These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

SomerBlinks non-RMT RL earnings

First post
Author
Careby
#341 - 2013-10-29 20:06:12 UTC
Rroff wrote:
...In this case the "RMT" bit thats the source of the objection is the fact that Somer makes a tiny amount of real money every time someone buys GTC through them...


Not exactly. Lots of websites run affiliate ads for GTC resellers. We all know those ads are run for money, and I don't know of anyone who objects to EVE-related websites supporting themselves by running ads, whether for GTC or anything else.

The "source of the objection" is the ISK (equivalent) incentive offered by one website to encourage users to buy GTC's through their link, rather than other links that do not pay such rewards. In essence, something worth ISK is being traded for something worth real money.

Since the EULA is CCP's creation, and CCP is free to interpret it in any way they please, and to decide whether or not to enforce it any time they like, and to ban or refrain from banning anyone they like for any reason, I don't really understand some of the demands we're seeing from players. The inmates don't run the asylum. But in this case, they can check out any time they like.

Movarer
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#342 - 2013-10-29 20:07:24 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
Movarer wrote:

Are you trolling or just dont know better?

Re-read your post, think about it long and hard and repost once you figure out where you went wrong.





What is it with people here always pretending to be smarter than others. If you see something in my post that you think is wrong just say what it is.

Or is this a case of me going wrong based on your opinion on the matter? Not on actual facts?



You miss 1.2b in one of your examples. HINT: its the one where Somer pays 150m for 5-8$.
flakeys
Doomheim
#343 - 2013-10-29 20:08:02 UTC
Careby wrote:
Rroff wrote:
...In this case the "RMT" bit thats the source of the objection is the fact that Somer makes a tiny amount of real money every time someone buys GTC through them...


Not exactly. Lots of websites run affiliate ads for GTC resellers. We all know those ads are run for money, and I don't know of anyone who objects to EVE-related websites supporting themselves by running ads, whether for GTC or anything else.

The "source of the objection" is the ISK (equivalent) incentive offered by one website to encourage users to buy GTC's through their link, rather than other links that do not pay such rewards. In essence, something worth ISK is being traded for something worth real money.

Since the EULA is CCP's creation, and CCP is free to interpret it in any way they please, and to decide whether or not to enforce it any time they like, and to ban or refrain from banning anyone they like for any reason, I don't really understand some of the demands we're seeing from players. The inmates don't run the asylum. But in this case, they can check out any time they like.



but but .... but they can never leave ...

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Baali Tekitsu
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#344 - 2013-10-29 20:09:41 UTC
Well actually there is a semi- official response to the whole issue, I just ask myself why no CSM member/CCP employee has bothered to post it in this or any other thread:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.fi/2013/10/csm8-status-report-week-twenty-five.html

Quote:

Speaking of soon(tm), as they have promised, CCP has also been working on the next response to the SOMERblink RMT situation. The CSM has been keeping a very close eye on this and we expect to do everything we can to help CCP with their response to this. They are very definitely taking this situation seriously.


Would have saved us quite some drama.

RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE

RAW23
#345 - 2013-10-29 20:11:29 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
Rroff wrote:
^^ Theres a lot of confusion as to the RMT aspect of this which isn't helping matters.

In this case the "RMT" bit thats the source of the objection is the fact that Somer makes a tiny amount of real money every time someone buys GTC through them. Whereas when some players tried to do similiar so as to convert ingame items into cash in their pockets CCP slapped them with the EULA.


From what I could tell almost every rebellious attempt to copy SOMER failed horribly because people fail to understand how SOMER's sceme works. There are actually 1 or 2 attempts that do understand it very clearly and as a result haven't been shut down (yet).

SOMER manages to walk the fine line very skillfully while most people trying to do the same on the forums are falling off with their first step. It's quite hilarious actually.


Do you not find it problematic that the line was apparently drawn in a completely arbitrary way that just so happened to put Somer on one side of it? Sure, some people failed to perfectly copy the exact mechanisms Somer used. But there was nothing at all different in principle in what they were doing and nor did their actions breach the EULA in any obvious way that was avoided by Somer (with the exception of the attempted character sale, which was an obvious breach, albeit of a completely different rule). And now that other people have successfully divined the precise mechanisms so as to make their operations identical in practice as well as in the principle, the whole thing has been ruled illegitimate. Do you really think, then, that these practices would have been OKed in the first place if they had been done by many players in the form we have seen in the last few days? I see no reason to think so, given CCP's response. It looks to me rather like Somer was allowed to do it because of who he was and not because he had invented a magic recipe that was actually in line with what CCP would normally allow. Otherwise why shut it down now that other people are doing exactly the same?

