These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Multiboxing softwares ruining pvp

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
culo duro
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#261 - 2013-08-06 09:20:10 UTC
Honestly i think most ISBoxer users could multibox better without it... also i love the old argument "it's one guy!" yeah so what get friends this is an MMO, you're meant to make friends and fly with them.

This guy decided to play eve solo, why don't you play with friends?

I've starting blogging http://www.epvpc.blogspot.com 
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#262 - 2013-08-06 09:23:09 UTC
culo duro wrote:
Honestly i think most ISBoxer users could multibox better without it... also i love the old argument "it's one guy!" yeah so what get friends this is an MMO, you're meant to make friends and fly with them.

This guy decided to play eve solo, why don't you play with friends?


Make friends? Why don't the multiboxers make friends instead fo multiboxing?

I have friends, I fly with them sometimes, but sometimes, I go solo, that's all
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#263 - 2013-08-06 09:26:10 UTC
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
Cheat? Really!? /Facepalm

Just stop crying, ISboxer will stay legal. Nothing is going to change. End of story.
(Even stubborn Blizzard is alowing it lol)


I'm not crying, just trying to keep PVP what it should be.
Spankijs Omaristos
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#264 - 2013-08-06 09:29:13 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
culo duro wrote:
Honestly i think most ISBoxer users could multibox better without it... also i love the old argument "it's one guy!" yeah so what get friends this is an MMO, you're meant to make friends and fly with them.

This guy decided to play eve solo, why don't you play with friends?


Make friends? Why don't the multiboxers make friends instead fo multiboxing?

I have friends, I fly with them sometimes, but sometimes, I go solo, that's all



Then find solo targets as well.
When you are solo, and see fleet of enemy ships - you GTFO. And no one cares 1 person controlled or 6.
Spankijs Omaristos
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#265 - 2013-08-06 09:32:11 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
Cheat? Really!? /Facepalm

Just stop crying, ISboxer will stay legal. Nothing is going to change. End of story.
(Even stubborn Blizzard is alowing it lol)


I'm not crying, just trying to keep PVP what it should be.



No you are crying.
So, tell me, how is your trying working out so far? (Because again, nothing is going to change, just a waste of space in forums lol)
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#266 - 2013-08-06 09:36:05 UTC
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
culo duro wrote:
Honestly i think most ISBoxer users could multibox better without it... also i love the old argument "it's one guy!" yeah so what get friends this is an MMO, you're meant to make friends and fly with them.

This guy decided to play eve solo, why don't you play with friends?


Make friends? Why don't the multiboxers make friends instead fo multiboxing?

I have friends, I fly with them sometimes, but sometimes, I go solo, that's all



Then find solo targets as well.
When you are solo, and see fleet of enemy ships - you GTFO. And no one cares 1 person controlled or 6.


A Tribal Band guy trying to teach my something about PVP? Funny...
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#267 - 2013-08-06 09:38:34 UTC
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
Cheat? Really!? /Facepalm

Just stop crying, ISboxer will stay legal. Nothing is going to change. End of story.
(Even stubborn Blizzard is alowing it lol)


I'm not crying, just trying to keep PVP what it should be.



No you are crying.
So, tell me, how is your trying working out so far? (Because again, nothing is going to change, just a waste of space in forums lol)


As far as I can see, not I'm the one who is afraid...
Spankijs Omaristos
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#268 - 2013-08-06 09:43:47 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
Cheat? Really!? /Facepalm

Just stop crying, ISboxer will stay legal. Nothing is going to change. End of story.
(Even stubborn Blizzard is alowing it lol)


I'm not crying, just trying to keep PVP what it should be.



No you are crying.
So, tell me, how is your trying working out so far? (Because again, nothing is going to change, just a waste of space in forums lol)


As far as I can see, not I'm the one who is afraid...


Who is afraid? :)

It seems you and some handful others are afraid, because deep in your gut you know and feel, that ISboxer will stay here forever!!! :D
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#269 - 2013-08-06 10:01:44 UTC
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Spankijs Omaristos wrote:
Cheat? Really!? /Facepalm

Just stop crying, ISboxer will stay legal. Nothing is going to change. End of story.
(Even stubborn Blizzard is alowing it lol)


I'm not crying, just trying to keep PVP what it should be.



No you are crying.
So, tell me, how is your trying working out so far? (Because again, nothing is going to change, just a waste of space in forums lol)


As far as I can see, not I'm the one who is afraid...


Who is afraid? :)

It seems you and some handful others are afraid, because deep in your gut you know and feel, that ISboxer will stay here forever!!! :D


Letting you to use your own carebear hordes??
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#270 - 2013-08-06 10:20:07 UTC
If you ban ISBoxer, then you basically allow anyone who uses it despite the ban to have an unfair advantage; you reward breaking the rules.

Leaving allowed means anyone can benefit from it if they so wish.

This same argument has been repeated over and over though, every time someone new comes to the forum to whine about it.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#271 - 2013-08-06 10:26:23 UTC  |  Edited by: TKL HUN
Khanh'rhh wrote:
If you ban ISBoxer, then you basically allow anyone who uses it despite the ban to have an unfair advantage; you reward breaking the rules.

Leaving allowed means anyone can benefit from it if they so wish.

This same argument has been repeated over and over though, every time someone new comes to the forum to whine about it.


Letting it to be used is not an advantage, but banning it will be my advantage?

L O L

Banning it will mean anyone can benefit from all the advantages what the GAME allows.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#272 - 2013-08-06 12:10:47 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I never tried to cheat in any game, so no thanks.


No one has managed to explicitly describe how using ISboxer is cheating.


Well he "said so" so it must be true right?
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#273 - 2013-08-06 12:19:58 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I never tried to cheat in any game, so no thanks.


No one has managed to explicitly describe how using ISboxer is cheating.


Well he "said so" so it must be true right?


I already said it why I think it is a form of cheating, read the posts.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#274 - 2013-08-06 13:48:14 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I never tried to cheat in any game, so no thanks.


No one has managed to explicitly describe how using ISboxer is cheating.


Well he "said so" so it must be true right?


I already said it why I think it is a form of cheating, read the posts.


CCP says your opinion is wrong.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Myra Faye
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#275 - 2013-08-06 14:28:02 UTC
1 person with 5 accounts or 5 people with 1 account, they are essentially functionally equivalent. So multi-boxers are not ruining PvP any moreso than people who tend to fight with a numbers advantage.

Don't like it? You have 3 options: a) join a corporation and roll with enough people to kill any MBer you come across, b) MB yourself or c) quit EVE and find a game you think has a more fair set of rules.

Oh, and stop saying **** is "ruining" the game. The software has been around for years. If it was going to ruin the game, it already would have.
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#276 - 2013-08-06 14:58:46 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I never tried to cheat in any game, so no thanks.


No one has managed to explicitly describe how using ISboxer is cheating.


Well he "said so" so it must be true right?


I already said it why I think it is a form of cheating, read the posts.


CCP says your opinion is wrong.


So far in this thread I didn't see anything that CCP said.
Myra Faye
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#277 - 2013-08-06 15:12:48 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:

So far in this thread I didn't see anything that CCP said.


Right, because CCP needs to come to this thread to "say something" even though multi-boxing has been fully permitted and in the game for years.

They said it already. It's said. Multi-boxing is a reality and it's not going anywhere any time soon and if you think a little boo-hooing in the forums is going to make them go "Oh, you're totally right. Even though we obviously thought about this years ago and made our decision then, and the fact that multi-boxing represents a not-insignificant portion of our annual revenue, we totally didn't realize some random schmuck on the forums was going to shed tears about it so now we're completely reversing our stance on the topic. Thanks, random schmuck, for opening our foolish eyes." then you're daft.
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#278 - 2013-08-06 15:31:02 UTC  |  Edited by: TKL HUN
Myra Faye wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:

So far in this thread I didn't see anything that CCP said.


Right, because CCP needs to come to this thread to "say something" even though multi-boxing has been fully permitted and in the game for years.

They said it already. It's said. Multi-boxing is a reality and it's not going anywhere any time soon and if you think a little boo-hooing in the forums is going to make them go "Oh, you're totally right. Even though we obviously thought about this years ago and made our decision then, and the fact that multi-boxing represents a not-insignificant portion of our annual revenue, we totally didn't realize some random ******* on the forums was going to shed tears about it so now we're completely reversing our stance on the topic. Thanks, random *******, for opening our foolish eyes." then you're daft.


I can't really understand people. They come here to insult someone, to make him/her look like an idiot, with reasons like "it's said". If this is just a little "boo-hoo" ing, and "it's said", why are you and others are here, trying to tell me anything, instead of being happy, about "It's said", "It will stay" "It will be allowed"? Do you really have so much spare time? Why are you even interested this thread, if you are so sure, it will be allowed?

I don't know if this thread, or other threads about multiboxing with a 3rd party software will make any difference in CCP's opinion about multiboxing, but damn, I like this game, and I try.
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#279 - 2013-08-06 15:47:42 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Khanh'rhh wrote:
If you ban ISBoxer, then you basically allow anyone who uses it despite the ban to have an unfair advantage; you reward breaking the rules.

Leaving allowed means anyone can benefit from it if they so wish.

This same argument has been repeated over and over though, every time someone new comes to the forum to whine about it.


Letting it to be used is not an advantage, but banning it will be my advantage?

L O L

Banning it will mean anyone can benefit from all the advantages what the GAME allows.

You seem to have not read my post. Banning it will do very little because people will circumvent the ban - and so only people willing to circumvent the EULA will have the advantage.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Myra Faye
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#280 - 2013-08-06 15:56:11 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
I like this game, and I try.


"I like this game, so I'll do my best to change it."

Checks out.