These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Racist Tears Harvest. Yumyum for sure.

First post
Author
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#121 - 2013-07-31 17:07:22 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:

And that is exactly my point. You only care that I used the word they. The fact that my relatives are relegated to living on reservations doesn't matter to you. The fact that treaties are broken in order to oppress them is meaningless to you. To you, Native Americans don't exist. We are worthless, we don't matter, we don't warrant protection, we don't deserve freedom. Your anti-racism ideals are in fact more racist than the Klan.


Call it: neo-racism.

Same old antics, different times.

Can see it now even. 40 years since desegregation and voting right changes, and as soon as the DoJ lessens their watch, some key Southern states started to toughen voter registration laws to the Jim Crow days.

These kids are but a new generation of the ignorant. That's what happens when folks are raised in ghettos and only see one color; one culture; one "world view" (Aidan's a perfect example of it as a EvE fanboi even...one game player who sits there insulting a different game because it's different than EvE, and still too ignorant to even want to change).


You missed the point completely. First, Voter ID laws don't adversely impact any one group. And second it is far more racist to give precedence to one racial group over another. How racist is it to give special scholarships to one racial group? If whites could have white-only scholarships people would riot, and in seeing insults to blacks the OP raced to the forums to brag. He also attacked my statements as racist because I pointed out how Native Americans are ignored and oppressed. The federal government gives out millions of dollars to minorities for college. Do you know what Native Americans get? $500 a year. That's not even a single semester. There are no taxpayer funded scholarships for Native Americans. The reason is simple. We are too few to matter to people like the OP. He doesn't care about equality, he only cares that people think he's a good person. After all, blacks were enslaved. Granted my ancestors were first enslaved and then systematically eradicated. But that's ok, because you'll get no medal or pat on the back for talking about how wrong that was. I'm from a culture on the verge of extinction, which probably makes the OP giddy with excitement. To him, I should lay down and die. I need to get out of the way so other racial groups can prosper. In his mind, a dollar spent on me is a dollar wasted. He's more racist than any klansman, but he gets a pat on the back for ignoring the plight of my people.
Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#122 - 2013-07-31 17:16:09 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
Starkiller Lothlorien wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
Xen Solarus wrote:
People that seem to be defending racism are ignorant in the extreme. The nature of freedom is countries based on laws means that some freedoms need to be given up to insure a fair and just society. Thankfully, the sort of "freedoms" we are talking about are things like murder, raping, stealing and even racism. Sure there are plenty of people in the world that like to do these things, but unfortunately they have no place in civilalized society.

Racism essentially boils down to ignorance. I could have been bullied by a kid with a big nose when i was younger, and grow up to have a deep hatred towards everyone with a big nose. Stupid huh? I mean, everyone is completely different, people with big noses are going to be competely different too. But that doesn't matter to me, those damn big nosed bastards are scum, the lot of them! Shocked

Justify it anyway you like, but racism is just as stupid as this. You could pick just about any feature to apply ignorant prejudices, eye colour, gender, skin colour, religion, national background. If you happen to have one of these prejudices, then quite franky i feel sorry for you. I recommend you think back, find the route source of your ignorance, be that some sort of negative experience or good old family indoctrination, and rethink your position. Cause quite franky, your wrong! Cool


The problem with your view is that simple insults become racism. We insult what we see, meaning you're not going to call a black man a dirty Jew, even if his grandmother is Jewish. Racism is determined and constant discrimination. Now when a race is forced to live on a small tract of land that the government continually tries to make smaller they can complain of racism today. A couple mean words is not racism. People claim racism, when they have large groups demanding greater rights than others. They claim racism even when laws are changed to give them greater rights than others. They claim racism because they have to follow the same laws as others. They claim its racist if race ISN'T a factor in college admissions. How terrible their lives must be. They only get MILLIONS in tax funded scholarships. They only get preferential treatment in college applications. They only get extra points on their SAT. They only get amnesty for entering the country illegally. How terribly racist of us.


Bio I ganked belong your alt, maybe?


No, but your disdain for Native Americans is showing. Your views of equality are rather, well, unequal. You enjoy thinking you're morally superior because you defend one race, while you willingly ignore the oppression of another. Perhaps you ganked that bio because it hit too close to home.


Beg pardon, not realise it was you raging in quoted post. Window fit to text, not show forum avatars etc. Post sound like whiteboy billybob anti-black vitriol, very much soso like text of ganked bio. Except bio text more like written by caveman before invention of education. TL;DR version: thought you caucasian KayKay-type racist.

