These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Redesign of some ships

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
#81 - 2011-10-28 21:00:57 UTC
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#82 - 2011-10-28 21:05:53 UTC
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8kBAWayqELU

NEW RAVEN!!!!!

that is all ¬_¬



So if the old scorp got made to look like a scorp when it was redone, with the new raven be a big black beaked bird?

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
Jacob Stov
#83 - 2011-10-28 21:53:03 UTC
Great news. Big smile Now if missile precision/ rigor riggs could influence short range missiles, too...Twisted
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
#84 - 2011-10-28 21:55:35 UTC
Looking at the in vid pic... if that is it, looks the same just higher poly count.
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#85 - 2011-10-28 21:58:31 UTC
Cruicifier and Sentinal.

They are the only Amarr ships that are really badly off design policy.
Max Von Sydow
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#86 - 2011-10-28 22:02:48 UTC
I think the apoc is also missing a few parts.
Space Momma
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#87 - 2011-10-28 22:48:58 UTC
TYPHOON....
kthnx
Roisin Connor
Fight Club Outfit
DammFam
#88 - 2011-10-28 22:56:22 UTC
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba wrote:
Looking at the in vid pic... if that is it, looks the same just higher poly count.


Even if they aren't thinking of doing new missile launchers yet, I hope they prepare them for animated missile launchers that will arrive some time in the distant future. Isn't Raven one of the ships that has "fake" missile bays?
stoicfaux
#89 - 2011-10-29 01:21:16 UTC
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba wrote:
Looking at the in vid pic... if that is it, looks the same just higher poly count.


It helps to have the video up with the 3d preview up in Eve. Instead of the engines being clumped together in a duck tail, they're distinctly separated individual tubes. The spikes on the wings have been re-arranged. The really long spike is enlongated even more. Overall, the new raven in progress looks more aggressive and balanced.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
Vrykolakasis
Sparrowhawks Corp
#90 - 2011-10-29 01:48:44 UTC
I'm definitely a bigger fan of the Maulus model than the Imicus model. I guess CCP felt the imicus model was unloved.
None Smith
Somnambulist Inc.
#91 - 2011-10-29 04:16:17 UTC
Vincent Gaines wrote:
People's Republic ofChina wrote:
I detest the golden banana apoc design. It looks like I wanna break the thing. The worst part is its the Marauder hull too, I was so disappointed when I found out. I would have much preferred the Abaddon look.

Brutix is the sexiest ship ever, do not touch my suicide ganking machine.


I've always hated the Apoc. It looks like a MENTALLY HANDICAPPED dog floating around.

Then again it also resembles handbanana.

edit: hopefully we never have a module like an engine retarder.



You sir have changed my life... I will never see the laser-banana in the same light again.

But to the spirit of this thread, the Moa looks like some kind of camcorder war-machine with weird A/V parts hanging off it. IMO it could use some kind of rework to make it look a little less haphazard and more symmetrical. If CCP really needs to keep it all weird lookin' then put some whirley-bits on it and maybe an odd thruster nozzle or two...
Kalihira
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#92 - 2011-10-29 11:04:35 UTC
whatever they do: HANDS OFF THE BRUTIX! it looks like a train with rockets strapped to its ass that screams badass! like it should!

my 2c
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
#93 - 2011-10-29 11:17:55 UTC
I think missile launcher models should be top of the list imo. Would be a major amount of work though as half the NPC ships have impossible fits with max turrets and missiles as well.

How about they just sort it for Caldari :)
Jennifer Starling
Imperial Navy Forum Patrol
#94 - 2011-10-30 05:45:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Jennifer Starling
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8kBAWayqELU
NEW RAVEN!!!!!
that is all ¬_¬

It just look like they're reskinning it; the model itself doesn't really look different.

Unlike the new Crow model, which looks a lot better imo.
Hoping it gets an extra missle slot What?

Too bad it's just a fake though ..
FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy
#95 - 2011-10-30 11:16:21 UTC
That Crow model looks cool but it should be asymmetrical..... just looks like all other Sci-fi space ships in other games/movies.
KLizMaN
Stark Innovations
#96 - 2011-11-02 01:37:47 UTC
Kagan Storm wrote:

That crap you did with a scorpion is ********.Oops

Old look was better.


I have to agree. The new Scorpion design is terrible. The design is to literal - I know if we mirror the ship it will make it look more like a Scorpion...ya that will be super clever of us Roll This is the only ship I refuse to fly based on looks.

KLizMaN
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#97 - 2011-11-02 11:27:59 UTC
GM Spiral wrote:
Why so much hate on the poor Moa? Sad

I disliked the ship intensely for years, but in the last couple of them it has grown on me. I quite like the overweight little metal ostrich with the overstuffed suitcase now. It is one of the ships that are uniquely EVE Online's. Quite a few ships could use a facelift, Moa likely among them. But I'd mourn that lumpen shape for a long time.

Anyways, carry on.


YES!

Hands off the Moa's shap.. reskin it yes, but leave it the way it is.

also, pretty much this for ALL ships... reskin them but leave them the shape they are.

I was pretty upset when you changed the Maller design, dont do it again please.

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2011-11-02 11:33:32 UTC
Cillet Baang Scott wrote:
Give the domi, raven and tempest a higher texture res and that'll be fine. Don't go changin the shape of my melon man!.




This the damn thing actually grew on me
Elistea
BLUE Regiment.
#99 - 2011-11-02 11:53:07 UTC
Le'Mon Tichim wrote:
Sansha ships need moar spikes.


At least 20% more spikes.



Now this made me laughBig smile
Cyniac
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2011-11-02 14:58:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Cyniac
You know...

You don't even need new skins for some of the ships. Just let people use the skins which are ALREADY in the game.

Take the Dominix:

5 skins that I know of:

Standard Domi - Bland, utilitarian, ugly.
Navy Domi - For when you need to hide in the bushes (Lol)
Roden Shipyards Domi - Very sleek - I'm all for it, burgundy on metal is hot.
Federation Customs Domi - Didn't really catch my eye but I believe its there somewhere. Kinda muted teal colours iirc.
Escort Domi (seen in Gallente Epic Arc) - Nice and shiny yellow! Definitely different, not sure if it's an improvement though.


Don't change a thing - just let pilots access what you already have and its going to be WIN!

(NB: Anyone know of any Domi skins I've missed out on?)