These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Alteration of Scripture.

Author
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#21 - 2013-10-22 01:29:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
Corruption is no reason for the Scriptures to remain static because corruption happens whether something changes over time or not. How many people would be able to read the original, untranslated texts? The vast majority wouldn't be able to. They would be reliant on the interpretations of others, and with that comes the possibility of corruption.

Not to mention that I'm not even sure how a static Scripture would be created. The earliest texts predate the original Empire and likely originated from oral histories and stories.

Besides, God could decide to send a prophet to us tomorrow and their words would be added. We don't get to decide when the Scriptures are 'done.'

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#22 - 2013-10-22 05:25:59 UTC
I with to clarify a bit. I am not accusing the Theology Council of being corrupt. Nor am I accusing them of altering scripture to suit the whims of their political masters, or themselves. I am not saying that the Scriptures should remain static, untranslated from their original. The Scriptures should be readily accessible to all that would desire to read them.

What gives me pause is the possibility of translating the Scriptures with an agenda. Even more so with the Theology Council having an interest in the outcome. Even more so with one of the recent leaders of the Theology Council being a Blood Raider.

The Scriptures were presented to me as words inspired by the divine that reveal the will and mysteries of God. Now, I find out that the translations and edits may be biased. Again, I am not certain one way or another. That gives me doubt, and doubt is the antithesis of faith.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#23 - 2013-10-22 10:59:25 UTC
While individual translations might have political agendas, those political agendas will be detected by other scholars of the scriptures and dealt with. There are many individuals in the Empire who are capable of producing a translation of ancient texts, after all.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#24 - 2013-10-22 11:49:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Alizabeth Vea
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
While individual translations might have political agendas, those political agendas will be detected by other scholars of the scriptures and dealt with. There are many individuals in the Empire who are capable of producing a translation of ancient texts, after all.

But, isn't the ultimate decider of what is accurate the Theology Council? Also, would they not be the greatest concentration of Scriptural scholars?

Edit: Apologies if I seem belligerent, it is not my intention.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#25 - 2013-10-22 12:29:00 UTC
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
While individual translations might have political agendas, those political agendas will be detected by other scholars of the scriptures and dealt with. There are many individuals in the Empire who are capable of producing a translation of ancient texts, after all.

But, isn't the ultimate decider of what is accurate the Theology Council? Also, would they not be the greatest concentration of Scriptural scholars?


I think the essence of the issue lays in how many of us are working on the Scriptures. We may not all be aware of the most recent, cutting edge bits and pieces coming out of space, but the very vast majority of Scriptural work is looked over, constantly and consistently, but regular Amarrians. There was a time, when the Council of Apostles were the arbiters of government, that such wasn't the case. They really did have the ultimate authority on what was translated from the Scriptures. The more modern Theology Council may have exactly the same conflict of interest, but very little of the opportunity to really twist the Scriptures into something that suits them. After all, we've all got eyes on it.

Where the Theology Council has any leeway, it is probably with the bits and pieces of Scripture they are still finding. They often are the ones that decide whether or not a piece of sculpture, fragments of story on papyrus, or piece of early engineering are officially Scripture. If it isn't, they can feasibly lock it away somewhere. There might by a long shot that they are hiding something important, and certainly there are organizations within the Amarr Empire who specialize in digging deep into those libraries looking to find some piece of history buried out of sight. A full text from the Council of Apostle days was found in a bank vault about twenty years ago that completely changed our notion of spiritual embodiment. Things like this do happen.

Overall, though, the Moral Reforms made sure that even non-ecclesiastical Amarrians are keeping their eyes on theological authorities. It's become a win-win situation for the Empire. Not only does it prevent the Theology Council from following in the footsteps of their predecessors, but all Amarrians have become better educated as a result. We boast an extremely high literacy rate for, after all, slaves threshing wheat still need to be able to read Scripture. I'm not sure if it was the point of the Moral Reforms to do these sorts of things, but they have surely been the beneficial effects of them.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#26 - 2013-10-22 12:33:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Strictly speaking, every translation has an agenda. As the Scriptures are partly political in nature, partly have implications for politics, the agenda of translating the Scriptures and interpreting them (as every translation is always also by necessity an interpretive act) is always somewhat politcal.