Starkiller no hate Native Americans. Wes Studi awesome in Mystery Men.
You got big bone to grind, mate. But you off target with this tangent, for sure. On lookout for more, no limits to ethnic horizon. Pvp has no colour, see? I see any bio babble crap about scalping and Tonto, I gank that Joker in the jambags too, locked.
o7
Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#123 - 2013-07-31 17:27:29 UTC
Erotica 1 wrote:

My favorite part was where the op mentioned the New Order. However, the website was missing. www.minerpumping.com

The rest just seems like an attempt to troll the forums:

1. Discusses a petition he filed, which is likely to get others to do the same. But we cannot discuss such matters.

2. As he blasts racism, he uses a derogatory word to describe country folk. Really? People who live in the country are not as good as you?

Thread devolves as expected into discussions of race and sexual orientation.



Not sure where you from, Emetica, where country folk all rednecks? I live countryside too, only a few rednecks in my village. Most cool, know about melting pot, no cross street no close migrants or snarl at heavens when fail understand economics.
Seen plenty rednecks in Bigtown, too, on soup run for mum. No need live in barrel to be ignorant blinker, no need live under bridge to be troll. Ch, i tell you know already. Apples and cans, innit?
symolan
BamBam Inc.
#124 - 2013-07-31 17:28:07 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
symolan wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
[quote=Xen Solarus]
The problem with your view is that simple insults become racism. We insult what we see, meaning you're not going to call a black man a dirty Jew, even if his grandmother is Jewish. Racism is determined and constant discrimination. Now when a race is forced to live on a small tract of land that the government continually tries to make smaller they can complain of racism today. A couple mean words is not racism. People claim racism, when they have large groups demanding greater rights than others. They claim racism even when laws are changed to give them greater rights than others. They claim racism because they have to follow the same laws as others. They claim its racist if race ISN'T a factor in college admissions. How terrible their lives must be. They only get MILLIONS in tax funded scholarships. They only get preferential treatment in college applications. They only get extra points on their SAT. They only get amnesty for entering the country illegally. How terribly racist of us.


If you start too many sentences with "THEY", then it borders on racism?

EDIT: guess it's rather on than to...


And that is exactly my point. You only care that I used the word they. The fact that my relatives are relegated to living on reservations doesn't matter to you. The fact that treaties are broken in order to oppress them is meaningless to you. To you, Native Americans don't exist. We are worthless, we don't matter, we don't warrant protection, we don't deserve freedom. Your anti-racism ideals are in fact more racist than the Klan.


Lots of things you note from my observation that your previous post contains a lot of they which is an infication of someone using stereotypes.

Re the points you think you observed. Matter... Well, you know, there's an Ocean between the two of us. I mean literally an Ocean, the atlantic one. So "matter"... Can ever be quite indirect only. To say that coz we ain't gonna make it perfect any aspiration to it is wrong or even evil as you will leave some things bad solves nothing.
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#125 - 2013-07-31 17:41:14 UTC
symolan wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
symolan wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
[quote=Xen Solarus]
The problem with your view is that simple insults become racism. We insult what we see, meaning you're not going to call a black man a dirty Jew, even if his grandmother is Jewish. Racism is determined and constant discrimination. Now when a race is forced to live on a small tract of land that the government continually tries to make smaller they can complain of racism today. A couple mean words is not racism. People claim racism, when they have large groups demanding greater rights than others. They claim racism even when laws are changed to give them greater rights than others. They claim racism because they have to follow the same laws as others. They claim its racist if race ISN'T a factor in college admissions. How terrible their lives must be. They only get MILLIONS in tax funded scholarships. They only get preferential treatment in college applications. They only get extra points on their SAT. They only get amnesty for entering the country illegally. How terribly racist of us.


If you start too many sentences with "THEY", then it borders on racism?

EDIT: guess it's rather on than to...


And that is exactly my point. You only care that I used the word they. The fact that my relatives are relegated to living on reservations doesn't matter to you. The fact that treaties are broken in order to oppress them is meaningless to you. To you, Native Americans don't exist. We are worthless, we don't matter, we don't warrant protection, we don't deserve freedom. Your anti-racism ideals are in fact more racist than the Klan.


Lots of things you note from my observation that your previous post contains a lot of they which is an infication of someone using stereotypes.

Re the points you think you observed. Matter... Well, you know, there's an Ocean between the two of us. I mean literally an Ocean, the atlantic one. So "matter"... Can ever be quite indirect only. To say that coz we ain't gonna make it perfect any aspiration to it is wrong or even evil as you will leave some things bad solves nothing.


If I'm understanding you, you're saying that Native Americans don't matter because we live across the ocean? You seem to be saying that you can't stop all racism, so why bother trying to stop it against me? Seems rather racist. But my original point stands. Any ethnic group that has faced targeted extermination attempts, and is STILL facing forced relocation, plus a steady assault on what little land they have left, a constant stream of broken promises, legislation trying to rationalize their continued oppression and also faces being ignored by the majority of the world's population, only they get my sympathy. And until the anti-racism crowd recognizes this they will continue being the worst bigots around. Only Israel knows my pain. But even Soviet Russia and Communist China have commented on my ancestors mistreatment. It's a sick world where two such oppressive regimes see the evil where so called free societies do not.
symolan
BamBam Inc.
#126 - 2013-07-31 18:11:05 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:


If I'm understanding you, you're saying that Native Americans don't matter because we live across the ocean? You seem to be saying that you can't stop all racism, so why bother trying to stop it against me? Seems rather racist. But my original point stands. Any ethnic group that has faced targeted extermination attempts, and is STILL facing forced relocation, plus a steady assault on what little land they have left, a constant stream of broken promises, legislation trying to rationalize their continued oppression and also faces being ignored by the majority of the world's population, only they get my sympathy. And until the anti-racism crowd recognizes this they will continue being the worst bigots around. Only Israel knows my pain. But even Soviet Russia and Communist China have commented on my ancestors mistreatment. It's a sick world where two such oppressive regimes see the evil where so called free societies do not.


I'm saying that you try rather hard to misunderstand other people and guess you know it.

You ask me whether Native American matter to me. the key is the word matter. How much do Tibetians, Syrians, Somalians and all else that suffer matter to you? they do less than my daily issues with my kids tbh, and I'm not gonna hypocrise here.
They concern or cause me to sympathize if my understanding of the english language is somehow correct.

If only the worst of plights get your sympathy. Mine is to all who suffer. but sympathy and matter... I'm not a native english speaker, matter is in my understanding something that is immediate. to be immediate it needs to be so.
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#127 - 2013-07-31 19:45:28 UTC
symolan wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:


If I'm understanding you, you're saying that Native Americans don't matter because we live across the ocean? You seem to be saying that you can't stop all racism, so why bother trying to stop it against me? Seems rather racist. But my original point stands. Any ethnic group that has faced targeted extermination attempts, and is STILL facing forced relocation, plus a steady assault on what little land they have left, a constant stream of broken promises, legislation trying to rationalize their continued oppression and also faces being ignored by the majority of the world's population, only they get my sympathy. And until the anti-racism crowd recognizes this they will continue being the worst bigots around. Only Israel knows my pain. But even Soviet Russia and Communist China have commented on my ancestors mistreatment. It's a sick world where two such oppressive regimes see the evil where so called free societies do not.


I'm saying that you try rather hard to misunderstand other people and guess you know it.

You ask me whether Native American matter to me. the key is the word matter. How much do Tibetians, Syrians, Somalians and all else that suffer matter to you? they do less than my daily issues with my kids tbh, and I'm not gonna hypocrise here.
They concern or cause me to sympathize if my understanding of the english language is somehow correct.

If only the worst of plights get your sympathy. Mine is to all who suffer. but sympathy and matter... I'm not a native english speaker, matter is in my understanding something that is immediate. to be immediate it needs to be so.


I wasn't trying to misunderstand you at all. Your English is terrible(which, since you probably never need to speak it, is understandable), and I thought you were implying that because you can't "see" the hardships of Native Americans they're of no concern to you. Now that you explained it well enough I understand you. The point I'm trying to get across, though that can be difficult when I get angry, is that the anti-racism movement is hypocritical at best, and downright evil at worst. The fact is that insults mean nothing unless the insulted person or persons lets them. The insults hurled at me, mostly from minority groups, don't bother me. They can call me a wahoo, a dirty Indian, a drunk, a peon, what ever they want. What bothers me is that some minority groups are treated so much better than my own race is. We get no help, which is fine except that others do. Like I said, the Obama administration just broke a 100 year old treaty to sue a Native American who has done more in his life to preserve, promote and advance our culture than the government ever has. And the lawsuit, which broke one treaty, is in response to a second treaty broken by the government. Imagine if the US invaded your country so that we could tax you to support me. Obama, who takes such a hard stance on racism, is so willing to attack my culture, my family, my people. All because we number so few that we can't vote him out without support. That seems, at least to me, to be a level of inequality few people experience today and yet people say blacks are oppress
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#128 - 2013-07-31 20:34:49 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
You missed the point completely. First, Voter ID laws don't adversely impact any one group.


How old are you, Xavier? I just need a point of reference of your life experience, as that statement shows you're pretty young.

And you missed the point completely if you don't even understand history and the Jim Crow laws.

Judge Ginsburg was quite right, that if the system in place now was reverted the old behaviors would return again...and did, as soon as the DoJ relaxed enforcement. It's not even 50 years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the old ways are returning via laws again.

And the voter registration rules did adversely affect any race than white voting in the South...why the Jim Crow laws were enacted in the first place. The main race it singled out was Blacks (as any other race was nominal in the South until after WWII).

It doesn't need to be aversive to 1 or 10 groups to be detrimental -- that it DOES discriminate -- is the problem.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#129 - 2013-07-31 20:58:17 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
If I'm understanding you, you're saying that Native Americans don't matter because we live across the ocean?


Which Native Americans, Xavier?

Reservation Native Americans aren't even US citizens (something a lot of people don't know). They don't hold US citizenship.

US citizens are governed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and all the laws of the USA.

Native Americans as a people is a very broad definition. A person who is 1/10th Creek, for example, can claim to be Native American though 1/10th of any ethnic group is so nominal there's little tie to the community itself. It's why the tribes are even cracking down on tribal claims (especially due to the nations having gambling casinos) without more proof than "my daddy was Cherokee 2x removed".

Then what would you claim about the Inuit, as they're as Native American as the Native Americans -- or does one POLITICAL ethnic group matter more?

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#130 - 2013-07-31 20:59:44 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
You missed the point completely. First, Voter ID laws don't adversely impact any one group.


How old are you, Xavier? I just need a point of reference of your life experience, as that statement shows you're pretty young.

And you missed the point completely if you don't even understand history and the Jim Crow laws.

Judge Ginsburg was quite right, that if the system in place now was reverted the old behaviors would return again...and did, as soon as the DoJ relaxed enforcement. It's not even 50 years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the old ways are returning via laws again.

And the voter registration rules did adversely affect any race than white voting in the South...why the Jim Crow laws were enacted in the first place. The main race it singled out was Blacks (as any other race was nominal in the South until after WWII).

It doesn't need to be aversive to 1 or 10 groups to be detrimental -- that it DOES discriminate -- is the problem.


I'm 26, and Voter ID laws are not the same as Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws were just racist laws, plain and simple. The Voter ID laws enacted recently do nothing but require proof of your identity from ALL voters. But it targets the poor, you say. Well no, since those on welfare can present their benefit cards(which generally have a photo) as ID. But the law says they can't do that! Well that makes sense, the photos are generally black and white, and of terrible quality. But that's ok, that benefit card can be presented at the DMV as proof to get state issued photo ID. But how are they gonna get there? Well, Ace, DMV offices are almost always in city centers, with easy access through public transportation. But it costs money! Not much, 50 dollars every 10 years or so, which is a minuscule cost. It equates to a whopping 5 dollars a year. So tell me again how these laws are so evil? The only people unable to get photo ID are those that owe fines and illegal aliens. Since illegal aliens aren't supposed to be voting, it's only those that owe fines that can't get photo ID if they don't already have it.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#131 - 2013-07-31 21:05:56 UTC
Sure, Ace...

Voting, the one fundamental American right, but hell, you don't have to prove you are a U.S. citizen to do it! That's downright Raciss!!!

How moronic. I've had a photo ID since I was 12, pretty sure they're free (and a legal requirement in half those states anyway).

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#132 - 2013-07-31 21:06:08 UTC
Dear Mum,

Picked up the Fish Serum from Buddy
Dropped it off with the new Contact at the Oasis.
And it seems to work pretty good,
but I had a bad reaction...

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#133 - 2013-07-31 21:11:02 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
We are too few to matter to people like the OP. He doesn't care about equality

I'm from a culture on the verge of extinction, which probably makes the OP giddy with excitement. To him, I should lay down and die. I need to get out of the way so other racial groups can prosper.

