These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Part 1

Author
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#81 - 2013-09-10 11:29:41 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
...In the end, the New Order's prime goal is getting people to interact and play in a Massively Multiplayer Online Game...


A noble excuse for plain old blackmail/extortion... ah well. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Lady Areola Fappington
#82 - 2013-09-10 11:41:21 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
...In the end, the New Order's prime goal is getting people to interact and play in a Massively Multiplayer Online Game...


A noble excuse for plain old blackmail/extortion... ah well. Blink



Hah, I love EVE!

In all honesty though, consider this with an open mind. If we just wanted to gank and bump, why offer a permit? If we wanted to blackmail, why only ask for 10mil for a year? If I were going for the ISK line, I'd charge a bunch more, for less time, with rules that are utterly impossible to maintain.

Setting aside all the glamor and glitter written in the Code, what is it really asking people to do? Interact. Play the game. Do you honestly think our gank teams can catch a miner who is ATK, tanky, and paying attention to local? That's a pretty hard gank to land, even worse in that we tell people exactly how we accomplish each kill.

If you play EVE as a miner, you have very little to worry about from The New Order. In fact, there's quite a few opportunities to make ISK off us (we seem to use up a lot of ships, and you miners are constantly reminding me that ships come from minerals). Now, if you play "push butan watch hulu collect ISK"....well, you may not want to interact with us, but we want to interact with you!

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#83 - 2013-09-10 12:09:09 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:

Setting aside all the glamor and glitter written in the Code, what is it really asking people to do? Interact. Play the game. Do you honestly think our gank teams can catch a miner who is ATK, tanky, and paying attention to local? That's a pretty hard gank to land, even worse in that we tell people exactly how we accomplish each kill.

Yes, killing a miner that is ATK, tanky and paying attention to local is pretty easy. Only a procurer or skiff would protect them from a gank landing on grid. Since you warp to your scout at distance, you can't even look out for a miner getting too close.
You new order guys put it behind the code, but at the end of the day, you'll gank whoever you want, whenever you want, regardless of code, permits and state of AFKness. It's just an RP reason to gank, which there's nowt wrong with.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#84 - 2013-09-10 12:16:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
You can sugarcoat it all you want, it's still not "right"... and you know it, or you wouldn't have to find excuses for it on every bend - not you specifically, mind you... I give you the benefit of the doubt, and believe that you believe what you are writig - still, forcing your opinion of how the game has to be played on others, is walking the fine line between asocial and amoral. It's only, somewhat tolerable 'cause EVE is the game it is.

...also: 100 bil may not be the most you could have gotten out of the whole "project", but it surely doesn't make you a good Samaritan, either. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Lady Areola Fappington
#85 - 2013-09-10 12:20:59 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:

Setting aside all the glamor and glitter written in the Code, what is it really asking people to do? Interact. Play the game. Do you honestly think our gank teams can catch a miner who is ATK, tanky, and paying attention to local? That's a pretty hard gank to land, even worse in that we tell people exactly how we accomplish each kill.

Yes, killing a miner that is ATK, tanky and paying attention to local is pretty easy. Only a procurer or skiff would protect them from a gank landing on grid. Since you warp to your scout at distance, you can't even look out for a miner getting too close.
You new order guys put it behind the code, but at the end of the day, you'll gank whoever you want, whenever you want, regardless of code, permits and state of AFKness. It's just an RP reason to gank, which there's nowt wrong with.



dude, that's too much ~effort~. Why worry about jumping a tanked ATK miner, setting up the proper approach, and warping in at distance when there's 6 other guys in the ice belt who're AFK and max yield fit. All you gotta do with those guys is mash approach on your venture, wait till you quit bobbling around, then warp your gankfleet in.

Anyway, your first hint that Something Bad is up is when you see all those red blinky -10's in local. That's the time to start vacating the area for abit. If you don't have your screen set up so you can see everyone in local at a glance...well, there's that situational awareness thing.

Yes Yes, I know sometimes we use warp in at range. Sometimes we even use cloaks. The vast, vast majority of scouts are ventures or procurers carrying scan mods and no mining lasers.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Takari
Promised Victorious Entropy
#86 - 2013-09-10 12:29:03 UTC
So you stopped mining, skilled up, and ganked someone? Truly you have learned the lesson James 315 sought to teach.

"Roll the dice, don't think twice. This is the way of things. Welcome to EVE." ~ CCP Falcon

"Good luck, shoot straight and don't back down." - Serendipity Lost

Lady Areola Fappington
#87 - 2013-09-10 12:31:15 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
You can sugarcoat it all you want, it's still not "right"... and you know it, or you wouldn't have to find excuses for it on every bend - not you specifically, mind you... I give you the benefit of the doubt, and believe that you believe what you are writig - still, forcing your option of how the game has to be played on others, is walking the fine line between asocial and amoral. It's only, somewhat tolerable 'cause EVE is the game it is.

...also: 100 bil may not be the most you could have gotten out of the whole "project", but it surely doesn't make you a good Samaritan, either. Blink



Different strokes I suppose. It's just a video game to me, I don't make moral judgements over a video game. To me, claiming someone is "bad" or "good" due to actions in EVE makes about as much sense as claiming someone is a mass murderer because they play CoD.

When I play EVE on this character I'm the awful nasty New Order agent forcing my will on innocent AFK miners who just want to be left alone.

When I log in on my corp CEO alt, I'm the nice caring mother figure guiding an indy corp around highsec to gather our riches in ore.

When I play Assassins Creed I'm a stealthy murderer from the past who sticks sharp pokey things into computer generated characters.

None of it has any real connection to me "behind the keyboard", per se. That person is a nurse practitioner working for a childrens hospital, who should really get her backside in bed to get some rest before a 24 hour shift. You folks are just so interesting to chat with!

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#88 - 2013-09-10 12:43:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Different strokes I suppose. It's just a video game to me, I don't make moral judgements over a video game. To me, claiming someone is "bad" or "good" due to actions in EVE makes about as much sense as claiming someone is a mass murderer because they play CoD.


...and that's where the biggest problem of MMOs... no, the whole internet culture these days... lies. As soon as you are effecting the lives of others, you have a moral responsibility... especially when you are in a position of (questionable) power.

You might find that trivial... but there have been kids that killed them self due to internet mobbing, so, yea, it isn't trivial at all... you never know who the other person is, you are having so much fun picking on.

I know, that was painted in rather broad strokes, but I guess you get my meaning.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#89 - 2013-09-10 14:58:14 UTC
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
1: OP doesn't know that moving at 1 m/s (and not webbed) means you are not aligned.

2: OP doesn't know that writing thousands of words while lacking a KM is a waste of a long lie.

3: OP doesn't know that misrepresenting himself as belonging to the group of people who have killed the invincible stabber (real membership = 0) is now against the TOS and bannable.



+4: OP isn't aware that this thread belongs in crime and punishment.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#90 - 2013-09-10 15:06:40 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Different strokes I suppose. It's just a video game to me, I don't make moral judgements over a video game. To me, claiming someone is "bad" or "good" due to actions in EVE makes about as much sense as claiming someone is a mass murderer because they play CoD.


...and that's where the biggest problem of MMOs... no, the whole internet culture these days... lies. As soon as you are effecting the lives of others, you have a moral responsibility... especially when you are in a position of (questionable) power.

You might find that trivial... but there have been kids that killed them self due to internet mobbing, so, yea, it isn't trivial at all... you never know who the other person is, you are having so much fun picking on.

I know, that was painted in rather broad strokes, but I guess you get my meaning.

Oh noes, better protect the miners they might be hurt in our internet spaceships environment.

Ganking might as well be harming people in real life, eve is just that real

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Lady Areola Fappington
#91 - 2013-09-10 15:10:42 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:


...and that's where the biggest problem of MMOs... no, the whole internet culture these days... lies. As soon as you are effecting the lives of others, you have a moral responsibility... especially when you are in a position of (questionable) power.

You might find that trivial... but there have been kids that killed them self due to internet mobbing, so, yea, it isn't trivial at all... you never know who the other person is, you are having so much fun picking on.

I know, that was painted in rather broad strokes, but I guess you get my meaning.


Broad strokes sometimes work best to convey a point, and I get you.

My counter to that though, is there should be no power as you phrased it, in this game. It's a video game. The line between fantasy (EVE) and RL should be nice, clear, and bright. EVE is pretend, Real Life is Real Life. When I set sights on an ill-prepared miner, I'm not attacking the person behind the screen. I'm attacking the character he's playing.

This game is billed as a harsh, cold, dystopian future where it's dog eat dog, morals are subjective, and the people with the biggest guns run the show, fair or not.

What you are basically asking people to do, is not engage in the game as designed and advertised, because there's a chance out there that someone might not have the mental maturity to realise the difference between EVE and RL. To me, that's an unfair burden to place on someone who is enjoying a video game, in accordance with the rules laid down for said game.

If we were playing a FPS, you wouldn't say "Guys don't shoot each other. One of you might be better than Timmy, and he'll feel bullied."
If we were playing an RTS, you wouldn't say "Guys, don't use rush tactics. Jimmy might feel mobbed, and hurt himself."


EVE is a competitive game. It's played predominantly by above average intelligence hypercompetitive 30somethings. There will be winners, and losers.



Just to expand on what I mean by the RL/EVE dividing line. IN EVE, I'll shoot, gank, and bump ill-prepared miners every chance I can. In RL, I'd invite that same miner out for a beer, because we're fellow players in EVE. If said miner's response to the invitation is screaming curses and throwing punches at the evil amoral ganker....well, that's no separation between fantasy and reality.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#92 - 2013-09-10 15:16:46 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:


Anyway, your first hint that Something Bad is up is when you see all those red blinky -10's in local. That's the time to start vacating the area for abit. If you don't have your screen set up so you can see everyone in local at a glance...well, there's that situational awareness thing.



The few times I've even encountered them, they tend to be +4 and above actually.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Lady Areola Fappington
#93 - 2013-09-10 15:33:09 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:


Anyway, your first hint that Something Bad is up is when you see all those red blinky -10's in local. That's the time to start vacating the area for abit. If you don't have your screen set up so you can see everyone in local at a glance...well, there's that situational awareness thing.



The few times I've even encountered them, they tend to be +4 and above actually.


You sure they were New Order? Our first goal is to get new guys down to outlaw status, by whatever means possible. We have channel celebrations when someone finally hits pure -10. Our fleet tactics revolve around operations as outlaw.

I know of a group out there who does predominantly freighter ganking, that requires their guys to remain about -3. You may have run into them.

If you really want to know if someone's "in" New Order, feel free to message me. I owe you a couple favors, Krix, you helped out one of my other avatars in the past.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#94 - 2013-09-10 15:48:37 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
This game is billed as a harsh, cold, dystopian future where it's dog eat dog, morals are subjective, and the people with the biggest guns run the show, fair or not.

What you are basically asking people to do, is not engage in the game as designed and advertised, because there's a chance out there that someone might not have the mental maturity to realise the difference between EVE and RL. To me, that's an unfair burden to place on someone who is enjoying a video game, in accordance with the rules laid down for said game.

If we were playing a FPS, you wouldn't say "Guys don't shoot each other. One of you might be better than Timmy, and he'll feel bullied."
If we were playing an RTS, you wouldn't say "Guys, don't use rush tactics. Jimmy might feel mobbed, and hurt himself."

EVE is a competitive game. It's played predominantly by above average intelligence hypercompetitive 30somethings. There will be winners, and losers.

Just to expand on what I mean by the RL/EVE dividing line. IN EVE, I'll shoot, gank, and bump ill-prepared miners every chance I can. In RL, I'd invite that same miner out for a beer, because we're fellow players in EVE. If said miner's response to the invitation is screaming curses and throwing punches at the evil amoral ganker....well, that's no separation between fantasy and reality.

While yes, it's a game and there's a separation between RL and EVE, but what you guys tend to engage in is not attacking a character, but an individuals method of playing the game. You repeatedly attack the same group of people telling them they are not allowed to play the game their way. In your FPS example, it's the equivalent of spawncamping permanently. Sure, it's a way to play the game, but since it's a multiplayer game, there's a certain level of social responsibility to ensure you are not permanently ruining the same individuals fun.

I don't really have a problem with the ganking crowd, but I can see how it would upset people and how I would consider what you do for your fun at the expense of a specific group of others to be on the shadier side of morality. Other people gank but they gank everyone, or they scam, but they scam everyone. They don't pick a certain target simply because it's easy to harass, then repeatedly attack that group until they are forced to change their playstyle or quit.

Honestly though, considering we already heard last week how you guys take some of this way beyond the confines of the game and purposely harass then defame people out of game, the discussion about your morality is not really required.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#95 - 2013-09-10 15:54:49 UTC
Jennam Musana wrote:
"He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee." -Some guy with a silly moustache Shocked



"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man." -HST

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#96 - 2013-09-10 16:02:00 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Shalua Rui wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Welcome to the high sec way of thinking. Where using an exploit that could get you banned is seen as a better option than fitting a tank in those empty mids.


Nice generalization there...

He has a point though Shalua, miners who fit a non cursory tank are few and far between. It's only the minority that fit more than a civilian/ small shield booster; most won't even fit a damage control, even though it can add around 30% to their EHP, because it uses a slot that can be used for an MLU.



It's funny when you look at the people who gank miners are the ones who complain more about the lack of tank than the miners who move on and simply replace their ship.

If all ships were designed for tank, fitting a tank wouldn't be an option, it would be default.

There is however, a strong percentage of miners who assume both yield and tank when only fitting yield... but those miners are still in their learning stages of being a miner in a pvp world.

They learn quickly, for the most part.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#97 - 2013-09-10 16:07:30 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
S Byerley wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:

Ok I'll rephrase that, I'm not directly discussing forum moderation.

What I am doing is using previously moderated posts, and their unredacted versions, as examples to suggest that the pre spawning of Concord for protection has been deemed an exploit in the past.

Does that satisfy you?


If you like, but it's obvious that moderation is based on what gets seen/reported rather than being an accurate indication of what is/isn't an exploit.




You're pretty much exactly wrong with that statement, my risk averse highsec friend.

CCP, and by extension the mod team, get quite antsy and delete happy even if you post a conceptual exploit, that isn't yet in the wild. They'll pop up and delete it, flagged or not.

I would recommend you go give the ol' pre-spawn CONCORD trick a try, but that would be encouraging you to break the ToS, which isn't kosher.

Instead, try this. File a support ticket to the senior GM team. This means you have to elevate the ticket if a senior GM doesn't answer. The question you want to ask is "Is it considered an exploit to pre-spawn CONCORD with a noob ship on an alt account, while mining in an asteroid belt with my main?"

I know the answer already, having done it, but we aren't allowed to share GM communication on the forums.



Noob ship.

Out of curiosity... does that have any factoring in regards to pre spawning Concord an exploit? Why not just ask "Is pre spawning Concord an exploit?" and be done with it?

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#98 - 2013-09-10 16:08:53 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Well, if taking into account the, very questionable, practice of "pulling CONCORD for protection" - a practice I didn't know of, by the way - my argument indeed is a little moot... IF it's really used by people that don't know how to/bother to properly fit their mining ships, but, on the other hand, know how to pull THAT off... which I doubt. I mean, in what universe is using an alt to draw CONCORD in for protection less complicated/problematic then fitting a proper tank?

...I'm mean, doesn't that whole argument sound wee bit too convenient, not to mention illogical?



What's worse, is that it's supposedly okay to drag Concord away, but not near....

Makes you wonder if Concord manipulation is the exploit, or the methods used in drawing them away/near...

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Lady Areola Fappington
#99 - 2013-09-10 16:09:29 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
This game is billed as a harsh, cold, dystopian future where it's dog eat dog, morals are subjective, and the people with the biggest guns run the show, fair or not.

What you are basically asking people to do, is not engage in the game as designed and advertised, because there's a chance out there that someone might not have the mental maturity to realise the difference between EVE and RL. To me, that's an unfair burden to place on someone who is enjoying a video game, in accordance with the rules laid down for said game.

If we were playing a FPS, you wouldn't say "Guys don't shoot each other. One of you might be better than Timmy, and he'll feel bullied."
If we were playing an RTS, you wouldn't say "Guys, don't use rush tactics. Jimmy might feel mobbed, and hurt himself."

EVE is a competitive game. It's played predominantly by above average intelligence hypercompetitive 30somethings. There will be winners, and losers.

Just to expand on what I mean by the RL/EVE dividing line. IN EVE, I'll shoot, gank, and bump ill-prepared miners every chance I can. In RL, I'd invite that same miner out for a beer, because we're fellow players in EVE. If said miner's response to the invitation is screaming curses and throwing punches at the evil amoral ganker....well, that's no separation between fantasy and reality.

While yes, it's a game and there's a separation between RL and EVE, but what you guys tend to engage in is not attacking a character, but an individuals method of playing the game. You repeatedly attack the same group of people telling them they are not allowed to play the game their way. In your FPS example, it's the equivalent of spawncamping permanently. Sure, it's a way to play the game, but since it's a multiplayer game, there's a certain level of social responsibility to ensure you are not permanently ruining the same individuals fun.

I don't really have a problem with the ganking crowd, but I can see how it would upset people and how I would consider what you do for your fun at the expense of a specific group of others to be on the shadier side of morality. Other people gank but they gank everyone, or they scam, but they scam everyone. They don't pick a certain target simply because it's easy to harass, then repeatedly attack that group until they are forced to change their playstyle or quit.

Honestly though, considering we already heard last week how you guys take some of this way beyond the confines of the game and purposely harass then defame people out of game, the discussion about your morality is not really required.



Yup, we target a specific group of people, ill-fit minders. Did you know, lowsec pirates target people carrying expensive cargo, and nullsec alliances target people they want to take/defend land from? The New Order also tends to spread out and move around some, as it helps prevent targeting the same person over and over again.

As for "changing playstyles"...you know, this is EVE. The cold, dark dystopian world where it's dog eat dog, morals are subjective, and you're only as strong as the guns you can bring to a fight. Yeah, I'd expect one to change their playstyle, if they think that means "Fly in in a retty, lock up some roids, and go watch Hulu till you hear asteroid depleted". Now, you may not be aware of this, but in PVP, when someone brings out a ship/fleet/doctrine that counters what you are flying, you "change your playstyle". He's got a brawler, better go fit kitey. Kitefit, go grab a brawler. These guys use cloaks, load up on smartbombs.


Now, I'm pretty sure yer referring to Erotica 1 with the whole harassing and defaming out of game, well, that was the mark's decision to continue. Nobody held a gun to the guys head, or threatened his family. All said mark had to do was disconnect, walk off, and end it all. Greed, however, tends to be a powerful motivator for people to do silly things. And yes, I spent my time singing on teamspeak as a ransom. Used to be, you got teased a little bit, maybe a blogpost if you were really awful, and a pat on the back for saving your ship. Nowdays, getting someone to sing on TS is some kind of crime against humanity.




Just to throw out a little thing on morals, this morning I listened to a very disturbing voicemail. Someone using a voice modulator called my cell, and told me he knew my address, my workplace, and the make of car I drove. I was told to apologize to the "highsec Mining Community" and post proof of deletion of my accounts, "or else". I'm sure, being the awful evil ganker, blowing up spaceships in the spaceship exploding game, that I deserved that, according to some. Yes, the police are involved. I'll soundcloud the message as soon as I get my phone back.




(reading back over my messages, I'd like to apologize if I've come off harsh. Said phone call has gotten under my skin in a bad way.)

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Malcolm Shinhwa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2013-09-10 16:10:17 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

While yes, it's a game and there's a separation between RL and EVE, but what you guys tend to engage in is not attacking a character, but an individuals method of playing the game. You repeatedly attack the same group of people telling them they are not allowed to play the game their way. In your FPS example, it's the equivalent of spawncamping permanently. Sure, it's a way to play the game, but since it's a multiplayer game, there's a certain level of social responsibility to ensure you are not permanently ruining the same individuals fun.

I don't really have a problem with the ganking crowd, but I can see how it would upset people and how I would consider what you do for your fun at the expense of a specific group of others to be on the shadier side of morality. Other people gank but they gank everyone, or they scam, but they scam everyone. They don't pick a certain target simply because it's easy to harass, then repeatedly attack that group until they are forced to change their playstyle or quit.

Honestly though, considering we already heard last week how you guys take some of this way beyond the confines of the game and purposely harass then defame people out of game, the discussion about your morality is not really required.


As I've always said, its not that we gank, its that we have a reason to gank that really ticks people off. Gank for lols and narry a thread would ever appear on the forums.

I don't remember hearing about a New Order knight or agent harassing anyone out of game. If that is true, the person being harrased should file a petition. No one I know in the NO would condone such a thing.

[i]"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental[/i]."