These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

SomerBlinks non-RMT RL earnings

First post
Author
Leigh Akiga
Kuhri Innovations
#81 - 2013-10-29 00:17:19 UTC
Dalmont Delantee wrote:
Leigh Akiga wrote:
I think legitimate/Official GTC and ETC sellers/affiliates should not be allowed to play the game, its the only way this doesnt stink to high heaven.


This would never work, because the people who provide the service usually start it because they love the game...



And there are numerous players that have become developers because they love the game as well, but they are required to give up their character for myriad reasons all of which should totally apply to ingame entities making mad RL and ingame bux from being 'authorized' and 'official' affiliates.
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#82 - 2013-10-29 00:19:44 UTC
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.

CCP is not against players buying ISK with real money, let's get that straight. If CCP wanted to prevent players buying money they wouldn't have introduced PLEX. That was a very deliberate move to offer players a legal way of buying ISK.

The thing CCP has always had a problem with were the shady RMT dealers who were botting all day long, installing shady viruses and stealing peoples money in some cases.

So what SOMER is doing is nothing more than an extension of the already legal PLEX system put in place by CCP.

Many people say "Oh RMT is legal as long as CCP gets the money?!"

Yes. That's exactly the point. That's why CCP introduced PLEX to begin with. So that any players who wants to buy ISK gives their money to CCP and not some shady Chinese company. SOMER is helping that cause and getting a commission for it. They set up an amazing business venture which probably grew larger than even they could have predicted. And I genuinely applaud them for it. Good job guys.

And to everyone who is crying RMT this RMT that I would suggest to set up your own venture of selling ISK in exchange for people using your affiliate link. You're supporting CCP, yourself and the player. It's a win-win-win. There are no losers.

"But now EVE is a pay-to-win game!"

Don't kid yourself. EVE has always been a pay-to-win game. Every MMO has to deal with illegal RMT. In every MMO you can buy currency to improve your game. EVE hasn't been any different since the start. You think all those large empires in 0.0 were founded on hard work and farming missions? Don't be naive, please. Hell, most Titans in the game are probably entirely RMT funded. RMT was around in 2003, RMT was around up to 2007 and CCP took control of the RMT market in 2008 by introducing the PLEX system. Now it's 2013 and guess what? RMT is still around, even allowing players to get in on a piece of the action. The capsuleers are taking control, right?

So again; bravo to SOMER. Keep up the awesome work and may you enjoy the spoils it got you.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

RAW23
#83 - 2013-10-29 00:25:46 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Dalmont Delantee
Gecko Corp
#84 - 2013-10-29 00:34:34 UTC
RAW23 wrote:
Dalmont Delantee wrote:


OK I think I understand your argument now.

Your argument is that people shouldn't make money from providing a service in relation to a game?

Why?


Roll

No, but you're getting close. I have no problem with people making money from such services. I even have no problem with people selling isk for cash if it is permitted. I also have no problem with people paying isk for rl services that cost real money so long as they are related to the game. What I have a problem with is some people selling isk for cash when others are not permitted to do so. It violates my sense of fair play, you see. If CCP does come out and say that what Somer is doing is ok, I won't be at all fussed about the principle of making a rl profit from isk as I will be able to make a couple of hundred bucks a day myself doing the same referral for cash incentives thing. Great! HOWEVER, the fact that CCP have repeatedly objected to such practices in public because they claim to object to the principle of isk for real money annoys me a great deal. Especially if they have knowingly allowed someone to violate their own publicly declared principles while not making clear to everyone else that this is permitted.

That clear enough for you? If you are still having comprehension problems I'm not sure what else I can suggest other than practicing critical analysis a little more before you bring your 'skills' out in public.


Now that, (other than the ending) I can agree too. Now I can sleep :)
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#85 - 2013-10-29 00:36:08 UTC
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.


Yeah except the player doesn't buy a GTC for a referral fee. The player buys a GTC for the full price, most of which ends up directly at CCP.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
#86 - 2013-10-29 00:39:18 UTC
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.


I don't get this ... who gets it if it isn't the guys doing the Programing/IT/Devlopment or whatever you call it at SOMER.

