These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Attention all miners - if you are ganked, its YOUR OWN FAULT.

Author
Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
#81 - 2011-10-26 01:27:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Chopper Rollins
CorpAlt 18368 wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
These words would be inspiring if OP was mining ice right now in Tolle. But he's not. And he won't be. At least not for long.

"Scan when a target enters system, relax when they leave." <<<< especially amusing, as that's when the rock or ice nearest you has been bookmarked, yeah relax, he left the system.

OP gets 11/10 for pig-headedly thinking he knows what he's talkiing about. Make that 12/10 actually.
Go on, tell me it's not your opinion, it's facts, that's such a great argument.


Could you suggest a better alternative?

Here, let me help you:

1) Mining in a tanked Hulk with a remote rep on you and being volleyed by 2 Tempests. Can you tank two Tempests? Alright, they'll bring more.
2) Having "counter-gankers" with ECM nearby and dying to smartbombs.
3) Having "counter-gankers" with DPS ships nearby and, again, dying anyway.
4) Mining while sitting still and, again, dying.




what

Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

FeralShadow
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#82 - 2011-10-26 01:27:55 UTC
I'm sure it's been said over

and over

and over

But miners typically have a number of incorrect assumptions, which lead to their demise:

Incorrect assumption #1: Concord is there to prevent you from dying
It is incorrect because concord will never EVER prevent you from dying. They are there to guarantee the attackers get exploded, and nothing more.

Incorrect assumption #2: You get to be "AFK" playing eve while the rest of us don't
Yes, CCP needs to make mining more interesting. But until that happens, if you don't want to lose a ship, dont go afk without docking up. Just like every other person has to do.

Incorrect assumption #3: Tanking a "insert mining ship here" will prevent suicide ganks
You can tank any ship you want, but people still alpha strike Freighters. What makes you think your tank on a mining ship will do anything? If they have a will, they will find a way.

Preventative measures: Be aware, and be there. Simple.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#83 - 2011-10-26 01:28:11 UTC
CorpAlt 18368 wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
These words would be inspiring if OP was mining ice right now in Tolle. But he's not. And he won't be. At least not for long.

"Scan when a target enters system, relax when they leave." <<<< especially amusing, as that's when the rock or ice nearest you has been bookmarked, yeah relax, he left the system.

OP gets 11/10 for pig-headedly thinking he knows what he's talkiing about. Make that 12/10 actually.
Go on, tell me it's not your opinion, it's facts, that's such a great argument.


Could you suggest a better alternative?

Here, let me help you:

1) Mining in a tanked Hulk with a remote rep on you and being volleyed by 2 Tempests. Can you tank two Tempests? Alright, they'll bring more.
2) Having "counter-gankers" with ECM nearby and dying to smartbombs.
3) Having "counter-gankers" with DPS ships nearby and, again, dying anyway.
4) Mining while sitting still and, again, dying.



Death is inevitable its part of the live. And if the miner is truly active he shouldnt have any problem with d-scan and alligning to SS and keeping distance with minimum transgression between warp out points. And it would be partly beneficial to other gameplay
CorpAlt 18368
State War Academy
Caldari State
#84 - 2011-10-26 01:29:36 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Death is inevitable its part of the live. And if the miner is truly active he shouldnt have any problem with d-scan and alligning to SS and keeping distance with minimum transgression between warp out points. And it would be partly beneficial to other gameplay


This is why I'm a proponent of this idea. I have said it in several previous posts in this same thread.
Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
#85 - 2011-10-26 01:30:01 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
CorpAlt 18368 wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
These words would be inspiring if OP was mining ice right now in Tolle. But he's not. And he won't be. At least not for long.

"Scan when a target enters system, relax when they leave." <<<< especially amusing, as that's when the rock or ice nearest you has been bookmarked, yeah relax, he left the system.

OP gets 11/10 for pig-headedly thinking he knows what he's talkiing about. Make that 12/10 actually.
Go on, tell me it's not your opinion, it's facts, that's such a great argument.


Could you suggest a better alternative?

Here, let me help you:

1) Mining in a tanked Hulk with a remote rep on you and being volleyed by 2 Tempests. Can you tank two Tempests? Alright, they'll bring more.
2) Having "counter-gankers" with ECM nearby and dying to smartbombs.
3) Having "counter-gankers" with DPS ships nearby and, again, dying anyway.
4) Mining while sitting still and, again, dying.



Death is inevitable its part of the live. And if the miner is truly active he shouldnt have any problem with d-scan and alligning to SS and keeping distance with minimum transgression between warp out points. And it would be partly beneficial to other gameplay



Seriously, what




Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

CorpAlt 18368
State War Academy
Caldari State
#86 - 2011-10-26 01:33:33 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Seriously, what


I've already asked, but do you have a better idea?
Henry Haphorn
Killer Yankee
#87 - 2011-10-26 01:38:09 UTC
A little something that the OP forgot to point out.

