Test Server Feedback

My bad i can't find the deployable cyno jammer on Sisi, maybe it's not in actual build and will be tested later.
There are a few factors to consider:

1) Cost
2) volume
3) anchoring time

In a basic gate camp let's say you need 1-2 scout, 1 dictor or a few drag bubbles and some dps BC/hac.
If the cyno jammer will cost for example 100 mil isk, need a transport to haul and take 10 min to anchor you will not able to field a throw away module like that for such a camp while u can afford to lose bubbles.
So it's too early to talk about jammer.
Anyway if you roam with ceptors the one with cyno fitted has just to bounce on nearest planet or tactical to ligh cyno and this will took no more then 4-5 seconds while others tackle.
Instead a ship without bubble immunity should @ least activate mwd to exit bubble (meanwhile u can try to lock and kill), warp as soon as out of bubble (but since u cycled your mwd will have longer align time) so this operation will take longer than instant warp.
To be honest try a ceptor with 2 warp speed rigs and 3 inertia and you will figure out what i'm talking about

do the math, a ceptor with warp speed rigs will cover the dscan range within 1 server tick, dscan can only be refreshed ever 3 server tick..

so you would have to be very lucky to catch one on dscan, and the next second, it will be on grid with you

and i'm not even taking the usecase where pilot has the new +53% warp speed implants

Can we wait until the expansion is out before we start talking about how badly it ruined everything?

For what it's worth, yes, it does seem a bit bizarre having that much force projection. Perhaps it'll even be nerfed so that interceptors just straight up can't fit a cyno. But at the end of the day, everybody will have access to these new interceptors. It's difficult to predict how the metagame will change, or if it'll change much at all, or how interesting the new metagame will be. Worst comes to the worst, it's chaotic bullshit for a couple of months until CCP figures out how to deal with it all.

Come what may, lads. Fight on.

Sorry OP, but judging by the information you are going on it looks like you don't have a solid grasp on what the real issues are for force projection.

I think you're kind of missing the point.

The only time a new Rubicon inty is vulnerable is while travelling, as it jumps gate then decloaks to warp. Without stabs, that takes a Claw 3.3 secs - plenty of time for an experienced SeBo'd Jag pilot to point him (1.4secs). So the Jag has almost two seconds to react.

Triple Stabs turn a 30m sig radius into 38.8m. The Jag pilot can lock & point that fit a tenth of a second faster. But his window of opportunity is significantly reduced because the inty can now warp from 0 in 1.9secs. So, a 0.6sec reaction time. Pretty much not going to happen. Plus, even if long-pointed the inty can kite off at over 4k/sec which the Jag can't touch.

It's nitpicking really. Any inty cyno is going to be a throwaway, albeit a slightly pricey one. The trick is getting it into position, and for that CCP have equipped inties particularly dangerously.

And just FYI - I've been playing with dictors & other small ships on SISI. With T2 Hyperspatial rigs (which aren't that expensive) and a cheapish implant they are all, without exception, ridiculously fast and stop on a dime. Nullified they are not, but lowsec is going to be a whole different ballgame.