issue is when people try to push off that perspective as fact then we're all worse off for every person who believes it.

This is regardless of criticism against any of the four factions.


The irony I find is in your third verse, preachy and hypocritical, as well as trying to downplay or sweep under the rug (or in some cases justify and praise) their darkest moments is something everyone does. The State does it, the Republic does it, the Empire does it, the Federation does it, everyone is as guilty, and it's very much a case of pot calling the kettle black when people point it out without conceding they're supporting an organisation just as guilty.


Personally, my hope for State/Federal relations returns to life before Malkalen, the biggest contention was the situation with Caldari Prime, a situation that has been resolved (albeit in a manner I would have hoped to avoid in an ideal universe) I don't expect the Federation and State to ever be friends, but I hope for them to co-exist peacefully with trade agreements and civil discourse.. and ultimately co-operation against hostiles that threaten us all.


Yes this war is being prolonged by gun merchants like Roden and power grabbers like Blaque, but can you honestly say, that if both were deposed, replaced with moderates seeking an end to conflict, the State would drop their guns tomorrow and work towards a truce? That there's no elements within the State also prolonging conflict out of personal interest?

That's not an accusation, that's a question to which I'm genuinely curious and one I'm putting faith in you to answer honestly.


Also you see me at my worst, or you see the Federation at its worst, big difference between the two. The only reason there's probably a blurred line is because the Federation seems to be the easy scape goat for people these days, I'd rather people try to accuse the State or the Republic unfairly of being the cause of everything going wrong these days, just to defend someone other than Blaque and Roden.


Actually I take that back, I'd rather people stopped with the bullshit false accusations all together, and stuck to accurate criticism and some self reflection to avoid the hypocrisy.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#54 - 2013-11-02 23:24:53 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
We crossed the border because a Gallente Admiral stuffed a Nyx into a station in the Malkalen system killing... well... I don't really need to finish that sentence, do I?

But really, trade is good, isn't it? Perhaps I'm not being the face of Kaalakiota as well as I should, but I am convinced that the rest of the cluster has things of value and interest for us. And people of value and interest for us, too.


No, you don't need to finish that - because as you already know, I agree with you.


Katrina Oniseki

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#55 - 2013-11-02 23:28:16 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
We crossed the border because a Gallente Admiral stuffed a Nyx into a station in the Malkalen system killing... well... I don't really need to finish that sentence, do I?


Actually you do need to finish it, because that was an Admiral completely denied, disgraced and not supported by the Federation for rogue actions in any capacity. It was little more than a Terrorist act, no more affiliated by the Federation than the actions of the Bloody Hands or the Dragonaurs are by the Republic or State.

Perhaps he thought his name would be sung in praise the way Tovil Toba is, that he could finally get "revenge for Hueromont" but no. His name brings shame, digust and bitterness within the Federation, no one will ever name their child after him or teach them about him, unless they wish to warn them of the dangerous of bitterness and hate.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#56 - 2013-11-02 23:33:47 UTC
Well, it's nice to see him so disowned. Given that I can't demand that you give us back Otro Gariushi, I can't ask any more than that of you. What's really striped my back, since Malkalen, is the need some people have to spin extensive conspiracy theories about it to try and absolve Noir of guilt.

Maybe it was just one man's hate and madness.

For the record? I want the same things that you want, Msr Marellus. I'm not the State, I can't promise cease fires and an end to hostilities anymore than you can, but I would be more than happy to see this war end, cede Placid to the Federation and demand Black Rise for the State.

I think your Federation owes the Intaki some explanations for marooning their homeworld in the middle of that mess, but that's between you and them, essentially.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

GoGo Yubari
PAK
#57 - 2013-11-02 23:49:49 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Jowen Datloran wrote:
So, Intaki secession is for the Intaki solar system alone?

Interesting. Considering that the Intaki homeworld is likely the most populated and culturally dominant in the region, one would expect them to have a pretty strong influence in the area through migration and financial agreements.

But maybe I am just thinking too much. Federate politics quickly ends up as a headache that way.


I may be entirely wrong, but the understanding I've had is that the Intaki hold sovereignty over their namesake System, it's where they had the power to dictate the influence of Federal Navy assistance (or lack of as they preferred), and doesn't extend beyond the gate borders.

While the Intaki have indeed spread beyond the system into other areas of Placid (and the Federation as a whole) there's sovereign control or ownership of outlying systems. It's all part of the Federation, the same could be said of the Jin Mei claiming Lirsautton, the Mannar claiming Mannar (though this is unlikely considering the unfortunate state of Mannar VIII) and the Gallente with regards to Luminaire*.