Truly this is just a question because if I misunderstand who is getting the $ commisions it could really alter what a fair solution would be to cut the quid-pro-quo element out of it.

.

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#87 - 2013-10-29 00:42:35 UTC
Diomedes Calypso wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.


I don't get this ... who gets it if it isn't the guys doing the Programing/IT/Devlopment or whatever you call it at SOMER.

Truly this is just a question because if I misunderstand who is getting the $ commisions it could really alter what a fair solution would be to cut the quid-pro-quo element out of it.


By developer he means CCP.

When someone buys a GTC the price is split up:

CCP gets about 75%
The GTC Reseller keeps about 20%
SOMER gets 5% for their trouble.

These are made up numbers, I don't know the actual ones, but you get the point.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#88 - 2013-10-29 00:49:56 UTC
EvE is so real, it's exciting. ^_^
Frying Doom
#89 - 2013-10-29 00:55:56 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
EvE is so real, it's exciting. ^_^

Of course its real

You can use real money to buy ships, characters, win wars, gamble.

How much more real do you need it to be Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Leigh Akiga
Kuhri Innovations
#90 - 2013-10-29 00:57:48 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
EvE is so real, it's exciting. ^_^


All this thread is missing is a wedding, a nightclub, a mortgage and a kickboxing girlfriend..
45thtiger 0109
Pan-Intergalatic Business Community
#91 - 2013-10-29 01:07:21 UTC
ISD Suvetar wrote:
Hi,

We understand that people are eager to discuss this matter; We (ISD) have decided to use this thread as a container so that people may post their views.

Please don't let this devolve into any kind of RMT discussion or otherwise, and we will let this stay open.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.



I concur with the above quote.

Great Job ISD Suvetar in keeping the Forum nice and clean Big smile

As I have said in the other area of the forum that i do not see that CCP & Somer Blink did anything wrong.

If CCP donated ships to Somer Blink for prizes I accept that.

I wish people get the facts right instead of using the blame game.

This is a game and CCP has put allot of man hours in making EvE a great game as it is.

Lets play the game as what it made for, instead of bringing politics in the game because politics can kill a game.

**You Have to take the good with the bad and the bad with the good.

Welcome to EvE OnLiNe**

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#92 - 2013-10-29 01:09:21 UTC
Nice business there... not only for-profit in-game, but even more so for-profit oog.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

RAW23
#93 - 2013-10-29 01:20:40 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.


Yeah except the player doesn't buy a GTC for a referral fee. The player buys a GTC for the full price, most of which ends up directly at CCP.


Sure. But that's the case for any GTC sale. Adding in a Somer isk for cash element doesn't change that.

Also, sorry for my snappy tone in the previous post. It's late and I've been arguing too much.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Frying Doom
#94 - 2013-10-29 01:22:17 UTC
45thtiger 0109 wrote:
This is a game and CCP has put allot of man hours in making EvE a great game as it is. .

Shame CCP had to ruin it.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#95 - 2013-10-29 01:26:11 UTC
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.


Yeah except the player doesn't buy a GTC for a referral fee. The player buys a GTC for the full price, most of which ends up directly at CCP.


Sure. But that's the case for any GTC sale. Adding in a Somer isk for cash element doesn't change that.

Also, sorry for my snappy tone in the previous post. It's late and I've been arguing too much.


My point was that, as far as RMT goes, the money paid for in-game currency normally doesn't end up with the game developer. CCP made a system where the money does end up back with them and SOMER is an extension of that existing legal system.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
#96 - 2013-10-29 01:41:05 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
You know what?

Bravo. Bravo to SOMER for finding a loophole and making an absolute killing off it. I for one like to applaud someone with a sense of business. Not only have they found a way to legally 'sell' in-game currency, they're doing it in a way where most of the money goes straight to the developer.


What?
None of the money for the referral fee (which is what is swapped for the ingame currency) goes to the developer. You seem a little confused on this front.


Yeah except the player doesn't buy a GTC for a referral fee. The player buys a GTC for the full price, most of which ends up directly at CCP.