What Needs to be done, then, is not to ensure that a translation is done without an agenda, but that it is done with the right agenda. Part of that is done by the standards of proper exegesis, about which I already wrote here on the Summit, which includes peer Review, as Admiral Lok'ri stressed. The other is the drawn out education and selection process for those that get into the Theology Council. And as far as I know None of the leaders of the Theology Council were Blood Raiders, you might confuse this with the Heretic Karsoth, who was Court Chamberlain, which is quite distinct from being a leader of the Theology Council. Though even he wasn't part of the Blood Raider cult, but cavorting with them.

Even though the Scriptures are words inspired by the divine that reveal the will and mysteries of God, they are, quite probably, biased here and there. They have been written down by humans after all, at a certain time, for a certain time. Bias is something intrinsic in the human condition. This, though, is no reason to stop striving to find God's plan for oneself and use the best tools available for this. The flaws of humans, that are caused by our seperation from God, shouldn't be what makes us doubt that we need reconciliation with God - quite the contrary! So, the bias we find even in the Scriptures should remind us that we are not supposed to idolize a text, but strive for the true healing that lies in reuniting with God.

The Scriptures are about the best tool we have, if we use it with reason, as reason certainly is a faculty God bestowed upon us not so that we don't use it. Still, one should never forget that even the Scriptures are not an end in themselves, will never reval the enitre fullness of God and are flawed compared to Him. They are a means to an end. We should use them as a tool to grow our faith, but that means that we Need to use them the right way. Salvation doesn't depend on the Scriptures being entirely free of bias. We can't demand a book that ensures our slavation. Salvation is, ultimately, something that is acquired by personal effort. Why should we hope to circumvent that by reading a book?

Rather, reading the Scriptures is something that demands personal effort to discern the will and mysteries of God. Will and mysteries of God aren't revealed to the casual reader of the Scriptures, and the IGS demonstrates that there are countless ways of misinterpreting the Scriptures, as demonstrated by heathens that think they understand them because they read a few fragments of them and now share their eisegesis with the general public. Only true dedication to discerning the will of God and His mysteries, the oppenness to recieve, rather than to introduce ones own egoic wishes, will allow one to recieve what is revealed.

If God is first in ones mind, every text will be alike Scripture, in fact. As God speaks to us constantly in all His creation. It is us who need to listen, though.

As to doubt being the antithesis of faith, I don't quite agree. There are two kinds of doubt: The doubt that is destructive, which leads us to abandon all hope and lay our human potential fallow, and the doubt that is constructive, Wakes our curiosity and activates our potential to recognize what is true. Doubt is a test of faith and only if we succumb to the fallacy that if there is doubt, then there is no space left for the Truth of God, then it is that it is antithetical to faith, because it is a test failed.
Zelarrs Elkoth
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#27 - 2013-10-22 15:38:07 UTC
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
As I understand it, the Theology Council played empress-maker when they declared Jamyl Sarum empress, despite her being a clone.


As a point, they determined her not to be a clone, in spite the pervading opinion outside of the empire.

Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Captain, Head of Diplomacy, Recruiting Officer Contact on channel: "PIE Public" "I walk the razor's edge of embracing the future while protecting what we value of the past."

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#28 - 2013-10-22 15:54:03 UTC
Zelarrs Elkoth wrote:

As a point, they determined her not to be a clone, in spite the pervading opinion outside of the empire.


I would call that a distinction not a difference. It would have been better if they granted some dispensation for her. Something along the lines of: "Sure, she's a clone, but she's clearly chosen by God, so who are we to argue?" What they did was essentially declare a lie to be truth.
After interacting with Lord Filth on the IGS, I looked into the Godflesh doctrine and I have to say, it doesn't make much sense to me.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Zelarrs Elkoth
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#29 - 2013-10-22 16:01:04 UTC
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
Zelarrs Elkoth wrote:

As a point, they determined her not to be a clone, in spite the pervading opinion outside of the empire.


