These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So, I want to gank
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
E-2C Hawkeye
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#141 - 2013-08-27 16:14:28 UTC  |  Edited by: E-2C Hawkeye
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
maturity: making personal attacks when questioned


Lol personal attacks? I am merely trying to be helpful and considerate in helping this person open his mind by pointing out that he like a vast majority of forum trolls (yourself included) will usually miss the main point of most topics because the majority of the time you derail thread after thread arguing over inane things that don’t really matter.
Wow, being called a troll by you is ironic, I've rarely seen you post anything remotely constructive, considerate or helpful, please do carry on lying to yourself if it makes you feel better.

Quote:
In this specific case it was over an arbitrary number.
You mean the arbitrary number that went from figurative to gross excess and then on to arbitrary? If you'd have said arbitrary in the first place then my only quibble would have been the number 30, because saying things "I like the morons that can't get that it doesn't matter what you tank when they bring 30 destroyers.", although true in the literal sense, is spin and misinformation of the worst kind when we're talking about ganking miners, which while offtopic is a related subtopic, 30 destroyers is almost a parody.

The only scenarios I can think of in ganking that would need 30 destroyers would be an Orca or freighter, and even then it may well be excessive *needs clarification as I'm unsure of the actual amount of destroyers required for these scenarios*

Quote:
From a physiological perspective this type of behavior is common place and used to draw attention away from the fact that they don’t have a good base to counter argue or debate the main topic or point.
You yourself are guilty of posting crap to draw attention away from the fact that you had no valid point to bring to the discussion, and instantly denigrated anybody that disagreed with you, that smacks of hubris.

If, however, you had actually made a valid point relating to the topic, and subtopics, that have been brought up instead of just exaggerating, and hadn't gotten your knickers in a twist when people called you out on it, then maybe, just maybe, you would have got some decent counter arguments and debate. Although I doubt it because you're just a poor sad excuse for a troll.

Before you start blaming others for the responses to your posts, you should try reading them.

It’s ok I can see you still don’t get it....and probably never will. As you were carry on
E-2C Hawkeye
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#142 - 2013-08-27 16:16:25 UTC
Rhes wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Lol personal attacks? I am merely trying to be helpful and considerate in helping this person open his mind by pointing out that he like a vast majority of forum trolls (yourself included) will usually miss the main point of most topics because the majority of the time you derail thread after thread arguing over inane things that don’t really matter.
It’s ok I can see you still don’t get....and probably never will. As you were carry on
In this specific case it was over an arbitrary number. From a physiological perspective this type of behavior is common place and used to draw attention away from the fact that they don’t have a good base to counter argue or debate the main topic or point.


You are a bad poster.


Thank you so much. Coming from a goonie that is very complementary of you sir.
E-2C Hawkeye
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#143 - 2013-08-27 16:24:44 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
[quote=Benny Ohu]maturity: making personal attacks when questioned



[quote]In this specific case it was over an arbitrary number.
You mean the arbitrary number that went from figurative to gross excess and then on to arbitrary? If you'd have said arbitrary in the first place then my only quibble would have been the number 30, because saying things "I like the morons that can't get that it doesn't matter what you tank when they bring 30 destroyers.", although true in the literal sense, is spin and misinformation of the worst kind when we're talking about ganking miners, which while offtopic is a related subtopic, 30 destroyers is almost a parody.

The only scenarios I can think of in ganking that would need 30 destroyers would be an Orca or freighter, and even then it may well be excessive *needs clarification as I'm unsure of the actual amount of destroyers required for these scenarios*



Here is a perfect example of you still being hung up on a number and even after numerous attempts to explain to you that the number didn’t matter you are still trying to argue over a number that was arbitrary and didn’t matter or effect the point and was exaggerated to show that it didn’t matter all the while still missing the main point.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#144 - 2013-08-27 16:33:49 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Rhes wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Lol personal attacks? I am merely trying to be helpful and considerate in helping this person open his mind by pointing out that he like a vast majority of forum trolls (yourself included) will usually miss the main point of most topics because the majority of the time you derail thread after thread arguing over inane things that don’t really matter.
It’s ok I can see you still don’t get....and probably never will. As you were carry on
In this specific case it was over an arbitrary number. From a physiological perspective this type of behavior is common place and used to draw attention away from the fact that they don’t have a good base to counter argue or debate the main topic or point.


You are a bad poster.


Thank you so much. Coming from a goonie that is very complementary of you sir.