Sure. But that's the case for any GTC sale. Adding in a Somer isk for cash element doesn't change that.

Also, sorry for my snappy tone in the previous post. It's late and I've been arguing too much.


My point was that, as far as RMT goes, the money paid for in-game currency normally doesn't end up with the game developer. CCP made a system where the money does end up back with them and SOMER is an extension of that existing legal system.



That's why I'm thinking that it could all be above board IF at one point a player had a PLEX... and in game asset , to do what they wanted at their choosing with.

SOMER would need to be blind to the source of that in game asset... a PLEX.. without any knowledge of who sold the GTC the plex came from.

Somer could pay extra Isk for the ingame asset and give EXTRA isk to existing constomers ... customers of their LOTTO, not customers of their GTC store.

Obviously, SOMER would limmit how many times a player could get more isk from them... and they could base that on how much each player played their lotto and made them ISK in-game.

Why would SOMER agree to that ? By offereing the bonus only to players that already made them more isk than the bonus, they'd keep themseve from being expoited in terms of ISK. Somer would only make $ if PLAYERs (not characters) chose to make the out of game transaction with them.....instead of another seller of gtcs that could make the identical plex to be exchanged.

The reality is.. many players would have loyalty to Somer and buy their plex via their easy method...yet many players woule be loyal to their corps and buy gtcs and get the isk rebate from SOMER....who would only be rebating what the player already made for them from their house Rake in the lottos they participated in.

I know I'm repeating myself here.. but.. I really think it is a clean alternative that draws sharp lines between the in game and out of game assets.

.

Cuddle Monster
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#97 - 2013-10-29 01:42:43 UTC
I am not going to pretend to know what SOMER's hosting fees are because I have no clue. However I do have experience in what it costs to run a website that I feel has very similar traffic and the hardware, technology, and service levels needed to run a site such as that. While those costs are EXTREMELY variable I would not bat an eye if they came out and said it was in excess of $2,000 a month to maintain the site.
The Greenmachine Greenmachine
Green's Bicycle Shop
#98 - 2013-10-29 01:48:28 UTC
wouldn't it be funny if it was ccp's plan from the beginning to just scam the **** out of all you people by purposely treating their customers in the manner they have and designing the game to extract the most amount of $. Indirectly and directly but it all ends up in their pockets in the very end. What if this is a giant CCP metagaming trick on all of you. Now that would be funny.
Frying Doom
#99 - 2013-10-29 01:53:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
While the CSM may stop CCP blundering from time to time, CCP really pick good ones not to talk over with the CSM.

But then again members of the CSM have told us, "a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like" and" I can't be bothered to talk to naive children." and the Best Quote Yet
Jester wrote:
"Do you think EVE players shoot themselves in the foot by challenging CCP when they give things away to community organizers?" I answered that in my experience, CCP takes player concerns seriously and in those few cases where those concerns are fueled by unjustified anger, the company tends to be very understanding and forgiving. And when those concerns are justified, CCP has shown a history of listening. Sometimes, getting them to listen requires fairly extraordinary efforts, but they do listen.
emphasis mine

so once again for your viewing pleasure CCP Hilmar.
CCP Hilmar wrote:
Currently we are seeing _very predictable feedback_ on what we are doing. Having the perspective of having done this for a decade, I can tell you that this is one of the moments where we look at what our players do and less of what they say. Innovation takes time to set in and the predictable reaction is always to resist change.
emphasis mine

CCP really has a history of listening......To their wallet.

So I will admit the CSM atm just seems to be telling us all through this how wrong we are and how right CCP are.

I am so glad they are there to represent us in these times of crisis.Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#100 - 2013-10-29 02:04:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Xen Solarus
Everyone wants to talk about the real issue here, but no-one is allowed to talk about the real issue here.

Would be nice for CCP to just come out and make a clear statement. Just how long do they plan to just ignore all these threads? There certainly seems to be alot of confusing comparisons, SOMER is allowed, but this isn't, and yet they are the same thing. Shocked

With the amount of petty things the community has mass-protested over, I'm surprised this hasn't hit quite high on the scale.

Oh, and in before the lock.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.