These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

(Moderators, Please Lock Thread) To those miners and missioners who wish to be left alone.

First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#221 - 2011-11-01 23:23:54 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
I believe they even (inwardly) question their own mental balance for having to engage in such non-constructive activity to get their jollies.
You believe that people are worried that they are having fun in a game? Ugh

Also, ganking builds character and teaches game mechanics. Highly constructive… if you so choose P
Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
#222 - 2011-11-01 23:24:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Teamosil
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
true they do not harrass individuals but specific group of people. In some way its actually more dangerous.


Well, not quite. They harrass anybody that is engaging in certain professions. Those players are all free to do something else or do the same thing somewhere else. The griefing policy isn't so much about stopping annoying behavior, it is about two things- preying on players basically during their first few hours in the game and preventing a specific player from really playing the game at all. Outside of those two pretty narrow exceptions CCP doesn't really intervene in conflicts between players.

I do think CCP ought to look at whether ganking as a means to market manipulation is properly balanced. If it's too easy to pull off and too hard to counter for the enormous rewards it generates, they should make it harder, easier to counter or less rewarding just like they would with any other profession. After all, individual goons are now bragging on the forum about personally having made tens of billions of ISK with only a couple hours of work doing something that really doesn't take much skill. If that were suddenly true of missioning or faction warfare or exploration sites or whatever, it'd need to be looked into to.

Honestly, my feeling is that the first time somebody does it, that shows a fair amount of innovation and creativity, and it's fine they got rewarded for that. But if the mechanic stays the same then they could just keep repeating it or other corps could just copy it, and then that's just imbalance at that point. Without the innovation part, it's just money that is too easy.

But it isn't griefing.
Vyl Vit
#223 - 2011-11-01 23:30:46 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Vyl Vit wrote:
I believe they even (inwardly) question their own mental balance for having to engage in such non-constructive activity to get their jollies.
You believe that people are worried that they are having fun in a game? Ugh

Also, ganking builds character and teaches game mechanics. Highly constructive… if you so choose P
Nicely played, sorta. It's more a matter of "if that's what you call fun..." But, hey. Let the grown ups handle this part of the discussion. You go ahead and smash some more of someone else's toys. We'll call you for din din.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#224 - 2011-11-01 23:34:49 UTC
Tippia wrote:


Also, ganking builds character


Always saw the saying "it builds character" as bullshit and just means "yeah it sucks but deal with it".

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#225 - 2011-11-01 23:36:25 UTC
Teamosil wrote:
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
true they do not harrass individuals but specific group of people. In some way its actually more dangerous.


Well, not quite. They harrass anybody that is engaging in certain professions. Those players are all free to do something else or do the same thing somewhere else. The griefing policy isn't so much about stopping annoying behavior, it is about two things- preying on players basically during their first few hours in the game and preventing a specific player from really playing the game at all. Outside of those two pretty narrow exceptions CCP doesn't really intervene in conflicts between players.

I do think CCP ought to look at whether ganking as a means to market manipulation is properly balanced. If it's too easy to pull off and too hard to counter for the enormous rewards it generates, they should make it harder, easier to counter or less rewarding just like they would with any other profession. After all, individual goons are now bragging on the forum about personally having made tens of billions of ISK with only a couple hours of work doing something that really doesn't take much skill. If that were suddenly true of missioning or faction warfare or exploration sites or whatever, it'd need to be looked into to.

Honestly, my feeling is that the first time somebody does it, that shows a fair amount of innovation and creativity, and it's fine they got rewarded for that. But if the mechanic stays the same then they could just keep repeating it or other corps could just copy it, and then that's just imbalance at that point. Without the innovation part, it's just money that is too easy.

But it isn't griefing.



far point. Its not griefing by definition.
Its just annoyance. Something like ass-rash. Lol

But if some power-block-entity takes it too far it may be too late and the consequences could be severe. Or could be for better EVE. Who knows anything based on it, is just speculation.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#226 - 2011-11-01 23:43:37 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
They know the efforts they spend "ganking" unarmed ships amount to nothing in the end, just some juvenile titillation.


In the first 24 hours I made a billion in profits from isotopes and sales of barges and brutix gank packs are higher then my production can keep up with.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#227 - 2011-11-01 23:44:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Vyl Vit wrote:
Nicely played.
I know. But then again, that's the whole problem isn't it: some people just can't understand that it's a game, and that other people are having fun in it. They are absolutely convinced that they must take everything that happens personally and that their pixels blowing up is a horrible affront to them.

Seeing as how you both agreed that it was nicely stated and as how you couldn't offer anything but a personal attack in response, it's safe to assume that the matter is settled: the problem lies with those silly miners who refuse to be anything but victims and who also refuse to accept the simple fact that they were the ones who made that choice and that they are the ones who can also choose not to be such victims.
Vricrolatious
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#228 - 2011-11-01 23:46:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Vricrolatious
MeestaPenni wrote:

In the Goon's case, it is not "warfare over resources."


All of EVE depends on fuel, and an extra-special amount of EVE depends on Oxygen Isotopes. These are the fuel for the most popular types of supercapitals, the Rorqual industrial ship, and for Gallente towers, which are the backbone of moon mineral reaction chains and thus of T2 production all across EVE. The economy depends on Oxytopes like it does on few other resources. If anything were to happen to the price of this one item, the howls would be louder than anything short of removing Veldspar from the game. (For some numbers, to supply the Oxytopes addiction of Jita alone, it takes approximately 200 Mackinaws mining Blue Ice 23/7...forever.)

Guess what we're going to do?
-The Mittani

When Goons started the Ice Interdiction Operation, it was for several reason and above is one of them. This is called Resource Denial and it's a valid warfare tactic.

Two years ago, in May of 2009, Noir. was contracted to deny access to all asteroid belts in a 1.0 system. How is Goons current operation any different other than A) It's on a larger scale and B) It's Goons and not Noir.

And no, I'm tnot trying to make the thread "It's all about Goons" thread, but I've noticed several times in the past 12 pages that we're brought up frequently and I've seen several of the new "Make Highsec Safe" posts reference the current Ice Interdiction, so I figured I'd run with it for one reply Pirate

WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#229 - 2011-11-02 00:17:31 UTC
lol "moderators please lock" whats that about?

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#230 - 2011-11-02 00:18:48 UTC
Tanya Powers wrote:
Vricrolatious wrote:
This is actually something I'd be curious about. Not the forum posts, but what would actually happen to New Eden's economy if one day the miners all went on strike (bots included.) I'm sure there are stockpiles of minerals, so it would take a while for the impact, but still...


For this to ever happen all the big alliances should kill or stop their own bots, wich will never happen.


Even the Goon bots?

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#231 - 2011-11-02 00:26:07 UTC
Teamosil wrote:
Justin Credulent wrote:
Quote:
…which is appropriate since most suicide gankers and can-flippers are not griefing.


Except for the fact that they are. CCP's position is the following:

http://support.eveonline.com/Pages/KB/Article.aspx?id=336


Read it more carefully. It says "An example of grief play would be the so called "Can baiting" in starter systems." Those are the handful of systems players are born in, not all hi sec.


and this is as I have said in the past, stupid as hell.
They get canflipped in said systems, they petition it, canflipper gets a ban. They get out of said system, it happens, player petitions it, GM laughs at them and says "welcome to EVE"

Itsa bad precedence. The player thinks the GMs will save them and its the GMs fault that they think that lol

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Amro One
One.
#232 - 2011-11-02 00:29:19 UTC
"Griefing" in the EULA is vage at best.

Its actually not what you think it is and using the word griefing is appropriated.

Pretty much, if you have a character and all is does is suicide gank, yes that can be banned, but once you kill a single rat your not considered greifing. as Now you are making ISK and playing part of the game.

I have yet to see corp mate killers get banned from game as all they do is grief people.

You guys are morons to think you can use the EULA to prove your point.
Vricrolatious
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#233 - 2011-11-02 00:30:43 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
Tanya Powers wrote:
Vricrolatious wrote:
This is actually something I'd be curious about. Not the forum posts, but what would actually happen to New Eden's economy if one day the miners all went on strike (bots included.) I'm sure there are stockpiles of minerals, so it would take a while for the impact, but still...


For this to ever happen all the big alliances should kill or stop their own bots, wich will never happen.


Even the Goon bots?


Bots are bots are bots, I'd love to see CCP find a way to kill bots and I don't care who they belong to.

WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric

Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#234 - 2011-11-02 06:59:08 UTC
Amro One wrote:
Pretty much, if you have a character and all is does is suicide gank, yes that can be banned,

No, that will not get you banned.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

CCP Spitfire
C C P
C C P Alliance
#235 - 2011-11-02 08:34:00 UTC
Locked by request.

CCP Spitfire | Marketing & Sales Team @ccp_spitfire