These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Factional Warfare : Doomed from the beginning? Am I wasting my time?

Author
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#1 - 2011-11-01 22:37:44 UTC
So, I was doing some history reading about the EvE expansions, and came across something really interesting. Being a post-apocrypha EvE player (Apoc was the splash screen when I first installed Eve Online) I was not privy to all the drama and conflict surrounding earlier expansions.

What I found fascinating was reading that Noah Ward, former lead developer of Eve Online (position now held by CCP Soundwave) was an opponent of implementing Faction Warfare from the very beginning.

This completely changes my perspective the historical relationship between the FW community and the Eve developers. Now it all makes much more sense.

I’ve only seen the recent developments:
*the ignoring of forum threads regarding FW

*CCP fails to show up at FW roundtable at Fanfest

*CCP Manifest’s failed promise at answering the questions in the “answer everything” thread

*Soundwave’s promise to respond after the Russia trip

*Threadnought about CCP failing to address FW community

*Moving of said threadnought to new forums, lack of CCP response other than more “we’ll get back to you”’s

*CSM identifying and listing FW under “abandoned features”

*FW bizarrely ending up on Winter expansion list

*Hilmar referencing FW as being on list of Winter fixes

*New player threadnought regarding feedback on how to improve FW system

*Random and highly controversial suggestion by CCP Soundwave, followed by several one-liners, than silence again

* CCP Spitfire says he’ll ask development team to respond, followed by all-too-predictable lack of response.

If Faction Warfare was opposed internally from the beginning, that it makes a lot of sense that it was pure fan-service, and very low on CCP ‘s long term agenda. I can understand now why everyone has said all along “CCP doesn’t care about FW” or “FW is a development hot potato, no one wants to touch it”

So now that I know the history, I need to ask again –

Developers, am I wasting my time giving you feedback on how to improve the system? Are you actually spending ANY time at all looking into this right now? You don’t have to give us details if its rough, but is this actually being given any development hours? Do you have any intention of seriously iterating on this feature for Winter Expansion?

To be honest, I didn’t understand the internal history about this topic. I’m just too new a player. I have shrugged off the naysayers and doubters for a year now, trying to be a voice for the Faction Warfare community in the forums and share feedback ideas. But I’m not going to waste more time if CCP would just come out and tell us what is really on their minds.

I didn’t have serious doubts about CCP’s intentions regarding FW. But I certainly do now.

Can a developer finally step forth and give us the full truth? Where does FW stand? Are you working on anything?
I know plenty of players have opinions, and will say “ I told you so”. I’m not interested in hearing from other players. I want the developers to come clean with me, and let me know whether to continue working on this or to just give it a rest. This is just about common courtesy and respect for me and my time.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Dirk Magnum
Spearhead Endeavors
#2 - 2011-11-01 22:48:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirk Magnum
I'm sure that "opposed internally from the begining" was really more of a case of "debated internally about how to implement and then what WAS implemented did not make some designers happy". I can't imagine what argument could be made against *some* type of faction warfare feature in an overall sense. It adds to the depth of the game.

                      "LIVE FAST DIE." - traditional Minmatar ethos [citation needed]

Fuujin
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2011-11-01 22:52:29 UTC
Sing it with me....Prom night dumpster baby....
mkint
#4 - 2011-11-01 23:12:54 UTC
FW is a symbol for everything that's wrong with CCP. As long as FW is not only broken, but that CCP maintains a media blackout about it, it's proof CCP is just in it for the paycheck.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#5 - 2011-11-01 23:19:23 UTC
Its a mute point since Noah(aka CCP Hammerhead) was part of the 20%. I think Noah had more of a issue with it not being fully developed and not thought through all the way. Thats why I think he was against it.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

BoneEater
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2011-11-01 23:20:11 UTC
Blog please?Cry
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#7 - 2011-11-01 23:21:35 UTC
Dirk Magnum wrote:
I'm sure that "opposed internally from the begining" was really more of a case of "debated internally about how to implement and then what WAS implemented did not make some designers happy". I can't imagine what argument could be made against *some* type of faction warfare feature in an overall sense. It adds to the depth of the game.



I'm basing my reaction off of the history of CCP's actions regarding the topic, regardless of what they've said. If some were opposed to the way it was implemented, you'd think there would be all the more motivation to correct the problem in the many many expansions that have been released since then.

Its not even about the complete and total lack of consideration given not only to the feature, but about the complete lack of consideration for the players' time that has been put in trying to communicate with CCP. The history of failed commitments to share their intentions for the feature points squarely towards "opposed from the beginning", not "this needs work, this form just wont do."

Again, lack of CCP communication regarding FW is old news, I just feel like an idiot for having stuck up for CCP for so long, trying to say "lets give them a chance" than I read about this and everything they've said to just rings hollow for me now.

Quote:
Sing it with me....Prom night dumpster baby....


You pretty much nailed it. This is how I felt today reading about FW's origin story.

I'm willing to stand corrected, and hoping that CCP can prove those I've historically argued against wrong come Winter Expansion.

But please, developers, if you don't seriously have FW fixes that you are working on, show us some courtesy and just tell us right now. The community deserves that at least.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Kuan Yida
Huang Yinglong
Electus Matari
#8 - 2011-11-01 23:27:09 UTC
chirrup chirrup chirrup...

That's right, it's the sound of crickets.

The dragon knight treasures the state, friendship, duty, promises, kindness, vengeance, honor, and righteousness more than his own life._ _- The Way of the Dragon Warrior Random Posts from Auga

Destru Kaneda
Arzad Police Department
#9 - 2011-11-01 23:33:13 UTC
Apollo Gabriel
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#10 - 2011-11-01 23:41:04 UTC
FW is a black eye for CCP, they have no idea how to fix or change it. Players have offered MANY ideas but since no one at CCP has a vision for it, none of those suggestions get incorporated into a grand vision.

It is what it is, another abandoned feature.
Always ... Never ... Forget to check your references.   Peace out Zulu! Hope you land well!
Apollo Gabriel
Kill'em all. Let Bob sort'em out.
Ushra'Khan
#11 - 2011-11-01 23:43:34 UTC
So to the question are you wasting your time ...

Are you having fun when you DO IT? if yes then NO, keep at it. If you aren't having fun thinking of it, don't think about it.

Sadly you'll need your cerebral pleasures from elsewhere.
Always ... Never ... Forget to check your references.   Peace out Zulu! Hope you land well!
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#12 - 2011-11-01 23:54:43 UTC
Apollo Gabriel wrote:
FW is a black eye for CCP, they have no idea how to fix or change it. Players have offered MANY ideas but since no one at CCP has a vision for it, none of those suggestions get incorporated into a grand vision.

It is what it is, another abandoned feature.


You know what? I can totally live with that at this point.

But I feel like I at least deserve to hear that from them, instead of taking hours of my time to provide feedback that they knowingly had no intention of utilizing.

I'm also fine if they've indeed been reading our posts as they say they do, and want to implement features we've proposed, but know that its too much for Winter Expansion. They could tell us that truth too.

Regardless of whether they have no intention of working on FW, or whether they are but are afraid to admit that its too ambitious for winter, they owe us that bare minimum amount of response, so we know whether to keep putting any serious effort into this.

I understand details about fixes may not be in releasable form at this point in time, but CCP should at least tell us whether they've actually been discussing / developing the feature internally at all.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#13 - 2011-11-02 00:08:16 UTC
Apollo Gabriel wrote:
So to the question are you wasting your time ...

Are you having fun when you DO IT? if yes then NO, keep at it. If you aren't having fun thinking of it, don't think about it.

Sadly you'll need your cerebral pleasures from elsewhere.


I would say most of the time I enjoy writing my ideas about the game, and listening to other's ideas as well. In particular, the thread where most of the activity is currently has even further broadened my understanding of a community I thought I knew all about. Some of the issues I previously felt strong about, like supercap removal from lowsec, have changed for me since hearing alternative perspectives, and I'm more optimistic now than I use to be about that situation. Respectful debate betters everyone involved.

That being said, would I engage in a feedback discussion day after day if I knew that feedback wasn't going to be utilized? Of course not.

There is a big difference between saying "Send us your thoughts, because if we ever get around to FW at all than we might use them"
and saying "We are actually building on this feature right now! Your feedback helps us get the feature done on time and in a form that strengthens the game and makes it more fun. "

We deserve to know which of the two they are saying.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#14 - 2011-11-02 00:10:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
The history speaks for itself man.

Stop looking for rays of hope

Quote:
There is a big difference between saying "Send us your thoughts, because if we ever get around to FW at all than we might use them"
and saying "We are actually building on this feature right now! Your feedback helps us get the feature done on time and in a form that strengthens the game and makes it more fun. "

We deserve to know which of the two they are saying.


Or "keep giving us ideas so we can pretend we're listening"

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2011-11-02 00:15:54 UTC
A real fix to action warfare, and not some half assed number moving would be one of the few things that could get me to buy a year long subscription again.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#16 - 2011-11-02 00:29:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen
I should direct my initial inquiry towards the current CSM as well.

The CSM has seen many of the cool new features ahead of time, they also would be in a fair place to asses whether this is lip service or whether they've actually seen Faction Warfare features on the developers desks during interviews and tours and discussions.

So, I'd be just as happy to hear from a CSM whether they were coming out of left field when they announced Winter Expansion as including FW fixes, or whether there is actually progress on this feature.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Amro One
One.
#17 - 2011-11-02 01:10:34 UTC
Your wasting your time.
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2011-11-02 02:14:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Har Harrison
I support this thread, having started the original thread on the old forums when CCP missed the round table.

All the questions and promises that Hans has asked, I have raised too, such as how long does it take for Soundwave to get back from Russia etc...

Let me be clear here. Hans has a vision for FW that I may not totally agree on, same as others may not agree with some of my ideas. What cannot be disputed is that at the moment, he probably is the number one bunny jumping up and down on the forums, with a number of us, including myself, also chipping in our 2c to try and keep the noise and PR pressure up

The biggest issue is that Spitfire asked us to consolidate out feedback into a single thread, which we largely did. 23 pages later, we haven't seen a dev in about 17 pages and well over a week... The dev (Soundwave) put a radical idea to the FW community, then seemed to leave.

BTW - for those who aren't up to speed. The idea Soundwave put out there - removing NPC navy - has been the only thing suggested that was specifically about FW as opposed to something that FW benefitted from as a side effect. That said - it destroys the very essence of why we are fighting for a militia... You might as well just say this is a big RvB type setup accross of high sec since the empires would no longer care that enemy militia have entered their territory...

Silence iKillYouu
Girls Lie But Zkill Doesn't
Pandemic Legion
#19 - 2011-11-02 02:42:30 UTC
Kuan Yida wrote:
chirrup chirrup chirrup...

That's right, it's the sound of crickets.


Sounds like birds to me.

EVE Mail me i dont check forums often.

Hershman
Creepers Corporation
#20 - 2011-11-02 02:56:05 UTC
I kind of like FW as it is...

I play EVE every day! Follow me at http://www.twitch.tv/matthershman

123Next pageLast page