These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Competitive Gaming

First post
Author
Captain Farallon
Moongoo Mining and Mixing
Goonswarm Federation
#361 - 2013-09-18 20:59:16 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:


I want something to happen at the start, if it did, i can enjoy the rest much better, this instant action part is missing, the slowphased gameplay is all cool, I think its holdig back a lot of gamers to experience eve, arenas could be the door opener to the rest of the game, that would work much better then the beginning of the game now


There are two issues I have with your suggestion. The first is that you don't have much pvp experience other than killing cyno alts and rookie ships, so maybe there's something already out there you're missing. Maybe you should explore more of the game rather than the game changing to conform to your needs. The second is you're looking for a risk-free simulation within a simulation, which is everything EVE is not about. There are other games out there where you can build space ships and shoot people with little or no consequence. The type of pvp you do right now isn't exactly expensive. Re-shipping can be a pain in the ass especially since you've decided to fly into enemy territory on your own, but that can be solved by getting some friends to fly with and coming up with a logistics plan like the rest of us.
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#362 - 2013-09-18 21:31:41 UTC
Captain Farallon wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:


I want something to happen at the start, if it did, i can enjoy the rest much better, this instant action part is missing, the slowphased gameplay is all cool, I think its holdig back a lot of gamers to experience eve, arenas could be the door opener to the rest of the game, that would work much better then the beginning of the game now


There are two issues I have with your suggestion. The first is that you don't have much pvp experience other than killing cyno alts and rookie ships, so maybe there's something already out there you're missing. Maybe you should explore more of the game rather than the game changing to conform to your needs. The second is you're looking for a risk-free simulation within a simulation, which is everything EVE is not about. There are other games out there where you can build space ships and shoot people with little or no consequence. The type of pvp you do right now isn't exactly expensive. Re-shipping can be a pain in the ass especially since you've decided to fly into enemy territory on your own, but that can be solved by getting some friends to fly with and coming up with a logistics plan like the rest of us.


you just repeat what the others say, this is not about explaining the sandbox, I understand the sandbox

this is a conversation about competitive gaming and to creat an environment for that

if you want to discuss how cool sandbox is, please open your own thread, here we only want to talk about competitive gaming and the people who understand it

thanks
Captain Farallon
Moongoo Mining and Mixing
Goonswarm Federation
#363 - 2013-09-18 21:49:36 UTC
Lets try this another way...

I fully understand competitive gaming. I've been a member of the online gaming community (and industry for a while) for close to two decades. The definition of "competitive gaming" is subjective based on what each individual player wants from the gaming experience. You can't dismiss other people's opinions as uneducated or say they don't understand just because their opinions differ from your own. If you want other people to start taking you seriously, you're going to have to start showing others some respect and understanding.

Now, with those inarguable facts being said, what is it you'd like to see from EVE Online in regards to competitive gaming? Perhaps those things are available and you haven't found them yet. I've been playing EVE since 2004 and there's still new stuff for me to explore. Maybe you can be pointed in the right direction. Or maybe there are other games that'll give you the gaming fix you crave, and we can talk about that too.

What you shouldn't do is be dismissive of other people because they tell you things you don't like to hear or have differing opinions. Otherwise there are some great stand-alone RPG and RTS space themed games you can explore where no one will bother you.
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#364 - 2013-09-18 22:06:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
Captain Farallon wrote:
Lets try this another way...

I fully understand competitive gaming. I've been a member of the online gaming community (and industry for a while) for close to two decades. The definition of "competitive gaming" is subjective based on what each individual player wants from the gaming experience. You can't dismiss other people's opinions as uneducated or say they don't understand just because their opinions differ from your own. If you want other people to start taking you seriously, you're going to have to start showing others some respect and understanding.

Now, with those inarguable facts being said, what is it you'd like to see from EVE Online in regards to competitive gaming? Perhaps those things are available and you haven't found them yet. I've been playing EVE since 2004 and there's still new stuff for me to explore. Maybe you can be pointed in the right direction. Or maybe there are other games that'll give you the gaming fix you crave, and we can talk about that too.

What you shouldn't do is be dismissive of other people because they tell you things you don't like to hear or have differing opinions. Otherwise there are some great stand-alone RPG and RTS space themed games you can explore where no one will bother you.


there are no arenas available.

please stop talking about the sandbox

this thread is about arenas, and leagues

thanks for understanding

if you don't have anything to add to the topic please move on, we do not discuss different games here, we do not discuss sandbox here, we do not discuss the gamemodes available in eve, we just discuss areans and leagues
samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#365 - 2013-09-18 22:09:16 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:
Captain Farallon wrote:
Lets try this another way...

I fully understand competitive gaming. I've been a member of the online gaming community (and industry for a while) for close to two decades. The definition of "competitive gaming" is subjective based on what each individual player wants from the gaming experience. You can't dismiss other people's opinions as uneducated or say they don't understand just because their opinions differ from your own. If you want other people to start taking you seriously, you're going to have to start showing others some respect and understanding.

Now, with those inarguable facts being said, what is it you'd like to see from EVE Online in regards to competitive gaming? Perhaps those things are available and you haven't found them yet. I've been playing EVE since 2004 and there's still new stuff for me to explore. Maybe you can be pointed in the right direction. Or maybe there are other games that'll give you the gaming fix you crave, and we can talk about that too.

What you shouldn't do is be dismissive of other people because they tell you things you don't like to hear or have differing opinions. Otherwise there are some great stand-alone RPG and RTS space themed games you can explore where no one will bother you.


there are no arenas available.

please stop talking about the sandbox

this thread is about arenas, and leagues

thanks for understanding


What you're not listening to is that by having instant access arenas it breaks our sandbox.

If you give people the option of risk free, instant access FAIR PvP they will take it. Eschewing (look it up) the more conventional PvP which gets them out in the world.

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#366 - 2013-09-18 22:11:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
samualvimes wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
Captain Farallon wrote:
Lets try this another way...

I fully understand competitive gaming. I've been a member of the online gaming community (and industry for a while) for close to two decades. The definition of "competitive gaming" is subjective based on what each individual player wants from the gaming experience. You can't dismiss other people's opinions as uneducated or say they don't understand just because their opinions differ from your own. If you want other people to start taking you seriously, you're going to have to start showing others some respect and understanding.

Now, with those inarguable facts being said, what is it you'd like to see from EVE Online in regards to competitive gaming? Perhaps those things are available and you haven't found them yet. I've been playing EVE since 2004 and there's still new stuff for me to explore. Maybe you can be pointed in the right direction. Or maybe there are other games that'll give you the gaming fix you crave, and we can talk about that too.

What you shouldn't do is be dismissive of other people because they tell you things you don't like to hear or have differing opinions. Otherwise there are some great stand-alone RPG and RTS space themed games you can explore where no one will bother you.


there are no arenas available.

please stop talking about the sandbox

this thread is about arenas, and leagues

thanks for understanding


What you're not listening to is that by having instant access arenas it breaks our sandbox.

If you give people the option of risk free, instant access FAIR PvP they will take it. Eschewing (look it up) the more conventional PvP which gets them out in the world.


again, we don't talk about sandbox we talk about arenas here, its like a different game, seperated from the sandbox, you don't get that? you don't want to talk about that part? fine, please move on you are just disturbing the conversation

there are many games that offer arenas, does it hold back people to play the sanbox in eve, nope... will eve arenas hold people back from playing the sandbox then, nope, its a different game, please stop beeing silly, thanks

do people play arenas yes, do people play eve yes, so... smartmind, that tells us people already play both, no problem if eve has it as well, and provides that gameplay to players who would leave eve if they want it, they add it, then players stay in eve

they want sanbox, they go to eve, they want arena matchmaking they go to eve as well
samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#367 - 2013-09-18 22:17:02 UTC

I'm someone who loses lots do I

A) log in to TQ and fly around in roams contributing to the economy by being a part of the construction>destruction>construction cycle etc


or

B) Play in the arenas which are disconnected from the sandbox as they are instanced, risk free and instant action.


one is healthy for the sandbox the other is detrimental.

People only have a limited amount of time in the EVE play bank

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#368 - 2013-09-18 22:20:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
samualvimes wrote:

I'm someone who loses lots do I

A) log in to TQ and fly around in roams contributing to the economy by being a part of the construction>destruction>construction cycle etc


or

B) Play in the arenas which are disconnected from the sandbox as they are instanced, risk free and instant action.


one is healthy for the sandbox the other is detrimental.

People only have a limited amount of time in the EVE play bank


you don't understand that players now just logoff if they want instant action, so its not helping the economy either

those two gamemodes have nothing to do with eachother, and thats fine

many people play world of tank next to eve, because they want action, thats a big disadvantage

most of the players have eve just in the background, you need to give them a gamemode where they can stay focused in the game
samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#369 - 2013-09-18 22:22:41 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:
samualvimes wrote:

I'm someone who loses lots do I

A) log in to TQ and fly around in roams contributing to the economy by being a part of the construction>destruction>construction cycle etc


or

B) Play in the arenas which are disconnected from the sandbox as they are instanced, risk free and instant action.


one is healthy for the sandbox the other is detrimental.

People only have a limited amount of time in the EVE play bank


you don't understand that players now just logoff if they want instant action, so its not helping the economy either

those two gamemodes have nothing to do with eachother, and thats fine


Then they need to try faction warfare.

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

SKINE DMZ
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#370 - 2013-09-18 22:25:55 UTC  |  Edited by: SKINE DMZ
I'll just drop here what CCP Gollath mentioned in the thread in GD

Quote:
For my 2c, ploughing a lot of work into creating content that is at best forced and gimmicky, at worst immersion breaking and tacky, is a waste of time. EVE focuses less on created content with developers controlling your experience ("themepark" MMO) and more on providing tools to create content with and allowing you to control your own experience ("sandbox" MMO).


I am not trying to be mean or put you down, I am literally just giving you alternative suggestions which you might enjoy more as I don't think null sec or high sec is what your play style gives.

Although if you really want the arenas, the tools for arenas are here, you can create this content like the developers say and want you to do (although with this reputation it might be a little hard to start with). There is a system which the big Red Versus Blue Corporation use for frigates, and you can do a lot of this kind of thing in Faction Warfare. Next to that nothing is stopping you from actually setting this up.

I understand that this is not a button that puts you in a arena, but that specific element, just that is what goes so against the sandbox and my apologies for using the sandbox, but it is true as it breaks immersion (or would need a good thought out alternative maybe like the simulator combined with WiS content which I support) and would affect the gameplay if there are no consequences or risk in this element.

A lot of big games do have this arena system, and I would agree that this is the majority of the players who would want such a thing, but it is a seriously dangerous step if CCP would choose to go this way as the majority of their community who has been here for a long time would never support this. It would change the players, and the game. There are already a lot of ways to get quick fights going and seriously you should try them as opposed to high sec and null sec, I would also agree with you that there are a lot of boring players in those high sec and null sec systems. But seriously try out low sec and FW there, there are a lot more solo players and little gangs going. Or join RVB for many instant fights in their constant war.

Next to that Wormholes are awesome.

I disagree

Ustrello
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#371 - 2013-09-18 22:34:03 UTC
Face it harry your idea was more dead on arrival than a crack whore's baby.
Captain Farallon
Moongoo Mining and Mixing
Goonswarm Federation
#372 - 2013-09-18 22:34:42 UTC
Harry, it sounds like you're not happy with EVE Online. This is not an arena game, but even so the developers do hold arena style events like the Alliance Tournaments. Even so, the losses in those events are permanent like in regular combat. The closest things EVE has to regular arena combat is faction warfare, and from what I understand it fits most of the criteria you're looking for.

If players are logging off because they can't find combat in EVE Online then they're doing it wrong. If they're playing World of Tanks (or other arena style games) that's fine because we didn't sign any contracts with our purchase of EVE limiting us to EVE and only EVE. I run multiple EVE accounts and am loving War Thunder as well. I suggest you try any of the many arena style titles available right now - many of them free to play.
Captain Farallon
Moongoo Mining and Mixing
Goonswarm Federation
#373 - 2013-09-18 22:44:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Farallon
If I may make a suggestion: stop sitting in JU- killing cyno alts in rookie ships and go join up with faction warfare. From the looks of your kill history you haven't done much pvp at all, and yet you're criticizing the system as if you're an authority on it. There is a LOT more to EVE Online then you've apparently experienced. You'll thank me later for this advice.

...unless of course you prefer killing afk cyno newbie ships and are unwilling to at least try the suggestions people are making for you, and the real fun is complaining on the forums about alleged missing features you haven't even explored yet.
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#374 - 2013-09-19 07:05:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
factional warfare does not offer what I'm searching for, if you search for 10 vs. 10, 50 vs. 50 you will search forever and not find it

there are just the normal 10 vs. 1 fights, or the 5 year skilled player shooting the 1 year skilled, uneven fights thats not challanging gameplay, its just about hording up as much people as possible to blob, or to fnd a new gamer that engages and looses

if you really want a challanging fight you wait for hours, its just cat and mouse game all the time, some are cats some are the mouse

you guys should not just sit in the station and play the game to realize this

the gamemode i propose will have those 10 vs. 10, 50 vs. 50 even fights within 30 seconds over a matchup system provided by the client, thats how its done in modern games and thats what is needed also in eve

that type of gameply is missing and thats the type of gameplay that has the biggest playerbase

attractig those players would just be a smart move, CCP tried with Dust, however I think they should have tried this in eve with an arena and league matchup system
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#375 - 2013-09-19 07:42:52 UTC
Lock thread for trolling, nobody can't be this stupid for real.

.

Tel Perion
Hazy Services Incorporated
#376 - 2013-09-19 08:32:09 UTC
Roime wrote:
Lock thread for trolling, nobody can't be this stupid for real.



Yeah, Harry clearly just wants to argue. He's completely ignoring any and all suggestions on how to achieve what he wants with the tools that are available and continues to demand WOW type arena combat. He's got to be a troll.

Or a douche.

I still can't decide.
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#377 - 2013-09-19 08:42:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
Captain Farallon wrote:
Harry, it sounds like you're not happy with EVE Online. This is not an arena game, but even so the developers do hold arena style events like the Alliance Tournaments. Even so, the losses in those events are permanent like in regular combat. The closest things EVE has to regular arena combat is faction warfare, and from what I understand it fits most of the criteria you're looking for.

If players are logging off because they can't find combat in EVE Online then they're doing it wrong. If they're playing World of Tanks (or other arena style games) that's fine because we didn't sign any contracts with our purchase of EVE limiting us to EVE and only EVE. I run multiple EVE accounts and am loving War Thunder as well. I suggest you try any of the many arena style titles available right now - many of them free to play.


no, arena style gameplay is needed in eve because it is perfect with the gamemechanics and big scale battles

no other game could provide instant 1000 vs. 1000 spacefights over a matchmaking system

this is unused potential with the game engine, at the moment nearly nobody can experience 1000 vs. 1000 fights, a lot do not even experience 100 vs. 100 often, you have to wait for month and you need to be in the right alliance when its happening, and you need to be on the right day as well at the right time, too many hurdles to experience it

those fights should happen every day, this is what gamers want, and they want that instantly, this has to be promoted

this will attract much more gamers than you guys with 100 accounts, thats not healthy growth if you grow the accounts by just maximizing the accounts per customer, this is more like cancer growth, showing something is wrong with the existing gameplay
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#378 - 2013-09-19 09:08:07 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:
Captain Farallon wrote:
Harry, it sounds like you're not happy with EVE Online. This is not an arena game, but even so the developers do hold arena style events like the Alliance Tournaments. Even so, the losses in those events are permanent like in regular combat. The closest things EVE has to regular arena combat is faction warfare, and from what I understand it fits most of the criteria you're looking for.

If players are logging off because they can't find combat in EVE Online then they're doing it wrong. If they're playing World of Tanks (or other arena style games) that's fine because we didn't sign any contracts with our purchase of EVE limiting us to EVE and only EVE. I run multiple EVE accounts and am loving War Thunder as well. I suggest you try any of the many arena style titles available right now - many of them free to play.


no, arena style gameplay is needed in eve because it is perfect with the gamemechanics and big scale battles

no other game could provide instant 1000 vs. 1000 spacefights over a matchmaking system

this is unused potential with the game engine, at the moment nearly nobody can experience 1000 vs. 1000 fights, a lot do not even experience 100 vs. 100 often, you have to wait for month and you need to be in the right alliance when its happening, and you need to be on the right day as well at the right time, too many hurdles to experience it

those fights should happen every day, this is what gamers want, and they want that instantly, this has to be promoted

this will attract much more gamers than you guys with 100 accounts, thats not healthy growth if you grow the accounts by just maximizing the accounts per customer, this is more like cancer growth, showing something is wrong with the existing gameplay


1) you still don't realize that the big fights are awesome because they don't happen every day, and because they cost actual ISK, take a lot of time prepare and have consequences in the wars? It's not the pressing F1 part that is great about PVP, it's the build-up, tactics and outcome.

2) if you think 1000 people can form a fleet complete with assigned roles and agree to execute any kind of tactics in your "30 seconds" you're just clueless about how fleets work

You're confusing competitive with Forvever-syndrome: a rare and unfortunate condition with features of lazyness, ADD and risk-aversion tied together with ignorance and messiah-complex.





.

Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#379 - 2013-09-19 09:15:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
Roime wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
Captain Farallon wrote:
Harry, it sounds like you're not happy with EVE Online. This is not an arena game, but even so the developers do hold arena style events like the Alliance Tournaments. Even so, the losses in those events are permanent like in regular combat. The closest things EVE has to regular arena combat is faction warfare, and from what I understand it fits most of the criteria you're looking for.

If players are logging off because they can't find combat in EVE Online then they're doing it wrong. If they're playing World of Tanks (or other arena style games) that's fine because we didn't sign any contracts with our purchase of EVE limiting us to EVE and only EVE. I run multiple EVE accounts and am loving War Thunder as well. I suggest you try any of the many arena style titles available right now - many of them free to play.


no, arena style gameplay is needed in eve because it is perfect with the gamemechanics and big scale battles

no other game could provide instant 1000 vs. 1000 spacefights over a matchmaking system

this is unused potential with the game engine, at the moment nearly nobody can experience 1000 vs. 1000 fights, a lot do not even experience 100 vs. 100 often, you have to wait for month and you need to be in the right alliance when its happening, and you need to be on the right day as well at the right time, too many hurdles to experience it

those fights should happen every day, this is what gamers want, and they want that instantly, this has to be promoted

this will attract much more gamers than you guys with 100 accounts, thats not healthy growth if you grow the accounts by just maximizing the accounts per customer, this is more like cancer growth, showing something is wrong with the existing gameplay


1) you still don't realize that the big fights are awesome because they don't happen every day, and because they cost actual ISK, take a lot of time prepare and have consequences in the wars? It's not the pressing F1 part that is great about PVP, it's the build-up, tactics and outcome.

2) if you think 1000 people can form a fleet complete with assigned roles and agree to execute any kind of tactics in your "30 seconds" you're just clueless about how fleets work

You're confusing competitive with Forvever-syndrome: a rare and unfortunate condition with features of lazyness, ADD and risk-aversion tied together with ignorance and messiah-complex.




1. you don't understand modern gamers

2. those 1000 will be fine and have a lot of fun

if you think arena fights will be so bad, just don't play in it, trust me, those other people will be fine with it

you play your sandbox, we play our arenas, not sure why you guys have issues with that

you keep repeating that you will never play in arenas, so all be fine

its just two different types of players, thats why it is seperated form the eve universe

you people act like if you want to decide what game a gamer should play

those eve dictators are so funny
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#380 - 2013-09-19 09:22:54 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:


1. you don't understand modern gamers

2. those 1000 will be fine and have a lot of fun

if you think arena fights will be so bad, just don't play in it, trust me, those other people will be fine with it

you play your sandbox, we play our arenas, not sure why you guys have issues with that

you keep repeating that you will never play in arenas, so all be fine

its just two different types of players, thats why it is seperated form the eve universe

you people act like if you want to decide what game a gamer should play

those eve dictators are so funny


1. you don't understand any games

2. no, they will be a chaotic mess with totally random outcomes

Yes, we play EVE, you are free to play other games with the consentual, meaningless and boring gameplay you like

You act like you are the one who knows what everyone else likes, when you know nothing of the game you are posting about, and continue trying to dictate what CCP should waste their dev time on.

.