These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Medium Ancillary Shield Booster and Shield Booster
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tarren Renalard
MyMIX Corp
#1 - 2013-10-07 03:53:30 UTC
Hello guys,

Have a quick question, would it be better to fly my tengu with dual Ancillary or an Ancillary and a Normal one? Just kinda worried cause of the reload time on the Ancillary is so long. Thought it might be better to run with the Ancillary then while reloading or when needed pulse the Normal one. Here's my fit i might be flying for PvP small gang/solo, Thanks for the help

[Tengu, HML 100mn 2 Adaptive PVP]
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
Beta Reactor Control: Reaction Control I
Damage Control II

Core C-Type 100MN Afterburner
Medium Ancillary Shield Booster, Navy Cap Booster 50
Pithum C-Type Medium Shield Booster
Dark Blood Warp Disruptor
Pith A-Type EM Ward Field
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Republic Fleet Target Painter

Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Precision Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Precision Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Precision Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Precision Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Precision Heavy Missile

Medium Anti-Explosive Screen Reinforcer II
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II
Medium Warhead Rigor Catalyst II

Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node
Tengu Electronics - Emergent Locus Analyzer
Tengu Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst
Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay
Tengu Engineering - Capacitor Regeneration Matrix
Hatsumi Kobayashi
Perkone
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-10-07 04:20:36 UTC
That looks both overly expensive and suboptimal, not usually a winning combination.

Your burst tank isn't anything special, you have trouble to even sustain the pithum MSB, you have no nanos so even with links your agility and acceleration are horrible and your damage is also forgettable. You could fix your tank with crystals but then your mobility is still in the shitter, or you could with nomads and then it's your tank that remains in the shitter.

I think your ASB vs SB problem is the least of your issues tbh

No sig.
Tarren Renalard
MyMIX Corp
#3 - 2013-10-08 06:55:40 UTC
Overly expensive? It's 1b , with fury it's 513 dps, resists are 80.7/87.8/81.6/79 cold with 1100 dps with dual med ancillary and have a full crystal set, and instead of just putting it down you could post a different fit? Thanks...
Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
#4 - 2013-10-08 07:24:24 UTC
Tarren Renalard wrote:
Overly expensive? It's 1b , with fury it's 513 dps, resists are 80.7/87.8/81.6/79 cold with 1100 dps with dual med ancillary and have a full crystal set, and instead of just putting it down you could post a different fit? Thanks...


As in the last thread you made, we explained that a HAMgu is more appropriate in the current meta. The specific loadout you posted lacks any form of capacitor protection (active tank with no CB or NOS for a 1bil+ ship), does not have a defensive web and is under-DPSed for the job at hand.
Dato Koppla
Spaghetti Militia
#5 - 2013-10-08 08:16:50 UTC
You'll have alot of problems with frigs with this setup, they will be able to catch up with you easily and web you down and your damage application to fast frigs with no web and HMs is horrible. By the time you take them down (if you're even able to) you'll have their entire gang on you.
Mra Rednu
Vanishing Point.
#6 - 2013-10-08 08:51:30 UTC
Yes thats an awesome fit, go with it.