These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

SomerBlinks non-RMT RL earnings

First post
Author
Leigh Akiga
Kuhri Innovations
#321 - 2013-10-29 19:23:41 UTC
I am curious what Somers relationship is with Markee Dragon, a confessed RMT'r.

"Marcus Eikenberry is 37, big, bearded and tattooed. He started gaming with Ultima Online in 1997.

“I was working a 40-hour job and playing 40 hours a week,” Eikenberry says. Naturally, he says, his wife complained. Rather than quit, “I decided to make the game my job.”

His wife, a “casual gamer,” was skeptical, but Eikenberry’s online gaming business took off, and the marriage survived. His two sons, also gamers, help out at the office, and his younger brother is a full-time employee.

Today, Eikenberry owns what he believes is the largest company of its kind, catering to online gamers from all over the world. Markee Dragon Inc. is housed in a boxy commercial complex near Portland International Airport.

His company is like a combination of Citibank and Wal-Mart. He sells virtual items—like gold, magic swords and real estate in the form of castles, or even entire characters—for real money.

The business involves complex spreadsheets tracking supply and demand in different areas of the virtual world, as well as constant monitoring of competitors’ prices. He even benefits from globalization. Often he buys from Chinese “gold farmers”—who spend their days killing monsters for virtual treasure, often earning a real-world commission (in yuan) on the fake gold pieces that they gather. The farmers’ employers make their money by selling the virtual loot to dealers like Eikenberry.

His employees connect buyers with sellers and run what are essentially credit checks, because of the high fraud rate in the secondary market for virtual goods.

Eikenberry says he facilitates over $1 million a month in sales.

Eikenberry has no moral qualms about how he makes his living. “The people that are buying [this stuff] already know what the game is about. You can’t say that they’re naive,” Eikenberry says. “I’ve never thought about it as the game that’s the problem. It’s the person that’s the problem.”

At the same time, he freely admits: “If you’re not addicted, we don’t make money off of you.”

According to the article on TMC Somer was an affiliate for Shattered Crystal and then got greedy and wanted a bigger cut, so SC cut Somer loose and Somer went to Markee Dragon.

HOW DOES ANYONE NOT SEE THE FIRE COMING FROM THIS SMOKESTACK Shocked
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#322 - 2013-10-29 19:29:45 UTC
Leigh Akiga wrote:
I am curious what Somers relationship is with Markee Dragon, a confessed RMT'r.

According to the article on TMC Somer was an affiliate for Shattered Crystal and then got greedy and wanted a bigger cut, so SC cut Somer loose and Somer went to Markee Dragon.

HOW DOES ANYONE NOT SEE THE FIRE COMING FROM THIS SMOKESTACK Shocked


I raised this issue before and it's interesting to look into. What's even worse though is that CCP recently did a community spotlight on this guy and how great he was.

Also, plot twist, apparently Marcus Eikenberry also founded Shattered Crystal which means that SOMER has done business exclusively with him since their inception.

Marcus has been known to do his RMT stuff creatively within the rules, finding loopholes and stuff. At one point losing an enormous amount of money because one of those loopholes got closed and his customers screwed over. It wouldn't honestly surprise me one bit if the same happened here. Found a loophole, manages to exploit it.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Alt Two
Caldari Capital Construction Inc.
#323 - 2013-10-29 19:31:45 UTC
Handsome Feller wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
In that case everyone should be allowed to RMT up to ~$130k before being told to stop.
All this started because Somer was being given special treatment, and now you want to give them even more? The EULA very clearly states that if you RMT you're out.



Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?

Because letting Somer get away with it without any consequences will just fuel the player anger even more.
Yes it's harsh but either Somer or someone from CCP needs to go, depending on who's fault it is. Ie. was this (or rather is this, it's still ongoing) done with CCP's approval or not.

Somer could do the decent thing here and remove the referral link right now, but it seems like they intend to profit as much as possible during these 10 days instead. Which makes me lean more towards banning them than not.
Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#324 - 2013-10-29 19:32:11 UTC
Baali Tekitsu wrote:

Yet in this case theyre not getting endorsed and praised for doing X and banned for X, but theyre getting praised for X (being oh so benefitial to the community) and (maybe) banned for Y (RMT).


Why didn't CCP ban them before? Why did they instead choose to reward them and praise them? CCP know exactly how Somer operate. CCP create, interpret and enforce the rules. Could it be that CCP messed up big style? If they did, maybe you could provide

Handsome Feller wrote:

...reasoned and rational justification as to why CCP should ban people because CCP mess up.