In his mind, a dollar spent on me is a dollar wasted. He's more racist than any klansman, but he gets a pat on the back for ignoring the plight of my people.


If we Edwardian gentlemen swanning about London in yesteryear, I slap you face with velvet glove, pistols at dawn. For why you no comment my previous apology and bigup to Native American people, Professor? And for shame this baseless character slur on. What next, kick my dog and call him GTFO?

Take off selective filter specs, maybe, open eyes, wipe ancestor grudge out and maybe see anti-racism not zero-sum game. House Lothlorien have despite for the Klan, sure, but not run out of sympathy for your people. Snot fair.
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#134 - 2013-07-31 21:21:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Xavier Higdon
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
If I'm understanding you, you're saying that Native Americans don't matter because we live across the ocean?


Which Native Americans, Xavier?

Reservation Native Americans aren't even US citizens (something a lot of people don't know). They don't hold US citizenship.

US citizens are governed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and all the laws of the USA.

Native Americans as a people is a very broad definition. A person who is 1/10th Creek, for example, can claim to be Native American though 1/10th of any ethnic group is so nominal there's little tie to the community itself. It's why the tribes are even cracking down on tribal claims (especially due to the nations having gambling casinos) without more proof than "my daddy was Cherokee 2x removed".

Then what would you claim about the Inuit, as they're as Native American as the Native Americans -- or does one POLITICAL ethnic group matter more?


You've got to be kidding. Were you born before 1924? That was the year the US government granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the US, or on any reservations inside US territory. They weren't allowed to vote until 1957 though. And Inuits ARE Native American, so I don't know what you're getting at there. Their culture is as much under attack as the Haudenosaunee culture. Their land is as much at risk as ours. Their very survival is as questionable as ours. And claiming to have some ancestor that was some ethnicity is meaningless. What makes a person Native American is their ties to the culture. I don't know what you're insinuating. It appears you're trying to marginalize Native Americans. First you're trying to negate the argument of unfair treatment by saying we aren't citizens, which I assure you we are. Then you attempt to dilute the importance of being Native American by saying anybody can claim to be so. And third, you're implying that I'm excluding some Native Americans, when I'm only using the term because it allows me to talk about a vast number of diverse groups without having to type each individual tribe's name. So what is the point in this post? And thank you for not comparing us to some WoW character.

Edit: And the fact that you call us Reservation Native Americans is rather insulting. Does it make me less human, less deserving of equality because I was born on a reservation?
Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#135 - 2013-07-31 21:25:02 UTC
Starkiller Lothlorien wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
We are too few to matter to people like the OP. He doesn't care about equality

I'm from a culture on the verge of extinction, which probably makes the OP giddy with excitement. To him, I should lay down and die. I need to get out of the way so other racial groups can prosper.

In his mind, a dollar spent on me is a dollar wasted. He's more racist than any klansman, but he gets a pat on the back for ignoring the plight of my people.


If we Edwardian gentlemen swanning about London in yesteryear, I slap you face with velvet glove, pistols at dawn. For why you no comment my previous apology and bigup to Native American people, Professor? And for shame this baseless character slur on. What next, kick my dog and call him GTFO?

Take off selective filter specs, maybe, open eyes, wipe ancestor grudge out and maybe see anti-racism not zero-sum game. House Lothlorien have despite for the Klan, sure, but not run out of sympathy for your people. Snot fair.


Your post got lost in the tangle of everybody else posting. My apologies for not being more attentive. And I will most certainly not kick your dog.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#136 - 2013-07-31 21:35:23 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
I'm 26, and Voter ID laws are not the same as Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws were just racist laws, plain and simple.


Right there shows the epic failure of the US educational system.

You don't even know what the Jim Crow laws were; why they existed; how it helped to segregate; and it's effects, yet want to define what is or isn't discrimination, as a 26 year-old lad who was born long after segregation even.

You don't even know the history.

I lived through the tail end of segregation (my siblings actually lived in it) and still remember the pickets at schools during the forced busing to desegregate the schools (those long 45min bus rides every day to goto school).

It was a social experiment like Dr. Livingston in Africa, and it showed how ugly segregation was. The black kids, many who were so poor, the mothers used bacon grease for their kids hair (how was momma going to afford hair dressing? She made 30 cents an hour house cleaning IF she could get a job, and welfare penalized having fathers in the household so forget a second income [which in turn ruined black communities]). That interacting with white people (or even Asians) was like they're from another planet. Had all those black girls wanting to braid my hair, because it's the first time they ever touched or worked with straight hair. They were that isolated from the community itself. Just 10 years before then, they couldn't even walk on sidewalks, a privilege even dogs had.

Do you even understand those things? Or do you take what we went through all for granted?

You missed the point by a long shot. It's not Black, white, yellow or red. It's about humans being treated as equals, as color is only skin deep.

The Jim Crow laws made institutional racism a possibility. Not even 50 years later has the damage caused by it been recovered from, as society is much slower to reform -- and it sure doesn't help when the next generation is as deaf, dumb and blind to repeat the same ugly history again.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#137 - 2013-07-31 21:38:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
Ace Uoweme wrote:
I'm super old so I know everything!


Please tell me how having to prove U.S. citizenship is unreasonable? Since a citizen cannot vote, why is this a problem if someone is a legal citizen?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Xavier Higdon
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#138 - 2013-07-31 21:50:38 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Xavier Higdon wrote:
I'm 26, and Voter ID laws are not the same as Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws were just racist laws, plain and simple.


Right there shows the epic failure of the US educational system.

You don't even know what the Jim Crow laws were; why they existed; how it helped to segregate; and it's effects, yet want to define what is or isn't discrimination, as a 26 year-old lad who was born long after segregation even.

You don't even know the history.

I lived through the tail end of segregation (my siblings actually lived in it) and still remember the pickets at schools during the forced busing to desegregate the schools (those long 45min bus rides every day to goto school).

It was a social experiment like Dr. Livingston in Africa, and it showed how ugly segregation was. The black kids, many who were so poor, the mothers used bacon grease for their kids hair (how was momma going to afford hair dressing? She made 30 cents an hour house cleaning IF she could get a job, and welfare penalized having fathers in the household so forget a second income [which in turn ruined black communities]). That interacting with white people (or even Asians) was like they're from another planet. Had all those black girls wanting to braid my hair, because it's the first time they ever touched or worked with straight hair. They were that isolated from the community itself. Just 10 years before then, they couldn't even walk on sidewalks, a privilege even dogs had.

Do you even understand those things? Or do you take what we went through all for granted?

You missed the point by a long shot. It's not Black, white, yellow or red. It's about humans being treated as equals, as color is only skin deep.

The Jim Crow laws made institutional racism a possibility. Not even 50 years later has the damage caused by it been recovered from, as society is much slower to reform -- and it sure doesn't help when the next generation is as deaf, dumb and blind to repeat the same ugly history again.


Did you expect me to go into detail about the Jim Crow laws? Ok, I will. They were laws enacted between the late 1800s(around 1890 some time) and some time in the 1960s. They were heralded as a way to preserve both white and black cultures by providing separate but equal facilities for black Americans. In reality, these facilities were almost always inferior. These laws were, in reality, legislated oppression. They were an attempt to force black Americans to live in subpar conditions, therefore bringing to light the "superiority" of white Americans. They were all state and local laws, and they varied by region. They included, but were not limited to, the segregation of public facilities(like restrooms and water fountains), public transportation(buses and trains), public places like parks, performance venues(theaters and concert halls), schools and even work places. I don't see why you needed me to go into so much detail. And I don't understand why someone who says they lived through such oppression would be so willing to allow that oppression to happen again. Or is it not oppression if it only happens to Native Americans? I just don't see why it's wrong when it happens to black Americans, but it's ok when it happens to Native Americans.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#139 - 2013-07-31 22:19:32 UTC
Xavier Higdon wrote:
You've got to be kidding. Were you born before 1924? That was the year the US government granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the US, or on any reservations inside US territory. They weren't allowed to vote until 1957 though.


Two words for you: Russell Means.

He didn't run off to Germany to live after renouncing his US citizenship, nor that Lakotah tribe, ya know?

Xavier Higdon wrote:
And Inuits ARE Native American, so I don't know what you're getting at there.


No, they're the First Peoples.

Native Americans slaughtered them like the US soldiers did the Native Americans...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Falls_Massacre

]So, much you don't know and don't want to know.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#140 - 2013-07-31 22:26:41 UTC
@ Xavier Higdon, I wouldn't bother with Ace, the person behind the avatar has an extremely high opinion of herself, and an ego to match. Thankfully they're buggering back off to WoW soon and the forums will be a nicer place because of it.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack