These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Golem Model

Author
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#21 - 2013-10-03 16:38:18 UTC
November is going to be rough on Golem owners.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Takari
Promised Victorious Entropy
#22 - 2013-10-03 16:59:54 UTC
I love this.. reminds me of the Manticore.. If the live model is even somewhat similar to this, I'll be adding Marauders to my training plan!

"Roll the dice, don't think twice. This is the way of things. Welcome to EVE." ~ CCP Falcon

"Good luck, shoot straight and don't back down." - Serendipity Lost

Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#23 - 2013-10-03 17:01:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Harvey James
shouldn't the Golem be Red kaalakiota rather than Lai Dai? same as manticore and cerberus should be too

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#24 - 2013-10-03 17:07:13 UTC
Harvey James wrote:
shouldn't the Golem be Red kaalakiota rather than Lai Dai? same as manticore and cerberus should be too

I like grey and red.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#25 - 2013-10-03 17:12:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
Shocked

Where are feathers?

The ugly duckling that could not into pretty.

Daffy would sue you.

If its true, I am buying Kronos, selling Golem.
Kal Saisima
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2013-10-03 17:41:58 UTC
What?! An ugly Caldari ship?! Such an outrage has never happened before!

Say what you will. Still better looking than the Moa.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#27 - 2013-10-03 17:49:22 UTC
Kal Saisima wrote:
What?! An ugly Caldari ship?! Such an outrage has never happened before!

Say what you will. Still better looking than the Moa.


mmm.. it's close and its not saying much about either ship really ... Moa has a Rustique look about it a kinda like ish....

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
Tactical-Retreat
#28 - 2013-10-03 17:54:40 UTC
Shocked

...

Ugh

That is all.

Signature Tanking Best Tanking

[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr

Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart

FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
#29 - 2013-10-03 18:04:22 UTC  |  Edited by: FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
And this is why I am holding off on training the lvl 5 on any be skill.

Also I reckon the wings fold down and that t shaped cockpit think folds up in bastion.
Periapsis Retrograde Burn
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2013-10-03 18:09:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Periapsis Retrograde Burn
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Why does this remind me of a platypus?


It's a semi-capstable torp-spamming spaceship for missions,
it's a brownish giant slowboat that never fliches from a fight!
It's got more than mere highslots,
'cause it is great for farmers and bots.
And the carebears swoon whenever they hear it make:

*sound of missiles firing*

It's Golem!
Golem the platypus!
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#31 - 2013-10-03 18:18:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Aglais
Who cares- with the changes Marauders are going to be receiving, nobody's going to be flying them anyways.

Addendum: I think the wings look awful- they should not change the wings. The hammerhead bridge there though looks pretty neat and IMO would be a welcome addition to many other Caldari hulls- Caracal and Moa especially.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#32 - 2013-10-03 18:26:18 UTC
Flip the wings upside down. Fixed.

Katrina Oniseki

Jasmine Assasin
The Holy Rollers
#33 - 2013-10-03 18:41:34 UTC
Wow, say it with me now..."Butterface".

Damn it CCP, just when I thought I was gonna start flying the Golem you go and do this to it.

John Ratcliffe
Tradors'R'us
IChooseYou Alliance
#34 - 2013-10-03 18:54:46 UTC
Looks ****.

I don't want one.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose

Luc Chastot
#35 - 2013-10-03 19:00:28 UTC
Could be considerably better looking.

Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Johnson Oramara
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#36 - 2013-10-03 19:12:16 UTC
Golem was never pretty but i kinda got used to it.

But this looks like very poor overly simplified lazy job, i really hope this was just a troll... but if it's not a troll? Well let's just say i would sell my golem no matter how well it would perform and get Vargur or Paladin instead even if i had to spend month for skills again...
Funky Lazers
Funk Freakers
#37 - 2013-10-03 19:37:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Funky Lazers
Johnson Oramara wrote:
Golem was never pretty but i kinda got used to it.

But this looks like very poor overly simplified lazy job


I'm a very big fan of symmetric ships, but this ship is very sloppy or even very ugly.
There is no love in it.
In fact this is the cappiest BS I ever seen.

Just change Golem's model into Rokh's one and problem solved.

Whatever.

sXyphos
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2013-10-03 19:50:32 UTC
give it 2 symmetric lances instead of one(make them both big) and lose the duckface(make it like an actual raven beak, sharp and pointy).And there you have it, a monster that looks like it'll impale your ship if u don't respect it Twisted
dexter xio
Dead Game.
#39 - 2013-10-03 19:58:08 UTC
This, looks, awesome.

Dead Game.

Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#40 - 2013-10-03 20:12:02 UTC
have to agree. it looks tarded.

the front/head looks ok-ish, but would much prefer the fold in the wings to be the other way and much closer to the wing tips.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs