Player Features and Ideas Discussion

The ideas aren't anti-E-UNI. There are actually ideas in there I think they'd love, because they help their situation, without breaking the sandbox.

I think quite a few unistas (except the non-teaching-perma-members of the university) would favour the teaching corporation idea.

dynamic world by scripts could be dynamic only to its limit.

"People are the most dangerous game"

vice verza... i am not against having more dynamic Empire i am just unsure what it would mean in large scale of sociopaths of EVE, which have only one purpose and thats **** off as many people as they can.

Your posting is horrible and your ideas are bad. Please post this crap in a wow forum where it belongs. Failing that, move this tripe to F&I "where it can die a deserved death."

Wow... Nice wall of text m8. OK, moving on.......... Next up is another thread from a cosmic-hobo about how to keep your feet from swelling in space.

A fellow Achewood fan?

That would work too. Basically a tankable form of CONCORD.

It doesn't? Well, then, you are correct. The first step is depletion.

Definitely, where Faction Warfare is concerned. Faction warfare is like a perma-wardec, race vs. race, no? So where would CONCORD come into play anyhow?

Certainly a controversial idea. CCP loves their teaching corps, tend to see them as good for the game (and they certainly can be), then they should institutionalize them with a set of criteria and rules. The idea would need further fleshing out, at any rate.

I like some of the ideas you propose, although, I think if they were all implemented, they would probably destroy what high-sec is and a lot of people enjoy the high sec part of the game.

I like the idea of low-sec buffers between warring empires. This would create more price variation between the different empire market and it would allow for cross-empire traders to turn a profit by blockade running the low-sec systems.

Allowing Concord to protect low-sec system seems like a bit of a stretch though. It would be preferable if system conquered by militias could earn some faction police. Not much, but enough to be an annoyance.

A while ago, CCP also proposed the idea of having dynamic quality for mission agents. I would like this. If agents became obsolete for a while after being ove-used, people would have to move around.

Also, at this point, Incursion seem to be one of the best isk income in the game, even in high-sec. At the start, Incursions were dangerous and people lost plenty of ships there, but it's not the case anymore. Incursion have become too easy to farm. The number and duration of high-sec incursion should be deminished to favor low-sec incursions.

About the Ice Belt, being from a wormhole, I would favor Ice belt being added as a new type of Gravimetric site that requires being scanned down. They would despawn/respawn after a few days. This would add a layer of difficulty to Ice mining, but it would also increase the security. It would be suicide to mine in an open belt in low-sec without a strong escort, and having an escort makes it un-profitable to harvest. If it's in a Gravimetric site, you see the probes in space before the hammer falls - that gives a chance to the miner to escape if he's paying attention.

They all shouldn't be implemented. It's just a list of ideas. Some make more sense with certain ideas, and make less sense with others.

Exactly. It would make for better investing and speculating for those willing to take risks crossing the lowsec boundaries.

You're probably, right, that such an idea probably fits in better with Faction Warfare.

I like this idea. Going to add it to the list. Agents have a certain number of missions to give away per week, to everyone. Once their missions are gone, they do not reset until the next weekly mission reset. Something along those lines.

I really like this idea. Far better than the notion of simply moving ice from high- to lowsec. Make them something that needs to be scanned down. Excellent suggestion. (I edited #10 to adopt it to your idea.)

If there was a giant button that read "I could not vehemently disagree with these "ideas" any more than I am," I would be mashing that button with fervor.

Not a single idea would prevent Goonswarm Shrugged. There should always be the opportunity for Gallente Ice Interdictions to happen. I was careful in presenting ideas that did not prevent such events from happening. They are important to the game. They are important to empire space.