These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why pay rent to live in Null Sec.

Author
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#201 - 2013-08-30 13:53:12 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:

I don't dislike Goonswarm Federation or its members, however...



Well, i do, those guys can do to hell, then hades, then whatever other underworld of torment is available for a few centuries, and after that, a weekend in DETROIT!

I mean seriously, I'd just got all comfortable and was able to rat in Delve when I was in IT, and here comes goons. Later, I was in Raiden and then NCDot and here comes (you guessed it), goons again so back to empire I go. I end up in TEST....just in time for a Goon/TEST falling out and war and there I go out of null again......

The entire reason for any Goon offensive is to stop Jenn aSide from enjoying null sec (it's not paranoia if it always happens). They don't observe the law of the blue doughnut at all!

This was a good post and the people on EVE-O are too stupid to realize why. +1

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Kharisa Tzestu
Eye Mock Holding Corporation
#202 - 2013-08-30 14:11:27 UTC
Skydell wrote:
I'd rather Iteron mine in 1.0 sec myself.

Groveling at the feet of an Overlord for "fun"? No, don't see it happening.

Why Iteron mine in 1.0 when you can ninja mine in 0.0 with a venture?

With as much 0.0 as there is that is totally empty you could have your pick of better ores than you can find in high-sec with minimal investment.

**** paying rent or even Sov bills for that matter, you pay Sov, I sell your ore cause you CBA to actually use all of the space your greedy ass has accumulated.

Even if you CBA, it isn't like you're going to be able to guard EVERY system in 0.0.

Cease paying rent, let the overlords burn themselves out with Sov while all of us mining insurgents rob them blind.

What they see as "scraps", we see as better opportunity than offered in high-sec (and a hell of a lot more fun to collect).
Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#203 - 2013-08-30 14:55:10 UTC
Kharisa Tzestu wrote:
Skydell wrote:
I'd rather Iteron mine in 1.0 sec myself.

Groveling at the feet of an Overlord for "fun"? No, don't see it happening.

Why Iteron mine in 1.0 when you can ninja mine in 0.0 with a venture?

With as much 0.0 as there is that is totally empty you could have your pick of better ores than you can find in high-sec with minimal investment.

**** paying rent or even Sov bills for that matter, you pay Sov, I sell your ore cause you CBA to actually use all of the space your greedy ass has accumulated.

Even if you CBA, it isn't like you're going to be able to guard EVERY system in 0.0.

Cease paying rent, let the overlords burn themselves out with Sov while all of us mining insurgents rob them blind.

What they see as "scraps", we see as better opportunity than offered in high-sec (and a hell of a lot more fun to collect).


Owning a wormhole with a null static is pretty fun. It's like being the monster in a horror movie.
Kharisa Tzestu
Eye Mock Holding Corporation
#204 - 2013-08-30 15:01:23 UTC
Andrea Okazon wrote:
Kharisa Tzestu wrote:
Skydell wrote:
I'd rather Iteron mine in 1.0 sec myself.

Groveling at the feet of an Overlord for "fun"? No, don't see it happening.

Why Iteron mine in 1.0 when you can ninja mine in 0.0 with a venture?

With as much 0.0 as there is that is totally empty you could have your pick of better ores than you can find in high-sec with minimal investment.

**** paying rent or even Sov bills for that matter, you pay Sov, I sell your ore cause you CBA to actually use all of the space your greedy ass has accumulated.

Even if you CBA, it isn't like you're going to be able to guard EVERY system in 0.0.

Cease paying rent, let the overlords burn themselves out with Sov while all of us mining insurgents rob them blind.

What they see as "scraps", we see as better opportunity than offered in high-sec (and a hell of a lot more fun to collect).


Owning a wormhole with a null static is pretty fun. It's like being the monster in a horror movie.

That does sound like it would be more fun than a barrel of monkeys but I am too attached to local.
Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#205 - 2013-08-30 15:01:26 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:
And we are talking about a game, not real life. You might pay rent in real life, but paying rent in a game, to me, is silly.
- Why? Because you are paying other "players"" so as to have fun. (Paying CCP, the game maker, to access the game is totally different. Sadly I can't find the words so as to describe this difference).

I don't see a tangible difference. I pay ~550 million ISK per month per account to play EVE Online. That is considerably higher than what the per-player cost to rent space is. If you are OK with PLEX, then I don't see why you wouldn't be OK with renting.


So basically, you are advising players to rent so "they" can pay for "your" subscription, with ISK.
Enduros
UK Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#206 - 2013-08-30 15:30:08 UTC
Andski wrote:

so for some reason you think we would create shill corps that don't pay rent, recruit a bunch of people into those corps to use our space rent and tax free, to accomplish what exactly?

nevermind, stay in hisec

Why wouldn't make shell corps? Add enough and you start to look legit after which real corps stars to sign up.

Also I'm not in hi-sec. What makes you think I'm in hi-sec?

Lyris Nairn wrote:
Don't listen to Andski. We would do exactly that, all for the explicit purpose of twirling our waxed mustaches while we cackle maniacally. All of this would occur while wearing a smoking jacket, petting a white cat, wearing a monocle, and enjoying a dinner of human infants sauteed in the blood of maidens.

Pretty much exactly how I imagine it.

Lyris Nairn wrote:
I am curious to know what entity within the CFC you were a part of, but not curious enough to dig through your employment history and cross-check with all the various member corps. Would you just come out and tell me? I would also like to know in what way GSF or the rest of the CFC mistreated you.

I was in FA. Most of the reasons fall in the alliance drama category and getting into it will derail the thread so lets not.

Deka Ekato wrote:
Fair enough, this emergent player behaviour is good business for both landlord and renter, but still, why choose to bassically pay other players for the right to play.

People fail to understand that some corps prefer to stay small and not deal with having lots of people. If you have 10 people in a corp you aren't gonna have any impact in 0.0 and people will come roll over you just because they can. Also I don't think you appreciate how much effort goes into actually holding sov.

Also nobody that rents is concerned with "giving income to someone". It gets written off as operating expense just as fuel and ammo. There is no viable alternative with the same benefits. Also every time you die in pvp you are essentially giving isk to someone in dropped mods. Does that mean we should all stop avoiding doing it at all costs?

Everyone saying people should just go and claim their own space need to go and do it first so we can follow an example.
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#207 - 2013-08-30 16:00:01 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:

This was a good post and the people on EVE-O are too stupid to realize why. +1
I am sure some people got it, ...if you have paid any attention to other posts Jenn aSide has made.

Damn funny.
Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#208 - 2013-08-30 16:08:36 UTC
Enduros wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:
Fair enough, this emergent player behaviour is good business for both landlord and renter, but still, why choose to bassically pay other players for the right to play.

People fail to understand that some corps prefer to stay small and not deal with having lots of people. If you have 10 people in a corp you aren't gonna have any impact in 0.0 and people will come roll over you just because they can. Also I don't think you appreciate how much effort goes into actually holding sov.

Also nobody that rents is concerned with "giving income to someone". It gets written off as operating expense just as fuel and ammo. There is no viable alternative with the same benefits. Also every time you die in pvp you are essentially giving isk to someone in dropped mods. Does that mean we should all stop avoiding doing it at all costs?

Everyone saying people should just go and claim their own space need to go and do it first so we can follow an example.


I don't know much or care about Sovereignty. I'm not advising people to simply to try to just go and claim their own space.
Sure, I am trying to discourage people, who are, or are considering renting, cause I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly.

I understand that the riches of Null Sec are extremely rewarding, but, personally, I don't want to provide other players with an easy source of income. As such, this is one of the reasons I avoid Null Sec, like the plague.
Enduros
UK Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#209 - 2013-08-30 16:13:34 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:
I don't know much or care about Sovereignty. I'm not advising people to simply to try to just go and claim their own space.
Sure, I am trying to discourage people, who are, or are considering renting, cause I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly.

I understand that the riches of Null Sec are extremely rewarding, but, personally, I don't want to provide other players with an easy source of income. As such, this is one of the reasons I avoid Null Sec, like the plague.


Well, the only way to get at those riches is having sov, because they are tied into ihub upgrades.

Easy income source you say... what's the alternative? WHs are a logistics nightmare. Hi-sec? Low-sec? those are far worse then renting.
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#210 - 2013-08-30 16:46:54 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:
..., cause I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly...
Generally, one of the 'costs' of joining a player Corp...taxes.
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#211 - 2013-08-30 17:40:39 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:

I understand that the riches of Null Sec are extremely rewarding, but, personally, I don't want to provide other players with an easy source of income. As such, this is one of the reasons I avoid Null Sec, like the plague.

If you buy things in Jita then I have some terrible news for you.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Yeep
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#212 - 2013-08-30 18:19:08 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:
I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly.


I guess you've never bought a ship off the market then? You make all your own ships and modules or just fly newbie ships.
Lady Areola Fappington
#213 - 2013-08-30 18:29:39 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:

I understand that the riches of Null Sec are extremely rewarding, but, personally, I don't want to provide other players with an easy source of income. As such, this is one of the reasons I avoid Null Sec, like the plague.

If you buy things in Jita then I have some terrible news for you.



Hey I don't know about YOU, but the minerals I mine are free! I build my ships from scratch!

You can't make me interact with other people.

(Am I doin it rite?)

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#214 - 2013-08-30 18:42:39 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:
I understand that the riches of Null Sec are extremely rewarding, but, personally, I don't want to provide other players with an easy source of income. As such, this is one of the reasons I avoid Null Sec, like the plague.

If you buy things in Jita then I have some terrible news for you.

Don't tell me, I'm not ready for it

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

SFM Hobb3s
Perkone
Caldari State
#215 - 2013-08-30 18:48:30 UTC
knobber Jobbler wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:
The renting of controlled Null Sec space, is a valid game mechanic, sure, and fair enough, but why pay rent to live there?

Are the riches of Null Sec so rewarding that people are willing to rent the right to live there?

Why reward those who control Null Sec with even more wealth that actually You have earned?

Why provide the Power Blocs with the opportunity to be able to pay for their subsriptions with Your ISK?
.


