These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites

First post First post First post
Author
Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#201 - 2013-09-26 21:44:06 UTC
Nanatoa wrote:
Alt Two wrote:
Maximus Andendare wrote:
But to GSF, TEST, RFF, Push, Angel Project, Eve University, Brave Newbies, RvB, etc.--you know, the REAL creators of content and services in the game--I'm sorry but you guys are all missing the point. The point simply is that SOMER Blink drives so many GTC sales, which in turn equals $$ for CCP. Of course CCP is going to do whatever they have to do drive more traffic to SOMER Blink's website, get more people blinking and then "oh hey let me buy a GTC while I'm here. I get free Blink credit!!"

This guy gets it. To CCP it's all about the money.
The only way to make your voices heard is to vote with your wallet. Paste a link to this thread as the reason for your account cancellation.

I guess this is "one of the moments where we [CCP] look at what our players do and less of what they say."

"People are totally doing a whole lot of blinks because of this promotion. This must be our greatest idea ever!" - CCP marketing department 2013
Sad but probably true...Sad
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#202 - 2013-09-26 21:44:58 UTC  |  Edited by: TheGunslinger42
CCP Navigator, this is an incredibly important question:

Have you audited literally every single transaction by SOMER? Have you audited literally every single account involved in those transactions?

To claim they have a 100% clean history, you must have. Please confirm that you have done such an exhaustive audit. Claiming they have completely honoured everything to date implies that such an exhaustive audit must have been performed. I am asking you to directly confirm that you, or another member of CCP, have done such an audit.

I am also asking if these audits reach out to SOMERs own site and services, as it would be quite possible for the eve "end" of these transactions to appear legitimate, but then for some sketchy stuff to happen "outside" the EVE environment.

Can you confirm that you have worked directly with the developers SOMER have and audited their services as well as EVE's own services?

If you have not, please immediately remove all the references to how trustworthy and perfectly legit SOMER are

This isn't tin foil hattery about SOMER, I believe they make enough isk legitimately to not need to do anything sketchy, but to have a CCP employee state in absolute certain terms ... well, that is an incredible precedent, and can only be legitimately claimed if such exhaustive audits of all transactions, accounts, and services - both on EVE Online and on the third party - have been performed
Zaxix
State War Academy
Caldari State
#203 - 2013-09-26 21:45:01 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
First :)

How about actually making a statement?

Bokononist

 

RAW23
#204 - 2013-09-26 21:45:38 UTC  |  Edited by: RAW23
CCP Navigator wrote:

Q4, So you said earlier that SOMER Blink are trusted. Does that mean CCP is promising they will always deliver?

A4, Not at all. What I am saying is that to date they have been 100% trustful and we expect that will continue.


This is one of the most appalling things I have ever heard from a CCP representative (a pretty tough field) and nothing in the changes announced in this thread alters the problematic nature of this statement. Indeed, you go on to make further statements about SOMER's history of trustworthy behaviour. Trust is a marketable commodity in EVE and you are saying, in CCP's name, that this group has been trustworthy to date. Not only can you not possibly know that this is true but you are also giving them a unique 'CCP Audited' title when the reliability of in-game audits is something that is always open to question. Even if you could be certain that they have been 100% trustworthy up to this point you damn well shouldn't say so! Assessment of trustworthiness is a key in-game issue and CCP should have absolutely no part of it.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#205 - 2013-09-26 21:47:14 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
CCP Navigator, this is an incredibly important question:

Have you audited literally every single transaction by SOMER? Have you audited literally every single account involved in those transactions?

To claim they have a 100% clean history, you must have. Please confirm that you have done such an exhaustive audit. Claiming they have completely honoured everything to date implies that such an exhaustive audit must have been performed. I am asking you to directly confirm that you, or another member of CCP, have done such an audit.

I am also asking if these audits which you must have done in order to make such statements reach out to SOMERs own site and services, as it would be quite possible for the eve "end" of these transactions to appear legitimate, but then for some sketchy stuff to happen "outside" the EVE environment.

Can you confirm that you have worked directly with the developers SOMER have and audited their services as well as EVE's own services?

If you have not, please immediately remove all the references to how trustworthy and perfectly legit SOMER are

This a 17 million times.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#206 - 2013-09-26 21:47:29 UTC
I was under the impression that CCP does not vouch for the trustworthiness of any player. Yet, here you are, implicitly vouching for their trustworthiness.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#207 - 2013-09-26 21:47:45 UTC
Zaxix wrote:
Chitsa Jason wrote:
First :)

How about actually making a statement?

That would be real nice indeed.
Cursan Voran
Jita Traders Society
#208 - 2013-09-26 21:48:57 UTC
Zaxix wrote:
Chitsa Jason wrote:
First :)

How about actually making a statement?


That is one of the better CSM posts.
Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#209 - 2013-09-26 21:49:08 UTC
Why was Somer specifically chosen over and above any other lottery service to receive unique assets?

Why was the CSM not consulted on this matter?

Was Internal Affairs consulted before this decision was made and publicised?

Did nobody within CCP stop to consider that, just possibly, Devs spawning unique items to be handed out to one specific player organisation was an activity which carries some historical baggage and might not go down well with those of us who remember the last time it happened?

....

Jesus christ CCP, what were you thinking?

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Kuni Oichi
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#210 - 2013-09-26 21:50:16 UTC
Changing the ships from the Gold Magnate, Guardian Vexor etc. addresses those people concerned about Eve's lore.


It does absolutely nothing to address the blatant favouritism being shown to a gambling site which facilitates and encourages people to spend RL money on their gambling habit.

It does nothing to address them giving fantastically rare items to a player corporation which is using them to increase its profit margin (I'm not blaming Somer for this, it's exactly what I'd expect them to do, this is all on CCP).

In spite of the hundreds of posts on the subject, CCP still continue to mismanage their PR disaster. They continue to fail to understand their own game. We don't want CCP showing favouritism, we don't want them giving massive advantages to a player owned corporation, we want an even and balanced sandbox.

Of course, if they do insist on showing favouritism, they should be making the ethical choice and giving their favouritism to the most ethical and philanthropic alliance in the game, Goonswarm.
Boom Boom Longtime
EVE Corporation 6908469858
Heroes and Villains.
#211 - 2013-09-26 21:50:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Boom Boom Longtime
I'd just love CCP to clarify on how this is a "community event", when clearly some aspects of the community are excluded from participating based on the enforcement of self appointed rules by a 3rd party entity not regulated by CCP per se.

This entity is governed by the same EULA as we all have to adhere to, sure.

In this instance however, CCP has effectively given another player / entity / website (effectively an out of game tool) the ability to dictate / choose whether i, as a paying eve customer can participate in content CCP has created (in game), or not.

I'd specifically like clarification on if this is meant to be a community event accessible to all paying subscribers who comply with the EULA - why i am currently unable to participate even if i wanted to as this character ?

Why am i being discriminated against?

Concord Approved Trader

Doris Dents
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#212 - 2013-09-26 21:52:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Doris Dents
KIller Wabbit wrote:
CCP Navigator wrote:
Cursan Voran wrote:
Also, as someone who does not use somer blink, how do I get a chance at these giveaways?


You can register and play a free promo blink which happen often and get an entry.


oh, you're even going to do their marketing for them?

Not mention factually untrue. You need to have played paid games in the last 48hrs to be eligible for the promo blinks unless you've already given them 1bn isk. The same guy that tells us they've audited Blink and it's 100% trustworthy doesn't even know the most basic rules of the site.
Zaxix
State War Academy
Caldari State
#213 - 2013-09-26 21:52:53 UTC
Andski wrote:
I was under the impression that CCP does not vouch for the trustworthiness of any player. Yet, here you are, implicitly vouching for their trustworthiness.

I'm sorry to correct you, Andski; however, they are EXplicitly vouching for their trustworthiness.

"SOMER Blink have a history of being trustworthy and honoring every blink played without exception."

Again, forgive my English nerd-dom.

Bokononist

 

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#214 - 2013-09-26 21:52:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Scatim Helicon
Andski wrote:
I was under the impression that CCP does not vouch for the trustworthiness of any player. Yet, here you are, implicitly vouching for their trustworthiness.


There's nothing 'implicit' about Navigator's vouch here.

e:f,b

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Gamer4liff
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#215 - 2013-09-26 21:53:46 UTC
Uh, CCP, you do realize as cool as the new cruiser sounds, these special versions could be worth even more than what was being given previously?

It's not too late to back away from this. This organization does not need incentives, and no player organization should EVER be granted CCP legitimacy. You can't just hand-waive this with a "buyer beware" in a short Q&A on a forum. You are playing kingmaker, the exact thing that the CSM was formed to prevent you from doing.

Think about it. It's not too late to pull the plug on this whole mess. Find some other way to honor your friend, send him an autographed eve print or something. But do not go through with this. You will be diminished not just in my eyes, but that of large swaths of the community, and the fundamental trust between developers and those playing the game will be broken in a more offensive way than in the T20 era of old.

A comprehensive proposal for balancing T2 Production: here

Doris Dents
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#216 - 2013-09-26 21:55:20 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:

Jesus christ CCP, what were you thinking?

This is becoming an all too regular question of late.
Edward Pierce
State War Academy
Caldari State
#217 - 2013-09-26 21:55:26 UTC
Dear CCP Navigator,

Please stop flinging **** into our sandbox.

Thank you,
Edward Pierce
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
Lulu McMullin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#218 - 2013-09-26 21:55:37 UTC
Doris Dents wrote:
KIller Wabbit wrote:
CCP Navigator wrote:
Cursan Voran wrote:
Also, as someone who does not use somer blink, how do I get a chance at these giveaways?


You can register and play a free promo blink which happen often and get an entry.


oh, you're even going to do their marketing for them?

Not mention factually untrue. You need to have played paid games in the last 48hrs to be eligible for the promo blinks unless you've already given them 1bn isk. The same guy that tells us they've audited Blink and it's 100% trustworthy doesn't even know the most basic rules of the site.



He doesn't have the same rulebook as the rest of us, and the same applies to SOMER...
Elria Antollare
Black Eclipse Corp
#219 - 2013-09-26 21:55:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Elria Antollare
This is unacceptable and it diminishes the history of EVE and a few very specific ships that have been repeatedly been said to NEVER be re-introduced ever again.

You had a bad idea and it remains a bad idea. There isn't an excuse you can give me to change my opinion on it.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#220 - 2013-09-26 21:56:50 UTC
I do hope the CSM bring up the issue of CCP employees explicitly stating that an in-game entity have honoured literally every single deal/transaction - including those which rely heavily on third party systems that are entirely unrelated to EVE / CCP itself and that they can be completely trusted.