These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

SOV tearing down the old.

First post
Author
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#41 - 2013-10-27 19:50:43 UTC
And here we go. IZ seems to believe that you should be FORCED to recruit Russians and other such people from different timezones, just to defend your stuff against day tripper wannabes and Rebel Alliance heroes like himself.

Because his player choice is more important than yours, folks. You heard it here.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2013-10-27 19:56:11 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And here we go. IZ seems to believe that you should be FORCED to recruit Russians and other such people from different timezones, just to defend your stuff against day tripper wannabes and Rebel Alliance heroes like himself.

Because his player choice is more important than yours, folks. You heard it here.

Not forced. Choose.

EvE is not World of Warcraft. Its supposed to be a sandbox. Strong smart players > weak lazy players. You seem to want to to be a weak lazy player and have the server hold your weenus? Amirite?

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#43 - 2013-10-27 19:59:58 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And here we go. IZ seems to believe that you should be FORCED to recruit Russians and other such people from different timezones, just to defend your stuff against day tripper wannabes and Rebel Alliance heroes like himself.

Because his player choice is more important than yours, folks. You heard it here.

Not forced. Choose.

EvE is not World of Warcraft. Its supposed to be a sandbox. Strong smart players > weak lazy players. You seem to want to to be a weak lazy player and have the server hold your weenus? Amirite?


No, it's forced. You outright said that, if timers are removed and someone can't keep their sov, it's their fault for not recruiting more people in other timezones.

That is saying "multi timezone or GTFO". That's force. That's you being a weak lazy player who wants to hobble the competition because you can't beat them.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Baaldor
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#44 - 2013-10-27 20:05:14 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:


EvE is not World of Warcraft. Its supposed to be a sandbox. Strong smart players > weak lazy players. You seem to want to to be a weak lazy player and have the server hold your weenus? Amirite?


Oh, you mean like the e-honor risk averse specialsnowflakes who can't deal with cloakers sitting in your jewing system?
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2013-10-27 20:09:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Infinity Ziona
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And here we go. IZ seems to believe that you should be FORCED to recruit Russians and other such people from different timezones, just to defend your stuff against day tripper wannabes and Rebel Alliance heroes like himself.

Because his player choice is more important than yours, folks. You heard it here.

Not forced. Choose.

EvE is not World of Warcraft. Its supposed to be a sandbox. Strong smart players > weak lazy players. You seem to want to to be a weak lazy player and have the server hold your weenus? Amirite?


No, it's forced. You outright said that, if timers are removed and someone can't keep their sov, it's their fault for not recruiting more people in other timezones.

That is saying "multi timezone or GTFO". That's force. That's you being a weak lazy player who wants to hobble the competition because you can't beat them.

No its called choosing. You want to be rich you choose to work hard to get rich. You want a nice looking girlfriend or (maybe you want a nice looking boyfriend?) you work at making yourself look nice and desirable. No ones forcing you to do that you just get extra good stuff if you choose to go after it.

This is exactly the same, you choose to recruit a balanced time zone alliance and you get nice stuff (Sov) or you don't and you get ping pong.

That's how life works, I know its hard for the Y generation to understand effort and reward but that's actually the reality.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#46 - 2013-10-27 20:17:04 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:

No its called choosing. You want to be rich you choose to work hard to get rich. You want a nice looking girlfriend or (maybe you want a nice looking boyfriend?) you work at making yourself look nice and desirable. No ones forcing you to do that you just get extra good stuff if you choose to go after it.

This is exactly the same, you choose to recruit a balanced time zone alliance and you get nice stuff (Sov) or you don't and you lose sov.

That's how life works, I know its hard for the Y generation to understand effort and reward but that's actually the reality.


Once again, nope. EVE is a video game, after all, not real life.

It's putting a barrier to entry where none existed before. That's the difference, that's why it's force. And what is your argument for why? To question the sexuality of people who disagree with you? That's fairly reportable by the way, especially coming from someone who whined so very, very hard about "personal attacks" in their own thread. Although I already knew you were a hypocrite, so it makes little difference to me.

Oh, and...