OK, so think of it like this:

You are a poor farmer. A peasant without any land. You graze your cattle on overworked common land along with all the other peasants. You have no space to grow crops. You cattle are unhealthy and small, you can't make money from the milk, they're too small to slaughter and the hides are worthless. Occasionally the other peasants using the common land kick you off. Your children are malnourished, you eat turnips - every day - and your wife thinks you are a disappointment. Your house is also quite terrible - you have to share it with hundreds of other peasants. You have to survive on 1 groat a month.

A wealthy landowner with a private army turns up and says that you can come and work on his land and all you have to do is pay him a tithe. Its 10 groats a month. 10 groats is allot but when you think about it you'll have some prime land all of your own, your cattle will graze and be healthy, there is enough land to grow crops. After you do the math, you realise that you'll be making 100 groats a month easily. In fact you'll have to take on staff to make the land make the most money. You'll not only get a spanking new space castle home but you can build country estates, the land owner will make sure your land is irrigated at no additional cost, he'll even send his standing army in to protect you should the revolting peasants turn up. That army will never set foot on your land unless its to protect it and they certainly can't farm on it. Its punishable by death. The children get new toys, the wife is happy and you'll never have to see another turnip again.

You take the landowner up on his offer and after a while you're stinking rich with none of the responsibility of actually maintaining the estate you live on (ok, the country estates need firewood). The peasants you left behind shout "renter" at you, which really means nothing as you look down on them from your golden carriage, dressed in your finest clothes. You even shoot one for the fun of it.


Now the key thing here is the wealthy man with a private army is NOT on your fields. How fast do you think they are going to get to you when you batphone/telegraph/smokesignal when two grotesque Legion duders knock on your door and a third is out doing unthinkable things to your groats?

Perhaps when you are cowering in the walls of your space tower you will think back to the heady days you opened your doors and walked out into the sun in freedom, with only the worry that some guy with his private army might evade the local sheriff and gank your cattle as you watched helplessly. And now you realize you have just become a slave to that same guy and his private army. Well done!
Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#216 - 2013-08-30 23:36:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Deka Ekato
Yeep wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:
I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly.


I guess you've never bought a ship off the market then? You make all your own ships and modules or just fly newbie ships.


So, this game play mechanic, ( the "freedom" of living in Null Sec ), is now a, ( player ), marketable product.

Sure, there is a cost to this "freedom", which is, you have to fight others to obtain and hold Sovereignty. But this game mechanic was placed by the game makers as a "free" choice. It is players who have smartly, ( business wise ), but restrictedly, (gameplay wise ), placed a price on this freedom.

Let's not talk about the, ( non exsitant ), opportunities for new/younger Corps the chance to obtain Sovereignty, ( sure they can fight for it, but they have no hope against the current Sovereign juggernaughts ). This is a different matter all together. ( OH!!! I'm guilty of actually bringing this up ).
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#217 - 2013-08-31 02:33:15 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:
Yeep wrote:
Deka Ekato wrote:
I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly.

I guess you've never bought a ship off the market then? You make all your own ships and modules or just fly newbie ships.

So, this game play mechanic, ( the "freedom" of living in Null Sec ), is now a, ( player ), marketable product.

Sure, there is a cost to this "freedom", which is, you have to fight others to obtain and hold Sovereignty. But this game mechanic was placed by the game makers as a "free" choice. It is players who have smartly, ( business wise ), but restrictedly, (gameplay wise ), placed a price on this freedom.

Let's not talk about the, ( non exsitant ), opportunities for new/younger Corps the chance to obtain Sovereignty, ( sure they can fight for it, but they have no hope against the current Sovereign juggernaughts ). This is a different matter all together. ( OH!!! I'm guilty of actually bringing this up ).

Aww, that reminds me to check on the fweddit thread

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Yeep
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#218 - 2013-08-31 07:57:18 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:

So, this game play mechanic, ( the "freedom" of living in Null Sec ), is now a, ( player ), marketable product..


The only thing paying your subscription entitles you to is access to the game client and servers. You have no inherant right to the limited resources of the Eve universe, especially those currently held by other players.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#219 - 2013-08-31 09:53:12 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
I mean seriously, I'd just got all comfortable and was able to rat in Delve when I was in IT, and here comes goons. Later, I was in Raiden and then NCDot and here comes (you guessed it), goons again so back to empire I go. I end up in TEST....just in time for a Goon/TEST falling out and war and there I go out of null again......

The entire reason for any Goon offensive is to stop Jenn aSide from enjoying null sec (it's not paranoia if it always happens). They don't observe the law of the blue doughnut at all!

This was a good post and the people on EVE-O are too stupid to realize why. +1

But the blue donut

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#220 - 2013-08-31 09:56:13 UTC
Deka Ekato wrote:
Let's not talk about the, ( non exsitant ), opportunities for new/younger Corps the chance to obtain Sovereignty, ( sure they can fight for it, but they have no hope against the current Sovereign juggernaughts ). This is a different matter all together. ( OH!!! I'm guilty of actually bringing this up ).


Diplomacy is a wonderful thing.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.