If you believe CCP didn't mess up and didn't mislead Somer into believing they were operating fully within the EULA, please provide your evidence for this.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#325 - 2013-10-29 19:34:17 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
How is it still in doubt wether or not it's actually legal? CCP supported SOMER on two different occasions. I think it's pretty safe to say that CCP has okay'ed SOMER and their business plan.


They made 135K off of them at 5-8%. so CCP got at least 2 mil out of the deal. OF COURSE they are going to support it. So what if they have to alter the rules to allow it and retroactively ignore the violation?

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Leigh Akiga
Kuhri Innovations
#326 - 2013-10-29 19:34:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Leigh Akiga
All of this begins and ends with one player who is determined to 'make a living' off of video games- because thats all they do, and then showing and helping others how to do it.

CARTEL
Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#327 - 2013-10-29 19:37:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Boogi
Alt Two wrote:

Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?

Because letting Somer get away with it without any consequences will just fuel the player anger even more.
Yes it's harsh but either Somer or someone from CCP needs to go, depending on who's fault it is. Ie. was this (or rather is this, it's still ongoing) done with CCP's approval or not.

Somer could do the decent thing here and remove the referral link right now, but it seems like they intend to profit as much as possible during these 10 days instead. Which makes me lean more towards banning them than not.


they fully intend to milk it for as long as possible, and they don't give a **** about the playerbase aside from what they can get out of them. have you ever actually read some of the **** the staff types in the comfort of their channel? they act like feudal overlords and as if the playerbase were merely serfs for them to make money off of. they showed nothing but disdain for the player concerns raised during all of the somer gate fiasco. the affiliate referral link along with the bonus credit will remain on their website until literally the last minute.
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#328 - 2013-10-29 19:38:17 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
How is it still in doubt wether or not it's actually legal? CCP supported SOMER on two different occasions. I think it's pretty safe to say that CCP has okay'ed SOMER and their business plan.


They made 135K off of them at 5-8%. so CCP got at least 2 mil out of the deal. OF COURSE they are going to support it. So what if they have to alter the rules to allow it and retroactively ignore the violation?



What violation?

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

ngaly
Doomheim
#329 - 2013-10-29 19:39:08 UTC
2.5 months ago I created a petition asking CCP if SOMERblink’s 200m credits reward for GTC purchases is violating the EULA. I actually got an answer back then. The GM told me that SOMERblink is not violating the EULA. I responded to that answer explaining the GM why the 200m reward is in fact RMT. The GM then told me that receiving SOMERblink credits, an artificial "currency" that allows his visitors to play a game on his website, does not constitute RMT and he said that these credits are not a promissory note for ingame riches. I then explained the GM why the 200m reward is in fact a promissory note. The GM gave me a rude answer and simply closed the petition.

Basically it looked like CCP knew it’s RMT but they weren’t going to act on it as long as the players don’t complain about it on a large scale.
Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#330 - 2013-10-29 19:41:23 UTC
Katarina Reid wrote:
Headshot

Not sure if im allowed to link the letter given to resellers but it says to stop players trading ingame items for cash. ETC + bonus items may not be direclty or indirectly traded by the buyer for isk. EULA says cant sell ingame stuff for cash. 10 days for reseller to stop it or else.

You can still support me for no reward when you buy your ETC's here

$660 made for me
377 sale of ETC's
$13,195 for CCP
188b given out


They gave you 10 days to stop; were I you, I'd be taking it right up to the line, just to drive the point home. At least, that's what SOMER appears to be doing; but maybe they're not subject to this cease and desist order.

Handsome Feller wrote:
Why do you think CCP should ban people because CCP mess up?


In order to ensure equitable and fair application of the rules across the board. In order to reinforce CCP's position as "impartial referees" of the sandbox, and show that there is no favoritism towards any player or group of players, and that no one is above the EULA/TOS.

I'm not saying that there should not be consequences for CCP as well, but those consequences will have to be determined by their customers who choose whether or not to pay subscriptions. However, the fact that CCP screwed up does not exempt someone from being held accountable to the rules; to do so would be unfair to the other customers who have been held to those rules.

Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.     _ - Kina Ayami_

Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#331 - 2013-10-29 19:41:51 UTC
ngaly wrote:
2.5 months ago I created a petition asking CCP if SOMERblink’s 200m credits reward for GTC purchases is violating the EULA. I actually got an answer back then. The GM told me that SOMERblink is not violating the EULA. I responded to that answer explaining the GM why the 200m reward is in fact RMT. The GM then told me that receiving SOMERblink credits, an artificial "currency" that allows his visitors to play a game on his website, does not constitute RMT and he said that these credits are not a promissory note for ingame riches. I then explained the GM why the 200m reward is in fact a promissory note. The GM gave me a rude answer and simply closed the petition.

Basically it looked like CCP knew it’s RMT but they weren’t going to act on it as long as the players don’t complain about it on a large scale.

if this is indeed the case, heads definitely need to roll.

incarna was quite the shitstorm and it doesn't even begin to compare to this.
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#332 - 2013-10-29 19:42:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Sexy Cakes
Handsome Feller wrote:
What I do know is that CCP, to all intents and purposes, endorsed Somer through a community spotlight, favours, iScorps and many many positive posts about them. This is not the behavior of a company who thinks Somer is breaking the rules and deserves to be punished. AFAIK, Somer did not hide the way they operate from CCP. CCP was fully aware of what they did and how they did it. CCP went ahead and essentially endorsed it. They even heaped praise upon it.


Despite your terrible analogies and hideous face you are right.

It would be the epitome of lame if CCP were to turn around ban SOMER 2 weeks after they gave them 500 billion ISK but SOMER needs to disappear from this point forward. I don't care if you sue them or just tell them to slunk off into the shadows and enjoy the rewards that you gave them.

CCP screwed the pooch by not investigating SOMER fully before supporting/backing/advertising their services, hell they made a huge mistake by even getting involved with them at all, but I don't think this whole thing boils down to anyone trying to screw me over at CCP. I can see that you guys probably approached this from the perspective that you could 'team' up with SOMER and get some more in game stuff going on but the fact of the matter is you guys made a massive mistake here.

Now I'm not saying Hilmar is to blame here (as a matter of fact I think he's not) but this is the response we got last time a huge mistake happened.

"From all this self-reflection, a genesis of renewal has taken root, a personal and professional commitment to restore the partnership of trust upon which our success depends, and a plan that sets the foundation for us to sensibly guide EVE to her fullest potential. In the coming days and weeks, the details of this plan and what it means for you will be unveiled. Part of what led us down this path is the fact we have not communicated well. This blog, and those that will follow, will hopefully demonstrate our conviction to transparency."

I can only hope for CCP's sake that they keep that in mind and give us the full details of what happened, what was done to rectify it and how its going to work from this point forward.

Not today spaghetti.

Leigh Akiga
Kuhri Innovations
#333 - 2013-10-29 19:46:49 UTC
Ace Boogi wrote:
if this is indeed the case, heads definitely need to roll.

incarna was quite the shitstorm and it doesn't even begin to compare to this.


You know what to do guys. It looks like our only recourse is to take it to the Monument.


Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#334 - 2013-10-29 19:49:48 UTC
Leigh Akiga wrote:
Ace Boogi wrote:
if this is indeed the case, heads definitely need to roll.

incarna was quite the shitstorm and it doesn't even begin to compare to this.


You know what to do guys. It looks like our only recourse is to take it to the Monument.



**** the monument. my finger has been hovering over the unsub button for all of my accounts since this fiasco started. as each day passes, i become more convinced this will be the only recourse left for any of us to prove our point. the only reason i stuck around was for the laughs after DNSBlack and others started testing the limits.
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#335 - 2013-10-29 19:52:33 UTC
ngaly wrote:
2.5 months ago I created a petition asking CCP if SOMERblink’s 200m credits reward for GTC purchases is violating the EULA. I actually got an answer back then. The GM told me that SOMERblink is not violating the EULA. I responded to that answer explaining the GM why the 200m reward is in fact RMT. The GM then told me that receiving SOMERblink credits, an artificial "currency" that allows his visitors to play a game on his website, does not constitute RMT and he said that these credits are not a promissory note for ingame riches. I then explained the GM why the 200m reward is in fact a promissory note. The GM gave me a rude answer and simply closed the petition.

Basically it looked like CCP knew it’s RMT but they weren’t going to act on it as long as the players don’t complain about it on a large scale.


Why on earth would anyone complain? Why IS anyone complaining?

As it stands we have two legal options for buying ISK with real money. And one of them is actually a much better value for your money.

