These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Imagine what Eve crossed with Wow would be like!

First post
Author
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#81 - 2013-07-21 13:55:18 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Sci-Fi is fantasy in space.
Nah. Sci-Fi is fantasy based on social and natural science rather than myth and legend.

Quote:
The space you'll even see isn't beautiful Hubble false color images
…but rather something spectacular like this. Of course, EVE doesn't use any Hubble false-colour images to begin with.
Terek Brinalle
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2013-07-21 13:57:33 UTC
Do we get mounts?

Can I ride a Minmatar slave around the station?
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#83 - 2013-07-21 14:09:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Uoweme
Tippia wrote:
but rather something spectacular like this. Of course, EVE doesn't use any Hubble false-colour images to begin with.


Classic example of Tippia, again, not understanding what she's talking about.

Any two-bit amateur astronomer can see the backdrop images in EvE are indeed inspired by the Hubble false-color images. Can see the M16 Eagle nebula; can see the Hydra nebula; can see the Omega nebula.

How do you know? Because the colors used by NASA doesn't represent the colors as they're even seen. It's like a trademark even.

In the early days of astrophotography photo filters did have a color to them (Hydrogen-Alpha and it's deep red tone is a classic example, as the red spectrum the human eye can actually see -- why you can see the reddish tone of Omega and Eagle nebulas with the naked eye [but not the Oxygen III blue/green that NASA used]). Oxygen III highlights a gray bandwidth to human eyes -- we don't see the pretty blues that NASA normally uses to represent that color in their Hubble photographs.

But in EvE you will see those pretty blue Oxygen III highlights, just like in the Hubble photographs! That color doesn't exist in reality, it's Photoshopped in. Lol

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#84 - 2013-07-21 14:20:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Classic example of Tippia, again, not understanding what she's talking about.
You mean like the fact that EVE uses any Hubble imagery, false-colour or otherwise?
You mean like the fact that space is pretty darn spectacular just using its own colours?

Oh sorry, you were going off on some irrelevant and tangential strawman? I didn't mean to interrupt you or ruin your point with facts…

…but it kind of just happened anyway.
BiscuitMonsterr
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2013-07-21 14:39:12 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Lephia DeGrande wrote:
It would be still Fantasy, I HATE FANTASY! Sci-Fi FTW!!


Sci-Fi is fantasy in space.

If you wanted a space sim that truly mimicked science you'd be bored to death. The space you'll even see isn't beautiful Hubble false color images, it's a pretty dull gray world (as the only light humans can see is the visible light spectrum -- and the most beautiful false colors are beyond what our eyes can actually see...like the Oxygen III and Hydrogen-Alpha photo filters can highlight).

And in space fighting Buck Rogers style would be a worthless adventure. Waste of resources for "fun" when, for example, for NASA every ounce of material moved is worth $$$$$$...every ounce...and you have to carry it, as resources don't just magically appear.

PvP in space IS science nonsense.

So enjoy your space opera!


Exactly! It's nice to see a veterinarian supporting my modest proposal. Obviously Buck Rogers is too old fashioned for the likes of Eve, I dont think we want those 70s fashions and all that space disco stuff, but they had space princesses I think.

By the way, I was researching Wow and I realised they already had spaceships in it with the race with the goatlegs and horns. So there is a percodent for a space-fantasy combo.
ctx2007
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#86 - 2013-07-21 14:45:21 UTC  |  Edited by: ctx2007
Reaches for broadsword +2/+4 vs undead, Oi OP have a real close look at the head chopping block! Twisted

Using the undead bit incase OP rises from the dead.

You only realise you life has been a waste of time, when you wake up dead.

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#87 - 2013-07-21 15:08:51 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Classic example of Tippia, again, not understanding what she's talking about.
You mean like the fact that EVE uses any Hubble imagery, false-colour or otherwise?
You mean like the fact that space is pretty darn spectacular just using its own colours?

Oh sorry, you were going off on some irrelevant and tangential strawman? I didn't mean to interrupt you or ruin your point with facts…

…but it kind of just happened anyway.


Tippia, I've been an amateur astronomer for decades now, and before CCD astrophotography (the bad old days of gas-hyping film).

Space does not have it's own "colours" (hmmm) beyond what the human eye can see (and since the universe as we define it is by a human perspective, the universe will be seen from a human POV).

The hocus pocus of the base color of the universe was for show, we couldn't even see it naturally that way.

Any other color representation is false-colored because humans can't tell the difference -- and photo filters are even needed to tease out the details (why the Hubble images used false colors anyway). Oxygen III is a classic filter to do just that, especially in nebulas with a lot of dust and radiation (like the M16 pillars, it would be washed out by the background radiation otherwise). It's no different than in Photoshop, when doing color separation in CYMK / RGB or LAB formats. Astrophotography filters operate much the same, and when each bandwidth is separated it can be given it's own color. Then, like in Photoshop, the color separated images are recombined into a false-color representation.

It looks very pretty. But it's not real. It's false-color.

Naturally, celestials in space is mostly seen by humans as gray, with some white light highlights (Orion nebula is a classic example of a nebulae that can be seen and appreciated without any photo filters). Nebulas like the classic Hubble Eagle nebula is seen in red light by the eye naturally, and it's contrast is brought out nicely by the hydrogen-alpha color filter (and why the M16 photos before Hubble was soooo red!). There's no blue/green there (typical false-color for Oxygen III in NASA Hubble photos).

Enjoy the fantasy and what fantasy offers, as science is harsher than space itself!

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

000Hunter000
Missiles 'R' Us
#88 - 2013-07-21 15:09:22 UTC
So many players... so what u do with em? split em up over different servers? U would prolly have to, to keep things playable.

Would be tempting if they let us bomb Azeroth from space! Twisted
Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
#89 - 2013-07-21 15:09:42 UTC
I dunno care if you count Sci-fi into Fantasy, hell i dont even care if fantasy or realistic, i just want to fly in space with spacecraft and future technology.

I cant stand anymore Orcs, and Magic and Steampunk ****, like Wow.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#90 - 2013-07-21 15:16:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Tippia, I've been an amateur
Obviously.

It doesn't change the fact that EVE uses any Hubble imagery, or the fact that space is pretty darn spectacular just using its own colours. Not even your long-winded and (still as) irrelevant strawman will change this… but then, that's kind of the nature of fallacies.

You're not telling me anything new, you know…
Naraish Adarn
Alexylva Paradox
#91 - 2013-07-21 15:20:57 UTC
i have to admit flambeing you wouldnt be sufficient. so how about tar and feathers instead
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#92 - 2013-07-21 15:23:55 UTC
000Hunter000 wrote:
Would be tempting if they let us bomb Azeroth from space! Twisted
Kind of like this?
Velarra
#93 - 2013-07-21 15:37:40 UTC
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#94 - 2013-07-21 15:51:30 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Tippia, I've been an amateur
Obviously.


Tippia debating "skills" in all it's color..

Tippia wrote:
It doesn't change the fact that EVE uses any Hubble imagery


Why Tippia you really need to move along, because the very fact EvE is using the same color scheme for Oxygen III photo filter that NASA used on it's images to represent the same bandwidth....Yeah, CCP's artists used the exact same representation to represent the exact same pillar features in it's own images and more.

And Tippia you don't even "get it".

It's like a watermarking an image. That color doesn't even exist, it only exists due to the Photoshopper at NASA adding it in...and CCP's artists just picked it up and photo manipulated the images WITH THE EXACT COLOR SCHEME (you can still see what it really represented).

The CCP artists didn't understand, it's false-color and represents nothing really.

You don't understand the color doesn't exist. As Oxygen III photo filter just adjusts the contrast of the objects in the photo...color isn't even represented by that filter. Just like your contrast/brightness buttons on your monitor.

Adjust the contrast of a gray image, what color do you see?

What is EvE? Space 4chan?

Shocked

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Marmaduke Hatplate
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2013-07-21 15:52:37 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Classic example of Tippia, again, not understanding what she's talking about.
You mean like the fact that EVE uses any Hubble imagery, false-colour or otherwise?
You mean like the fact that space is pretty darn spectacular just using its own colours?

Oh sorry, you were going off on some irrelevant and tangential strawman? I didn't mean to interrupt you or ruin your point with facts…

…but it kind of just happened anyway.


Tippia, I've been an amateur astronomer for decades now, and before CCD astrophotography (the bad old days of gas-hyping film).

Space does not have it's own "colours" (hmmm) beyond what the human eye can see (and since the universe as we define it is by a human perspective, the universe will be seen from a human POV).

The hocus pocus of the base color of the universe was for show, we couldn't even see it naturally that way.

Any other color representation is false-colored because humans can't tell the difference -- and photo filters are even needed to tease out the details (why the Hubble images used false colors anyway). Oxygen III is a classic filter to do just that, especially in nebulas with a lot of dust and radiation (like the M16 pillars, it would be washed out by the background radiation otherwise). It's no different than in Photoshop, when doing color separation in CYMK / RGB or LAB formats. Astrophotography filters operate much the same, and when each bandwidth is separated it can be given it's own color. Then, like in Photoshop, the color separated images are recombined into a false-color representation.

It looks very pretty. But it's not real. It's false-color.

Naturally, celestials in space is mostly seen by humans as gray, with some white light highlights (Orion nebula is a classic example of a nebulae that can be seen and appreciated without any photo filters). Nebulas like the classic Hubble Eagle nebula is seen in red light by the eye naturally, and it's contrast is brought out nicely by the hydrogen-alpha color filter (and why the M16 photos before Hubble was soooo red!). There's no blue/green there (typical false-color for Oxygen III in NASA Hubble photos).

Enjoy the fantasy and what fantasy offers, as science is harsher than space itself!


But isn't everything we see just a product if different wavelengths of light hitting our cones and rods etc?

In pitch darkness, every cat is black and all that. Without light, nothing has a colour. If you wear a pair of commando night vision goggles, you're not going 'ooh, things aren't really green, Imm not having this!', are you?

And when we look at our monitors, we're obviously not seeing through our avatars eyes, unless my character is being dragged behind his ship on a giant elastic band. The only in game rationale I can find for me being able to view the ship I'm inside from a distance of 100km away is that I'm viewing it via a feed from a camera probe orbiting my ship, controlled from my cockpit. And that feed is altered by computers to make it easier for us to perform our space duties. We need to be able to differentiate stuff in order to act on it successfully. The hud gives me a targeting reticule, and likewise it colours space stuff to aid my interaction with it.

You've missed the point with your talk about 'space is not colourful'.

As for the OP: no thanks. Wow is terrible.

"Friends and fun...The only 2 really important things in EVE Online." - Crazy Dutch Guy

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#96 - 2013-07-21 15:58:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Why Tippia you really need to move along, because the very fact EvE is using the same color scheme
…doesn't change the fact that EVE doesn't use Hubble images, or the fact that space is pretty darn spectacular just using its own colours.

Quote:
And Tippia you don't even get it.
Yes I do. So much so that, unlike you, I got that it is an irrelevant tangential strawman that you keep want to drag me onto. Maybe it's not intentional and you can't even see it yourself, but that doesn't change the fact of what you're doing.

You can keep yammering on about how much I supposedly don't know or understand, but it's not actually true and you're not telling me anything new. All you're doing is repeating something irrelevant because you are under the misapprehension that your point wasn't understood when in reality, it just… well… wasn't relevant.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#97 - 2013-07-21 16:05:54 UTC
Marmaduke Hatplate wrote:
But isn't everything we see just a product if different wavelengths of light hitting our cones and rods etc?


In this case -- the aqua blues that look so pretty in that M16 Hubble photo -- was added for effect only.

Oxygen III filter (which that aqua color represented) isn't even a color...it's a contrast filter.

So, seeing it in EvE, with the same nebulosity features, is a Hubble false-color representation of the universe.

Doesn't exist at all in science fact.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Marmaduke Hatplate
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2013-07-21 17:58:11 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Marmaduke Hatplate wrote:
But isn't everything we see just a product if different wavelengths of light hitting our cones and rods etc?


In this case -- the aqua blues that look so pretty in that M16 Hubble photo -- was added for effect only.

Oxygen III filter (which that aqua color represented) isn't even a color...it's a contrast filter.

So, seeing it in EvE, with the same nebulosity features, is a Hubble false-color representation of the universe.

Doesn't exist at all in science fact.


So? What's your point?

"Friends and fun...The only 2 really important things in EVE Online." - Crazy Dutch Guy

Shedemei Silfar
Miskatonic Mercantile
#99 - 2013-07-21 20:16:24 UTC
<-- Can't figure out why anyone is even seriously discussing said troll's post, let alone getting bent over space colors.

Grats tho, on getting useless trivia/board warrior to V.

............wanders off to blow up more internet spaceships
Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#100 - 2013-07-21 22:07:30 UTC
Wow only good for werewolf ERP. No need for that in Eve. OP got head on wrong way round. Wow need space, get off planet, not eve need Orks.

Hubble cool however. Brian Cox sexy Brit Scientist (not fat actor play Hannibal Lector) say Hubble cool and he know supernova from backside. Ace blather blabla make no sense as usual. Shame on him, should know better.

Soup lady here.