These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

So CCP, how about giving us a hard number

First post
Author
Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-10-02 20:50:20 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
ask 'em on twitter?

e: they actually talk about stats on twitter, or they used to? is that still a thing ccp does?


Because while a small percent of the player bases fuse the forums, and even fewer read Twitter.


How do you know? I'd like to see the link that states this.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#22 - 2013-10-02 20:51:46 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would never give those numbers out tbh. It is open game. Go figure it out its not so hard.


Malbrick did a lot of leg work, far more than I could.
And his range was very very large, from 100 billion/month to 2 TRILLION/month, in taxes.

It would be very useful, and dead easy for CCP to simply give the community an aggregate value of the taxes for all of high sec.
And as far as you suggesting it is an open game, it is impossible for an individual to nail that number down, especially since one can only estimate how many players utilize a planet, let alone for every planet in high sec.

CCP is the ONLY one who has the current value of the taxes.
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
#23 - 2013-10-02 20:54:26 UTC
Montevius Williams wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
ask 'em on twitter?

e: they actually talk about stats on twitter, or they used to? is that still a thing ccp does?


Because while a small percent of the player bases fuse the forums, and even fewer read Twitter.


How do you know? I'd like to see the link that states this.

Does not the feed itself indicate how many followers the twitter account has?
To Be Me
Doomheim
#24 - 2013-10-02 21:01:05 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
ask 'em on twitter?

e: they actually talk about stats on twitter, or they used to? is that still a thing ccp does?


Because while a small percent of the player bases fuse the forums, and even fewer read Twitter.


I like forums.

I just dont sypathize with the general public that post in here.

But the reads entertain me.

thumbs up if you like :))))

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#25 - 2013-10-02 23:52:00 UTC
Can you tell me how many people are running specific reactions while you're at it...because of conspiracies or something, not so I can get even more filthy rich...

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#26 - 2013-10-03 00:05:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
You understand that there is no “pie” here, right? That the tax rate the NPCs charge will not change? That the only pie cake is what the players themselves create, which will either be small (due to useful and low tax rates so that people use the planet in question) or non-existent (due to uselessly high tax rates so people don't use the planet). This cake is nothing that CCP can give us any numbers on since it doesn't exist yet and since it is outside of CCP's control.


Oh, and last time we got any numbers on the NPC part, it was 700bn a month across all of EVE… so unless players want to tax themselves out of any kind of PI income, the player-created cake will most likely be in the low hundreds — most of which will simply be the margin between the old and new commodity base costs. A truly pitiful sum.
Black Canary Jnr
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2013-10-03 00:17:25 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would never give those numbers out tbh. It is open game. Go figure it out its not so hard.


Malbrick did a lot of leg work, far more than I could.
And his range was very very large, from 100 billion/month to 2 TRILLION/month, in taxes.

It would be very useful, and dead easy for CCP to simply give the community an aggregate value of the taxes for all of high sec.
And as far as you suggesting it is an open game, it is impossible for an individual to nail that number down, especially since one can only estimate how many players utilize a planet, let alone for every planet in high sec.

CCP is the ONLY one who has the current value of the taxes.



mabrick was lazy. he assumes everyone is gonna spend a month training planetary consolidation to 5 and does a flat average of all the planets in hs for his 19 mill/ planet sum.

I've run sums based off kao jaos and grimmashs numbers and the amount of isk per a month will make pocos just not worth it on the vast majority of hs planets. oh and this was before they announced the nerf in prices for p1 to 4 products.

but since all the carebears can't figure this bit of maths out for yourselves ....

OMG GOONS GONNA TAKE OVER HISEC :cry:
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#28 - 2013-10-03 08:58:43 UTC
Heres a titbit for the 'ohnoes gewns will take everything' crowd

We as an alliance have been concentrating on gathering POCOs in lowsec for the best part of two and a half years, spending massive amounts on gantrys and upgrades, not to mention capital fuel to grind the structures and titan bridges to defend them when they got attacked. Want to know what percentage we managed to get after all that effort and expenditure? Less than 10% and bear in mind this is in lowsec where its way easier to actually project the forces required while still being able to protect them.

Yes Goons are larger than us by an order of magnitude but bear in mind theyre operating in an environment where they cant leverage those numbers anywhere near as well as they can in nullsec. I know goons love to **** with people for lolz and dont really care about money but for the amount of work theyd have to put in in a location they dont normally operate in beyond the gank squads the return compared to something like ramping up freighter ganking or ice interdicting is miniscule.

Note I'm not saying they wont take any at all, obviously thats a dumb idea, just that people are massively overreacting because of one entity that would have to make the biggest logistical effort in the history of EVE for returns which can be best described as miniscule.

And thats something I just dont see happening.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#29 - 2013-10-03 13:31:00 UTC
Darek Castigatus wrote:
Heres a titbit for the 'ohnoes gewns will take everything' crowd

We as an alliance have been concentrating on gathering POCOs in lowsec for the best part of two and a half years, spending massive amounts on gantrys and upgrades, not to mention capital fuel to grind the structures and titan bridges to defend them when they got attacked. Want to know what percentage we managed to get after all that effort and expenditure? Less than 10% and bear in mind this is in lowsec where its way easier to actually project the forces required while still being able to protect them.

Yes Goons are larger than us by an order of magnitude but bear in mind theyre operating in an environment where they cant leverage those numbers anywhere near as well as they can in nullsec. I know goons love to **** with people for lolz and dont really care about money but for the amount of work theyd have to put in in a location they dont normally operate in beyond the gank squads the return compared to something like ramping up freighter ganking or ice interdicting is miniscule.

Note I'm not saying they wont take any at all, obviously thats a dumb idea, just that people are massively overreacting because of one entity that would have to make the biggest logistical effort in the history of EVE for returns which can be best described as miniscule.

And thats something I just dont see happening.



Sorry, but a number that may be the 1 trillion ISK / month range, or higher, well, that is not miniscule.
Of course, it could be 500 M/ month. It could be 2 trillion / month.

It cannot be calculated nearly as easily as say, moon goo.
The amount of any type of moon is readily counted, (I know that many of the cartels had a precise census of every tech moon, and are now doing the same thing with R64's), but the same cannot be said for PI. It is estimates.

Now, I am sure the null sec cartels have a decent estimate of the value of the PI before they ramp up their campaign, but unless CCP fed them precise numbers, even they don't have a true value. And of course, we know that no one at CCP would collude with the cartels to give them that data.

So it is in the best interest of all, including the cartels, to know the true value of the taxes being diverted to the cartels.
Lady Areola Fappington
#30 - 2013-10-03 13:43:00 UTC
You know, a smart person wouldn't be going "Waaagh grr gewns will take ALL highsec planets and leave us with nothing ohhno!"

Said smart person would be thinking "Hmm, what items are bottlenecks for important PI products. Now how many of those planets are out there? Would it be possible to cartel those?"

After that, the smart person would start screwing with the market for the best return on investment when Rubicon drops, and wouldn't be posting conspiracy theories on the forums.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#31 - 2013-10-03 13:55:37 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would never give those numbers out tbh. It is open game. Go figure it out its not so hard.


Malbrick did a lot of leg work, far more than I could.
And his range was very very large, from 100 billion/month to 2 TRILLION/month, in taxes.

It would be very useful, and dead easy for CCP to simply give the community an aggregate value of the taxes for all of high sec.
And as far as you suggesting it is an open game, it is impossible for an individual to nail that number down, especially since one can only estimate how many players utilize a planet, let alone for every planet in high sec.

CCP is the ONLY one who has the current value of the taxes.
Of course it would be useful. But that doesn't mean it should be done. The whole reason the economy in eve works so well is that it takes people estimating and working out trends themselves. A lot of it is based on speculation. If you took that speculation away, firstly the fun of the eve economy would removed and secondly the so would the profit.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Velicitia
XS Tech
#32 - 2013-10-03 14:30:08 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
You know, a smart person wouldn't be going "Waaagh grr gewns will take ALL highsec planets and leave us with nothing ohhno!"

Said smart person would be thinking "Hmm, what items are bottlenecks for important PI products. Now how many of those planets are out there? Would it be possible to cartel those?"

After that, the smart person would start screwing with the market for the best return on investment when Rubicon drops, and wouldn't be posting conspiracy theories on the forums.



oi! get back to bumping miners Evil

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Lady Areola Fappington
#33 - 2013-10-03 14:39:24 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
You know, a smart person wouldn't be going "Waaagh grr gewns will take ALL highsec planets and leave us with nothing ohhno!"

Said smart person would be thinking "Hmm, what items are bottlenecks for important PI products. Now how many of those planets are out there? Would it be possible to cartel those?"

After that, the smart person would start screwing with the market for the best return on investment when Rubicon drops, and wouldn't be posting conspiracy theories on the forums.



oi! get back to bumping miners Evil



Yes Ma'am sorry ma'am, my thinking muscle keeps flexing and it hurts!

Keep forgetting us gankers are all dimwitted sociopathic thralls of James 315, psychotically getting our jollies by destroying poor innocent miners who just want to be left alone to play the game like they want. It's a sandbox damnit!


I'll go out tonight and gank five Mackinaws in penance. Blink

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Velicitia
XS Tech
#34 - 2013-10-03 14:42:09 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
You know, a smart person wouldn't be going "Waaagh grr gewns will take ALL highsec planets and leave us with nothing ohhno!"

Said smart person would be thinking "Hmm, what items are bottlenecks for important PI products. Now how many of those planets are out there? Would it be possible to cartel those?"

After that, the smart person would start screwing with the market for the best return on investment when Rubicon drops, and wouldn't be posting conspiracy theories on the forums.



oi! get back to bumping miners Evil



Yes Ma'am sorry ma'am, my thinking muscle keeps flexing and it hurts!

Keep forgetting us gankers are all dimwitted sociopathic thralls of James 315, psychotically getting our jollies by destroying poor innocent miners who just want to be left alone to play the game like they want. It's a sandbox damnit!


I'll go out tonight and gank five Mackinaws in penance. Blink


nah, just figure if all the carebears are bitching about goons, makes that exact opportunity all the easier. Cool

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#35 - 2013-10-03 14:48:50 UTC
If it would stop Dinsdales rabidly paranoid posting about how Rubicon is nothing more than "yet another" stab at the heart of High Sec, I'd send CCP a whiole years worth of Rum to post the numbers he wants. Of course any numbers they give out would only serve as confirmation of his biases no matter what they actually prove, so I'll just keep my rum to myself.
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
#36 - 2013-10-03 15:34:54 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
If it would stop Dinsdales rabidly paranoid posting about how Rubicon is nothing more than "yet another" stab at the heart of High Sec, I'd send CCP a whiole years worth of Rum to post the numbers he wants. Of course any numbers they give out would only serve as confirmation of his biases no matter what they actually prove, so I'll just keep my rum to myself.


That's right. Keep shooting the messenger.

I love how the null sec zealots message is "high sec is paranoid, shut up", then when the latest removal of a high sec income source is successful, the message becomes "well, of course it was removed, you deserved to lose it"
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#37 - 2013-10-03 21:00:05 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Sorry, but a number that may be the 1 trillion ISK / month range, or higher, well, that is not miniscule.
Of course, it could be 500 M/ month. It could be 2 trillion / month.
…again, we have the number. And yes, it is absolutely minuscule. We also know that it is not any kind of pie to share between the entities that decide to set up POCOs, so even if it was big, it wouldn't really matter.

We can further easily see that the cake that the highsec PIers create for themselves is in the low hundreds per month.

Quote:
Now, I am sure the null sec cartels have a decent estimate of the value of the PI before they ramp up their campaign
Sure. But so do you. You just keep shouting because they're not even remotely pointing towards what you want them to point to.
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
#38 - 2013-10-03 21:13:41 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
If it would stop Dinsdales rabidly paranoid posting about how Rubicon is nothing more than "yet another" stab at the heart of High Sec, I'd send CCP a whiole years worth of Rum to post the numbers he wants. Of course any numbers they give out would only serve as confirmation of his biases no matter what they actually prove, so I'll just keep my rum to myself.


That's right. Keep shooting the messenger.

Damn straight. 'Cause the messenger isn't bringing us a real message. He's brought us a flaming cowpie disguised as message.

And I, for one, find that irksome.

Quote:
I love how the null sec zealots message is "high sec is paranoid, shut up", then when the latest removal of a high sec income source is successful, the message becomes "well, of course it was removed, you deserved to lose it"
Hi-Sec POCOs don't represent a loss of ISK. They represent a grand opportunity for those as are clear-eyed enough to see the bonanza that awaits and act appropriately.

Clearly, that won't be you.
Lykouleon
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#39 - 2013-10-03 21:21:27 UTC
WWWAAAAAAAHHHH CCP I feel entitled to information WAAAAAHHHHHH spoon feed me things I demand to have WAAAAHHHH grr goons.

Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#40 - 2013-10-03 21:33:49 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
If it would stop Dinsdales rabidly paranoid posting about how Rubicon is nothing more than "yet another" stab at the heart of High Sec, I'd send CCP a whiole years worth of Rum to post the numbers he wants. Of course any numbers they give out would only serve as confirmation of his biases no matter what they actually prove, so I'll just keep my rum to myself.


That's right. Keep shooting the messenger.

I love how the null sec zealots message is "high sec is paranoid, shut up", then when the latest removal of a high sec income source is successful, the message becomes "well, of course it was removed, you deserved to lose it"


This reply was so predicitable it's sad. You see by saying "high sec" is paranoid when I was talking to YOU shows that you have some "issues". You are not high sec lol.

You're simply to biased to accept the truth. No one is trying to hurt you, hell CCP has been helping you types, like when they un-nerfed incursions, "safeties", mining ship buffing etc . It's like in that Features and Ideas thread where you showed a total inability to understand that the interceptor and warp accel chances hit null sec harder than it could ever hit high sec (as, for example, it nerfs carrier and battleship ratting income with slwoer warps AND makes thing decidely more dangerous in null, not of which I'm protesting by the way, because unlike you I understand the game I'm playing).

You would have thought that CCP outright telling you that pocos would have nc taxes still would have calmed your fears of null sec domination. And that's what it is that drives you, fear to go along with that "omg im in high sec I can't do nothing against the cartels but write angry letters on the forums" impotence you got goin on lol.

Previous page123Next page