With SOMER you buy a 35 dollar 60 day GTC for which you receive 200m credit. You can directly cash it out if you want, leaving you with something like 140m. Or if you're lucky you may walk away with a little more. 800m? 1 billion if you're extremely lucky?

OR

You buy a 35 dollar 60 day GTC, turn that directly into two PLEX and sell those for a whooping guaranteed 1.2 billion ISK.

And everyone is crying about SOMER facilitating RMT? Are you freaking kidding me? CCP is offering this right in their PLEX store. They are even promoting the in-game trade:

CCP's own PLEX store wrote:
Purchase PLEX to trade on the EVE market when prices and demand are high. Bulk purchase options available for serious traders.


CCP is promoting RMT themselves for much, much, MUCH better value than SOMER will ever be able to. For the love of god stop pretending this is about RMT. RMT is legal as long as the money ends up at CCP. Deal with it or give me your stuff.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#336 - 2013-10-29 19:56:01 UTC
^^ Theres a lot of confusion as to the RMT aspect of this which isn't helping matters.

In this case the "RMT" bit thats the source of the objection is the fact that Somer makes a tiny amount of real money every time someone buys GTC through them. Whereas when some players tried to do similiar so as to convert ingame items into cash in their pockets CCP slapped them with the EULA.
Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#337 - 2013-10-29 19:57:40 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:

Why on earth would anyone complain? Why IS anyone complaining?

JUST STOP TALKING ABOUT IT AND MAYBE ITLL GO AWAY ON ITS OWN
Movarer
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#338 - 2013-10-29 20:00:23 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
ngaly wrote:
2.5 months ago I created a petition asking CCP if SOMERblink’s 200m credits reward for GTC purchases is violating the EULA. I actually got an answer back then. The GM told me that SOMERblink is not violating the EULA. I responded to that answer explaining the GM why the 200m reward is in fact RMT. The GM then told me that receiving SOMERblink credits, an artificial "currency" that allows his visitors to play a game on his website, does not constitute RMT and he said that these credits are not a promissory note for ingame riches. I then explained the GM why the 200m reward is in fact a promissory note. The GM gave me a rude answer and simply closed the petition.

Basically it looked like CCP knew it’s RMT but they weren’t going to act on it as long as the players don’t complain about it on a large scale.


Why on earth would anyone complain? Why IS anyone complaining?

As it stands we have two legal options for buying ISK with real money. And one of them is actually a much better value for your money.

With SOMER you buy a 35 dollar 60 day GTC for which you receive 200m credit. You can directly cash it out if you want, leaving you with something like 140m. Or if you're lucky you may walk away with a little more. 800m? 1 billion if you're extremely lucky?

OR

You buy a 35 dollar 60 day GTC, turn that directly into two PLEX and sell those for a whooping guaranteed 1.2 billion ISK.

And everyone is crying about SOMER facilitating RMT? Are you freaking kidding me? CCP is offering this right in their PLEX store. They are even promoting the in-game trade:

CCP's own PLEX store wrote:
Purchase PLEX to trade on the EVE market when prices and demand are high. Bulk purchase options available for serious traders.


CCP is promoting RMT themselves for much, much, MUCH better value than SOMER will ever be able to. For the love of god stop pretending this is about RMT. RMT is legal as long as the money ends up at CCP. Deal with it or give me your stuff.


Are you trolling or just dont know better?

Re-read your post, think about it long and hard and repost once you figure out where you went wrong.



TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#339 - 2013-10-29 20:01:49 UTC
Rroff wrote:
^^ Theres a lot of confusion as to the RMT aspect of this which isn't helping matters.

In this case the "RMT" bit thats the source of the objection is the fact that Somer makes a tiny amount of real money every time someone buys GTC through them. Whereas when some players tried to do similiar so as to convert ingame items into cash in their pockets CCP slapped them with the EULA.


From what I could tell almost every rebellious attempt to copy SOMER failed horribly because people fail to understand how SOMER's sceme works. There are actually 1 or 2 attempts that do understand it very clearly and as a result haven't been shut down (yet).

SOMER manages to walk the fine line very skillfully while most people trying to do the same on the forums are falling off with their first step. It's quite hilarious actually.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#340 - 2013-10-29 20:05:08 UTC
Movarer wrote:

Are you trolling or just dont know better?

Re-read your post, think about it long and hard and repost once you figure out where you went wrong.





What is it with people here always pretending to be smarter than others. If you see something in my post that you think is wrong just say what it is.

Or is this a case of me going wrong based on your opinion on the matter? Not on actual facts?

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums