These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Multiboxing softwares ruining pvp

First post
Author
culo duro
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#441 - 2013-08-22 10:37:06 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
culo duro wrote:
i still think OP should just get some friends.


This was already discussed too.


hence the "still".

I've starting blogging http://www.epvpc.blogspot.comĀ 

Mag's
Azn Empire
#442 - 2013-08-22 10:39:11 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Missed out on this one, but can see it was handled quite nicely.

So to recap. Multiboxing is cheating, the OP does it and logic has no place in his argument.

OK, carry on. Big smile


If you want to bark into a topic, read it trough, and don't post bull**it.
I did thanks, hence my recap. Cool

Maybe you could help this guy, tell him how he's ruining PvP. Big smile

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#443 - 2013-08-22 10:44:36 UTC
Mag's wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Missed out on this one, but can see it was handled quite nicely.

So to recap. Multiboxing is cheating, the OP does it and logic has no place in his argument.

OK, carry on. Big smile


If you want to bark into a topic, read it trough, and don't post bull**it.
I did thanks, hence my recap. Cool

Maybe you could help this guy, tell him how he's ruining PvP. Big smile


Very funny. Netagive Ten? So u have your own 20 member smartbomb rokh fleet? That's why you are trolling?
Krkan Krkasticni
Iron Whales
Goonswarm Federation
#444 - 2013-08-22 11:00:46 UTC
You my good man need a wingman.

Thankfully I am running wingman / body guard program for those in need of an additional.

For a flat fee of 200 Mil ISK / week my main will provide you with our services.

After ISK is received I will join your corp and provide any and all support needed.

You can EVE mail me for any and all information needed for this service.
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#445 - 2013-08-22 11:07:15 UTC
Krkan Krkasticni wrote:
You my good man need a wingman.

Thankfully I am running wingman / body guard program for those in need of an additional.

For a flat fee of 200 Mil ISK / week my main will provide you with our services.

After ISK is received I will join your corp and provide any and all support needed.

You can EVE mail me for any and all information needed for this service.


LMFAO
Mag's
Azn Empire
#446 - 2013-08-22 21:29:08 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Mag's wrote:
I did thanks, hence my recap. Cool

Maybe you could help this guy, tell him how he's ruining PvP. Big smile


Very funny. Netagive Ten? So u have your own 20 member smartbomb rokh fleet? That's why you are trolling?
No, Negative Ten actually.

Nah no 20 man bombing fleet, 2 at most will catch all those noob ships and shuttles. I in fact multibox the whole corp with ISBoxer, that's why we suck so much. Big smile

Oh and I'm not trolling, simply laughing at you like everyone else. Blink

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#447 - 2013-08-22 21:50:19 UTC
Mag's wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Mag's wrote:
I did thanks, hence my recap. Cool

Maybe you could help this guy, tell him how he's ruining PvP. Big smile


Very funny. Netagive Ten? So u have your own 20 member smartbomb rokh fleet? That's why you are trolling?
No, Negative Ten actually.

Nah no 20 man bombing fleet, 2 at most will catch all those noob ships and shuttles. I in fact multibox the whole corp with ISBoxer, that's why we suck so much. Big smile

Oh and I'm not trolling, simply laughing at you like everyone else. Blink


Thanks god i don't care :)
Vrenth
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#448 - 2013-08-22 22:52:01 UTC
One of our biggest adversaries multiboxes, and he can't catch a cruiser coming through a gate. I think what you mean is "Multiboxing is ruining MY pvp". Adapt.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#449 - 2013-08-22 23:29:45 UTC
Vrenth wrote:
One of our biggest adversaries multiboxes, and he can't catch a cruiser coming through a gate. I think what you mean is "Multiboxing is ruining MY pvp". Adapt.

What kind of cruiser, the T3-Covert-Ops-Cloak-Interdiction-Nullified type?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#450 - 2013-08-27 06:10:28 UTC
Vrenth wrote:
One of our biggest adversaries multiboxes, and he can't catch a cruiser coming through a gate. I think what you mean is "Multiboxing is ruining MY pvp". Adapt.


Well using multiboxing softwares is not the best for tackling then?

And yes, it ruined my pvp a few times, but I'm not the only one.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#451 - 2013-08-27 08:07:39 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Vrenth wrote:
One of our biggest adversaries multiboxes, and he can't catch a cruiser coming through a gate. I think what you mean is "Multiboxing is ruining MY pvp". Adapt.


Well using multiboxing softwares is not the best for tackling then?

And yes, it ruined my pvp a few times, but I'm not the only one.


Yet so far you have exactly zero proof that anyone was multiboxing. EVE is about adapting to new situations as they come along & you're refusing to do this, which is hilarious.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#452 - 2013-08-27 09:44:49 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Vrenth wrote:
One of our biggest adversaries multiboxes, and he can't catch a cruiser coming through a gate. I think what you mean is "Multiboxing is ruining MY pvp". Adapt.


Well using multiboxing softwares is not the best for tackling then?

And yes, it ruined my pvp a few times, but I'm not the only one.


Yet so far you have exactly zero proof that anyone was multiboxing. EVE is about adapting to new situations as they come along & you're refusing to do this, which is hilarious.


GTO with adapting, all the scared birds yelling ADAPT, who cares? There are things u can't adapt to.

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#453 - 2013-08-27 10:22:05 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Edit: AFAIK ISBoxer is not free. Is there a good, free alternative?



The fact is not free is not an excuse, that's simply using RL money and an external program to improve your in game abilities beyond regular gameplay and get benefits over other players.

In fact IG alts should be like on forums for many self proclaimed elite players and CCP personnel, alts don't count thus should not influence in any form or shape iteration with other players. But alts = RL money for CCP...dam !

Now each and everyone has his own opinion about it, this is mine and I know I'll get tons of hate for it but could care less.

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

oodell
Rotciv Rrama Industries
Goonswarm Federation
#454 - 2013-08-28 03:28:40 UTC  |  Edited by: oodell
Hi! I multibox. A rather lot.

There seems to be a rather hilarious overestimation of the true power/capability of tools such as isboxer (and others). While I would love to be a pvp supergod, as some say this tool makes you, my several hundred (approaching a thousand) stealth bomber losses this year is probably sufficient proof to show otherwise. (I'm pretty bad at eve though so maybe I am a god, just a terrible one, who knows)

Out of game requirements:
-Ridiculously high end PC
-Way above average general computer knowledge
-Patience and ability to learn the tool (which, by the way, is completely unintelligible and difficult to use)

Skill requirements:
-Very high battlefield perception
-Insane multitasking ability
-Capability to react to quickly changing circumstances
-Recovering from a bad situation when things go wrong
-Knowledge of when to cut your losses and bail

In game requirements:
-Logistics chain to supply X characters on deployments or otherwise
-Massive almost corp-level income source(s). Even more if you are plexing the accounts.
-All the other things, like skill management, moving characters around etc. Multiplied X times of course.


Even if you are great at all that, you're going to lose a devastating number of ships, and for most people it isn't sustainable at all.

People keep saying this is pay to win, or easy mode pvp, or it's breaking the game. I have been multiboxing for about a year and a half now. It took me about a year of constantly playing to master just one shiptype. During wartime I easily lose 100 ships a month, uninsurable. I pay out 6.5 BILLION a MONTH in plex alone, and several more billion on ships, ammo and logistics. Every month. Poof.

All the software does is repeat commands. Simple right? WELL...not really. Ever notice how your overview is slow to load when things enter/leave grid? Well it turns out they load at different rates for everyone, which means locking things accurately is next to impossible at times. I could list dozens of other limitations like that, but that's just an example. How do you keep cameras aligned? How do you approach a target with traversal when they aren't? Drones are difficult to use and control. Overview is a disaster in every sense. Micromanaging modules is incredibly difficult. If your ships get split up it's a nightmare. Using more than one shiptype exacerbates all of these issues.

The fact is, an equivalent fleet of real people will always be more effective than a single person. Running a multibox squad is very similar to a barely constrained trainwreck at all times, and once something goes wrong it more often than not spirals into an orgy of death and destruction. For you. It's usually expensive. And since you're fighting a bunch of real people, they will capitalize on it every time. That said, multiboxers usually find some niche role in which it works, practice it for months until they master it, and then unleash hell on everyone else. That's where these tear threads come up, because it's usually someone at the other end of six months of practice, failures, lessons learned and, eventually, perfection. At least as close as you can get. Sorry if you feel CCP should make it easy against someone who is playing the game several levels above you. For a lot of people, this is endgame content.

To fund it all, I either have to rat for 30+ hours a month, or do other activities (guess which I prefer). In the past, this has included things like market speculation and trade (requiring market knowledge and billions of isk) and POS reactions. (Think 30+ POS at a time) Currently I'm taking a break and I'm burning through my isk stockpile alarmingly quickly. The point is this - without a wholesome understanding of many varied aspects of the game, this kind of expense just isn't sustainable.

So, for everyone that says it's easy, or pay to win or whatever other nonsense you're spewing, I invite you to give the trial a go, start up a half dozen accounts and then do a few roams through syndicate in thoraxes. I look forward to your lossmails.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#455 - 2013-08-28 05:08:58 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Vrenth wrote:
One of our biggest adversaries multiboxes, and he can't catch a cruiser coming through a gate. I think what you mean is "Multiboxing is ruining MY pvp". Adapt.


Well using multiboxing softwares is not the best for tackling then?

And yes, it ruined my pvp a few times, but I'm not the only one.


Yet so far you have exactly zero proof that anyone was multiboxing. EVE is about adapting to new situations as they come along & you're refusing to do this, which is hilarious.


GTO with adapting, all the scared birds yelling ADAPT, who cares? There are things u can't adapt to.



You can adapt to this but choose not to.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#456 - 2013-08-28 06:39:09 UTC
oodell wrote:
Hi! I multibox. A rather lot.

There seems to be a rather hilarious overestimation of the true power/capability of tools such as isboxer (and others). While I would love to be a pvp supergod, as some say this tool makes you, my several hundred (approaching a thousand) stealth bomber losses this year is probably sufficient proof to show otherwise. (I'm pretty bad at eve though so maybe I am a god, just a terrible one, who knows)

Out of game requirements:
-Ridiculously high end PC
-Way above average general computer knowledge
-Patience and ability to learn the tool (which, by the way, is completely unintelligible and difficult to use)

Skill requirements:
-Very high battlefield perception
-Insane multitasking ability
-Capability to react to quickly changing circumstances
-Recovering from a bad situation when things go wrong
-Knowledge of when to cut your losses and bail

In game requirements:
-Logistics chain to supply X characters on deployments or otherwise
-Massive almost corp-level income source(s). Even more if you are plexing the accounts.
-All the other things, like skill management, moving characters around etc. Multiplied X times of course.


Even if you are great at all that, you're going to lose a devastating number of ships, and for most people it isn't sustainable at all.

People keep saying this is pay to win, or easy mode pvp, or it's breaking the game. I have been multiboxing for about a year and a half now. It took me about a year of constantly playing to master just one shiptype. During wartime I easily lose 100 ships a month, uninsurable. I pay out 6.5 BILLION a MONTH in plex alone, and several more billion on ships, ammo and logistics. Every month. Poof.

All the software does is repeat commands. Simple right? WELL...not really. Ever notice how your overview is slow to load when things enter/leave grid? Well it turns out they load at different rates for everyone, which means locking things accurately is next to impossible at times. I could list dozens of other limitations like that, but that's just an example. How do you keep cameras aligned? How do you approach a target with traversal when they aren't? Drones are difficult to use and control. Overview is a disaster in every sense. Micromanaging modules is incredibly difficult. If your ships get split up it's a nightmare. Using more than one shiptype exacerbates all of these issues.

The fact is, an equivalent fleet of real people will always be more effective than a single person. Running a multibox squad is very similar to a barely constrained trainwreck at all times, and once something goes wrong it more often than not spirals into an orgy of death and destruction. For you. It's usually expensive. And since you're fighting a bunch of real people, they will capitalize on it every time. That said, multiboxers usually find some niche role in which it works, practice it for months until they master it, and then unleash hell on everyone else. That's where these tear threads come up, because it's usually someone at the other end of six months of practice, failures, lessons learned and, eventually, perfection. At least as close as you can get. Sorry if you feel CCP should make it easy against someone who is playing the game several levels above you. For a lot of people, this is endgame content.

To fund it all, I either have to rat for 30+ hours a month, or do other activities (guess which I prefer). In the past, this has included things like market speculation and trade (requiring market knowledge and billions of isk) and POS reactions. (Think 30+ POS at a time) Currently I'm taking a break and I'm burning through my isk stockpile alarmingly quickly. The point is this - without a wholesome understanding of many varied aspects of the game, this kind of expense just isn't sustainable.

So, for everyone that says it's easy, or pay to win or whatever other nonsense you're spewing, I invite you to give the trial a go, start up a half dozen accounts and then do a few roams through syndicate in thoraxes. I look forward to your lossmails.


Thanks for the explanation.

I think for those who multiboxing, money is not an issue, and I think I never said it's an easy thing to set up.

Anyway, expensive or not, hard to set up or not, it's still an out of game tool which can affect the game directly, and that is bad.
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#457 - 2013-08-28 07:18:23 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Anyway, expensive or not, hard to set up or not, it's still an out of game tool which can affect the game directly, and that is bad.

how does a corp of 10 multiboxed characters affect the game more than a corp of 10 "unique" characters?


unless said 10 multiboxed characters are botting and doing stuff faster than a human that is, in whch case you should report it.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#458 - 2013-08-28 08:52:48 UTC
Grimpak wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Anyway, expensive or not, hard to set up or not, it's still an out of game tool which can affect the game directly, and that is bad.

how does a corp of 10 multiboxed characters affect the game more than a corp of 10 "unique" characters?


unless said 10 multiboxed characters are botting and doing stuff faster than a human that is, in whch case you should report it.


I don't mind unique chars and individuals, that is allowed in this nice sandbox. Ofc multiboxing is allowed too, but why???
oodell
Rotciv Rrama Industries
Goonswarm Federation
#459 - 2013-08-28 09:45:08 UTC  |  Edited by: oodell
TKL HUN wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Anyway, expensive or not, hard to set up or not, it's still an out of game tool which can affect the game directly, and that is bad.

how does a corp of 10 multiboxed characters affect the game more than a corp of 10 "unique" characters?


unless said 10 multiboxed characters are botting and doing stuff faster than a human that is, in whch case you should report it.


I don't mind unique chars and individuals, that is allowed in this nice sandbox. Ofc multiboxing is allowed too, but why???



You haven't given a reason not to. As I was trying to explain, 10 multiboxed characters are definitely inferior in almost every impact-full way to 10 real players, and realistically multiboxers are more often than not cornered into a niche, albiet one they tend to master. On top of that, the whole thing falls apart when something goes wrong, and in eve, it's not hard to make things go wrong. I'd almost agree with you if this was WoW, since there is no loss or such. But this is eve. You can go kill the 10-boxing tornado guy and ruin his whole day. Also, may I remind you, his gang is something close to a billion isk worth of ships he's flying around.

So what's the problem? Without the hand-waving 'it's bad' strawman argument?

So far the arguments have been:
1) It's against the EULA, or should be (Well sorry, it's not, and shouldn't be, because technically key repeating is a rather simple concept, and very limited in practise. You could do exactly the same thing, albiet with more setup work, with any other simple key repeater program. ISboxer and other software just makes it relatively easy to set up. Hell, you could use 10 mice taped together. Yes someone has done that. Quite successfully.)
2) I don't have the money to buy a computer hardware fast enough or lack the knowledge (Whose problem is that?)
3) I can't/won't invest the time and energy to do this stupid crazy thing so CCP should ban it (Well some people want to. It's a huge challenge. Why ruin a niche gameplay element just because you can't or won't pursue it? Not many people can afford titans either. Maybe we should remove those too.*)
4) It's 3rd party software that impacts the game. (So should ban keyboard macros too? Alt-tab functionality? The GARPA mapping tools? evemon? EFT? eve-market? What about google docs that pull massive amounts of market data that enables large scale market manipulation? Jabber? Outside forums? These are all 3rd party tools that massively impact the game, far more than ISBoxer ever will. Eve thrives on the metagame)
5) It's going to ruin the game. (All other points aside, a substantial number of people are never going to be able to figure out how to do this, and even if they do, very few will have the in-game finances or real life time to sustain it for long. So the population is self limiting.)


* Death to all supercaps
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#460 - 2013-08-28 10:34:30 UTC
oodell wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Anyway, expensive or not, hard to set up or not, it's still an out of game tool which can affect the game directly, and that is bad.

how does a corp of 10 multiboxed characters affect the game more than a corp of 10 "unique" characters?


unless said 10 multiboxed characters are botting and doing stuff faster than a human that is, in whch case you should report it.


I don't mind unique chars and individuals, that is allowed in this nice sandbox. Ofc multiboxing is allowed too, but why???



You haven't given a reason not to. As I was trying to explain, 10 multiboxed characters are definitely inferior in almost every impact-full way to 10 real players, and realistically multiboxers are more often than not cornered into a niche, albiet one they tend to master. On top of that, the whole thing falls apart when something goes wrong, and in eve, it's not hard to make things go wrong. I'd almost agree with you if this was WoW, since there is no loss or such. But this is eve. You can go kill the 10-boxing tornado guy and ruin his whole day. Also, may I remind you, his gang is something close to a billion isk worth of ships he's flying around.

So what's the problem? Without the hand-waving 'it's bad' strawman argument?

So far the arguments have been:
1) It's against the EULA, or should be (Well sorry, it's not, and shouldn't be, because technically key repeating is a rather simple concept, and very limited in practise. You could do exactly the same thing, albiet with more setup work, with any other simple key repeater program. ISboxer and other software just makes it relatively easy to set up. Hell, you could use 10 mice taped together. Yes someone has done that. Quite successfully.)
2) I don't have the money to buy a computer hardware fast enough or lack the knowledge (Whose problem is that?)
3) I can't/won't invest the time and energy to do this stupid crazy thing so CCP should ban it (Well some people want to. It's a huge challenge. Why ruin a niche gameplay element just because you can't or won't pursue it? Not many people can afford titans either. Maybe we should remove those too.*)
4) It's 3rd party software that impacts the game. (So should ban keyboard macros too? Alt-tab functionality? The GARPA mapping tools? evemon? EFT? eve-market? What about google docs that pull massive amounts of market data that enables large scale market manipulation? Jabber? Outside forums? These are all 3rd party tools that massively impact the game, far more than ISBoxer ever will. Eve thrives on the metagame)
5) It's going to ruin the game. (All other points aside, a substantial number of people are never going to be able to figure out how to do this, and even if they do, very few will have the in-game finances or real life time to sustain it for long. So the population is self limiting.)


* Death to all supercaps


How the hell evemon or eft or dotlan or etc etc has a direct effenct on the game? And i said a reason why it shouldn't be allowed.

Is it expensive? is it hard to set up? "Whose problem is that"?