I would call that a distinction not a difference. It would have been better if they granted some dispensation for her. Something along the lines of: "Sure, she's a clone, but she's clearly chosen by God, so who are we to argue?" What they did was essentially declare a lie to be truth.
After interacting with Lord Filth on the IGS, I looked into the Godflesh doctrine and I have to say, it doesn't make much sense to me.


You are taking the belief that she is absolutely is a clone on faith. I grant you that it fits a pattern we see in everyday life and that's a logical assumption, but how do you know for sure?

The Theology Council determined that it's not what appears to be and made a ruling. I have more faith in that than in jumping to conclusions based on assumptions and appearances.

I don't really expect outsiders to, so I understand why you would presume otherwise. It's still a presumption you are taking on faith, unless you have first hand knowledge of this alleged cloning?

Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Captain, Head of Diplomacy, Recruiting Officer Contact on channel: "PIE Public" "I walk the razor's edge of embracing the future while protecting what we value of the past."

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#30 - 2013-10-22 17:13:37 UTC
Zelarrs Elkoth wrote:


You are taking the belief that she is absolutely is a clone on faith. I grant you that it fits a pattern we see in everyday life and that's a logical assumption, but how do you know for sure?

The Theology Council determined that it's not what appears to be and made a ruling. I have more faith in that than in jumping to conclusions based on assumptions and appearances.

I don't really expect outsiders to, so I understand why you would presume otherwise. It's still a presumption you are taking on faith, unless you have first hand knowledge of this alleged cloning?


No, I do not have first hand knowledge of Empress Jamyl being a clone, nor do I have firsthand knowledge of evidence of her being a clone. It simply seems like the most rational, simplest explanation. Either way, her being a clone or not does not matter to me, so I'll drop the issue.

Father Constantin, you have assuaged almost all of my doubts. I guess I simply did not fully understand the number of people in the Empire that concerned themselves with translating Scripture and ensuring accuracy.

Ms. Mithra, your words, as always, are insightful and a wonderful thesis.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#31 - 2013-10-22 17:15:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Odelya d'Hanguest
Ms Vea,

you shouldn’t expect those “insiders” to provide you with answers to your honourable questions, when all you need to answer them is a working mind and some research. The Theology Council and its supporters are corrupting the ancient and righteous ways of our ancestors, the faithful and the just. If it was a lesson in twisted obscurantism you were seeking, you have talked to the right people.

I can assure you without doubt that the TC is corrupting the innocent and spreading perfidiousness. The result can be seen: Where faith and duty should prevail, sectarianism and sycophancy have grown strong.

With kind regards,
Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House d’Hanguest
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#32 - 2013-10-22 17:29:17 UTC
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
While individual translations might have political agendas, those political agendas will be detected by other scholars of the scriptures and dealt with. There are many individuals in the Empire who are capable of producing a translation of ancient texts, after all.

But, isn't the ultimate decider of what is accurate the Theology Council? Also, would they not be the greatest concentration of Scriptural scholars?

Edit: Apologies if I seem belligerent, it is not my intention.


The thing about the Theology Council is that they are a council.

If an individual has a political agenda they won't gain the support of their peers.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#33 - 2013-10-22 17:30:39 UTC
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Ms Vea,

you shouldn’t expect those “insiders” to provide you with answers to your honourable questions, when all you need to answer them is a working mind and some research. The Theology Council and its supporters are corrupting the ancient and righteous ways of our ancestors, the faithful and the just. If it was a lesson in twisted obscurantism you were seeking, you have talked to the right people.

I can assure you without doubt that the TC is corrupting the innocent and spreading perfidiousness. The result is can be seen: Where faith and duty should prevail, sectarianism and sycophancy have grown strong.

With kind regards,
Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House d’Hanguest


Lady d’Hanguest, (I hope I got that title right)
While all the others here have made assertions, they have backed them with facts. If you have any facts to back you claims, please share them. I left this topic in an open forum specifically for this reason.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Isis Dea
Society of Adrift Hope
#34 - 2013-10-22 17:38:32 UTC
I enjoy witnessing the double standards surfacing within this topic. The ways of the faithful clearly are translated differently amongst the different parties.

I wonder how many agendas are involved.

More Character Customization :: Especially compared to what we had in 2003...

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#35 - 2013-10-22 19:01:54 UTC
Isis Dea wrote:
I enjoy witnessing the double standards surfacing within this topic. The ways of the faithful clearly are translated differently amongst the different parties.

I wonder how many agendas are involved.



As whenever a group of humans gather together, there is at least one agenda per individual and one agenda per group of individuals present.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#36 - 2013-10-22 19:12:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Odelya d'Hanguest
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Ms Vea,

you shouldn’t expect those “insiders” to provide you with answers to your honourable questions, when all you need to answer them is a working mind and some research. The Theology Council and its supporters are corrupting the ancient and righteous ways of our ancestors, the faithful and the just. If it was a lesson in twisted obscurantism you were seeking, you have talked to the right people.

I can assure you without doubt that the TC is corrupting the innocent and spreading perfidiousness. The result is can be seen: Where faith and duty should prevail, sectarianism and sycophancy have grown strong.

With kind regards,
Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House d’Hanguest


Lady d’Hanguest, (I hope I got that title right)
While all the others here have made assertions, they have backed them with facts. If you have any facts to back you claims, please share them. I left this topic in an open forum specifically for this reason.
Ms Vea,

I will try to keep this short, but a little excursion into history will have to precede my arguments.

Since its establishment the Empire, it was ruled by emperors, who, as first among equals, were elected by and from the Council of Apostles, which Amash-Akura, our first emperor, established more than fifteen millennia ago. It was for thousands of years that the Empire flourished and rose to greatness. And its sanctified order prevailed—until Heideran V was elected, may the Lord curse this day.

Heideran V, may the Lord curse him and his offspring, declared those who disagreed with him “heretics” and guilty of “prideful disobedience.” What followed was civil war. (A pattern which must seem familiar to those following some recent discussions.) During the turmoil of civil war, which ended with the deceiver’s victory, the Scriptures were manipulated corresponding to the lust for power of Heideran V. For this purpose, and to fill the gap of the Council of Apostles, Heideran V invented the “Theology Council”, to act as a mouthpiece of the emperors.This very syndicate which had sinned against the Word of the Lord, designed the “Succession Trials” from scratch, inventing traditions such as “Shathol'Syn.” All this was coined “Moral Reforms,” for every savagery clothes itself in euphemisms and lies.

Much like Zaragram II had dreamed of, the devoted followers of the new order consider the emperor to be God-like. Is there something more blasphemous?

Take a look at the Scriptures. Most theologians, even the most devious, agree that Book I and II stem from the time of Dano Gheinok, our first prophet, who brought the light into darkness. Long before the Empire was established it was written:

The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited.
Be Careful. Pure Thought is the Instigator of Sin.
Be Watchful. Free Thought is the Begetter of Disorder.
Be Respectful. Uniform Thought is the Way of Life.
The Mercy of our Emperor is Limitless. His Rule is Benign and Righteous. His Love is Perpetual.

- The Scriptures, Book I, The Code of Demeanor

Now, why do the Scripture speak of “our Emperor”? Is it another term for God? But isn’t God usually referred to as “the Lord”? The answer is that the TC (or Zaragram II before them) blasphemed against the Lord, deceiving people into believing that the Word speaks about the Emperor, where it speaks about the Lord Himself, closing the theme of the verse:

The Mercy of God is Limitless. His Rule is Benign and Righteous. His Love is Perpetual.
- The Scriptures, Book I, The Code of Demeanor

The Empire has experienced and battled many such deviant tendencies and heresies. For sure you are familiar with the “Equilibrium of Mankind” the “Sani Sabi.” Now imagine, those cults would have emerged victorious during civil war. Wouldn’t they claim that they are the legitimate rulers of the Empire, which have always been right?

