These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Mysterious mass grave found on site of refugee centre

Author
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#41 - 2013-09-14 04:30:04 UTC
It certainly is. There have certainly been cases where followers of the Amarr faith in the Minmatar Republic have faced even worse discrimination than that, as well. I recently needed to move three families to a colony of believers twelve jumps from their original home. The reason they wanted to move so far? The fourth family of faithful were caught meditating on Scriptures, surrounded by the local townsfolk, and skinned alive. Their flesh was tanned and set on a flagpole in the center of town.

As I said, this was by far a minority. From my experience, the violent minority of people who will assault someone of the faith is still smaller than the minority of Matari who will personally defend them. The problem is, those two groups of people aren't often mingled. I've found it more common traveling out into low security space that the violent minority tends to act brazenly.

The majority simply don't care, one way or another. It is a small number that I've seen, though, who would commit such atrocities.

Then again, this may also be a matter of time. Perhaps it has dulled the hatred that you perhaps experienced as a child. Certainly, I was only relatively recently given my mission and only very recently have I become a capsuleer. My exploration of Minmatar space has all been fairly recent, within the last five years.

Have you found that things are changing? Or do I simply not see enough of the violence from my admittedly limited explorations?

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Vikarion
Doomheim
#42 - 2013-09-14 06:11:55 UTC
Eran Mintor,

When I say that there are no Caldari outside the State and its institutions, I am not speaking strictly geographically. Certainly, I am somewhat. But I have apparently failed to convey my meaning. Let me try again, from scratch.

"Caldari" is a primarily cultural and national term, denoting the descendants from the original Caldari cultural unit that resided on Caldari Prime. There are no other Caldari besides those who reside within this national cultural community, for they have either abandoned the original and only Caldari entity, or they have never known it.

To be a Caldari is to adopt the norms, practices, and beliefs of the Caldari. That is to say, the Caldari can welcome others of different ethnicity, but they must conform to what the Caldari are to be Caldari. The Caldari State is founded on, and exists as the incarnation of Caldari values, culture, institutions, society, and beliefs.

Thus, anyone who, outside of these values, culture, institutions, society, and beliefs, claims to be Caldari, is essentially denying the sovereignty and the nature of the Caldari State. Anyone who operates outside of the institutions of the State, and claims to be Caldari, is either lying, or does not understand what they are talking about. A Caldari who claimed to believe that God required him to show reverence towards the True Amarr as the first representatives of God would be no longer Caldari.

So, yes, those who have joined Mordu's Legion are no longer Caldari. As are those who join the Guristas, the Angels, the Federation, the Empire, or any other organization. The Caldari State is not something one dabbles in. You are either in, or out.

What right do we have to define who is Caldari? The right gained by killing anyone who has attempted to dispute our title, just as others use force to accept or refuse titles. You may hate us, you may love us, but we are not you, and we will not be you. Missionaries to the State are not welcome, from any nation.
Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#43 - 2013-09-14 07:57:45 UTC
Baracca,

While my recent experience in the past three years has been limited due to...certain circumstances...I have found ways and means to return to Republic space time-to-time without raising alarm among my old kin. For almost a year now I've been spending an increasing time planet-side which has helped evolve my perspective. The experiences I've had since I grew up in the Republic to now, where the CEWPA conflict has been going on for over five years has indeed changed, though it hasn't been for the best in my view.

Personally, I have begun to see an increase in hostility and rejection of many outsiders. Barring the discussion of religion, outsiders such as but not limited to the Starkmanir, Nefantar, and Federals still face much difficulty in being accepted and respected. Slow improvements should be expected with such great changes and events, but I have seen little-to-no improvement among the old tribes and even a decline towards the Federals.

I do feel that Matari care for the greater whole of their people but there is much differing as to how the goals of betterment can be achieved among us. While the Matari people have always disagreed, as do any other parties involved in running a nation, the violence and aggression that passions harbor have continued and increased. The Bloody Hands of Matar still operate without the government doing anything about their Matari-on-Matari bloodshed. The government itself seems to support uncalled for violence, ala Coliele, and does not voice any kind of restraint against hate and violence whether it be against other Matari or outsiders.

I certainly felt more comfortable living in the Republic when Karin Midular was leading our people. Many have called her an appeaser, but she had common-sense and the mind of a leader to guide her people towards stability and progress. Shakor, being the warlord he is and always has been, does not have this knowledge and only knows how to lead in war. Sadly, the Matari people seem to accept this and, at least when I first joined the Minmatar militia, begged for his violent action. I certainly was guilty to think he would lead our people to progress and emancipation yet he has made no reforms in five years and certainly hasn't made any effort to empower the Matari people.

Perhaps I am drifting off-topic again, and I apologize. The question was how do I see things changing and honestly, they are not changing that much from when the war first broke out. There was a great appeal to our leaders to act back then. Karin Midular was seen as inept and unable to help the Minmatar Nation grow but, in retrospect, she did a lot better than Shakor. Our impatience has led us down a path of violence that, until recently, we were not treading. Our leaders have led us astray and failed to be responsible for the people they claim to represent. The change happened before the war broke out, and the change slowly continues to drift down a downward path.

It is up to Matari other than myself to lift up the Minmatar Nation and change this path. I hope capsuleers like those among Electus Matari, can help the baseline population to reach this alteration.



Vikarion,

I'm glad to see we were saying much of the same thing. However, I think a few things should be made clear.

First, I originally wasn't talking about Caldari living in the Empire who followed Amarrian beliefs. The original point was about outsiders living in the Empire following their own (ie. not Amarrian) cultural beliefs, such as the Caldari people who live and operate there.

As we've gone over, you can still be a Caldari with Caldari beliefs outside of the State in places such as the Empire, or even the Republic. Caldari can be non-citizens of these foreign countries, or they could theoretically still be citizens while maintaining their Caldari culture and beliefs. In the previous excerpts I pulled from your source, it stated that many citizens of Amarr who are forced, as a part of citizenship, to make an oath to the Amarr faith do not, in fact, believe in the faith. Could these men and women not be Caldari simply because they had to pledge a false oath due to circumstance? I personally believe they are still to be considered Caldari, however I am obviously biased in this regard and I will cover this shortly.

The second issue I wish to discuss is that of a Caldari, or any loyalist, who doesn't adhere to the national identity. Those of Mordu's Legion and other examples I could make are still Caldari in my mind. One may not always agree with the governments decisions and directions and this often causes them to split off. I don't believe this makes them less of what they were before; if anything it only proves their bravery and resolve to stick to what they believe is best. The example of Heth leading the Caldari down an otherwise 'un-Caldari path' of dictatorship is as good of an example as you may find. People may not always agree with governance or their peers, but that does not make them less of who they are.

That brings me to the other thing I was going to discuss, though only briefly. I may have left the Republic three years ago and even turned against it by leading militia forces of the 24th IC against the TLF and affiliates, but I still do and always will consider myself Matari because that is who I am, who I was raised to be, and how I think and act. I don't care what labels people may give me as they are insignificant. Call me a traitor, coward, or murderer but I know why I did what I did and it certainly wasn't because I no longer was Matari.

-Eran
Vikarion
Doomheim
#44 - 2013-09-14 08:23:18 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:

As we've gone over, you can still be a Caldari with Caldari beliefs outside of the State in places such as the Empire, or even the Republic. Caldari can be non-citizens of these foreign countries, or they could theoretically still be citizens while maintaining their Caldari culture and beliefs. In the previous excerpts I pulled from your source, it stated that many citizens of Amarr who are forced, as a part of citizenship, to make an oath to the Amarr faith do not, in fact, believe in the faith. Could these men and women not be Caldari simply because they had to pledge a false oath due to circumstance? I personally believe they are still to be considered Caldari, however I am obviously biased in this regard and I will cover this shortly.


To be Caldari, you must be a citizen of the State. If I were to put it in religious terms, I would say that there is no salvation outside of the State and its institutions. If I were to speak mathematically, I would say that it is impossible to maintain a single unit in two exclusionary sets. The culture, the mindset, the methodology of life is intimately wound up in our institutions. As we define them, they define us.

We are not a kind people. We are not inclusive. We are practical, functional, unified, and ruthless.

Eran Mintor wrote:
The second issue I wish to discuss is that of a Caldari, or any loyalist, who doesn't adhere to the national identity. Those of Mordu's Legion and other examples I could make are still Caldari in my mind. One may not always agree with the governments decisions and directions and this often causes them to split off. I don't believe this makes them less of what they were before; if anything it only proves their bravery and resolve to stick to what they believe is best. The example of Heth leading the Caldari down an otherwise 'un-Caldari path' of dictatorship is as good of an example as you may find. People may not always agree with governance or their peers, but that does not make them less of who they are.


The good of the many comes before the good of the one, and those in charge are generally so for a reason. That is to say this: I disagreed with many of Heth's actions, although not all. Yet, until his incompetence became obvious, until he acted against the interests of the State so completely that no excuse could be made, I was obligated to obey the dictates of his office. Did I disagree? Yes. Did I allow my disagreement to change my loyalties? No.

It is not the responsibility of a Caldari to perceive himself as an agent divorced from his level of responsibility. The man who abandons his post because he disagrees with his leader is a traitor. When a man is presented with conflicting duties, he must choose which to follow. When Heth fired on KK employees, I found myself in such a position. I chose the path that defended Caldari citizens from aggression. In retrospect, the right choice. What would not have been the right choice is running off to join the Legion because I don't like having to make hard choices.

To be Caldari is to accept that you are not always the master of your fate, that sometimes there are no good options, and that you have a duty to uphold your obligations more than you have the right to indulge your preferences. Those who leave because they cannot handle this are contemptible. Those who leave to pursue other opportunities can be admirable, but they have divorced themselves from the whole to a certain extent. They are, perhaps, the only gray area...I would suggest that they are Caldari still if they aid the State, and not, if not.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#45 - 2013-09-14 08:35:48 UTC
Although Vikarion covered it admirably perhaps I can summarise.

1. Caldari is not a genetic grouping that belongs merely to the bloodlines 'Civire' and 'Deteis' and 'Achur'.
2. Caldari is not a cultural grouping that includes 'seafood', 'utilitarian' and 'wayist'.
3. Caldari is not a grouping that is defined by 'habitation within the political unit known as "The Caldari State".'

Caldari are those who are citizens of the State - or members of institutions like the Caldari Navy. Citizenship is not a state of mind - it is an award given for service. Citizenship is not a right it is a privilige.

We are not inclusive. We do not seek new members or expansion, in general.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#46 - 2013-09-14 16:40:08 UTC
You both seemed to have missed what I was saying. Certainly the main point I was trying to make that started this discussion here has been forgotten due to this debate. I'll try once more to try to illustrate a few things with fewer, and clearer words. I don't have the time right now so it'll have to wait.

-Eran
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#47 - 2013-09-14 18:49:50 UTC
Word length is not the issue, sometimes longer words convey concepts more precisely. Perhaps you can simply structure your argument in a more concise and logical fashion. Fewer and better words?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#48 - 2013-09-14 21:13:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Eran Mintor wrote:

Now to address your emphasis at the end of your last post-you would be one of few to think all Caldari must be employed by a mega-corp and it's institutions. What of the Mordu's Legion, as an example? These Caldari ex-patriates are no longer Caldari in your mind?


I would say they are Caldari if they either self-identify as Caldari or follow Caldari cultural and social norms in addition to serving interests, and might be said to be Caldari de facto. They would remain technically and legally not part of the State, so they are not Caldari de jure.

The Legion fulfills the same role as freelance capsuleers fulfill at present: I am legally and officially not a part of the State so long as I operate under the mandates CONCORD and its affiliates, the DED and the SCC. However, I identify as a Caldari, and continue to seek to act in the interests of the State. As such I can operate as what is in effect, a deniable asset. I am able to pursue operations in the interests of the State, my shareholders, and my corporate clients whilst providing them with the legal recourse that such actions were undertaken without official sanction.

This is probably no different to the number of Megacorporate competitive intelligence assets deployed abroad who often have to appear that they disavowed they are a citizen of the State, and who might very well be seen to be, "Not Caldari" insofar as being no longer part of State society. Indeed, they would be treated as such by the great majority of State citizens either as traitors or as the disassociated. This is of course until they might succeed in their operations and place the shaped plasma charge under the seat of a target's personal vehicle; compromise foreign Executives through blackmail or extortion; or conclude whatever other acts of corporate espionage and the like deemed necessary. (I only make guesses here since I have little experience or knowledge in the field of espionage - corporate or otherwise).

Once the operation is concluded then such assets are no longer traitors to me once they return to the State and their corporation both as a citizen and as a Caldari.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#49 - 2013-09-15 17:40:07 UTC
The only original point I cared to make was that there are Caldari, in whatever sense of your requirements, living in the Empire space whom are free to follow their customs of culture & spiritualism. The only reason I brought it up was in response to this:

Kyllsa Siikanen wrote:
The last I checked, actually, practice of any religion save the orthodox Amarrian one within the Empire was a crime.

Or are Blood Raiders and EoM no longer branded heretics?


I wished to make it clear that practice of other religions in the Empire is possible without being a criminal in certain circumstances. I understand that it is illegal as a citizen, but that is not the argument I was making.



As to where this discussion has gone lately, all I care to say is that everyone has their own ideology for labeling ethos.

More specifically, the labels of ethos go beyond race but definitions of what ethos is. In regards to the ethos of Caldari, Amarr, Minmatar, and Gallente, there are many who differ on how to label them. Diana Kim is a good example and I surely don't mean that as an insult, but extremists are great at showing just how much people can differ in this. The people more towards the center on any issue may not have such telling differences but there, of course, are some.

So in short; Your labeling will not always be agreed with. Let's just agree to disagree.

-Eran
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#50 - 2013-09-15 19:10:46 UTC
See, the thing is, whilst we might have legitimate cause to agree to disagree on the labelling of 'good cup of tea' when it comes to defining what is Caldari, it really OUGHT to be our view that is paramount...

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#51 - 2013-09-15 19:14:52 UTC
Certainly, which is why I mentioned Diana Kim. Even Gesakaarin brought up some points that conflict with the cut-and-dry logic of Vikarion. I never said that my opinions on the matter of Caldari ethos to be more valid. I think too many assumptions are being made of the simple things I am saying.

-Eran
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#52 - 2013-09-15 20:07:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Eran Mintor wrote:

More specifically, the labels of ethos go beyond race but definitions of what ethos is. In regards to the ethos of Caldari, Amarr, Minmatar, and Gallente, there are many who differ on how to label them.


I would say you are correct in that the ethos of a nation's or people's culture and society is the product of the sum total of their beliefs, opinions, and desires. I would say it is those who, in not being able to understand contrary opinions or thoughts, who are the most prone to the extremism of making the claims that they, and they alone understand and are the representatives of a national ethos. Such thinking is what drives every Broteau, every UDI or Templis Dragonaur terrorist, every Amarrian zealot, and every Bloody Hands of Matar attack. Small minds and fearful hearts will always lead such people to resort to the tools of violence and hatred due to their failure to be able to survive in a world where there exist beliefs, opinions and desires different to their own.

In this, I have presented my thoughts as my own as a Caldari, not as a claim to being the sole and only thoughts that drive Caldari or the citizens of the State in order that it may assist you - if you have the desire - to understand them.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#53 - 2013-09-16 03:59:48 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
See, the thing is, whilst we might have legitimate cause to agree to disagree on the labelling of 'good cup of tea' when it comes to defining what is Caldari, it really OUGHT to be our view that is paramount...

Agreed.

I wouldn't mind if the definition of Amarr were as straightforward as Caldari. Right now, it might refer to someone who is True Amarr, a citizen of the Empire, a product of the culture of that Empire, or someone who follows the Amarr faith. It's messy, but that's what happens when you have a theocratic Empire dominated by a specific ethnic group. Things blend together.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Previous page123