Tank your freakin mining ships, always be ready at a moment's notice to react and always have a plan (not all plans have to involve running away).

Besides, I don't always trust the d-scanner because we miners can't be warping out to every little pvp ship that comes up on scan. What if they're not suicide gangs and are out war decing someone instead? What if it's just a lone wolf looking to do some 1v1 with another lone wolf?

If every miner had to warp away every time a pvp ship comes up on scan, then productivity is lost because we are too busy being scared and we can't have that. Sometimes you just have to face the bull and grab it by the horns. Of course, a miner also has to know his/her limits.

Adapt or Die

Mr Bill Bravor
State War Academy
Caldari State
#88 - 2011-10-26 01:47:28 UTC
CorpAlt 18368 wrote:
Mr Bill Bravor wrote:
What works in lowsec is not practical in hisec. While you may be able to avoid getting ganked you wouldn't get any mining done so essentially you would be wasting your time.

If you convinced everybody to do this what would keep a single pilot from warping in to each belt every five minutes just to make them all warp out? You would have a ganker with no ganks and a bunch of miners with no ore. Sounds kind of boring.



Could you suggest a better alternative rather than discouraging miners from experimenting with the tactics discussed in this thread?



Just pointing out the obvious end result. Its up to them if they get discouraged or not.

What was that quote from the movie War Games. "Strange game, the only way to win is to not play the game" Big smile

President Caldari
True Caldari Nation
#89 - 2011-10-26 01:52:20 UTC
Karadion wrote:
You fail to understand why the miner's are complaining. They want to run their bots without worrying about getting ganked.


Exactly. There's your 191st Like.

They are getting smarter and remaining in NPC's where you can't wardec them, yet the ability to pop the illegal robot operated missions will rack up the killboards and we will be doing our part to help in that department.

-President Caldari

2 Million ISK Bounty for locating a Non-NPC bot mining Corp.
Elyssa MacLeod
Doomheim
#90 - 2011-10-26 01:58:02 UTC
President Caldari wrote:
Karadion wrote:
You fail to understand why the miner's are complaining. They want to run their bots without worrying about getting ganked.


Exactly. There's your 191st Like.

They are getting smarter and remaining in NPC's where you can't wardec them, yet the ability to pop the illegal robot operated missions will rack up the killboards and we will be doing our part to help in that department.

-President Caldari

2 Million ISK Bounty for locating a Non-NPC bot mining Corp.


lol yeah, an hulkageddon was about bot control, not farming tears

GM Homonoia: Suicide ganks are a valid and viable tactic in EVE.

Where is your God now carebear?

President Caldari
True Caldari Nation
#91 - 2011-10-26 02:02:35 UTC
Elyssa MacLeod wrote:
lol yeah, an hulkageddon was about bot control, not farming tears


Well kind of. And also just for tears.

Elyssa MacLeod
Doomheim
#92 - 2011-10-26 02:06:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Elyssa MacLeod
President Caldari wrote:
Elyssa MacLeod wrote:
lol yeah, an hulkageddon was about bot control, not farming tears


Well kind of. And also just for tears.



well I mean saying mining ganking is just for killing bots is just as disingenuous

Its for tears, then for fun, then for driving prices up, then several other reasons then waaaaay down the line, for killing bots lol

GM Homonoia: Suicide ganks are a valid and viable tactic in EVE.

Where is your God now carebear?

Jenshae Chiroptera
#93 - 2011-10-26 02:27:03 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
There is officially no excuse to be ganked in highsec anymore.


Late so I am ignoring the thread.

Covert Ops tackler (~20M) + Brutix ready to warp in.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Bomberlocks
Bombercorp
#94 - 2011-10-26 02:47:08 UTC
I like this thread. I find EVE humour, best humour. Big smile
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#95 - 2011-10-26 03:01:52 UTC
This from a miner friend who likes gankers (helps lower competition he says).

To mine with a near 0% chance of getting ganked (in HS, but it doesn't matter what HS), follow the steps below:

Setup
1- Scout your area. Know where the best ore is before you start.
2- Once you determine which group of rocks you want, fly within 5km of the center of them (using a non mining ship).
3- Create a warp in BM at the location and drop a can with something cheap in it to use as a reference.
4- Fly straight in any direction (ideally one that will not intersect roids either forward or backward) for at least 200km (not that hard in a cheap fast frig or a shuttle).
5- Create BM1.
6- Warp to the can (or the warp in BM).
7- Travel the opposite direction and go another 200km.
8- Create BM2.

