These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Winter expansion 2013/14 - What will it be?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lara Dantreb
Reisende des Schwarzschild Grenze
#81 - 2013-09-12 21:07:04 UTC
Tech 3 modules : at least as good as Meta 4/5 but way less overheating while overloaded ! Can be fit only on T3 hulls

The missing 5th subsystem ! giving a boost to overload too !

---   Buying T2 ship bpos since 2005  ---
Cynter DeVries
Spheroidal Projections
#82 - 2013-09-12 22:39:05 UTC
Bischopt wrote:
Now that Odyssey's been done they should do Troy.

New main feature: disguising yourself as a frozen corpse while you're still alive and attacking ships from the inside after they pick you up.
Then again, in Odyssey you cant visit your dead mom in hell or kill a bunch of guys who are trying to bang your wife. Troy probably won't let you play trojan horse either :(

Nah, we did the Trojan Horse thing with the NeX.

Eve Online: Aeneid
All the Odyssey features get revisited, then bounty hunting, then the Jovians get reborn as Romulans with the founding of really-quite-altitudinous-sec space.

Cynter's Law of feature suggestion: Thou shalt not suggest NPCs do something players could do instead.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#83 - 2013-09-12 22:43:39 UTC
Cynter DeVries wrote:
Nah, we did the Trojan Horse thing with the NeX.

Eve Online: Aeneid
All the Odyssey features get revisited, then bounty hunting, then the Jovians get reborn as Romulans with the founding of really-quite-altitudinous-sec space.

Shouldn't they be Remusians in that case, just to avoid any potential IP quarrels?
R4VE
Tolerable Risk
#84 - 2013-09-12 23:01:19 UTC
fix roles and pos's, call it an expansion I dont care just do it!
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#85 - 2013-09-13 01:07:59 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Mycool Jahksn wrote:
Maybe we'll see planetary flight? Should have arrived 7 years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Pg1dzAvL2M


Or maybe we won't. Roll


Never going to happen. Get over it.



one can dream cant they Cry

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#86 - 2013-09-13 01:12:08 UTC
Malcanis wrote:


It's obvious to even a casual observer that planetary flight was a nice idea mentioned nearly a decade ago that's never going to be implemented.


how about EVE Valkyrie? i could see atmospheric dog fighting in gas giants and ice planets and such?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
Rosewalker
Khumaak Flying Circus
#87 - 2013-09-13 05:38:09 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
when T2 industry is removed from high sec.


I don't recall any proposal to remove it from hi-sec.


I think Dinsdale is referring to a couple of dev blogs written by CCP Greyscale on design goals for null sec back in 2011. Here's the quote from the second dev blog from August 2011.

CCP Greyscale wrote:


Industry

99% self-sufficient by volume


  • For further discussion. People building things in nullsec should only need to travel to empire (or more than a couple of regions across nullsec) for low-volume supplies. This requires that industrialists have a ready supply of low-end minerals available nearby in nullsec, without breaking other systems or goals. (Likely means some way of mining low-ends in a massively more rapid manner compared to current tools.)


Geared towards T2


  • Our current proposal is that hisec is for volume T1 goods, lowsec will be for meta/faction gear eventually, nullsec is for T2, and wormholes are for T3


Lucrative


  • Building T2 modules/ships in nullsec should be a good way to make a lot of money. There are many inherent drawbacks in doing industry in nullsec and we need to balance out these hidden costs.




Dinsdale does have a tendency to spout off his theories without providing links to back up his arguments, doesn't he? It was a very interesting proposal that Greyscale and Team BFF put forward. Why do you think I moved to low sec?

The Nosy Gamer - CCP Random: "hehe, falls under the category: nice try, but no. ;)"
Borgana
Transco
#88 - 2013-09-30 15:37:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Borgana
How about Ore provides us with a new mining ship to fill in T3 on them.

Or add some high, med and low slots for editional modules (extra high slots doesn't have to be strip miners)
just some extra way of barges and exhumers to be able to defend themselves in low sec and null sec space from invaders.

For a long time a lot of the ships have undergone a lot of changes, and even new ships have been added into the game.
Though what about barges and exhumers? they havn't had better ships being put into the game on those (Venture doesn't count)

come on CCP think about the industry part of EVE also :-)