These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE: The Free to Play REVOLUTION!

First post
Author
Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#161 - 2013-10-31 20:30:38 UTC
Star Citizen is going to blow goats. /thread

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Matokin Lemant
#162 - 2013-10-31 21:52:59 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
EVE already has the best free to play model in the business.


The only problem it requires grind for the majority of people. If you are space rich off the backs of others, then you don't need to log in only so often, but there are only a handful of people who fall under that category.

I think I would enjoy EVE more if I didn't have to log on as much is what I am trying to say.

But CCP will have none of that.


At current prices, a single plex costs 20.5 mil isk per DAY. That's 20-25 minutes per day in a null sec anomaly like forsaken hub if you are flying a crappy t1 BS or attack battlecruiser.

Hell, doing ONE site in non-shiny HQ incursion fleet flying a tech 1 BS pays 31 mil + lp. You could literally join a high sec incursion fleet, run ONE HQ site with them per day and at the end of the month you could buy a plex and have STILL have a quarter bil+ isk left to spend on space-hookers and space-blow.

And you would enjoy a game more if you didn't have to play that game as much? At what point do you realize that the game in question is not your cup of tea?



Yes that is all well and good for people who are in one of the large null power blocks and have access to high quality null sec anomaly allot of the player base dont.

As for HQ incursions its not that easy to get into an HQ fleet. People all have blues and the like who fleet up to run incursions together. You have to be one of the people who do them frequently to even get a look in on an HQ fleet.

And honestly who likes just grinding isk 24/7 just to keep there account(s) open...one of the reasons I only have one out of my 3X running currently.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#163 - 2013-10-31 22:37:23 UTC
Matokin Lemant wrote:
Yes that is all well and good for people who are in one of the large null power blocks and have access to high quality null sec anomaly allot of the player base don't.


Hisec pilots have access to Incursions too, y'know. Get a fleet together, make 60M ISK/hr while barely trying.

The only thing stopping you is your will to fail.
Celestra Doxaila
MinTek Tactical Division
#164 - 2013-11-01 00:29:23 UTC
Seriously, every thread in GD that propose s a feature is "nope".
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#165 - 2013-11-01 00:32:45 UTC
Celestra Doxaila wrote:
Seriously, every thread in GD that propose s a feature is "nope".

Not everyone. Just the ones that are bad. And the ones that belong in F&I…

…oh wait. P
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#166 - 2013-11-01 01:11:19 UTC
This thread again?

Star Citizen isn't a threat to EVE. Both games offer completely different features. Just by virtue of both being in space does not make them similar. Comparing them is like comparing a pair of cross trainers to high heels just because they are both a type of shoe. There is a comparison, sure, but it's in the differences, not the similarities. There are more differences than similarities, and that makes them completely different game types.

As for your entire F2P argument, it's based on the premises that EVE is a 'bad bad game' and it's losing subs. Both of these are false premises which you have failed to articulate. It is also based off the speculative premise that EVE is going to lose more subs to SC. As stated, this is speculative at best, and highly unlikely, due to the fact that even if people do 'switch', they will discover the differences between both games and most likely be back on EVE, if not playing both games. In any case, it's pure speculation at this point, and despite the amount of money Mr Roberts has made for his 'little' project, most of it has come from a very dedicated Wing Commander fan base, which at this stage is much smaller in population than the existing EVE fan base.

In other words, if you were to take everyone that donated money to the SC Kickstarter and line them up with the people paying for EVE subs, the EVE line would be longer, and that's taking alt accounts into consideration as well.

EVE's subscription system is the most successful subscription system of any game ever. That's why EVE's player base is always in steady growth, whereas every other MMO on the market, including WOW, has hit a peak and started to decline. WOW won't decline quickly, or quietly, but it is in decline. The other reason for EVE's success here is its uniqueness. There is no other game quite like it currently on the market.

If you really must have a CCP game to compare Star Citizen to, however, I would suggest taking a look at their up and coming Valkyrie title.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Karak Terrel
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER
#167 - 2013-11-01 01:22:32 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I fall for every troll and write massive posts to refute them

Well done
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#168 - 2013-11-01 01:42:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Karak Terrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I fall for every troll and write massive posts to refute them

Well done


Trolling is against forum rules. I just naturally assume people are generally capable of following the rules. If this thread is a troll, then it needs to be locked. How you came by that conclusion, what with you not being the OP of course, is interesting, but no doubt merely speculative in and of itself. You trolling me just now, however, in such a disrespectful fashion, is nothing short of flaming, which is also against the rules. At least I had the courtesy and maturity to address the OP with reasoned and carefully assessed and articulated discussion points. Was it a bit too long for you?

All you've really done here is make an assumption about the OP, then based on that assumption, try to put me down. So far, though, I've managed to escape the cynicism and bitterness and subsequent speculations of the real trolls on the forums, like yourself of course, who are really only here to seek out weakness and exploit it for the sake of their own ego growth. I hope it was worth it, but that's probably why trolling is against the rules. At least, if the OP was trolling, he was doing it with civility instead of spite.

I stand by my choice to take the OP seriously, because I prefer to seek the best in people. Some, like you, might call that naive. But that's why the world is going to ****, and unfortunately, it's hard to see the best in people that put their worst so openly on display like yourself.

I recommend you go find yourself a good Disney movie and try to remember what it was like, long ago, when you could at least address people as if they had the right to respect. Because if you can't show respect to begin with, you most certainly don't deserve to have it returned. And yet, here I am, and I still have shown you no spite or disrespect myself, even though after that crap, you wholly deserve it.

I do believe that makes me the better man.

Cheers for that.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Johnny Marzetti
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#169 - 2013-11-01 02:00:20 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Karak Terrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I fall for every troll and write massive posts to refute them

Well done


Trolling is against forum rules. I just naturally assume people are generally capable of following the rules. If this thread is a troll, then it needs to be locked. How you came by that conclusion, what with you not being the OP of course, is interesting, but no doubt merely speculative in and of itself. You trolling me just now, however, in such a disrespectful fashion, is nothing short of flaming, which is also against the rules. At least I had the courtesy and maturity to address the OP with reasoned and carefully assessed and articulated discussion points. Was it a bit too long for you?

All you've really done here is make an assumption about the OP, then based on that assumption, try to put me down. So far, though, I've managed to escape the cynicism and bitterness and subsequent speculations of the real trolls on the forums, like yourself of course, who are really only here to seek out weakness and exploit it for the sake of their own ego growth. I hope it was worth it, but that's probably why trolling is against the rules. At least, if the OP was trolling, he was doing it with civility instead of spite.

I stand by my choice to take the OP seriously, because I prefer to seek the best in people. Some, like you, might call that naive. But that's why the world is going to ****, and unfortunately, it's hard to see the best in people that put their worst so openly on display like yourself.

I recommend you go find yourself a good Disney movie and try to remember what it was like, long ago, when you could at least address people as if they had the right to respect. Because if you can't show respect to begin with, you most certainly don't deserve to have it returned. And yet, here I am, and I still have shown you no spite or disrespect myself, even though after that crap, you wholly deserve it.

I do believe that makes me the better man.

Cheers for that.


Someone make an mp3 of this. I'd do it myself but my wife already thinks I'm crazy.
Karak Terrel
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER
#170 - 2013-11-01 02:10:28 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Karak Terrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I fall for every troll and write massive posts to refute them

Well done

I fall for every troll and write massive posts to refute them

Well d.. oh wait..

leaving well fed
Liam Inkuras
Furnace
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#171 - 2013-11-01 03:52:27 UTC
Are you that EA guy?

I wear my goggles at night.

Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone

Knights Armament
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#172 - 2013-11-01 23:42:39 UTC
star citizen is not going to have meaningful pvp.

Respawning in the ship you just saw blown to bits isn't hardcore enough for me.
Allison A'vani
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#173 - 2013-11-01 23:57:00 UTC
Shrike Arghast
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#174 - 2013-11-02 01:19:46 UTC
If you can't afford to play MMORPGs, then you clearly shouldn't be playing MMORPGs.

You should be working.
Jim McMorris
McMorris Co.
#175 - 2013-11-02 09:37:58 UTC
Shrike Arghast wrote:
If you can't afford to play MMORPGs, then you clearly shouldn't be playing MMORPGs.

You should be working.


I can afford to buy a campervan, but I won't buy it. If they were offering me the campervan for free, I'd take it.

It's really simple.

[b]Chief Executive Officer McMorris Co. EVE's Only Legitimate ISK Doubling Corporation[/b]

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#176 - 2013-11-02 09:49:53 UTC
Jim McMorris wrote:
Shrike Arghast wrote:
If you can't afford to play MMORPGs, then you clearly shouldn't be playing MMORPGs.

You should be working.


I can afford to buy a campervan, but I won't buy it. If they were offering me the campervan for free, I'd take it.

It's really simple.
Which doesn't connect to her post at all.
"can not afford" != "not willing to spend money on"
samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#177 - 2013-11-02 10:35:23 UTC
Karak Terrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I fall for every troll and write massive posts to refute them

Well done



The biggest problem with troll posts is that you occasionally get other innocents on the forums believing the Bul*****

Thus a proper refutal must always be made lest some poor newb actually believes all the scare stories of the week

Including but by no means restricted to such fallacies as:

The Blue Doughnut
I'm a good PvPer
Mittens
The CSM are Shills
AFK cloakers kill people
minerbumping is a breach of human rights
the thorax was designed by someone who didn't put it in as a joke
EvE is dying
Goons are evil (and CCP)
null seccers hate hi-seccers
Drake
minerals mined are free

and other such brilliant tin foil hattery.and generally badly thought out ideas


If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Arresy Barres
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#178 - 2013-11-02 11:21:58 UTC
Thanks to OP, half of the sandwich I was eating as scrolling over GD is now stuck in my throat and the other half on the table and keyboard.

Now, as I collect the pieces back and wash down with a cup of water what I was coughing intensely upon, man, this thread is just too good. I don't even know if OP was serious, if he isn't, this thread is golden. If he is, though, this thread is even more golden.

While we're at it, why don't we implement flaming skins for interceptors, make yellow skins for all Amarr banana ships, and graffiti skins for titans, yeah buddy, because surely enough EVE Online is a dieing game, oh how sad this is, let's all hold our hands and cry, because EVE might not be around next year. ;_;

Straightforward.

Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#179 - 2013-11-02 11:43:20 UTC
Jim McMorris wrote:
Alright guys I've got this one.

At the moment, EVE cannot survive in the long-run, which is what CCP want the game to be a - a game lasting decades, not years. With biggies like Star Citizen coming round with one-time fees and no-subs, there's gonna be some serious questions asked by the players. Questions like this:

"Why am I still paying for this bad bad game when star citizen is a lot cheaper?"

This question will mean people will unsubscribe. We've also noticed a big trend in the MMO world going away from subs, that trend isn't fully done yet. But when it is, who knows what'll happen to the CCP.

The big business model transFORMATION

Okay guys, so here's how I think CCP should do it.

1) EVE becomes free. Anybody can make account, download and start getting scammed by goons.

2) CCP sells character slots, ship paints, golden pods and more clothes and stuff. Basically, CCP sells as much as it can that doesn't have an impact on gameplay.

3) Population of EVE rises. There are huge huge wars because there are so many people fighting and having fun.

4) EVE is a lot better, more dynamic. Look at all of the politics with 400k people fighting for a finite amount of space. Imagine 5 million people fighting for the same amount of space? It would be crazy. Absolutely crazy.

This would probably INCREASE CCPs profits as well. I'd recommend that they do this IPO on the stockmarket they were talking about, as that will get the big businesses interested and posting articles about this awesome sci-fi sim. All of the hardcore eve fans, like the mitani, will probably buy shares - so they'll have even more money to improve the game.

As they improve the game more people play and buy cosmetic items and CCP get richer.

Thoughts please.


Thread update:


Thanks for feedback guys, I think there are a few more points worth adding here.

1) CCP should also consider the option of buy to play. Perhaps a £39.99 to get access to the game client, but fees after that - this would ensure there is a paywall to supplement CCP profits and keep out the hacking community. With the increased profits, CCP would have greater confidence in following a strictly cosmetic cash4items scheme.

Buy to play has been an extremely successful model and I think it is particularly relevant to EVE ONLINE. Why? The model in GW2 has triggered slow but steady growth, this is the type of growth CCP has always been experiencing with EVE. http://massively.joystiq.com/2013/08/23/lead-designer-says-guild-wars-2-is-growing-its-playerbase/

2) Secondly, a steam launch as free to play would be a great bolster to current numbers. 0.9 of the world's population has a steam account. http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/10/30/0-9-of-the-global-population-have-steam-accounts/


they already have the best free to play model with PLEX, nothing else needed
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#180 - 2013-11-02 14:26:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
30 Likes and counting. ^_^

Did you, person 30, ever reach this post ?