Mining
1- Warp to your warp in BM.
2- Lock desired roid and start the miners.
3- Chose BM1 (or 2... it doesn't really matter) and select "Approach".
4- Before you get out of range of your roid, select the other BM and click approach.
5- Repeat step 4 until you have cleared all the roids you can, or until you decide to call it a day.

Gank!?
1- As soon as you see a ship on overview that is not an industrial ship (or to be safe, do it anyway), select "Warp" to whichever BM you are moving to. Unless they catch you at a really bad time (ie during turn around) you will insta-warp 200+km away from them, at which point you can safely go to a station or continue mining after warping back.

This method will stop almost every non-dedicated ganker.


The downsides come when the dedicated ones show up.
Yes, they can scram you in a CovOps frig while the gank ship warps in (except that starts Concord in, and by the time the ganker gets their, the scrammer may be dead).
Yes, they could observe for a while and determine you are using this method and use a cloaky to make BMs where they think yours are. However, this requires more luck/work than an X-type drop.


Yes this is work. However, if every miner did this, ganking would become very difficult (compared with what we have now)... and more fun in my opinion.

So, you miners have a choice. Work and make the gankers work, or be lazy and let lazy gankers kill you.
Elyssa MacLeod
Doomheim
#96 - 2011-10-26 03:06:37 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:


So, you miners have a choice. Work and make the gankers work, or be lazy and let lazy gankers kill you.


Or mine missions a few months

GM Homonoia: Suicide ganks are a valid and viable tactic in EVE.

Where is your God now carebear?

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#97 - 2011-10-26 03:09:04 UTC
Mr Bill Bravor wrote:
What works in lowsec is not practical in hisec. While you may be able to avoid getting ganked you wouldn't get any mining done so essentially you would be wasting your time.

If you convinced everybody to do this what would keep a single pilot from warping in to each belt every five minutes just to make them all warp out? You would have a ganker with no ganks and a bunch of miners with no ore. Sounds kind of boring.


What works in lowsec works in highsec, and works in nullsec. It's a simple principle - adjust the range of your D-scan to only be showing things in the area immediately bubbling the belt where you are working. If you go setting your D-scan to max range, you'll be flooded with useless junk. It's a precision instrument - use it precisely.

And you're right, there isn't anything stopping a hostile ship from warping in and spooking everyone and causing them to scatter.

How many times must it be said though, there are thousands of near-empty systems in the game with riches far exceeding what can be mined in a highsec belt? Why is everyone insisting on remaining in highsec? Where is the willingness to adapt to a changing situation?

Anyone on these forums can see the truth of the situation clear as glass - highsec is a crowded, hostile space, rife with people looking to harass miners. Why do you want to stay there so bad, when you can have a much more relaxing time in lowsec instead?

When I harvest/mine in lowsec, I only have to spam D-scan whenever another player enters the system. The rest of the time I can munch on snacks, watch porn, do homework, and keep an eye on things. But if someone that could kill me enters the system, I'm right there on the scanner, protecting my ship. Attentiveness is better than any tank.

This complaining is still quite unfounded - if the problem is that directional scanner brings up too much highsec clutter, or the problem is that you dont like losing a shred of isk per hour, the solution is still simple, and still the same - mine elsewhere.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#98 - 2011-10-26 03:16:14 UTC
Corina Jarr wrote:
This from a miner friend who likes gankers (helps lower competition he says).

To mine with a near 0% chance of getting ganked (in HS, but it doesn't matter what HS), follow the steps below:



Thanks Corina, its nice to know that there are a few people out there willing to learn how to properly fly their ships, and adapt to a hostile situation by using the tools provided to them, and to develop a system that mitigates loss.

I wish more miners had this kind of attitude. Rather than blame the world for their problems, they could simply learn to protect themselves and keep having fun despite the danger. There are many ways to set up systems like this, but the idea that you have to be parked stationary at a can is ridonkulous. That is the most simple way to mine, takes the least effort, and bears the highest risk. It is still very much possible to be moving at 75%, aligned, for some time while harvesting your material of choice, whether it be ore, ice, or gas. When set up like this, it is still a 100% insta-warp, every time.

What we've seen in this thread is a stubborn group of angry players who feel entitled to a risk-free activity that provides a guaranteed isk / hour earnings potential.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Tahna Rouspel
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#99 - 2011-10-26 03:31:09 UTC
I'm not a miner and I live in a wormhole, but I think that mining needs to be way more interesting to do. It was designed to be an afk activity. It barely requires more than 1 imput per 5 minutes.

I'd rather fly a covetor and risk losing it than be active while mining. Mining is lousy isk per hours anyway, so I won't be doing it anyway -_-;;
Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#100 - 2011-10-26 03:58:54 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
There is officially no excuse to be ganked in highsec anymore.


Late so I am ignoring the thread.

Covert Ops tackler (~20M) + Brutix ready to warp in.

I don't think you really know how ganking in highsec works.