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Maaaaowm Ogeko
Pandemic Horde High Sec Division
#346 - 2013-10-29 20:12:42 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:

CCP is promoting RMT themselves for much, much, MUCH better value than SOMER will ever be able to. For the love of god stop pretending this is about RMT. RMT is legal as long as the money ends up at CCP. Deal with it or give me your stuff.


From this post, I can conclude that there are one of two possibilities here:

1. You are deliberately trying to confuse people who do not understand how all this works at the most basic level.

2. You, yourself do not understand how all this works at the most basic level.

In any case, you are insignificant while this issue is not insignificant and is getting to be extremely troublesome.

I have two accounts, and while I love this game, if the management of CCP is really and truly this corrupt I will not continue to pay to support them.

Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#347 - 2013-10-29 20:12:51 UTC
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
Well actually there is a semi- official response to the whole issue, I just ask myself why no CSM member/CCP employee has bothered to post it in this or any other thread:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.fi/2013/10/csm8-status-report-week-twenty-five.html

Quote:

Speaking of soon(tm), as they have promised, CCP has also been working on the next response to the SOMERblink RMT situation. The CSM has been keeping a very close eye on this and we expect to do everything we can to help CCP with their response to this. They are very definitely taking this situation seriously.


Would have saved us quite some drama.

the only thing they seem to be taking seriously is how to shut down Somer's competition Roll
Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#348 - 2013-10-29 20:28:29 UTC
Kirren D'marr wrote:
Handsome Feller wrote:
Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?


In order to ensure equitable and fair application of the rules across the board. In order to reinforce CCP's position as "impartial referees" of the sandbox, and show that there is no favoritism towards any player or group of players, and that no one is above the EULA/TOS.


You are correct in that no one is above the EULA/TOS. CCP, the creator, interpreter and enforcer of the EULA/TOS defines if anyone is in contravention of them. Presumably CCP deemed Somer to be operating within them and were more than happy with how they operate, hence the community spotlight, iScorps etc. So, by CCP, Somer have done nothing wrong. There is nothing to enforce according to the creator, interpreter and enforcer of the EULA/TOS.

Were CCP acting impartially? Maybe, maybe not. But that ball lies squarely in CCP's court and is CCP's issue. Pretending it's Somer's fault and using them as a scape goat would be atrocious judgement call on CCP's part.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#349 - 2013-10-29 20:36:18 UTC
Ace Boogi wrote:
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
Well actually there is a semi- official response to the whole issue, I just ask myself why no CSM member/CCP employee has bothered to post it in this or any other thread:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.fi/2013/10/csm8-status-report-week-twenty-five.html

Quote:

Speaking of soon(tm), as they have promised, CCP has also been working on the next response to the SOMERblink RMT situation. The CSM has been keeping a very close eye on this and we expect to do everything we can to help CCP with their response to this. They are very definitely taking this situation seriously.


Would have saved us quite some drama.

the only thing they seem to be taking seriously is how to shut down Somer's competition Roll

Is it working?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#350 - 2013-10-29 20:37:44 UTC
Handsome Feller wrote:
Kirren D'marr wrote:
Handsome Feller wrote:
Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?


In order to ensure equitable and fair application of the rules across the board. In order to reinforce CCP's position as "impartial referees" of the sandbox, and show that there is no favoritism towards any player or group of players, and that no one is above the EULA/TOS.


You are correct in that no one is above the EULA/TOS. CCP, the creator, interpreter and enforcer of the EULA/TOS defines if anyone is in contravention of them. Presumably CCP deemed Somer to be operating within them and were more than happy with how they operate, hence the community spotlight, iScorps etc. So, by CCP, Somer have done nothing wrong. There is nothing to enforce according to the creator, interpreter and enforcer of the EULA/TOS.

Were CCP acting impartially? Maybe, maybe not. But that ball lies squarely in CCP's court and is CCP's issue. Pretending it's Somer's fault and using them as a scape goat would be atrocious judgement call on CCP's part.


