These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Double Standard? (True Slave Foundations)

Author
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#61 - 2013-10-31 22:40:40 UTC
Aura'lynn Vindaktris wrote:
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
It does seem that Ms Dea's primary concern is that she objects, not to Tiberious but to the involvement of Nation supporters in the channel in general. However, the Summit, if I am not mistaken, exists for the purposes of discourse among loyalists of all factions -- or none -- and as such in the nature of fairness and civil discourse, this is a situation which ought to exist, anyway. If anything, I think we're LACKING moderators from one or two factions, which should be remedied.


Which factions?


Signed,
A Curious Party

Serpentis, Gurista? I would say EoM but they are a bit too special.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#62 - 2013-10-31 22:42:18 UTC
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
It does seem that Ms Dea's primary concern is that she objects, not to Tiberious but to the involvement of Nation supporters in the channel in general. However, the Summit, if I am not mistaken, exists for the purposes of discourse among loyalists of all factions -- or none -- and as such in the nature of fairness and civil discourse, this is a situation which ought to exist, anyway. If anything, I think we're LACKING moderators from one or two factions, which should be remedied.


We're always looking, but the issue is finding someone who is both a member of a faction AND a suitable moderator.

Right now we lack a Gallentean loyalist moderator, for example, but no one suitable has popped into, nor have we had any volunteers.
Isis Dea
Society of Adrift Hope
#63 - 2013-10-31 22:44:37 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Aura'lynn Vindaktris wrote:
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
It does seem that Ms Dea's primary concern is that she objects, not to Tiberious but to the involvement of Nation supporters in the channel in general. However, the Summit, if I am not mistaken, exists for the purposes of discourse among loyalists of all factions -- or none -- and as such in the nature of fairness and civil discourse, this is a situation which ought to exist, anyway. If anything, I think we're LACKING moderators from one or two factions, which should be remedied.


Which factions?


Signed,
A Curious Party

Serpentis, Gurista? I would say EoM but they are a bit too special.


The Summit = Home of criminal. Minus a few parties. No attacks and drama please. Mind you, we already own all the seats of power, no contending the other invested parties.

So entirely disgusting...

More Character Customization :: Especially compared to what we had in 2003...

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#64 - 2013-10-31 22:46:27 UTC
Isis Dea wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Aura'lynn Vindaktris wrote:
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
It does seem that Ms Dea's primary concern is that she objects, not to Tiberious but to the involvement of Nation supporters in the channel in general. However, the Summit, if I am not mistaken, exists for the purposes of discourse among loyalists of all factions -- or none -- and as such in the nature of fairness and civil discourse, this is a situation which ought to exist, anyway. If anything, I think we're LACKING moderators from one or two factions, which should be remedied.


Which factions?


Signed,
A Curious Party

Serpentis, Gurista? I would say EoM but they are a bit too special.


The Summit = Home of criminal. Minus a few parties. No attacks and drama please. Mind you, we already own all the seats of power, no contending the other invested parties.

So entirely disgusting...


Maybe it was incorrect of me to strike out my sand comment.
Ivanneth Maethor
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2013-10-31 22:51:56 UTC
Isis Dea wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:

Serpentis, Gurista? I would say EoM but they are a bit too special.


The Summit = Home of criminal. Minus a few parties. No attacks and drama please. Mind you, we already own all the seats of power, no contending the other invested parties.

So entirely disgusting...

Yes, we're lacking Gallente and Minmatar representation. No offense to Ms Starfire, but Stormcrows are registered under Mordu's Legion. There's also a lack of representation from the Sisters of EVE, I believe, and SOCT. I would not expect CONCORD representation du to their neutrality.
Saber1
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#66 - 2013-10-31 22:52:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Saber1
Evi Polevhia wrote:

Maybe it was incorrect of me to strike out my sand comment.


I'll give the crazy woman points for persistence. But that's about it.

Interesting to see how one-sided this entire discussion has gone.


Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
I would not expect CONCORD representation due to their neutrality.


Please. Never.

The channel is loathed enough as it is.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#67 - 2013-10-31 22:55:02 UTC
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
Isis Dea wrote:
Evi Polevhia wrote:

Serpentis, Gurista? I would say EoM but they are a bit too special.


The Summit = Home of criminal. Minus a few parties. No attacks and drama please. Mind you, we already own all the seats of power, no contending the other invested parties.

So entirely disgusting...

Yes, we're lacking Gallente and Minmatar representation. No offense to Ms Starfire, but Stormcrows are registered under Mordu's Legion. There's also a lack of representation from the Sisters of EVE, I believe, and SOCT. I would not expect CONCORD representation du to their neutrality.


Not that I can speak for them in any capacity, but I would think the SoE and SoCT would also remain neutral in nearly every regard. Them having a diplomatic representative to a neutral meeting ground would serve little purpose.
Ivanneth Maethor
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2013-10-31 22:56:02 UTC
Saber1 wrote:
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
I would not expect CONCORD representation due to their neutrality.


Please. Never.

The channel is loathed enough as it is.

I have no recollection of your presence in the channel anyway, why would it therefore even matter to you?
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#69 - 2013-10-31 22:59:32 UTC
To be, for once, serious. There is an actual problem with places like The Summit and other "open" places. It's been mentioned repeatedly over the last few years almost every time there's been new ventures pioneered or projects considered. "Open" places allowing everyone in, will by default mean a lot of people are prohibited if they have certain standards.

If one does not want to rub shoulders with criminals, then places where criminals are prolific become off limits. If you don't want to rub shoulders with Feddies, you aren't going to consider the Crystal Boulevard as the first choice to visit. If you have principles that keep you from mingling with Sansha, places that welcome them and are even moderated by a representative of theirs will be barred from entry.

The simple solution is of course to throw all principles and standards to the wind. This should be recognized by everyone as less than ideal. These principles and standards are valuable to many, essential to some and should be preserved. In effect, no matter how unbiased, fair and professional the moderation is, the very presence proclaims loudly to the entire cluster that you are not welcome if you're not willing to mingle with the Sansha, Blooders and whoever else now holds claim there.

This is not a fair thing to ask, if the Summit is supposed to be for "everyone", because that means it's just for the "everyone" that populates or tolerates the populace of one end of the scale of civilization. The other side of it is, without the actual words, told to either suck it up or go away.

Is this really a good thing for a place of diplomacy and community? Is this something that benefits the capsuleers of New Eden, really?

I can't say I have the answers, but I certainly can understand that the questions are raised. Of course, they're just going to be ridiculed and ignored this time as well, but I don't think it benefits anyone if they go entirely silent either.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#70 - 2013-10-31 23:10:10 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
To be, for once, serious. There is an actual problem with places like The Summit and other "open" places. It's been mentioned repeatedly over the last few years almost every time there's been new ventures pioneered or projects considered. "Open" places allowing everyone in, will by default mean a lot of people are prohibited if they have certain standards.

If one does not want to rub shoulders with criminals, then places where criminals are prolific become off limits. If you don't want to rub shoulders with Feddies, you aren't going to consider the Crystal Boulevard as the first choice to visit. If you have principles that keep you from mingling with Sansha, places that welcome them and are even moderated by a representative of theirs will be barred from entry.

The simple solution is of course to throw all principles and standards to the wind. This should be recognized by everyone as less than ideal. These principles and standards are valuable to many, essential to some and should be preserved. In effect, no matter how unbiased, fair and professional the moderation is, the very presence proclaims loudly to the entire cluster that you are not welcome if you're not willing to mingle with the Sansha, Blooders and whoever else now holds claim there.

This is not a fair thing to ask, if the Summit is supposed to be for "everyone", because that means it's just for the "everyone" that populates or tolerates the populace of one end of the scale of civilization. The other side of it is, without the actual words, told to either suck it up or go away.

Is this really a good thing for a place of diplomacy and community? Is this something that benefits the capsuleers of New Eden, really?

I can't say I have the answers, but I certainly can understand that the questions are raised. Of course, they're just going to be ridiculed and ignored this time as well, but I don't think it benefits anyone if they go entirely silent either.


People are free to set up alternate channels as they wish. I believe an Amarrians Only alternative exists and has been quite successful.

On the other hand, "Moderation free" versions of the same channel have tended to flounder and dissapear
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#71 - 2013-10-31 23:11:54 UTC
Ivanneth Maethor wrote:
I would not expect CONCORD representation du to their neutrality.


It would also require a Capsuleer loyal to CONCORD that enjoys bashing their head against a solid object repeatedly in frustration.

Last I checked, we're a rare breed as it is, and while I respect the moderators of the Summit for their work, I've no desire to step in their shoes.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Reeves Todako
Caldari Corn Paste
#72 - 2013-10-31 23:17:02 UTC
Miss Isis, let me tell you about my dear ole Aunt Raile. Raile once got very irritable and angry at all the small inconsequential parts of life. Eventually we discovered she had a rash, a terrible one that she had hid from her family and friends. On a whim, she tried one of our classic flavors 'Sea of Huimoto'. Crazy, they called her. Raile was always a trailblazer. And wouldn't you know it, the 'Sea of Huimoto' flavor of Caldari Corn Paste cleared that rash right up! She went back to her old self, happy and friendly.

We are having a special on economy size orders of 'Sea of Huimoto' for all of your needs. Please contact me to place an order.
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#73 - 2013-10-31 23:19:04 UTC
People do set up alternate channels. In fact, I do believe there are official channels for the exact same purpose as The Summit. That's not the point, though, is it? There is for all intents and purposes just one channel that's there for "everyone", simply due to old habits, weight of numbers and out of... control... reasons. As it were. The problems outlined above doesn't just disappear just because people can make Teh Sumiit or derivatives thereof.

It's not about moderation either. Moderation is welcome. You've been a good one, for all I know. It's about actually welcoming everyone. The only way to welcome everyone, is to block and bar someone from entry. When that traitor set up Arek'jalaan, many were interested but weren't able to participate as it quickly became for all intents and purposes drowned in criminals and cultists of all sorts. We see the same thing with the Summit.

That alternatives exist does not make the problems disappear, particularly when the only official alternative is entirely unmoderated. Right now as I set up this missive, that sad fact is all too apparent as someone is claiming to be scratching my teeth.

So is that truly your only solution, Tiberious? "Go away"?

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#74 - 2013-10-31 23:45:17 UTC
I think perhaps you draw black and white choices when there are scales of grey being used instead.

You suggest the logical fallacy that by inviting everyone, we bar entry to others. They bar entry to themselves, and the consequences for those choices lay with only themselves - no matter how much they flail around on the floor in a fit of indignation. If they choose not to associate with certain groups, such is their choice.

Tiberious' answer was not to simply say 'go away'. It was to point out that those choices reside with the attendees of the channel, not the channel itself.

Isis Dea is free to exclude herself from The Summit due to issue with Tiberious as a member of Nation, as is anyone else - but doing so is their own choice unless and until their behavior becomes issue enough for the moderators to make that choice for them. Until then, she (and everybody else) will just need to accept the fact that, yes, he is a moderator.

Katrina Oniseki

Arista Shahni
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#75 - 2013-10-31 23:49:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Arista Shahni
I think what has not been pointed out is that True Slave, though Nation Loyalists, are not Nation. They can not speak for Kuvakei in any official capacity, the same way none of us can speak for our respective factions in an official capacity.

Isis, your self hatred is obvious, and has been obvious. This is not an insult. It is in a way, a compliment, as you are clear-eyed enough to see yourself as exactly what you are. But do realise that other people also see themselves as they are, and in a sense, as others are.

In the end, we are all capsuleers, under the tritanium fist of CONCORD, save an illegal cloning facility or two -- if they're even in operation or still functioning these days, as the data on them is rather old. This includes also the members of TS-F.

I may despise their views, because they conflict strongly with the ones I was raised to follow, nearly unconciously, as a citizen of the Kingdom. There are the views of quite a few people I despise. But at the end of the day when one murders thousands of baseliners a day regardless of faction standing or the self-justification used to fall asleep at night after the frequency crystals cool down and the weapons stop cycling, we are an a very real sense no longer truly our factions, our origins, or our baseliner "histories".

Our loyalties as Capsule Pilots are considered fluid and dangerous because of the immensity of our ability to change the world around us, and we are all controlled for this exact reason, by the same organization -- CONCORD. Not The Empress, not the President of the Fed, not the CEO's of the megacorps, not the Tribal Leaders of the Republic, not the countless Alliance leads, Pirate commanders, or corporate CEOs.

Do not fool yourself that you are still playing Conquestors and Heathens [[translates as Cowboys and Indians, or Cops and Robbers, whichever is appropriate via the translators - you get the hint]]. You are a Capsuleer. TS-F are Capsuleers. The Summit is a comms channel for Capsuleers.

"I say that even as the holy and the righteous cannot rise beyond the highest which is in each one of you - so the wicked and the weak cannot fall lower than the lowest which is in you also.  And as a single leaf turns not yellow but with the silent knowledge of the whole tree, so the wrong-doer cannot do wrong without the hidden will of you all."

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#76 - 2013-10-31 23:59:24 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
I think perhaps you draw black and white choices when there are scales of grey being used instead.

You suggest the logical fallacy that by inviting everyone, we bar entry to others. They bar entry to themselves, and the consequences for those choices lay with only themselves - no matter how much they flail around on the floor in a fit of indignation. If they choose not to associate with certain groups, such is their choice.

Tiberious' answer was not to simply say 'go away'. It was to point out that those choices reside with the attendees of the channel, not the channel itself.

Isis Dea is free to exclude herself from The Summit due to issue with Tiberious as a member of Nation, as is anyone else - but doing so is their own choice unless and until their behavior becomes issue enough for the moderators to make that choice for them. Until then, she (and everybody else) will just need to accept the fact that, yes, he is a moderator.


So in short, once more, it becomes "throw away standards or go away". It is thus as I stated earlier, that those with standards, principles or morals that do not mix with Sansha (or Blooders, or whatever other truly horrific beasts plague New Eden) are barred from that place. What you in effect say is that if you seek a place open for all, but won't lay down with the worst criminals around, it is a "fit of indignation"?

I still don't have answers that will ever be considered such, but it remains an inescapable fact that those on the other side of the greyscale remain barred, as long as the only other choice is embracing the darkest greys in New Eden.

Is it truly so alien a concept that some may seek an open and free place to gather while retaining at least a semblance of civilization and morality? It's rather sad that even if it may be a minority, they are thus turned away no matter how much you pretend to welcome them.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Isis Dea
Society of Adrift Hope
#77 - 2013-11-01 00:02:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Isis Dea
Katrina Oniseki wrote:

Isis Dea is free to exclude herself from The Summit due to issue with Tiberious as a member of Nation, as is anyone else - but doing so is their own choice unless and until their behavior becomes issue enough for the moderators to make that choice for them. Until then, she (and everybody else) will just need to accept the fact that, yes, he is a moderator.


There is no issue with Tiberious. There would have been had he taken issue with my involvement of the sex trade, while he is a walking advocate of mass abduction.

I will not be leaving but he won't have my respect as a character. He is an enemy of my people, of my friends, of all that I have stood to be as a capsuleer. There are many people I have kept close who suffer severely because of what his people have done and continue to do.

His opinions, and those within his corporate entity, are vile. They set off a hate that burns hotter than anything I hold against the Amarrians.

Sansha is evil.

I'm sure many share this opinion. I'll try my absolute damnedest not to let that get in way of my interactions on The Summit. But the longer I hold that back, the more it eats at me.

Am I letting down all those who are suffering because of their actions by not ripping them a new one every chance I get?

After all, that's what the victims are feeling…


No promises.

I'm an immortal, already fighting for so many that aren't here today. It hurts enough as it is.

More Character Customization :: Especially compared to what we had in 2003...

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#78 - 2013-11-01 00:05:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Jinari Otsito wrote:

So in short, once more, it becomes "throw away standards or go away". It is thus as I stated earlier, that those with standards, principles or morals that do not mix with Sansha (or Blooders, or whatever other truly horrific beasts plague New Eden) are barred from that place. What you in effect say is that if you seek a place open for all, but won't lay down with the worst criminals around, it is a "fit of indignation"?

I still don't have answers that will ever be considered such, but it remains an inescapable fact that those on the other side of the greyscale remain barred, as long as the only other choice is embracing the darkest greys in New Eden.

Is it truly so alien a concept that some may seek an open and free place to gather while retaining at least a semblance of civilization and morality? It's rather sad that even if it may be a minority, they are thus turned away no matter how much you pretend to welcome them.


That is not what I said. Nowhere in my post was anybody told to "go away". Do not put words into my mouth.

What I said was that they are free to choose whether or not to attend. That means exactly and only that. I am unsure what part of 'choice' you have difficulty understanding. I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make. You seem to blame The Summit's open door policy for excluding people, and suggest that instead of what you claim is us excluding people, we should instead be excluding people.

As for the fit of indignation, that is more a jab at specific people who do indeed throw a very literal fit of indignation. It's not directed at everybody who choose not to attend.

EDIT: Quote added for clarification on who I am speaking to.

Katrina Oniseki

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#79 - 2013-11-01 00:07:32 UTC
Isis Dea wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:

Isis Dea is free to exclude herself from The Summit due to issue with Tiberious as a member of Nation, as is anyone else - but doing so is their own choice unless and until their behavior becomes issue enough for the moderators to make that choice for them. Until then, she (and everybody else) will just need to accept the fact that, yes, he is a moderator.


There is no issue with Tiberious. There would have been had he taken issue with my involvement of the sex trade, while he is a walking advocate of mass abduction.

I will not be leaving but he won't have my respect as a character. He is an enemy of my people, of my friends, of all that I have stood to be as a capsuleer. There are many people I have kept close who suffer severely because of what his people have done and continue to do.

His opinions, and those within his corporate entity, are vile. They set off a hate that burns hotter than anything I hold against the Amarrians.

Sansha is evil.

I'm sure many share this opinion. I'll try my absolute damnedest not to let that get in way of my interactions on The Summit. But the longer I hold that back, the more it eats at me.

Am I letting down all those who are suffering because of their actions by not ripping them a new one every chance I get?

After all, that's what the victims are feeling…


No promises.

I'm an immortal, already fighting for so many that aren't here today. It hurts enough as it is.


Fair enough. This is, perhaps, the entire point of the Summit. You are welcome to your opinion of Tiberious and Sansha's Nation. Maker knows I share those opinions.

What I do not share is the opinion that he is unfit for a very specific task of moderation due to his loyalties. In fact, his loyalties and hideous brain implants may make him more fit for the task than myself. I admit to being more prone to emotional outbursts than he ever was even before his implantation.

Katrina Oniseki

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#80 - 2013-11-01 00:07:54 UTC
Isis Dea wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:

Isis Dea is free to exclude herself from The Summit due to issue with Tiberious as a member of Nation, as is anyone else - but doing so is their own choice unless and until their behavior becomes issue enough for the moderators to make that choice for them. Until then, she (and everybody else) will just need to accept the fact that, yes, he is a moderator.


There is no issue with Tiberious. There would have been had he taken issue with my involvement of the sex trade, while he is a walking advocate of mass abduction.

I will not be leaving but he won't have my respect as a character. He is an enemy of my people, of my friends, of all that I have stood to be as a capsuleer. There are many people I have kept close who suffer severely because of what his people have done and continue to do.

His opinions, and those within his corporate entity, are vile. They set off a hate that burns hotter than anything I hold against the Amarrians.

Sansha is evil.

I'm sure many share this opinion. I'll try my absolute damnedest not to let that get in way of my interactions on The Summit. But the longer I hold that back, the more it eats at me.

Am I letting down all those who are suffering because of their actions by not ripping them a new one every chance I get?

After all, that's what the victims are feeling…


No promises.

I'm an immortal, already fighting for so many that aren't here today. It hurts enough as it is.


Well, take heart, then! This being an open forum, while they are perfectly allowed to be here, you are perfectly allowed to tell them (and anyone) what to do with their agenda.

You should be happy that they are here. It isn't often in space that targets present themselves.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26