These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

[Request] Prevent Incursions Mothership from being killed immediately after appearing

First post
Author
Mortis Aguila
PushmePullyou Industrial Services
#1 - 2013-10-25 18:27:16 UTC
I've only been running Incursions for about two months. So I have little objective knowledge of "how things used to be". But from what little exposure I've had to inter-community politics and the infantile temper tantrums resulting from lost in-site contests, the current state of Incursions appears to me to be #BROKEN#.

In recent weeks, one or two shield Incursion communities have taken it upon themselves (for whatever reason) to ruin the gameplay for all Incursion runners by killing the Mothership as soon as it appears, lately within 12-16 hours of the Incursion first spawning, rather than leaving it up for a few days so players can get a chance to run HQ, Assault and Vanguard sites without having to travel 30+ jumps every day to get to the next spawn.

At the risk of incurring the wrath of those who claim "Eve is a sandbox! Wah, wah, wah!" whenever somebody complains about a broken game mechanic, I'd like to make a suggestion to fix the problem:

Since the primary motivation of the above referenced shield communities for popping the mom appears to be to grief the entire Incursions community as punishment for perceived offenses committed by one or more armor communities, I suggest changing the spawn mechanic to remove the detrimental effect to the entire Incursions community. This can be done by re-spawning another Incursion in the same location as the one just killed if the mom is popped less than seven days after appearing. Over-farming of the mom site can be prevented by removing the reward for completing the site if it is run within a week of the mothership's appearance. It doesn't need to be a week, just a reasonable length of time to discourage childish temper tantrums which diminish the enjoyment of the game for the greater community.

Waiting expectantly for the rants of the griefers whose entire reason for playing is to think of ways to make as many people as possible angry. :3
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#2 - 2013-10-26 04:31:53 UTC
What's the problem here?

Some guys just seem to be more efficient than others.
Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#3 - 2013-10-26 12:45:48 UTC
hahahahahaha

abloobloobloobloo

never gonna happen

this made my morning. your salty incursion tears have fueled me for an entire day

i need a cigarette after that

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-10-26 16:11:59 UTC
So you're mad at people for completing the content as CCP intended, instead of abusing the mechanics to farm it for more money?

I see.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-10-26 16:19:58 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
So you're mad at people for completing the content as CCP intended, instead of abusing the mechanics to farm it for more money?

I see.



Yeah pretty much this.

Sympathy level = 0.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#6 - 2013-10-26 17:57:47 UTC
I heard a rumour that the direct application of sufficent DPS will stop anyone from shooting NPCs.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Mortis Aguila
PushmePullyou Industrial Services
#7 - 2013-10-26 18:15:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Mortis Aguila
Didn't expect sympathy. Did expect ridicule. Just documenting (again) that douchebaggery is rampant and encouraged in this game.
oOReikaOo Michiko
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2013-10-26 18:21:47 UTC
Mortis Aguila wrote:
Didn't expect sympathy. Just documenting (again) that douchebaggery is encouraged in this game.


This is where the correct application of "Yea this is EVE!" is permitted

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfSDNPFCPfY

Mra Rednu
Vanishing Point.
#9 - 2013-10-26 23:03:44 UTC
Nerf shields, that will show them !!
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#10 - 2013-10-27 09:58:53 UTC
Counter-proposal:

Remove ALL other sites when the mothership spawns. 100% risk free isk faucets are a BAD THING, this would at least turn off the flow early.
Mortis Aguila
PushmePullyou Industrial Services
#11 - 2013-10-27 15:44:25 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:

Remove ALL other sites when the mothership spawns. 100% risk free isk faucets are a BAD THING, this would at least turn off the flow early.

Destruction of the mothership does not increase or reduce risk to the fleets while running incursion sites. It simply ends the incursion. Those of us who want to participate in incursions and do not have the means of assembling a fleet capable of running the Kundalini Manifest site are cut off from running the lower tiered sites due to the almost immediate destruction of the mothership as soon as it appears. My complaint is not that fleets capable of killing the mom are killing the mom. That's the purpose of the site.

I have no facts, just hearsay to back this up, but it appears certain shield communities are intentionally running back-to-back HQ sites, not merely to reap the ISK/LP rewards for those sites, but primarily to run the red out of the bar and causing the mom to spawn, then immediately kill it. Again, not primarily to reap the ISK/LP rewards, but to deny access to that incursion by all players as soon as possible. Again, hearsay tells me that the reason they are doing this is in response to being butthurt over armor fleets occasionally contesting a site, and sometimes winning those contests.

While I can understand the irritation of having to deal with a contest when you're trying to run sites, I don't think it adheres to the spirit of the game to pitch a hissy-fit and intentionally take a dump in EVERYBODY'S oatmeal.
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2013-10-27 15:50:55 UTC
Mortis Aguila wrote:
I have no facts, just hearsay to back this up, but it appears certain shield communities are intentionally running back-to-back HQ sites, not merely to reap the ISK/LP rewards for those sites, but primarily to run the red out of the bar and causing the mom to spawn, then immediately kill it. Again, not primarily to reap the ISK/LP rewards, but to deny access to that incursion by all players as soon as possible. Again, hearsay tells me that the reason they are doing this is in response to being butthurt over armor fleets occasionally contesting a site, and sometimes winning those contests.

What if they just legitimately want to rid highsec of the Sansha menace as fast as possible?
Mortis Aguila
PushmePullyou Industrial Services
#13 - 2013-10-27 18:26:57 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
Mortis Aguila wrote:
I have no facts, just hearsay to back this up, but it appears certain shield communities are intentionally running back-to-back HQ sites, not merely to reap the ISK/LP rewards for those sites, but primarily to run the red out of the bar and causing the mom to spawn, then immediately kill it. Again, not primarily to reap the ISK/LP rewards, but to deny access to that incursion by all players as soon as possible. Again, hearsay tells me that the reason they are doing this is in response to being butthurt over armor fleets occasionally contesting a site, and sometimes winning those contests.

What if they just legitimately want to rid highsec of the Sansha menace as fast as possible?

If true, that would be very heroic of them. I would arrange a ticker tape parade in their honor.
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#14 - 2013-10-27 18:34:08 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Mortis Aguila wrote:
While I can understand the irritation of having to deal with a contest when you're trying to run sites, I don't think it adheres to the spirit of the game to pitch a hissy-fit and intentionally take a dump in EVERYBODY'S oatmeal.

Soooooo... war dec them? Or hire gankers/spies to take them out? Rather than be passive aggressive and ask for mechanical changes to the game... why not actually retaliate directly (or semi-directly) until they stop?

edit:
To me, this all seems to be in the spirit of the game. The shield-runners don't like people competing against them so they "burn everything" hoping it makes their competitors/enemies move on.
It's a valid tactic... no worse than people running away from a fight they are not assured of winning... or docking up whenever non-friendlies enter a system... or ganking a poor sob that got separated from everyone else.
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#15 - 2013-10-27 23:31:50 UTC
I really don't see why you are posting here about this.

The scorched earth policy being used is not the result of any CCP created mechanic but is the result of player actions and does not appear in any way to violate the EULA. If anything (I admit from an outsiders point of view) its refreshing to see something besides ISK farming happening in the Incursion community.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-10-28 00:29:48 UTC
Samillian wrote:
I really don't see why you are posting here about this.

The scorched earth policy being used is not the result of any CCP created mechanic but is the result of player actions and does not appear in any way to violate the EULA. If anything (I admit from an outsiders point of view) its refreshing to see something besides ISK farming happening in the Incursion community.


Nailed it.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-10-28 01:55:42 UTC  |  Edited by: mynnna
Mortis Aguila wrote:
Danika Princip wrote:

Remove ALL other sites when the mothership spawns. 100% risk free isk faucets are a BAD THING, this would at least turn off the flow early.

Destruction of the mothership does not increase or reduce risk to the fleets while running incursion sites. It simply ends the incursion. Those of us who want to participate in incursions and do not have the means of assembling a fleet capable of running the Kundalini Manifest site are cut off from running the lower tiered sites due to the almost immediate destruction of the mothership as soon as it appears. My complaint is not that fleets capable of killing the mom are killing the mom. That's the purpose of the site.

I have no facts, just hearsay to back this up, but it appears certain shield communities are intentionally running back-to-back HQ sites, not merely to reap the ISK/LP rewards for those sites, but primarily to run the red out of the bar and causing the mom to spawn, then immediately kill it. Again, not primarily to reap the ISK/LP rewards, but to deny access to that incursion by all players as soon as possible. Again, hearsay tells me that the reason they are doing this is in response to being butthurt over armor fleets occasionally contesting a site, and sometimes winning those contests.

While I can understand the irritation of having to deal with a contest when you're trying to run sites, I don't think it adheres to the spirit of the game to pitch a hissy-fit and intentionally take a dump in EVERYBODY'S oatmeal.



You know what it sounds like to me, from your description here?

It sounds like you engaged in some PvP - perhaps indirectly, but PvP nevertheless - with the shield fleets by contesting a site they were going for, thus harming their wallets. Now they're striking back - namely, by shutting off your farming ability as quickly as possible - and you're whining that they're being unfair.

Basically, it sounds like you're no better than a typical schoolyard bully. You pick on the other kid until he lashes back, then you run to the teacher. Only difference is that this is EVE, not the schoolyard, so there's no bull**** zero tolerance policies that get the other kid expelled for protecting himself.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Querns
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-10-28 02:32:54 UTC
I would recommend that if you do not like the fact that someone is intentionally shutting off the incursion early, that you mount your finest battlesteeds and engage them in hounourable Player vs. Player combat.

If you're unwilling to do this to protect your money making schemes, I'm afraid Eve is gonna be a pretty unfriendly place for you, especially in the next 6-36 months.

This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#19 - 2013-10-28 02:35:22 UTC
mynnna wrote:
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
So you're mad at people for completing the content as CCP intended, instead of abusing the mechanics to farm it for more money?

I see.



Yeah pretty much this.

Sympathy level = 0.


We may need a number smaller than 0 here.

Get some of our top men on this.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Mortis Aguila
PushmePullyou Industrial Services
#20 - 2013-10-28 03:18:57 UTC
In hindsight, this was probably the wrong place to post in an effort to instigate an uproar at the behavior of certain Incursion communities. Apologies for that. In response to the commentor who thinks denying access to the Incursions gameplay to the entire Eve community because they got their panties in a twist about being contested by a fleet from another community in a site ... I'm glad you didn't have access to nuclear weapons when somebody picked on you in your childhood.
123Next page