And yet, others doing the same as SOMER have been shut down; therefore CCP has failed in its enforcement of the EULA/TOS. There are only two ways to rectify this: either punish SOMER equal to what has been done to others guilty of the same act, or reinstate all others who were previously punished for this act.

To do otherwise would also be an "atrocious judgement call on CCP's part."

Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.     _ - Kina Ayami_

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#351 - 2013-10-29 20:42:31 UTC
Alt Two wrote:
Handsome Feller wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
In that case everyone should be allowed to RMT up to ~$130k before being told to stop.
All this started because Somer was being given special treatment, and now you want to give them even more? The EULA very clearly states that if you RMT you're out.


Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?


Because letting Somer get away with it without any consequences will just fuel the player anger even more.
Yes it's harsh but either Somer or someone from CCP needs to go, depending on who's fault it is.


Let's face it, CCP fully endorsed Somer. CCP did not go "oh hey Somer, that's against the EULA, you're banned". They showered them with publicity, gifts and praise. How can that possibly be Somer's fault? If "there must be blood" it should be CCP's.
Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#352 - 2013-10-29 20:44:16 UTC
Handsome Feller wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
Handsome Feller wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
In that case everyone should be allowed to RMT up to ~$130k before being told to stop.
All this started because Somer was being given special treatment, and now you want to give them even more? The EULA very clearly states that if you RMT you're out.


Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?


Because letting Somer get away with it without any consequences will just fuel the player anger even more.
Yes it's harsh but either Somer or someone from CCP needs to go, depending on who's fault it is.


Let's face it, CCP fully endorsed Somer. CCP did not go "oh hey Somer, that's against the EULA, you're banned". They showered them with publicity, gifts and praise. How can that possibly be Somer's fault? If "there must be blood" it should be CCP's.

the gifts, endorsements, publicity, etc., and the RMT are separate issues.
Careby
#353 - 2013-10-29 20:44:39 UTC
Kirren D'marr wrote:
...To do otherwise would also be an "atrocious judgement call on CCP's part."

Indeed, but they have the right to make as many such calls as they please. At their peril, perhaps. Or perhaps not.

Montmazar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#354 - 2013-10-29 20:45:51 UTC
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
Well actually there is a semi- official response to the whole issue, I just ask myself why no CSM member/CCP employee has bothered to post it in this or any other thread:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.fi/2013/10/csm8-status-report-week-twenty-five.html

Quote:

Speaking of soon(tm), as they have promised, CCP has also been working on the next response to the SOMERblink RMT situation. The CSM has been keeping a very close eye on this and we expect to do everything we can to help CCP with their response to this. They are very definitely taking this situation seriously.


Would have saved us quite some drama.


Jester and associated CSMs once again demonstrating that they believe their job is PR for CCP.
Alt Two
Caldari Capital Construction Inc.
#355 - 2013-10-29 20:45:58 UTC
Handsome Feller wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
Handsome Feller wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
In that case everyone should be allowed to RMT up to ~$130k before being told to stop.
All this started because Somer was being given special treatment, and now you want to give them even more? The EULA very clearly states that if you RMT you're out.


Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?


Because letting Somer get away with it without any consequences will just fuel the player anger even more.
Yes it's harsh but either Somer or someone from CCP needs to go, depending on who's fault it is.


Let's face it, CCP fully endorsed Somer. CCP did not go "oh hey Somer, that's against the EULA, you're banned". They showered them with publicity, gifts and praise. How can that possibly be Somer's fault? If "there must be blood" it should be CCP's.

I would agree with you if it weren't for the fact that Somer is still doing it.
Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#356 - 2013-10-29 20:47:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Boogi
Alt Two wrote:

I would agree with you if it weren't for the fact that Somer is still doing it.

simply put, Somer doesn't actually give a **** about the playerbase beyond how much isk and bux they can squeeze out of them. just go chill in their channel for a bit and see how they talk about people. they seriously don't care if people are upset, because they are laughing their way to the bank. that link will remain there for as long as possible.

kinda funny how Somer and Andrev haven't posted at all in here isn't it? especially Andrev, who is always so quick to call people out in these types of threads. they also abandoned their thread in the in-game events forum Roll


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3802585#post3802585

one of Somer's competitors has already ceased and desisted, as did Katarina Reid. let's see how long it takes Somer...
RAW23
#357 - 2013-10-29 20:52:32 UTC  |  Edited by: RAW23
Ace Boogi wrote:
Alt Two wrote:

I would agree with you if it weren't for the fact that Somer is still doing it.

simply put, Somer doesn't actually give a **** about the playerbase beyond how much isk and bux they can squeeze out of them. just go chill in their channel for a bit and see how they talk about people. they seriously don't care if people are upset, because they are laughing their way to the bank. that link will remain there for as long as possible.

kinda funny how Somer and Andrev haven't posted at all in here isn't it? especially Andrev, who is always so quick to call people out in these types of threads. they also abandoned their thread in the in-game events forum Roll


If he has been given 10 days to stop then it would be silly to expect him to stop before he has to and ridiculous to demand that he be punished for not stopping in a time-frame shorter than the one that has been permitted. Look, the actual practice of isk for cash is not really a threat to eve or the player experience. What is a threat is CCP's arbitrary attitude towards such behaviour. It is CCP that is the problem here. The most Somer is guilty of is collusion but no entity is going to punish someone for colluding with themselves; the notion just doesn't make sense.

edit - I may have misinterpreted your post as calling for Somer to be put up against the wall. Sorry if this was wrong.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#358 - 2013-10-29 20:57:12 UTC
Careby wrote:
Kirren D'marr wrote:
...To do otherwise would also be an "atrocious judgement call on CCP's part."

Indeed, but they have the right to make as many such calls as they please. At their peril, perhaps. Or perhaps not.



And as I stated, CCP's consequences for these calls will be determined by their customers.

Showing that they can treat their customers equally would go a long way towards mitigating that response. It may or may not be the most correct action on their part, but I wouldn't be surprised if SOMER got thrown under the bus for it.

Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.     _ - Kina Ayami_

Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#359 - 2013-10-29 20:58:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Boogi
RAW23 wrote:

If he has been given 10 days to stop then it would be silly to expect him to stop before he has to and ridiculous to demand that he be punished for not stopping in a time-frame shorter than the one that has been permitted. Look, the actual practice of isk for cash is not really a threat to eve or the player experience. What is a threat is CCP's arbitrary attitude towards such behaviour. It is CCP that is the problem here. The most Somer is guilty of is collusion but no entity is going to punish someone for colluding with themselves; the notion just doesn't make sense.

i agree that it is CCP that is the problem here. regardless though, Somer needs to go because she broke the EULA in the same ways other did, and while others have been punished, she has not. her level of RMT is beyond ridiculous and can't go unpunished if CCP wants to come out of this with any shred of credibility left.

do you really think it's fair that even the slightest hint of RMT gets others punished, and that people using the same model as Somer get locks and threats, but Somer is allowed to RMT over $135k (conservative estimate) and not face any consequences at all?

how i see it, if Somer doesn't recieve punishment, then everyone else should be free to RMT to their hearts content. but if the practice is declared outlawed, then Somer is the biggest transgressor of them all and should receive no leniency at all.

even if her cash cow got shut down, she'd still be sitting on a fat pile of cash. at this point, i would expect her to go full bittervet mode and start RMTing the more traditional way. i mean **** it, she already beat the game, so why not fully cash out now and go down as even more of an eve legend?

the only way to prevent this is through seizure of all her assets/isk and permaban of all her accounts.
corbexx
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#360 - 2013-10-29 20:59:29 UTC
Ace Boogi wrote:
Alt Two wrote:

I would agree with you if it weren't for the fact that Somer is still doing it.

simply put, Somer doesn't actually give a **** about the playerbase beyond how much isk and bux they can squeeze out of them. just go chill in their channel for a bit and see how they talk about people. they seriously don't care if people are upset, because they are laughing their way to the bank. that link will remain there for as long as possible.

kinda funny how Somer and Andrev haven't posted at all in here isn't it? especially Andrev, who is always so quick to call people out in these types of threads. they also abandoned their thread in the in-game events forum Roll


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3802585#post3802585

one of Somer's competitors has already ceased and desisted, as did Katarina Reid. let's see how long it takes Somer...


Also keep in mind that the reason shatter crystal stopped using somer was cos he kept asking for more and more of % from the gtc referal. That more than anything shows making cash was very high on his list (could be wrong but think noisy gamer said the difference between 5% and 8% was liek grand a month or something)