These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So why do people hate cloaking?

First post
Author
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#561 - 2013-07-22 19:17:22 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

I didn't forget them lol. Why would an industry corp pay mercenaries when we were already set up with multiple systems on standby? Besides, all that would do is encourage them to come more often.


Who said pay them? I'm not sure of too many people who would say no if you offered them the chance to kill supercaps for free. Lol

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#562 - 2013-07-22 19:19:49 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.


I also covered this the other day, but basically this will just move the griefing to w-space. I'll drop in with some friends, get seen, boucne around then log out. Same as afk cloaking, you'll never be sure I'm not there.

Furthermore, what method do you have to fix local? I'm sure you feel local is fine, right?

Right?

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#563 - 2013-07-22 19:20:55 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

No, you are speaking a mixture of pure opinion and facts with spin. For example yes, CCP said cloaking is not broken, however they never said that it was not going to be looked at.


LOL, you made me spit beer everywhere, it was like Beerkkake.

How self-serving can one thought be? They said it was ok but they never said they wouldn't look at it? ROFL.

They.said.it.was.fine. Get over it.

Quote:

Probes were working as intended, yet they changed those. I;v never said that your counters don't work, but you simply won't be able to change all null players, so its a completely useless alternative.


There it is. There is the problem. Black and white thinking. If it doesn't work 100%, it's not an alternative.

Where have we heard that before?

oh yea, miners vs ganking. We siad "fit a tank", they said 'they will just bring more gankers so that isn't a solution" and used that as an excuse to FIT NO TANK AT ALL lol. Brilliant.they were, and brilliant you are.

Who cares is stupid people don't use the tools we've outlined. Smart people already do, which is why AFK claking isn't a problem. This is EVE, stupid lazy people in null who can't be bother to prepare are SUPPOSED to die dude.



Quote:

I've given my reasons, you've disregarded them all as you disagree. Yet you disagree with everything and provide nothing beyond opinion to counter it.
I can solve the problem though. I can simply hide your posts, since I don't care what arrogant, self-important nobodies like you have to say and it will seem like you aren't even part of the thread. That way you can spew what you want.


Thank you. I accept your surrender in the Name of the French...I mean Gallente.

Which remind me, since the Gallente are french way doesn't my Domi have a surrender button?
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#564 - 2013-07-22 19:23:26 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

oh yea, miners vs ganking. We siad "fit a tank", they said 'they will just bring more gankers so that isn't a solution" and used that as an excuse to FIT NO TANK AT ALL lol. Brilliant.they were, and brilliant you are.


You know what was funny about this was, the solution CCP came up with was hilarious. Since the miners refused to do it themselves, CCP basically held their hands and forced them to fit a certain way based on what ship you took. Basically ship fitting for dummies. Lol

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#565 - 2013-07-22 19:23:31 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

I didn't forget them lol. Why would an industry corp pay mercenaries when we were already set up with multiple systems on standby? Besides, all that would do is encourage them to come more often.


Who said pay them? I'm not sure of too many people who would say no if you offered them the chance to kill supercaps for free. Lol

Still too much hassle. Coridinating and that, Pllus we were in renter space, so not sure who would be allowed in and whatnot.

Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.


I also covered this the other day, but basically this will just move the griefing to w-space. I'll drop in with some friends, get seen, boucne around then log out. Same as afk cloaking, you'll never be sure I'm not there.

Furthermore, what method do you have to fix local? I'm sure you feel local is fine, right?

Right?

Local is a different argument, and I couldn't care less either way. I've lived in both null and WH, and it's not exactly high on my care list.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#566 - 2013-07-22 19:24:20 UTC
Quote:
Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.


Oh, you mean the anti cloak probes? Those would ruin wormholes. You do realize that they have to log out, and stay in space, right? So probes like you suggest would pretty much ruin any chance they have of actually playing the game.

Or did you mean the equally idiotic "make cloaks cost isotopes"? Also, ruins wormholes, even more vastly open to abuse.

You haven't proposed a good idea yet, and every idea that has been thrown out, has unforseen consequences. You can't just make that go away by using capslock.

Present a good argument, and people will listen. But you can't do that, because you are on the wrong side of the argument, so all you have left to argue with is emotional appeals, whining, and shouting. And those always lose.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#567 - 2013-07-22 19:27:12 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

No, you are speaking a mixture of pure opinion and facts with spin. For example yes, CCP said cloaking is not broken, however they never said that it was not going to be looked at.


LOL, you made me spit beer everywhere, it was like Beerkkake.

How self-serving can one thought be? They said it was ok but they never said they wouldn't look at it? ROFL.

They.said.it.was.fine. Get over it.

Quote:

Probes were working as intended, yet they changed those. I;v never said that your counters don't work, but you simply won't be able to change all null players, so its a completely useless alternative.


There it is. There is the problem. Black and white thinking. If it doesn't work 100%, it's not an alternative.

Where have we heard that before?

oh yea, miners vs ganking. We siad "fit a tank", they said 'they will just bring more gankers so that isn't a solution" and used that as an excuse to FIT NO TANK AT ALL lol. Brilliant.they were, and brilliant you are.

Who cares is stupid people don't use the tools we've outlined. Smart people already do, which is why AFK claking isn't a problem. This is EVE, stupid lazy people in null who can't be bother to prepare are SUPPOSED to die dude.



Quote:

I've given my reasons, you've disregarded them all as you disagree. Yet you disagree with everything and provide nothing beyond opinion to counter it.
I can solve the problem though. I can simply hide your posts, since I don't care what arrogant, self-important nobodies like you have to say and it will seem like you aren't even part of the thread. That way you can spew what you want.


Thank you. I accept your surrender in the Name of the French...I mean Gallente.

Which remind me, since the Gallente are french way doesn't my Domi have a surrender button?

OK, well you spat beer all over yourself because you didn't bother reading the following sentence. Probes were working fine. They changed them. Twice in fact. "Working as intended" doesn't mean "Immune to change"

No, I'm not saying it's not 100% therefore not an alternative. I'm saying you are suggesting changing the mindset of every playier in null as an alternative. If you can't see how ridiculous that idea is then you have no hope. I know you think you are amazing but nobody else even knows who you are, so how do you plan on implementing your "change the mindset" plan. Seriously. If you can tell me a workable way for you to change all null players then I'm all ears.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#568 - 2013-07-22 19:30:20 UTC
Quote:
OK, well you spat beer all over yourself because you didn't bother reading the following sentence. Probes were working fine. They changed them. Twice in fact. "Working as intended" doesn't mean "Immune to change"


Lol what?

Quote:
Probes were working fine.


Quote:
Probes were working fine.


Yeah, he said that. This is the kind of thinking that we are dealing with, gentlemen.

So, CCP said "cloaking is not broken" and you take this to mean "we are totally leaving the door open to changes based on QQ". And your evidence for this? Probes. Wow.

I cannot comprehend how much of a fool you have to be to genuinely believe that.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#569 - 2013-07-22 19:31:13 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.


Oh, you mean the anti cloak probes? Those would ruin wormholes. You do realize that they have to log out, and stay in space, right? So probes like you suggest would pretty much ruin any chance they have of actually playing the game.

Or did you mean the equally idiotic "make cloaks cost isotopes"? Also, ruins wormholes, even more vastly open to abuse.

You haven't proposed a good idea yet, and every idea that has been thrown out, has unforseen consequences. You can't just make that go away by using capslock.

Present a good argument, and people will listen. But you can't do that, because you are on the wrong side of the argument, so all you have left to argue with is emotional appeals, whining, and shouting. And those always lose.

It wouldn't break WH space. The idea is the probes take longer than a logoff timer and changing grid cancels them out. The act of logging off would render the probes useless. You throw out the ideas because you don't read them and then make assumptions about what it would mean.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#570 - 2013-07-22 19:34:08 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
OK, well you spat beer all over yourself because you didn't bother reading the following sentence. Probes were working fine. They changed them. Twice in fact. "Working as intended" doesn't mean "Immune to change"


Lol what?

Quote:
Probes were working fine.


Quote:
Probes were working fine.


Yeah, he said that. This is the kind of thinking that we are dealing with, gentlemen.

So, CCP said "cloaking is not broken" and you take this to mean "we are totally leaving the door open to changes based on QQ". And your evidence for this? Probes. Wow.

I cannot comprehend how much of a fool you have to be to genuinely believe that.

Yes, he quoted it... in the wrong context. Had he quoted it with the first sentence as it was intended it would have made more sense, but he didn't he quoted it out of context.

No, I'm not saying anything of the sort. But Jenn is saying that CCP saying "its not broken" means they will NEVER change it. Which is not true. Probes were also "not broken" yet the first time they changed it is because people complained it was "too hard" to use them. That's the exact same thing.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#571 - 2013-07-22 19:34:24 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

Still too much hassle. Coridinating and that, Pllus we were in renter space, so not sure who would be allowed in and whatnot.


That's what you have diplos for, but still, you're a renter. The sov holding alliance could have easily helped you out. If you hand them stuff like this, they should oblige. After all, its their rent money this guy is messing with.

Quote:

Local is a different argument, and I couldn't care less either way. I've lived in both null and WH, and it's not exactly high on my care list.


Well its probably 90% of the reason afk cloaking exists at all. If you don't believe null-sec players have it good, consider this: High sec minders have to watch for gankers. Their local has tons of static from a bunch of people who may or may not be friendly. The only way for them to reliably tell if they are in danger is to pump their d-scan and look for telltale catalyst tornadoes, etc. In nullsec, all you have to do is look at local. Blue? Good. Red? uh oh, dock. That's how easy it is for the nullsec miner. Not to mention any fleets coming their way are reported miles out, long before they land you already know size, disposition and general direction.

You know what happens most of the time? They keep ratting and mining right up until the first red shows in local, then dock and wait for the storm to pass, hoping the gang will get bored quick and move on.

So you park an alt and add a little static to the mix. Of course you don't have a problem with it, but amazingly, a cloaked player is a huge, unfair and broken mechanic that needs to be fixed immediately. I wonder why that is?

Why should the guy in highsec have to mine while staying aligned and pumping his d-scan? He doesnt get to reap as good of rewards as you do? Why do the wormhole guys typically not even care? Because they deal with the uncertainty every day, and they know what ot do.

This is really no different.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#572 - 2013-07-22 19:36:06 UTC
Quote:
I'm saying you are suggesting changing the mindset of every playier in null as an alternative. If you can't see how ridiculous that idea is then you have no hope. I know you think you are amazing but nobody else even knows who you are, so how do you plan on implementing your "change the mindset" plan. Seriously. If you can tell me a workable way for you to change all null players then I'm all ears.


What medications do you take? Because I never suggested any of what you say above.

See, I never suggested any such thing. I've explained mitigation techniques but I'm not going to fly around nullsec spamming local. I dost care that other people can't figure things out. Dumb people (ie people who refuse to adapt) may usually be ok in high sec, but they should die in a fire in Null.

I'm saying there's no problem because that people think of as a problem is childishly easy to counter, IF YOU WANT TO.

People should use and exhaust existing tools to mitigate risk BEFORE asking for more. But you and your type skip that part and go right to "ccp, please change this!".

Why is this so hard for you to grasp? I suppose it's because you're the type who can't see beyond his own perspective (i get that feeling from your posts). But that is, again, your problem, not mine or a problem with the game.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#573 - 2013-07-22 19:38:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Jenn aSide wrote:
Quote:
I'm saying you are suggesting changing the mindset of every playier in null as an alternative. If you can't see how ridiculous that idea is then you have no hope. I know you think you are amazing but nobody else even knows who you are, so how do you plan on implementing your "change the mindset" plan. Seriously. If you can tell me a workable way for you to change all null players then I'm all ears.


What medications do you take? Because I never suggested any of what you say above.

See, I never suggested any such thing. I've explained mitigation techniques but I'm not going to fly around nullsec spamming local. I dost care that other people can't figure things out. Dumb people (ie people who refuse to adapt) may usually be ok in high sec, but they should die in a fire in Null.

I'm saying there's no problem because that people think of as a problem is childishly easy to counter, IF YOU WANT TO.

People should use and exhaust existing tools to mitigate risk BEFORE asking for more. But you and your type skip that part and go right to "ccp, please change this!".

Why is this so hard for you to grasp? I suppose it's because you're the type who can't see beyond his own perspective (i get that feeling from your posts). But that is, again, your problem, not mine or a problem with the game.

And I'm saying the problem is that people DON'T counter it. Thus Null empties as soon as you enter. This will keep happening forever. Banging on and on about how people should just counter it won't change a damn thing. And the tools are exhausted. There's no way to find an AFK cloaker. I think there should be. Simples.

EDIT: Also your mitigation techniques take more time that simply having a 2nd system set up ready to go, so why the hell would any industrialist bother to sit around mitigating all day.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#574 - 2013-07-22 19:42:36 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.


Oh, you mean the anti cloak probes? Those would ruin wormholes. You do realize that they have to log out, and stay in space, right? So probes like you suggest would pretty much ruin any chance they have of actually playing the game.

Or did you mean the equally idiotic "make cloaks cost isotopes"? Also, ruins wormholes, even more vastly open to abuse.

You haven't proposed a good idea yet, and every idea that has been thrown out, has unforseen consequences. You can't just make that go away by using capslock.