You have yet to actually say why any of the complete, utter nonsense you endlessly spew onto these forums is a good idea other than "because I say so", or "trust me", or my very favorite "Grr Goons". You have no argument, you're just being obnoxious. At least Ace was amusing in her endless narcissistic absurdities. You, on the other hand, are banality personified.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#47 - 2013-10-27 20:35:56 UTC
Just dropping timers is such an impossible outcome that it's not even worth arguing about. It's the equivalent of someone coming in and saying "pinkforestbanana", and then crossing their arms as if it was your turn to offer a rebuttal. It's a literal non-issue because it will never happen.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#48 - 2013-10-27 20:37:08 UTC
kaarous infinity ziona is an elite pvper in her nullified cloaky proteus, hunting all the pveers that are completely safe in nullsec, i think she knows what she's talking about, and everything you say against her bad ideas is invalid because you just want to hide behind your timers and not defend your things, except when the timers come out and you have to protect them anyway
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#49 - 2013-10-27 20:42:47 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
kaarous infinity ziona is an elite pvper in her nullified cloaky proteus, hunting all the pveers that are completely safe in nullsec, i think she knows what she's talking about, and everything you say against her bad ideas is invalid because you just want to hide behind your timers and not defend your things, except when the timers come out and you have to protect them anyway


You forgot that it's a shield fit Proteus, because IZ is such a special snowflake that any criticism just falls off like Teflon.

And besides, the fact that I haven't lived in null in years, and as such have nothing to defend with my statements, will surely fall on deaf ears.

That's why I said IZ bores me. At least the previous iteration of forum trolls were semi amusing. But Harry is a broken record (I also imagine everything he says in the Randy Newman voice) and IZ is just a incurable fool. Gotham deserves a better class of criminal.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Roby Omanid
Hounds of War.
#50 - 2013-10-27 20:55:23 UTC
I know nothing about grinding hubs for sov, so correct me if this scenario is a bad example, I just thought this could be a hypothetical scenario if timers were removed, but lets say alliance "X" "Y" and "Z" are all 1000+ members.

Without reinforcement timers alliance X begins attacking alliance Y, alliance Y notices the attack going on and they're able to rush to their defense. TiDi goes into effect, slowing the system down to 10% and making the fight last forever. Alliance Z has been planning to invade alliance X and hearing about this fight, instead of trying to just get on killmails, goes and logs on caps and supercaps and takes a part of alliance X's sov because alliance X can't get back to defend their systems. So now if you attack someone you're also forced to leave behind a defense fleet in case someone tries to take your sov while you're fighting for someone else's sov. Which means that alliance X can only field about half of their numbers for an attack, meanwhile the defender doesn't have to worry about fielding fleets in multiple regions.

Or probably more far-fetched, alliance Y decides "screw this" and does a "sov flip" on X.

What you find shocking, they find amusing.

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#51 - 2013-10-27 20:58:15 UTC
Get rid of all of it. I don't need a flag to tell me that my corp 'owns' a system and neither do I need to see our name on a map. We own a system by dominating all traffic within it. Territories need a reliable and consistent military to maintain them if you don't have that you don't have 'sov' even if your name is on the map.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Baaldor
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#52 - 2013-10-27 21:07:13 UTC
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Get rid of all of it. I don't need a flag to tell me that my corp 'owns' a system and neither do I need to see our name on a map. We own a system by dominating all traffic within it. Territories need a reliable and consistent military to maintain them if you don't have that you don't have 'sov' even if your name is on the map.


yes, to hell with all the other peeps that are into building empires, creating content and the amazing ability to herd cats...
Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#53 - 2013-10-27 21:10:50 UTC
Roby Omanid wrote:
I know nothing about grinding hubs for sov, so correct me if this scenario is a bad example...


Naw, the outcome is alliances forming whenever it's convenient for them, and trying to out-spam their own structures and out-grind the enemy's structures so that the enemy loses activity at a higher rate to burnout from absolutely eye-stabbingly nauseating gameplay.

Which, unfortunately, is not far off where we are now with Dominion, but this would be even worse.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#54 - 2013-10-27 21:11:47 UTC
Baaldor wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Get rid of all of it. I don't need a flag to tell me that my corp 'owns' a system and neither do I need to see our name on a map. We own a system by dominating all traffic within it. Territories need a reliable and consistent military to maintain them if you don't have that you don't have 'sov' even if your name is on the map.


yes, to hell with all the other peeps that are into building empires, creating content and the amazing ability to herd cats...


I think what he means is **** the "name on the map" aspect of sov, and make it about actual tangible effects on gameplay, not focus the whole thing on some generally meaningless flag-planting at the expense of the actual gameplay involved.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#55 - 2013-10-27 22:43:02 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Baaldor wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Get rid of all of it. I don't need a flag to tell me that my corp 'owns' a system and neither do I need to see our name on a map. We own a system by dominating all traffic within it. Territories need a reliable and consistent military to maintain them if you don't have that you don't have 'sov' even if your name is on the map.


yes, to hell with all the other peeps that are into building empires, creating content and the amazing ability to herd cats...


I think what he means is **** the "name on the map" aspect of sov, and make it about actual tangible effects on gameplay, not focus the whole thing on some generally meaningless flag-planting at the expense of the actual gameplay involved.


There is some merit to that, I'd say. In quite a few systems, it wouldn't really matter to anyone if the Goons dropped sov on them tomorrow. The fact that the flag still flies is largely due to the desire to flip everyone else the virtual bird by having that much sov.

At least, from what I can tell. I am neither an interested party nor part of the Goon finance team, so whatever benefit, if any, they gain from holding those systems would be beyond me.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#56 - 2013-10-27 22:49:05 UTC
Yeah, it's mostly psychological, though holding sov for strategic station control is the most common practical reason to hold space you don't use, which is solved by decoupling station control from sovereignty.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#57 - 2013-10-27 23:23:46 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
In quite a few systems, it wouldn't really matter to anyone if the Goons dropped sov on them tomorrow. The fact that the flag still flies is largely due to the desire to flip everyone else the virtual bird by having that much sov.

Progodlegend would love a good staging system for the invasion in which his coalition will fulfill the stated goal for which it exists.
Varius Xeral wrote:
Yeah, it's mostly psychological, though holding sov for strategic station control is the most common practical reason to hold space you don't use, which is solved by decoupling station control from sovereignty.

Also, you want ihub upgrades, for general use. Renters care about this in particular.

Oh yeah also jump bridges (nerf force projectionnnnn), cyno beacons (free killmails) and cyojammers.

And sov bonuses for towers. Which will be less important as your gains will be siphoned away, grr goons siphon all their reaction farms

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#58 - 2013-10-27 23:52:42 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
If timers stay, then I suppose siphons should have timers as well.

I must say, I think the siphons could have been done differently. As they stand, they seem like they are good for little more than griefing.

Griefing goons, perhaps.

Varius Xeral wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
If timers stay, then I suppose siphons should have timers as well.

They should. However, I'm all for siphons being released as currently envisioned, so people can get an unmitigated view of structure spam and grind ping-pong at its absolute worst, and why it is an absolutely terrible idea.

Yes, more structures.

For best effect though, treat them like a pos module, where you get them into structure and then they are "reinforced" (like incapped) and you must rep them up to 50% shields, 100% armor/structure before they can be used again.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#59 - 2013-10-28 00:01:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Actually this gives me an idea.

Instead of gates, use pos-based methods to decide if the station/ihub is invulnerable. So it's like this,

You need a sovereignty blockade unit on more than half of the planets.

For each planet, you need a sovereignty invasion unit on more than half of the moons. ( You can put sovereignty invasion units on grid with a hostile pos). For planets with no moons, you can just sbu the planet.

You can have multiple online SBU/SIUs at any time. This does away with defensive SBUing. They will have to be placeable like siphons, not snap-to a grid.


Once online, a SIU has one shield reinforce timer. One onlined, a SBU has two (shield, armor) reinforce timer. The TCU should be placed on the sun now, it has three (shield, armor, structure) timers.


Basically, once you have a SBU up, it works even if you lose control over the moons. But if you don't have control, you can't online a SBU. Same for TCUs. Having more than half of the planets SBUed only allows you to online a TCU, previously online TCUs will all count for sov in the order they were onlined. So if there were already four TCUs up, you'd have to destroy them and make sure #5 was yours.

Of course if your enemy starts onlining 10 more tcus when you drop SIUs on their pos, you have to destroy all 15 and make sure #16 if yours.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Felicity Love
Doomheim
#60 - 2013-10-28 00:03:53 UTC
Grinds.

More than anything, people hate "stuff" that takes too much time.

Case in point, look at how Anchoring/Unanchoring timers have changed over the years.

Any "new" system needs to address the time requirements of the actual doing of "x" or "y", rather than timers designed to allow participation and/or responses from competing parties.

Ugh

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )