These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[NEWS] “Operation Highlander” documents released, implicate Federation in widespread spying

Author
TomHorn
Horn Brothers Holdings Inc.
#201 - 2013-10-29 16:50:40 UTC
Quote:
Which is why you'll surely support the CEP if they order Heth's execution.


No i wont Andreus. I dont call the man who won back home and freed us from Federation tyranny a traitor.

I was right, Heth was right when we talked about enemies from within. CEP has been compromised and is not fit for purpose. All the megas have been infiltrated with enemy agents, and top executives have worked with the Federation against the State. The ruling that Heth was a terrorist and a traitor should be overturned. Where ever Heth is he is likely gone for good and not coming back. Let us remember the glory and treat him with dignity

The provist party should also be reinstated as a legal political entity within the State.
Anslo
Scope Works
#202 - 2013-10-29 16:53:16 UTC
Heth was bad for business. He almost drove KK into the ground, fueled paranoia, and just gave everyone an ulcer for no reason.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#203 - 2013-10-29 17:05:09 UTC
TomHorn wrote:


I was right, Heth was right when we talked about enemies from within. CEP has been compromised and is not fit for purpose. All the megas have been infiltrated with enemy agents, and top executives have worked with the Federation against the State..


And this is the guy that thinks I need a tinfoil hat... yikes.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#204 - 2013-10-29 17:05:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
TomHorn wrote:
Quote:
Which is why you'll surely support the CEP if they order Heth's execution.


No i wont Andreus. I dont call the man who won back home and freed us from Federation tyranny a traitor.

I was right, Heth was right when we talked about enemies from within. CEP has been compromised and is not fit for purpose. All the megas have been infiltrated with enemy agents, and top executives have worked with the Federation against the State. The ruling that Heth was a terrorist and a traitor should be overturned. Where ever Heth is he is likely gone for good and not coming back. Let us remember the glory and treat him with dignity

The provist party should also be reinstated as a legal political entity within the State.


So you're refusing a legal finding of the CEP, a legal finding by the CBT and numerous legal findings by the boards of several of the Okusaiken?

Did you enjoy being Caldari? Because now you're one of those filthy traitors you've been railing against.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Indira Harashani
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#205 - 2013-10-29 17:21:09 UTC
TomHorn wrote:
I dont call the man who won back home and freed us from Federation tyranny a traitor.

Perhaps I have missed a news report or two, but exactly when was it announced that Tibus Heth was, in fact, Yakiya Tovil-Toba risen from the grave, or reincarnated or what-have-you?

Lady Indira Harashani

Holder of the Kheryskova Archipelago, Kihtaled IV

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#206 - 2013-10-29 17:36:34 UTC
It find it alarming how so many people are disloyal to the Federation while as we speak, young men and women are giving their lives so you can keep calling yourself "Gallente". The Federation helps you in ways you probably take for granted. The best example of the sucess of the Federation is that you often don't notice it.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Anslo
Scope Works
#207 - 2013-10-29 17:57:15 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
It find it alarming how so many people are disloyal to the Federation while as we speak, young men and women are giving their lives so you can keep calling yourself "Gallente". The Federation helps you in ways you probably take for granted. The best example of the sucess of the Federation is that you often don't notice it.

I don't need the Federation to call myself Gallente. Hell people don't even call me Gallente because of my heritage, so no skin off my nose. I don't need a government to know who I am.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#208 - 2013-10-29 19:57:11 UTC
Makoto Priano wrote:
Khross-haan; I'm certain I've said this elsewhere, but I'll say it again. It's a pleasure to see you taking a more active interest in affairs again.


Your words are a welcome kindness, Priano-haani and I thank you. Though, truly, I am only one man and there are far more deserving individuals of such accolades.

~Malcolm Khross

TomHorn
Horn Brothers Holdings Inc.
#209 - 2013-10-30 18:29:08 UTC
CEP have released their statement today.

New Caldari – The Chief Executive Panel has released a joint statement on behalf of all CEOs of the megacorporations refuting the portion of the Operation Highlander dossier leaked by the Scope last week. “The megacorporations of the Caldari State completely deny that any executives worked with the Gallente Federation in bringing about the downfall of Tibus Heth or the invasion of Caldari Prime,” their statement said.

source http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/cep-denounces-operation-highlander-leak/
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#210 - 2013-10-30 19:16:05 UTC
So, pretty much what we've been saying all along. Good to hear.

Katrina Oniseki

Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#211 - 2013-10-30 19:22:19 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
It find it alarming how so many people are disloyal to the Federation while as we speak, young men and women are giving their lives so you can keep calling yourself "Gallente". The Federation helps you in ways you probably take for granted. The best example of the sucess of the Federation is that you often don't notice it.


The best part of the Federation is that, Progressor grumps to the contrary, we don't obsess over loyalty and betrayal. Flexibility and promiscuity are our strengths, not our weaknesses.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#212 - 2013-10-30 20:57:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Fredfredbug4
Anslo wrote:
I don't need a government to know who I am.

That's not what I was saying. What I'm saying is that you are a citizen of this country, act like one and be proud of it.

Andrea Okazon wrote:

The best part of the Federation is that, Progressor grumps to the contrary, we don't obsess over loyalty and betrayal.


Which I guess is why we bombed Caldari Prime and a hundred years later, burned a man alive for the entire cluster to see.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Bataav
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#213 - 2013-10-30 22:25:47 UTC
The original topic of this discussion wasn't something I'd intended to comment on, but as the discussion has touched on Intaki secession, I think it'd be neglectful of me not to respond to some of the points made.

I'd like to focus on some aspects of the commentary from the pro-Fed participants that I believe are relevent to current affairs in the Federation - namely the topic of 'minorities within the whole', whether they be cultural or ethnic or, in the case of Intaki secession, political.

First though I want to highlight something that's played on my mind for a long time:

Caellach Marellus wrote:
Makoto Priano wrote:
...why so many Intaki joined the Legion or formed the Syndicate...
So many Intaki would be the 5,000 that were exiled to form the Syndicate? That's hardly many...

5000? That's a very nice round number, isn't it? I question it, taking it to be a neat and tidy head count by the Federal U-Nats of the time.

The fact that this "statistic" is so universally accepted as fact though, is perhaps down to a misreading of the history books. A popular reference source tells us that ...the Federation quickly subdued the Intaki. Those deemed the biggest threat to the stability of the regime were arrested and exiled. Some of these went over to the Caldari side, but the majority of the exiles, some five thousand in total, went out into the great unknown at the outskirts of Federation space.

There weren't 5000 exiles, there were others, uncounted, that chose the State.

How many? One thousand? Two? We could add 50% or more to the "5000" founders of the Syndicate, and still the text would be accurate. And what of dependents? How many wives went with their exiled husbands? How many children were there? Siblings.. Elderly parents...

5000? We could double that figure easily.

And Vremaja Idama is on record as saying that in the wake of the bombardment of Caldari Prime, the Intaki held their tongues. How many would-be exiles remained in Placid? How many lowered their eyes in fear of Gallente reprisal?

And this 5000 is a number upon which the scale of Intaki dissatisfaction is measured? What other demographic statistics should we question?

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
...the overwhelming majority of the Intaki...

This one?

We openly acknowledge that yes, we are in the minority. But "minority" and "majority" are just vague blanket terms. If we take a number at random I think we can agree that 80% would be an overwhelming majority in political terms. But should the remaining 20% - a fifth of the population - simply be ignored?

The pro-Feds certainly paint secessionists as little more than an vocal irrelevence, an irritation to be brushed away, rather than actually acknowledge and engage with. Regardless of the actual numbers our concerns are valid and our position is deserving of respect, regardless of whether you agree with it or not.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
TomHorn wrote:
Long live a free Intaki

... we sneer.

Indeed.

Whatever happened to the Federation being the land of free speech and democracy? From our perspective it seems more like the land of media-driven popularism and herd mentality.
Bataav
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#214 - 2013-10-30 22:26:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Bataav
The only time the Federation champions it's minority groups is when it's convenient. We're often reminded that "a full third of the Federation is Minmatar!" A beacon of multiculturalism. An ethnic melting pot to be proud of. The Intaki system enjoys the benefits of migration too.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
billions of non-Intaki Federal citizens live and work on planets that would be inside a notional "independent Intaki nation?"

Very true, though not actually relevent to the secessionist cause. I'm sorry Andreus, but the Gallente Federation does not hold a monopoly on multi-ethnic societies in New Eden, and such diversity would not be a burden on an independent Intaki sovereignty.

I encourage people to question these accepted truths regarding the Intaki political landscape, these broad brush-stroke references to the "overwhelming" scale of Federal support. I wonder what results a vote would bring...

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
TomHorn wrote:
You cant have any objections to a referendum.
You don't seem to understand how the system works...

Andreus is right. For a referendum to take place the people require the right to vote and the Senate took that away from us.

But flippancy aside...

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
A referendum would not be handled by the Federal Senate - it would be organised by the Intaki Assembly. The Intaki Assembly is the political entity responsible for the overwhelming majority of legislative and executive decisions in Intaki space, and if a referendum on Intaki independence were to be discussed, it would be discussed by them. That's how decentralised government in the Federation actually works.

On most issues, yes. But the Assembly only has juristiction within the Intaki system and the secessionist movement covers a wider area.

Remember, the Assembly awarded shipping and security contracts to Ishukone and Mordu's Legion in Intaki only. It exercised it's right to turn away the Federal Navy at the gate to Intaki.

I'm not aware if a single case where its powers have extended beyond the system's boundaries.

Therefore, while any vote would be localised, I believe the scale of the issue to be such that it would fall to the Senate to call a referendum.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#215 - 2013-10-30 22:53:53 UTC
For an organisation that constantly whines about others taking their statements out of context or intentionally twisting their intent, the ILF sure seem to be masters of it.

Bataav wrote:
Very true, though not actually relevent to the secessionist cause. I'm sorry Andreus, but the Gallente Federation does not hold a monopoly on multi-ethnic societies in New Eden, and such diversity would not be a burden on an independent Intaki sovereignty.

Either you intentionally misread my statement or you didn't understand the point I was making. I find either possibility shameful.

The point isn't that they're non-Intaki Federal citizens. The point is that they're non-Intaki Federal citizens, whom - ironically enough - almost every Intaki seccessionalist movement conveniently forgets when it suits them. Leaving aside the subject of Intaki Federal unionists - who, it always gives me great pleasure to remind seccessionalists, comprise an absolute majority of the population of any suggested seccession territory - for a moment, the seccessionalist movement completely ignores between millions (at the lowest proposed extent) and hundreds of millions (at the highest) of Federal citizens who would suddenly, through no fault of their own, be Federal citizens in a territory outside of Federal space.

I suppose they should just pack up and move off our land?

Bataav wrote:
On most issues, yes. But the Assembly only has juristiction within the Intaki system and the secessionist movement covers a wider area.

Remember, the Assembly awarded shipping and security contracts to Ishukone and Mordu's Legion in Intaki only. It exercised it's right to turn away the Federal Navy at the gate to Intaki.

I'm not aware if a single case where its powers have extended beyond the system's boundaries.

Regional governments, no matter how powerful, do not have executive or legislative power over areas outside their mandated region? Working as intended.

What? That means that the Intaki Assembly cannot push certain seccessionalist agendas because some of its aims are out of scope? Well, that's the fault of the seccessionalist movement for attempting to move the scope of the issue beyond the Intaki system. Seccession of other planets or systems are matters for their specific governments to decide.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Ailer Stane
Doomheim
#216 - 2013-10-30 23:11:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Ailer Stane
Bataav wrote:
But the Assembly only has juristiction within the Intaki system and the secessionist movement covers a wider area.

Remember, the Assembly awarded shipping and security contracts to Ishukone and Mordu's Legion in Intaki only. It exercised it's right to turn away the Federal Navy at the gate to Intaki.

I'm not aware if a single case where its powers have extended beyond the system's boundaries.

Therefore, while any vote would be localised, I believe the scale of the issue to be such that it would fall to the Senate to call a referendum.

Learned Sir.

While the Assembly may focus on matters related specifically to the Intaki system. Isn't the Assembly itself comprised of representatives from the various "colonies"? Embodied in the membership of the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha?

What then, in your opinion comprises an enfranchised Intaki?

Should a referendum be approved who would be allowed to vote?

Non Intaki within the purposed "sovereignty"?

The wider Intaki diaspora?

Please know that while I disagree with your chosen solution to "Intaki's" many problems I value and respect your opinion.
Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#217 - 2013-10-31 00:18:35 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Anslo wrote:
I don't need a government to know who I am.

That's not what I was saying. What I'm saying is that you are a citizen of this country, act like one and be proud of it.

Andrea Okazon wrote:

The best part of the Federation is that, Progressor grumps to the contrary, we don't obsess over loyalty and betrayal.


Which I guess is why we bombed Caldari Prime and a hundred years later, burned a man alive for the entire cluster to see.


Like all the empires, our society is sick. But we have the medicine we need to get better.
Bataav
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#218 - 2013-10-31 00:22:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Bataav
Mr Stane, your question is well timed and cuts directly to the root of the issue.

You ask: Who would be allowed to vote?

This is not a matter for enfranchised Intaki. It is a matter for all citizens, regardless of ethnicity or heritage, of what could be an Intaki sovereignty.

Set ethnicity aside. It's a distraction from the issues that matter when it comes to the secessionist debate. It's why fringe groups such as Intaki Pure fail to gain ground.

Ixiris appears to suggest that any referendum would only happen to non-Intaki citizens, rather than with them.He seems to think they would be singled out and excluded. Why? The full particiption of all affected should be encouraged, welcomed and valued.

I do not identify these people as "non-Intaki Federal citizens", or "non-Intaki Federal citizens", as if changing the emphasis in that sentence helps address the day to day issues that affect their lives. I see these people as citizens of Intaki, citizens of Agoze, and so on.

They are the people from whom the Federal Senate removed the right to vote. They are the people who find their homes on the front line in the war between Federation and State, while their neighbours in the independent Intaki Syndicate have avoided the conflict.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Regional governments, no matter how powerful, do not have executive or legislative power over areas outside their mandated region? Working as intended.

We understand that under the current Federal model, the Assembly's juristiction is restricted, and so we do not shy away from engaging with the neighbouring local governments as well. However, there exists a level of autonomy for the Assembly, and so just as with any other executive body that has a duty of care towards its people, they too should be held accountable for their short comings.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#219 - 2013-10-31 00:34:44 UTC
Andrea Okazon wrote:


Like all the empires, our society is sick. But we have the medicine we need to get better.


Which is why we need loyal citizens who are willing to make it better.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#220 - 2013-10-31 00:51:52 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Andrea Okazon wrote:


Like all the empires, our society is sick. But we have the medicine we need to get better.


Which is why we need loyal citizens who are willing to make it better.


We do.