Present a good argument, and people will listen. But you can't do that, because you are on the wrong side of the argument, so all you have left to argue with is emotional appeals, whining, and shouting. And those always lose.


It wouldn't break WH space. The idea is the probes take longer than a logoff timer and changing grid cancels them out. The act of logging off would render the probes useless. You throw out the ideas because you don't read them and then make assumptions about what it would mean.


so wait how does this work? because I thought it would be like this: no local, so i have to be "seen" by the enemy so they know I'm there. Then bounce a round for 10 minutes or so, so I never stay on the same grid anyway, then log off. How are your probes supposed to know that I logged out? Are they magic logoff probes?

No, I think you'll be furiously trying to find me for hours while I'm not even logged in. Lol

But honestly, wormhole people probably wouldn't care because they deal with the threat all day every day.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#575 - 2013-07-22 19:42:43 UTC
Right well I'm done updating market orders. Back later maybe.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#576 - 2013-07-22 19:44:48 UTC
Quote:
And I'm saying the problem is that people DON'T counter it.


Then they suffer the consequences. What's wrong with that?

Quote:
Thus Null empties as soon as you enter. This will keep happening forever. Banging on and on about how people should just counter it won't change a damn thing.


Not true. Eventually, the bads will go back to highsec where they belong, and leave nullsec to the people who actually have a pair. That, or they can just hide forever, but then they'll be short on the rent, and get kicked out anyway, same thing. The end result is that those people DO NOT deserve to be in nullsec if a single player in a frigate gets their panties in a twist.

Quote:
And the tools are exhausted.


No, you even said it yourself, they don't counter it. Not can't. Don't. Failure to use already existing capabilities.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#577 - 2013-07-22 19:45:58 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.


Oh, you mean the anti cloak probes? Those would ruin wormholes. You do realize that they have to log out, and stay in space, right? So probes like you suggest would pretty much ruin any chance they have of actually playing the game.

Or did you mean the equally idiotic "make cloaks cost isotopes"? Also, ruins wormholes, even more vastly open to abuse.

You haven't proposed a good idea yet, and every idea that has been thrown out, has unforseen consequences. You can't just make that go away by using capslock.

Present a good argument, and people will listen. But you can't do that, because you are on the wrong side of the argument, so all you have left to argue with is emotional appeals, whining, and shouting. And those always lose.


It wouldn't break WH space. The idea is the probes take longer than a logoff timer and changing grid cancels them out. The act of logging off would render the probes useless. You throw out the ideas because you don't read them and then make assumptions about what it would mean.


so wait how does this work? because I thought it would be like this: no local, so i have to be "seen" by the enemy so they know I'm there. Then bounce a round for 10 minutes or so, so I never stay on the same grid anyway, then log off. How are your probes supposed to know that I logged out? Are they magic logoff probes?

No, I think you'll be furiously trying to find me for hours while I'm not even logged in. Lol

But honestly, wormhole people probably wouldn't care because they deal with the threat all day every day.

Yeah, possibly they would keep searching, but that's no different from now. You can't tell if the cloaker has left or not. And yeah, I don't think WH people would care. It wouldn't have any effect on them.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#578 - 2013-07-22 19:45:59 UTC
Oh, no its even better, now that I digest what you say.

So basically the probes are a local for wormhole space. Deploying them will either out the target, or when they deactivate it will tell you all cloaked ships in system have either logged off or have left the system.

Effing brilliant. Lol Carebear space for null and wormholes! \o/

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#579 - 2013-07-22 19:47:11 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
And I'm saying the problem is that people DON'T counter it.


Then they suffer the consequences. What's wrong with that?

Quote:
Thus Null empties as soon as you enter. This will keep happening forever. Banging on and on about how people should just counter it won't change a damn thing.


Not true. Eventually, the bads will go back to highsec where they belong, and leave nullsec to the people who actually have a pair. That, or they can just hide forever, but then they'll be short on the rent, and get kicked out anyway, same thing. The end result is that those people DO NOT deserve to be in nullsec if a single player in a frigate gets their panties in a twist.

Quote:
And the tools are exhausted.


No, you even said it yourself, they don't counter it. Not can't. Don't. Failure to use already existing capabilities.


They won't go back though will they. Think about it. Not every system is camped, so they just move and make money elsewhere to pay the rent. It just leaves big sections of null dead.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Victoria Sin
Doomheim
#580 - 2013-07-22 19:47:15 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:

But honestly, wormhole people probably wouldn't care because they deal with the threat all day every day.


... and have a mechanism for preventing people from coming into their system should they choose to use it, called collapsing the hole.