Player Features and Ideas Discussion

For me the first big clue was when he replied as omnathious on bouhs account lol. Oooppps.
Ah well in Ccps hands now Ip addresses will confirm.
We can at last filter out all that noise,
Nasty to impersonate multiple people to get your own way.Scamming and cheating in the game is fine but the forums are real world, there are rules, and standards of behaviour.
Ah well that's done now, we can get the ships we need rather than having things forced on us.



Can we explorers have our +10 Virus strength please.

Hey CCP rise good news! You can now disregard half the pages in this thread! Much less work to do.

Define "enough." If you have access to T2 exploration modules it probably won't hurt you too much, as blowing 1 can in 100 instead of 1 can in 200 is an incredibly minor ISK/hour loss, even if it is double the cans blown. However, if you only have T1 modules, it's an immense nerf and makes the ship completely non-viable. 30 virus strength can actually kill a mainframe virus suppressor, 25 virus strength is completely unable to even starting from full HP. 25 VS is also completely unable to kill a system core while virus suppressed, 30 VS can. 30 VS also kills firewalls, restoration nodes, and system cores in three attacks instead of four, resulting in 33% less damage taken.

You will probably lose one mainframe in three with only 25 VS, 30 VS is probably like one in ten. 25 VS means revealing a single suppressor is pretty much an automatic failure unless you find a kernel rot or attack vector to get rid of it.

Why is this allowed?

[Stratios, Webs are token EWAR]
1600mm Reinforced Steel Plates II
Damage Control II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Reactive Armor Hardener
Drone Damage Amplifier II

Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I
Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I

Covert Ops Cloaking Device II
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Ion Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M

Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I

Ogre II x5

A cloaky ship with 760 dps, 3 ewar slots and 55k ehp BEFORE res shift?

Seriously? what the ****?

yeah maybe it does a bit like vulcan ship meets jedi ship. But this is EVE, each race has radically different ship designs (some of which bear vague similarities to ships in fictional universes) and the Sisters of Eve are going to have ships that look different than the existing ones.

Sisters of EVE are an international humanitarian science-and-religion organization, according to their info panel.

I like the idea of exploration bonuses, but is there any plan to incorporate some kind of remote boosting or repair feature in some capacity? Like a bonus to repair modules or drones or support activity?

I think they are being more focused on single player mode rather than fleet,but I am really not sure, I think people are a bit scared of mission creep, but so much noise in this thread i lost touch with what real peoples opinion was on this,
Something was mentioned about clouds of cloaky reppers, but not sure if that was a real person or one of the spammers.

You are saying that you want to do high end exploration without skills to do it. And you want CCP to help you on top of that ? Come on...

That's ridiculous...

Ccp rise, Tl;DR version.
There is concern amongst some that the fact this can be fitted in such a way that a large amount of damage can be projected at extremely close range, and that range can be achieved by creeping up under cloak and then ripping loose.
When you look at the balancing can you see if the damage is more able to be projected at PvE ranges, without removing reasonable PvP abilities?
Explorers are very very excited by this ship,and now the spammer issue has been addressed,
(A user implemented a determined spamming effort with multiple identities to cripple the ship for this role, and has been identified and reported for action)
very very strong concencus is for + 10 virus strength,
Interest in scanning is focused around core probe scanning, no one seems overly concerned with the levels you are suggesting,this depends of course on whether you are planning to introduce sites that are more difficuilt to scan down.Higher levels are more appropriate to combat scanning and expanded probe launcher so seem of less concern to the explorers.
There is a desire for a further high slot on the frigate and no one seems to object much.
No one much cares for laser cap bonuses and no one seems believe that they work much as a weapons system for this ships role.
Some concern about an exploration ship up against sleepers and the new drone AI so possible an amendment to drone hit points or drone signature.
Cargo bay is seen as a little restricted, particuarly if the cruiser is to carry a few space yurts and possibly syphons for a long duration mission.We don't know of course how big they will be and whether they are assembled in space or launched whole.

That is about it, we are all looking forward to your thoughts, and looking forward to What Rubicon brings.

This user has been reported for using multiple identities to spam this thread. The accounts have posted repeatedly with the intention of giving the impression that a number of people hold a similar view.This has been passed to CCP for action.

Not true.

If you calculate the dps the same way people calculated it for the Stratios (overheat all guns and drones), then you have 630 dps with the Proteus.

And the Stratios don't have any more range than blasters. We are talking Ogre dps. And T3 have twice the tank of this Stratios BTW.