It isn’t about translation. It is about schismatic and criminal forgery.

With kind regards,
Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House d’Hanguest

P.S.: It is “Duchess” [no name] or “Your Grace.”
Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#37 - 2013-10-22 19:53:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Alizabeth Vea
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
Ms Vea,

I will try to keep this short, but a little excursion into history will have to precede my arguments.

Since its establishment the Empire, it was ruled by emperors, who, as first among equals, were elected by and from the Council of Apostles, which Amash-Akura, our first emperor, established more than fifteen millennia ago. It was for thousands of years that the Empire flourished and rose to greatness. And its sanctified order prevailed—until Heideran V was elected, may the Lord curse this day.

Heideran V, may the Lord curse him and his offspring, declared those who disagreed with him “heretics” and guilty of “prideful disobedience.” What followed was civil war. (A pattern which must seem familiar to those following some recent discussions.) During the turmoil of civil war, which ended with the deceiver’s victory, the Scriptures were manipulated corresponding to the lust for power of Heideran V. For this purpose, and to fill the gap of the Council of Apostles, Heideran V invented the “Theology Council”, to act as a mouthpiece of the emperors.This very syndicate which had sinned against the Word of the Lord, designed the “Succession Trials” from scratch, inventing traditions such as “Shathol'Syn.” All this was coined “Moral Reforms,” for every savagery clothes itself in euphemisms and lies.

Much like Zaragram II had dreamed of, the devoted followers of the new order consider the emperor to be God-like. Is there something more blasphemous?

Take a look at the Scriptures. Most theologians, even the most devious, agree that Book I and II stem from the time of Dano Gheinok, our first prophet, who brought the light into darkness. Long before the Empire was established it was written:

The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited.
Be Careful. Pure Thought is the Instigator of Sin.
Be Watchful. Free Thought is the Begetter of Disorder.
Be Respectful. Uniform Thought is the Way of Life.
The Mercy of our Emperor is Limitless. His Rule is Benign and Righteous. His Love is Perpetual.

- The Scriptures, Book I, The Code of Demeanor

Now, why do the Scripture speak of “our Emperor”? Is it another term for God? But isn’t God usually referred to as “the Lord”? The answer is that the TC (or Zaragram II before them) blasphemed against the Lord, deceiving people into believing that the Word speaks about the Emperor, where it speaks about the Lord Himself, closing the theme of the verse:

The Mercy of God is Limitless. His Rule is Benign and Righteous. His Love is Perpetual.
- The Scriptures, Book I, The Code of Demeanor

The Empire has experienced and battled many such deviant tendencies and heresies. For sure you are familiar with the “Equilibrium of Mankind” the “Sani Sabi.” Now imagine, those cults would have emerged victorious during civil war. Wouldn’t they claim that they are the legitimate rulers of the Empire, which have always been right?

It isn’t about translation. It is about schismatic and criminal forgery.

With kind regards,
Odelya Negin Intourtsetseg of House d’Hanguest

P.S.: It is “Duchess” [no name] or “Your Grace.”

I admit, you make a compelling argument. The history is rehashed from what I've already seen written the past few weeks, just looked at from a different light. As a counter argument, it was stated that the Council of Apostles were the arbitrators of Scripture in an absolute way, whereas now, as so stated by Father Constantin, that knowledge and responsibility is much more diffused. Also, you still have not convinced me that the abolition of the Council of Apostles is a bad thing. One of the things that annoyed me with respect to my birth culture is tradition for the sake of tradition. I suppose that no culture can totally rid themselves of this, but there is a point at which it becomes a hindrance. If the Moral Reforms were in response to the 'Mad Emperor' and the failure of the Council of Apostles, as is claimed (although, convincing me of causality with a gap of
fifteen hundred years is going to be pretty difficult), then it would be a good thing, no?

The verse you cite is interesting. If there is not an emperor, as it was when the book was written why would it be referenced? That is an interesting question. Although, I am not so sure that replacing the Emperor with God makes more sense either, as the first and last lines would then conflict. Also in the same book, there is another reference to the emperor, elsewhere.

Quote:
The Amarr people came into the world and the world came into being.
Our illustrious ancestors freed their souls from the evils of the old.
world and created a new one.
The great Amarr Empire was founded to cultivate the spirit of man.
To do so the enemies of the outside had to be defeated and the enemies of the inside controlled.
The Lord gave our Emperor the power to harness the Good and punish the Evil.
Ever since, the Emperor has lived the lives of his subjects and breathed the air of authority.
-The Scriptures, Book I 1:14

Now, herein lies a conundrum. If I accept that the verse you quoted was edited, what about this one? It does reference the Empire and the Emperor. Also any attempt to substitute God in the place of emperor utterly fails. I would be interested in hearing your views on this verse, Your Grace.

I am indeed familiar with the Sani Sabik. Much too familiar, in fact. Should the Sani Sabik ever ascend to a position of power in the Cluster, it would be as bad as Nation.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#38 - 2013-10-22 20:07:54 UTC
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
Zelarrs Elkoth wrote:

As a point, they determined her not to be a clone, in spite the pervading opinion outside of the empire.


I would call that a distinction not a difference. It would have been better if they granted some dispensation for her. Something along the lines of: "Sure, she's a clone, but she's clearly chosen by God, so who are we to argue?" What they did was essentially declare a lie to be truth.

People like to claim the Empress is a clone, but I've never seen them present any evidence to support that claim.

On one hand, we have the Theology Council, an organization with a strong incentive to not have a clone on the throne. They did a through investigation into the Empress' return and have access to all her relevant medical data.

On the other hand, we have Random Capsuleer #285 who says she's a clone based on... their gut feeling. Their investigation into the issue is them reading a new article and they have no access to any tests or medical information.

Why would anyone believe the RC #285?



Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#39 - 2013-10-22 20:22:45 UTC
Makkal Hanaya wrote:

People like to claim the Empress is a clone, but I've never seen them present any evidence to support that claim.

On one hand, we have the Theology Council, an organization with a strong incentive to not have a clone on the throne. They did a through investigation into the Empress' return and have access to all her relevant medical data.

On the other hand, we have Random Capsuleer #285 who says she's a clone based on... their gut feeling. Their investigation into the issue is them reading a new article and they have no access to any tests or medical information.

Why would anyone believe the RC #285?

The difference in my 'feeling' (and that's what it is, I have no evidence to support it either way) that the Empress is a clone, and others that scream it from the rooftops, is that I do not think it makes the Empress illegitimate. As it seems to offend many Amarr, I'm going to completely drop the subject.

I do wonder though, why you think the Theology Council has a strong incentive not to let a clone on the throne?

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#40 - 2013-10-22 20:56:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Rodj Blake
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
Alizabeth Vea wrote:
Zelarrs Elkoth wrote:

As a point, they determined her not to be a clone, in spite the pervading opinion outside of the empire.


I would call that a distinction not a difference. It would have been better if they granted some dispensation for her. Something along the lines of: "Sure, she's a clone, but she's clearly chosen by God, so who are we to argue?" What they did was essentially declare a lie to be truth.

People like to claim the Empress is a clone, but I've never seen them present any evidence to support that claim.

On one hand, we have the Theology Council, an organization with a strong incentive to not have a clone on the throne. They did a through investigation into the Empress' return and have access to all her relevant medical data.

On the other hand, we have Random Capsuleer #285 who says she's a clone based on... their gut feeling. Their investigation into the issue is them reading a new article and they have no access to any tests or medical information.

Why would anyone believe the RC #285?


Indeed.

And it's not only the Theology Council which agrees that Jamyl I should be Empress. The Privy Council does too. And the Speakers. In fact, every organ of the Amarrian state not only supports her now, but also supported her when she was declared Empress.

As such, it's hard to see how Random Capsuleer #285 has a leg to stand on when they question her legitimacy.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori