These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Real Criticism of CCP

Author
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#301 - 2013-09-08 04:44:45 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Hey, I was RIGHT! It's "having fun" during a declared "no fun time". We can't let the proles in our "industrial focused no PVP" corp get the idea that shooting at each other is an interesting part of EVE. They might depart, then who'll AFK mine for us?!


You don't think it's a little self-righteous to join an indy/pve/whatever corp and try to convert everyone? Chances are if someone is pursuing a slow-paced meta-focused profession in an already slow-paced meta-focused game, they aren't particularly interested in your childish high-sec PVP.
Lady Areola Fappington
#302 - 2013-09-08 05:50:12 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Hey, I was RIGHT! It's "having fun" during a declared "no fun time". We can't let the proles in our "industrial focused no PVP" corp get the idea that shooting at each other is an interesting part of EVE. They might depart, then who'll AFK mine for us?!


You don't think it's a little self-righteous to join an indy/pve/whatever corp and try to convert everyone? Chances are if someone is pursuing a slow-paced meta-focused profession in an already slow-paced meta-focused game, they aren't particularly interested in your childish high-sec PVP.



Not in the least! As some of the more vocal PVE only folks like to trumpet, "It's my sub when you start paying for it then you can tell me what to do".

Your premise is flawed anyway. Anyone who makes sport of deccing "industry" corps knows about the "erryone stay docked they'll just go away" tactic. Just encourages us to keep the dec going as long as possible.

You get a lot more street cred coming out and fighting, even if you don't succeed. Some of us have even been known to drop a dec when asked, if said corp cowboys up and heads out to fight.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#303 - 2013-09-08 06:06:54 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Your premise is flawed anyway. Anyone who makes sport of deccing "industry" corps knows about the "erryone stay docked they'll just go away" tactic. Just encourages us to keep the dec going as long as possible.


So you waste more time and money to feel like you haven't lost? Whatever gets your rocks off I guess, but you're underestimating the patience and diversification of seasoned indys.

Quote:
You get a lot more street cred coming out and fighting, even if you don't succeed. Some of us have even been known to drop a dec when asked, if said corp cowboys up and heads out to fight.


Sounds legit.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#304 - 2013-09-08 06:26:57 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Your premise is flawed anyway. Anyone who makes sport of deccing "industry" corps knows about the "erryone stay docked they'll just go away" tactic. Just encourages us to keep the dec going as long as possible.


So you waste more time and money to feel like you haven't lost? Whatever gets your rocks off I guess, but you're underestimating the patience and diversification of seasoned indys.


Are you, perhaps, completely incapable of understanding the motivation behind it? Firstly, if the target doesn't fight, there's not much time lost (unless you consider clicking locator agents to be significant time), and secondly for the kind of person who does it for fun it's pretty cheap.

Oh...

And it's hard to underestimate "indy corps". I once randomly wardecced a corp I saw putting up recruitment ad cans(words cannot describe how much I hate that), and recieved an evemail the next morning from not one, but two people telling me that "people like me" are the reason they were quitting eve.

So, like I said, it's quite the task to actually underestimate them. Hard to dig deeper than rock bottom.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#305 - 2013-09-08 06:52:29 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Are you, perhaps, completely incapable of understanding the motivation behind it? Firstly, if the target doesn't fight, there's not much time lost (unless you consider clicking locator agents to be significant time), and secondly for the kind of person who does it for fun it's pretty cheap.


Are you claiming corps that continuously fight back and lose don't get decced again? That certainly flies in the face of the motivations as I understand them.

Quote:
And it's hard to underestimate "indy corps". I once randomly wardecced a corp I saw putting up recruitment ad cans(words cannot describe how much I hate that), and recieved an evemail the next morning from not one, but two people telling me that "people like me" are the reason they were quitting eve.


I did say seasoned. Comparing two rage-quitters to seasoned indys is like me comparing you to.... someone who's good at PVP.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#306 - 2013-09-08 06:58:01 UTC
Quote:
Are you claiming corps that continuously fight back and lose don't get decced again? That certainly flies in the face of the motivations as I understand them.


No, I am saying that Lady Areola Fappington's statement that she will toss them a "gf" in local and leave them alone (with some respect for their backbone) is not something that you can refute as you tried to.

Quote:
I did say seasoned.


Whether you put salt, pepper, or Mrs. Dash on that meat, it's still a chicken.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#307 - 2013-09-08 07:04:41 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
No, I am saying that Lady Areola Fappington's statement that she will toss them a "gf" in local and leave them alone (with some respect for their backbone) is not something that you can refute as you tried to.


PVP doubling? Sounds legit.

Quote:
Whether you put salt, pepper, or Mrs. Dash on that meat, it's still a chicken.


Is it aggravating when your unseasoned steak tastes like **** in comparison?
Lady Areola Fappington
#308 - 2013-09-08 07:25:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Lady Areola Fappington
Here, S Byerley, I'll give you the exact thought processes behind each of these scenarios. I can't make it any more clear.


Indy corp docks up, clams up:
Hah, this is going to be easy. All it took was one wardec to stop them in their tracks. I got enough ISK in the fund to keep this going for months, I wonder when one of them will grow a pair and peek out. Hey other guys in my corp, all you gotta do is park a cloaky in system here to freeze the wardecced corp up. Someone get a spy in so we can laugh at all the raging in corpchat.


Indy corp grows a pair, and comes out to fight.
Hmm, looks like these guys wanna play. Caught me with my pants down, I was in the middle of smack talking, lost my cruiser. Hey other guys in my corp come over to this system these guys are gonna throw down. Yo, Bob X Target, next time you fit that rifter, try a brawler fit with ACs. (Week later) Hey you target guys are fun. You want to fight another week, or get back to your indy thing?



I respect the indy guys who're willing to fight back. I laugh at the tears generated by the indy guys who hide in-station and rage about how unfair it is. Either way, I'm getting my kicks out of the deal.


And, just to toss in here, which of these sounds more fun? "Hey guys we've been wardecced. Everyone dock up, and stay docked. Don't interact with the deccers. Maybe if we're really quiet they'll go away." vs. "Hey guys we're wardecced. Everyone jump in whatever you can afford to lose. We're bringing the fight to THEM, and be-damned with the losses!"

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#309 - 2013-09-08 07:28:55 UTC  |  Edited by: S Byerley
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Hey you target guys are fun. You want to fight another week, or get back to your indy thing?


Sounds legit.

Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
I laugh at the tears generated by the indy guys who hide in-station and rage about how unfair it is.


And when they don't cry or rage?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#310 - 2013-09-08 07:37:35 UTC
Quote:
And when they don't cry or rage?


You keep it going until they do, or until they disband.

Is this really so hard?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#311 - 2013-09-08 07:40:16 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
And when they don't cry or rage?


You keep it going until they do, or until they disband.

Is this really so hard?


When compared to doing nothing? Certainly.
Lady Areola Fappington
#312 - 2013-09-08 07:44:11 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Hey you target guys are fun. You want to fight another week, or get back to your indy thing?


Sounds legit.

Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
I laugh at the tears generated by the indy guys who hide in-station and rage about how unfair it is.


And when they don't cry or rage?



They cry and rage. They always do. I've been at this in one form or another for quite a few years, and it never fails.

Even if they don't say a word, you know you're getting under their skin, disrupting operations, and causing a bother. The neverending threads on how horrible and bad wardecs and ganking is proof enough of that.


I'll let you in on a small secret. I run a moderately successful mining and industry corp on my alt account. We live in high. We've been decced by all the usual suspects....in fact, I think Mr. Kane may have turned his attention to us once in the past. My standing SOP for warops has been "See a WT, go get in a combat ship, and hunt them. Don't care about loss."

My corpmates adore it. Our killboards went past infrared a long time ago. The running gag in corp chat is "WT in local, gonna go lose me a ship!" Yet, somehow, we've survived...not only that, grown. We've had a few "Griefer corps" give us props for shooting back. Sure as hell beats "We're decced, everyone dock up, no fun allowed."


No I'm not going to tell you who my indy corp is. You can try to find us if you like though. We like shooting spaceships in the spaceship shooting game.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#313 - 2013-09-08 07:44:44 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
And when they don't cry or rage?


You keep it going until they do, or until they disband.

Is this really so hard?


When compared to doing nothing? Certainly.


It's not even hard. I've done far more just for the offchance of tears.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#314 - 2013-09-08 07:50:48 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
They cry and rage. They always do. I've been at this in one form or another for quite a few years, and it never fails.

Even if they don't say a word, you know you're getting under their skin, disrupting operations, and causing a bother.


They always rage because even when they don't rage they're raging? Straight
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#315 - 2013-09-08 07:52:29 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
They cry and rage. They always do. I've been at this in one form or another for quite a few years, and it never fails.

Even if they don't say a word, you know you're getting under their skin, disrupting operations, and causing a bother.


They always rage because even when they don't rage they're raging? Straight


Close.

Because even if they don't rage, they're not playing.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#316 - 2013-09-08 07:57:59 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
S Byerley wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
They cry and rage. They always do. I've been at this in one form or another for quite a few years, and it never fails.

Even if they don't say a word, you know you're getting under their skin, disrupting operations, and causing a bother.


They always rage because even when they don't rage they're raging? Straight


Close.

Because even if they don't rage, they're not playing.


Keep thinking that.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#317 - 2013-09-08 08:01:04 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
S Byerley wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
They cry and rage. They always do. I've been at this in one form or another for quite a few years, and it never fails.

Even if they don't say a word, you know you're getting under their skin, disrupting operations, and causing a bother.


They always rage because even when they don't rage they're raging? Straight


Close.

Because even if they don't rage, they're not playing.


Keep thinking that.


I shall, given the terms of what we were discussing:

I wardec someone.

They decide to not login/undock/whatever in hopes that I will go away.

Ergo, they aren't playing. Which, presumably, since they are paying CCP for it, they want to do.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Gordin Brott
Huvilma Sentinels
GunFam
#318 - 2013-09-08 10:58:25 UTC
A partial solution to the highsec ganking issue would be to make characters on trial accounts unable to initiate aggression against other player characters in highsec. "Concord regrets to inform you that this action is prohibited under the terms of your probationary pilot license"

As things currently stand, there is nothing stopping me from having a string of 5-6 trial accounts all simultaneously training the basic skills needed to fly a suicide gank Catalyst. Once that character's sec status drops below a level where they can function, discard him and peel the next one off the stack. There isn't even any need to biomass them, as you simply let the trial run out and abandon it. These accounts cost me nothing beyond the time needed to set them up, and as long as I don't do anything stupid such as contracting hulls or skillbooks to them, are completely untraceable to me.

Of course, if you have subbed an account to do this or are taking time out from training your main, then as far as I'm concerned you have the right to do whatever is allowed by the EULA, no matter how morally dubious. You are paying (or getting someone else to pay) for game time with real-world currency, and should be rewarded accordingly. Trial accounts are not paid for, and it seems reasonable to me that they should be limited in such a way as they can no longer be used as disposable anonymous suicide alts.

With regard to this being too restrictive to potential new players, this prohibition should only apply to people initiating aggression, so shooting somebody who is already flashy or a wartarget would be allowed. Also, there would be nothing stopping them from joining FW and/or shooting up lowsec.
Lady Areola Fappington
#319 - 2013-09-08 11:22:25 UTC
Gordin Brott wrote:
A partial solution to the highsec ganking issue would be to make characters on trial accounts unable to initiate aggression against other player characters in highsec. "Concord regrets to inform you that this action is prohibited under the terms of your probationary pilot license"

As things currently stand, there is nothing stopping me from having a string of 5-6 trial accounts all simultaneously training the basic skills needed to fly a suicide gank Catalyst. Once that character's sec status drops below a level where they can function, discard him and peel the next one off the stack. There isn't even any need to biomass them, as you simply let the trial run out and abandon it. These accounts cost me nothing beyond the time needed to set them up, and as long as I don't do anything stupid such as contracting hulls or skillbooks to them, are completely untraceable to me.

Of course, if you have subbed an account to do this or are taking time out from training your main, then as far as I'm concerned you have the right to do whatever is allowed by the EULA, no matter how morally dubious. You are paying (or getting someone else to pay) for game time with real-world currency, and should be rewarded accordingly. Trial accounts are not paid for, and it seems reasonable to me that they should be limited in such a way as they can no longer be used as disposable anonymous suicide alts.

With regard to this being too restrictive to potential new players, this prohibition should only apply to people initiating aggression, so shooting somebody who is already flashy or a wartarget would be allowed. Also, there would be nothing stopping them from joining FW and/or shooting up lowsec.



Good thinking on that, but just from my own experience, there's not many gankers who run serial trials like that. It pretty much restricts you to only group ganking mining barges. You just can't get in enough SP to get really proficient.

Part of the "ganking challenge" is getting as efficient and quick as you can at taking down your targets. You end up needing targeting skills, nav skills, rigging, cybernetics for those who use implants and of course, gunnery.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
New Eden Tech Support
#320 - 2013-09-09 16:48:48 UTC
Tara Read wrote:
Renault T'Bonin wrote:
Yup, I'm posting anonymously. Make of that what you will.

I own multiple characters, and I'm a fairly rich industrialist in the game. I've headed an alliance, held sov, know how to fight, and date back to 2004.


So let me get this straight. You post on an alt, ***** about people ganking and boo hoo not enough consequences, then bother to post (on an alt) all the "accomplishments" which boil down to:

1. I have more alts. (uhuh)

2. I have isk. (so does everyone else)

3. Ive been in charge of people! (This makes you relevant how?)

4. Ive held sov! (Again the whole I'm a null sec sock puppet I hold sov = I'm gud!)

5. I know how to fight.

Really? Are you sure? Did you swap mining lasers for maximum dps? IF you understood game mechanics and truly knew how to fight, you'd be out seeking revenge instead of making a ***** fest here bawwing about the evil wittle gankers!

6. Age means NOTHING if all you do is sit and mine rocks all day. Stop thinking playing since such and such a date makes you a competent player.

I hope I kill you. Burn your pod. Loot the wreck, and put your corpse on contract while placing a bounty on you just for lulz.

Dont like that? What are you going to do? Oh that's right. Nothing. Which is why every last one of you lazy spoiled carebears need to burn just like all of high sec.


I dunno why I like this post so much - I'm a high-sec industrial player :D - but I'll be damned... maybe I'm repressing my inner pirate? Pirate

Probably not but ... slowclaps for you