All other systems are the sovereignty of the Federation and not to any entity within, as said, I may be wrong, but that's how I've always understood it.


*Caldari Prime and all local space patrolling it, of course.

This is true these days, but the Intaki Assembly held sovereignty over most of Placid and a careful reading of the original posts has already detailed this, along with the changes that broke up the Placid-wide Assembly.

To reiterate, the many colonies there were either created or found first by the Intaki Assembly, many in the pre-Federation era. Meddling by Gallente space organizations in this process of expansion was the very thing that spurred Intaki membership in the early Federation. The signing of the Federal Charter did not bring an end to a greater Intaki region, but this was caused much later by the Further Federation Act which among other things led to the formation of the Federal districts (created to address secessionist tendencies inside the Federation, one should note).

This provides a possible de jure basis for a secession that also includes some of these worlds. That's not to say secession of any kind is about to happen, but it does prove that any consideration of secession by the Intaki Assembly should include the possibility of other worlds that might want to democratically join the process.

Love by nature. Live by luck. Kill by profession.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#58 - 2013-11-02 23:53:55 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Well, it's nice to see him so disowned. Given that I can't demand that you give us back Otro Gariushi, I can't ask any more than that of you. What's really striped my back, since Malkalen, is the need some people have to spin extensive conspiracy theories about it to try and absolve Noir of guilt.

Maybe it was just one man's hate and madness.


Not even knowing what/who came next, I would gladly have Gariushi back any day, the man was one of the brightest hopes for peace and prosperity.

Conspiracy theories will always be abound, Noir was being impersonated, the Empress is a clone under the control of someone else, the Sanmatar ordered the assassination of Midular.

A gripe within the Federation, not so much a personal gripe but still something that doesn't sit right with me, is the similarities between incidents and the reactions to them within the State.

Terrorists bomb Nouvelle Rouvenour, it's the tipping point that begins bombards, receives constant criticism that the Caldari were attacked for the actions of terrorists.

Noir orchestrates the Malkalen incident, it's the incident that leads to the massacre at Algogille the assault on Caldari Prime, the placement of a State Titan in a Federal system and the rebirth of the Federal/State war. Apparently all justified in response to a Federal (despite disavowed in every official and near unofficial *conspiracy theorists aside* capacity) attack.


Man crashes a Super Carrier into a station, kills thousands of innocents, decried as a monster, traitor, terrorist and shamed.

Man crashes a Carrier into a planet, kills thousands of innocents, praised as a hero, is a cornerstone of education and an eternal legend in State folklore.


Now yes, perception can change the stance on this, in either direction. But there's a number of similarities and yet the compete difference in public reaction between the two in the State is a major source of contention for Federal citizens.



Quote:
For the record? I want the same things that you want, Msr Marellus. I'm not the State, I can't promise cease fires and an end to hostilities anymore than you can, but I would be more than happy to see this war end, cede Placid to the Federation and demand Black Rise for the State.

I think your Federation owes the Intaki some explanations for marooning their homeworld in the middle of that mess, but that's between you and them, essentially.


Honestly? Call me a Hawk, but that was part of a series of weak, knee-jerk panic reactions by Foiritan. He quickly conceded Caldari Prime, and under the threat of the Shiigeru in Luminaire signed concessions that threw Intaki, his ancestral homeworld, in the line of fire. If anything the Intaki were betrayed by the man they voted in themselves, not that it in any way it puts the blame on them, but it was something the Federation learned all too late.

Foiritan was a great peace time leader, who could oversee positive diplomacy and economical growth, but had no clue what the hell to do when **** hit the fan.


The day the guns stop firing is a day I'll be drinking to remember and celebrate something, and not to cope with the day that was.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#59 - 2013-11-03 00:08:03 UTC
GoGo Yubari wrote:
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Jowen Datloran wrote:
So, Intaki secession is for the Intaki solar system alone?

Interesting. Considering that the Intaki homeworld is likely the most populated and culturally dominant in the region, one would expect them to have a pretty strong influence in the area through migration and financial agreements.

But maybe I am just thinking too much. Federate politics quickly ends up as a headache that way.


I may be entirely wrong, but the understanding I've had is that the Intaki hold sovereignty over their namesake System, it's where they had the power to dictate the influence of Federal Navy assistance (or lack of as they preferred), and doesn't extend beyond the gate borders.

While the Intaki have indeed spread beyond the system into other areas of Placid (and the Federation as a whole) there's sovereign control or ownership of outlying systems. It's all part of the Federation, the same could be said of the Jin Mei claiming Lirsautton, the Mannar claiming Mannar (though this is unlikely considering the unfortunate state of Mannar VIII) and the Gallente with regards to Luminaire*.


All other systems are the sovereignty of the Federation and not to any entity within, as said, I may be wrong, but that's how I've always understood it.


*Caldari Prime and all local space patrolling it, of course.

This is true these days, but the Intaki Assembly held sovereignty over most of Placid and a careful reading of the original posts has already detailed this, along with the changes that broke up the Placid-wide Assembly.

To reiterate, the many colonies there were either created or found first by the Intaki Assembly, many in the pre-Federation era. Meddling by Gallente space organizations in this process of expansion was the very thing that spurred Intaki membership in the early Federation. The signing of the Federal Charter did not bring an end to a greater Intaki region, but this was caused much later by the Further Federation Act which among other things led to the formation of the Federal districts (created to address secessionist tendencies inside the Federation, one should note).

This provides a possible de jure basis for a secession that also includes some of these worlds. That's not to say secession of any kind is about to happen, but it does prove that any consideration of secession by the Intaki Assembly should include the possibility of other worlds that might want to democratically join the process.


I stand corrected on the history basis of pre FFA sovereignty and control, however I would point something out regarding the FFA itself. It was created on the back of a mix of Intaki and Mannar pressure, while the former wanted a peaceful measure and the latter a more militaristic approach regarding the Caldari at the time. It was designed to reduce the conflict, bring stability to the government and remove the chance of the totalitarian nature of the U-NATS government ever happening again.

The Intaki were also granted out multiple opt outs in the FFA's laws and binding contracts, and yes, while they lost power and influence, they were not the only ones, pre Federation Gallente states are no longer under their control. If the Gallente secceded from the Federation, they would only have direct claim to Luminaire, and not the great space beyond they had already founded.


As for individual systems within Placid, they would have the same process as any other, the right to referendum and independent government, with all the negatives and positives that entices.

As Andreus once stated though, the Intaki have never gone as far as to organise such a referendum to get a consensus from their people, either the Assembly considers it a foregone conclusion not worth holding, or they don't believe in secession (permanently or at this time) for whatever reasons.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#60 - 2013-11-03 00:29:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Man crashes a Super Carrier into a station, kills thousands of innocents, decried as a monster, traitor, terrorist and shamed.


Admiral Noir purposely rammed his ship into the Station. There is absolutely no controversy about the navigational heading and intention to hit the station. Even if the conspiracy theories are true, the ship was under direct manual control and was intentionally flown on a collision course with that specific station.

He also publicly broadcasted his hate speech. He openly stated his disdain for the State and his intentions for revenge and such as he was piloting the ship into a heavily populated station. There was no question of why Noir was doing it.

The attack took place at a diplomatic summit during a time of peace, intended to calm hostilities.

Quote:

Man crashes a Carrier into a planet, kills thousands of innocents, praised as a hero, is a cornerstone of education and an eternal legend in State folklore.


There is very little evidence to suggest Tovil-Toba intended to or would have been able to actually hit any specific target the way he did. His approach was handled in the middle of a fierce firefight in low orbit, a last ditch effort by the admittedly noble Federation Navy to stop a disaster. It is doubtful that Tovil-Toba had sufficient time to pinpoint his approach vector to target Heuromont. As soon as he entered the upper atmosphere of Gallente Prime, navigational control of his ship was impossible anyways due to simple aerodynamics and wind sheer. His ship literally broke apart into thousands of pieces - some larger than others. He was probably already dead long before the impact. Where the pieces landed is entirely up to the way the winds blew - if you'll pardon the pun.

Tovil-Toba had been leading the Federation fleet on a game of cat and mouse for almost two weeks around the moons of GalPrime. He did so with the intention of distracting the Federal fleet so more Caldari survivors could evacuate. His last action was arguably yet another attempt to distract the Federation fleet - one which worked admirably. Evidence exists to suggest a vast majority of the Federation Navy was present to try and stop him, allowing his goal of distraction to work.

Finally, all this happened during a time of war. These were the actions of a military commander doing his job. While the loss of lives at Heuromont is regrettable, it was part of war, and part of the civilian collateral damage on both sides of the conflict.

In short, the two examples are wholly different. They are only coincidentally similar in that starships were used as ramming weapons.

Katrina Oniseki