The Goon speaks the truth.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882
E-2C Hawkeye
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#145 - 2013-08-27 18:30:02 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Rhes wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Lol personal attacks? I am merely trying to be helpful and considerate in helping this person open his mind by pointing out that he like a vast majority of forum trolls (yourself included) will usually miss the main point of most topics because the majority of the time you derail thread after thread arguing over inane things that don’t really matter.
It’s ok I can see you still don’t get....and probably never will. As you were carry on
In this specific case it was over an arbitrary number. From a physiological perspective this type of behavior is common place and used to draw attention away from the fact that they don’t have a good base to counter argue or debate the main topic or point.


You are a bad poster.


Thank you so much. Coming from a goonie that is very complementary of you sir.



The Goon speaks the truth.


Yes they ALL do. Shocked /sarcasm off
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#146 - 2013-08-27 19:15:27 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:

Here is a perfect example of you still being hung up on a number and even after numerous attempts to explain to you that the number didn’t matter you are still trying to argue over a number that was arbitrary and didn’t matter or effect the point and was exaggerated to show that it didn’t matter all the while still missing the main point.

Yes the point, you missed it completely. We know the number was exaggerated to make a point, we're just unsure of what the point was, and whether or not you actually had one in the first place.

The Goon (Grr™) is right, you're a terrible poster, even by their standards.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#147 - 2013-08-27 22:28:50 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:

Here is a perfect example of you still being hung up on a number and even after numerous attempts to explain to you that the number didn’t matter you are still trying to argue over a number that was arbitrary and didn’t matter or effect the point and was exaggerated to show that it didn’t matter all the while still missing the main point.

Yes the point, you missed it completely. We know the number was exaggerated to make a point, we're just unsure of what the point was, and whether or not you actually had one in the first place.

The Goon (Grr™) is right, you're a terrible poster, even by their standards.


Gotta agree with that, to be honest. Especially since he has spent the last several pages trying to convince us he doesn't really care but we're wrong anyway. Roll

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.
Barron Hammerstrike
Medusa Nova Mining And Trade
#148 - 2013-08-30 20:40:14 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:
Lets Gank the Ganker that is Ganking... While Concord Ganks them.


Gank train?
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#149 - 2013-08-30 20:46:38 UTC
Barron Hammerstrike wrote:
Alice Saki wrote:
Lets Gank the Ganker that is Ganking... While Concord Ganks them.


Gank train?

Gank'em Style

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#150 - 2013-08-30 21:08:27 UTC
This **** is still going ?
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#151 - 2013-08-30 21:15:15 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
This **** is still going ?

This thread is like Eve, still providing lols long after it should have died.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#152 - 2013-08-30 21:19:50 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
This **** is still going ?


I met my old thread
On the forums last night
She seemed like she wanted attention
I just smiled
And we dredged up some old posts
And we necroed ourselves some threads
Still going after all these years
Oh, still going after all these years

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#153 - 2013-08-30 21:43:46 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
This **** is still going ?


I met my old thread
On the forums last night
She seemed like she wanted attention
I just smiled
And we dredged up some old posts
And we necroed ourselves some threads
Still going after all these years
Oh, still going after all these years

I don't know that song,
but i seriously admire that cool looking "ḑ̴͈̦̲͜͢͢e̴͡҉̲̼̱̯͔̻͢͡ḇ̧̲̫̰͔͉͝a͏̸̷̡̤͝ͅͅc̢̡̮̫̙̰̠͕͇͟͠l̷̛͖̟̱͓͉͙͓̥͓̪̫̀́ę̸̗̱̘̗̥̬͕͈̫̱̼̻͔̺̠̣̘ͅ" in your signature !
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#154 - 2013-08-30 22:16:34 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Solstice Project wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
This **** is still going ?


I met my old thread
On the forums last night
She seemed like she wanted attention
I just smiled
And we dredged up some old posts
And we necroed ourselves some threads
Still going after all these years
Oh, still going after all these years

I don't know that song,
but i seriously admire that cool looking "ḑ̴͈̦̲͜͢͢e̴͡҉̲̼̱̯͔̻͢͡ḇ̧̲̫̰͔͉͝a͏̸̷̡̤͝ͅͅc̢̡̮̫̙̰̠͕͇͟͠l̷̛͖̟̱͓͉͙͓̥͓̪̫̀́ę̸̗̱̘̗̥̬͕͈̫̱̼̻͔̺̠̣̘ͅ" in your signature !



All credit to Vipre Morte


And the song is a play on "Still Crazy after all these years" by Paul Simon

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon