These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

God Squad "best there is Campaign" LOL

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kai86
THE G0D SQUAD
#21 - 2011-10-28 18:50:52 UTC
Vito, bit off more than we could chew? LMAO HARDLY!

You see, here is the funny thing you all aren't realizing.

Efficiency -
Double Tap - 65%
NKING - 40%
ADOPT - 62%

those scores are after 2 weeks of war where we fought all 3 on their terms while outnumbered and grouped together because if we did not they would dock and log out for the evening. Knowing that we like good fights, we have spread ourselves out a little bit more than usual. We recently had a spy implanted into us from ADOPT who's goal was to kill the 100 percent efficiency we had VS ADOPT. He did this by losing a ship on the 4-4 undock and then losing a corpies' as well because of lack or rep/help during that fight. They used this underhanded tactic to get back at us because we dropped them like a bad habit. After the loss we were all feeling a bit ticked off that they would stoop that low so we decided to do the same.

We implanted one of our alts with the sole intent on losing ships under the ADOPT flag to right the wrong that they made. Once he was in, he immediately lost a Megathron Navy Issue x2 and a Navy Geddon. We were going to do machariels out of spite but it would have been too obvious.


Now that ADOPT know we can hit them where it hurts even when they dock up against us, they have ceased fighting us at all and most are not logging in for more than to change skills. The remainder stay mainly in frigates until they see one of us in local and then they dock, log or both. They wanted to play the metagame, welcome to!

On Battleclinic, we made ADOPT lose a grand total of 43 billion ISK in the ships that we destroyed and more is on the way!

Vito, in response though, we are doing MORE than fine and as i said if it had not been a metagame tactic used by ADOPT, we would still have 90's efficiencies still but they had to stoop to these underhanded methods in order to get any and all kills off of us. Pretty sad when the "owners of highsec" <--- this was said to our spy as he was asking about the alliance, have to resort to metagame tactics to beat a 33 man corp/alliance. We are biting off more than we could chew? No, not really at all huh?
Devils Embrace
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2011-10-28 20:08:14 UTC
Kai86 wrote:
Vito, bit off more than we could chew? LMAO HARDLY!

You see, here is the funny thing you all aren't realizing.

Efficiency -
Double Tap - 65%
NKING - 40%
ADOPT - 62%

those scores are after 2 weeks of war where we fought all 3 on their terms while outnumbered and grouped together because if we did not they would dock and log out for the evening. Knowing that we like good fights, we have spread ourselves out a little bit more than usual. We recently had a spy implanted into us from ADOPT who's goal was to kill the 100 percent efficiency we had VS ADOPT. He did this by losing a ship on the 4-4 undock and then losing a corpies' as well because of lack or rep/help during that fight. They used this underhanded tactic to get back at us because we dropped them like a bad habit. After the loss we were all feeling a bit ticked off that they would stoop that low so we decided to do the same.

We implanted one of our alts with the sole intent on losing ships under the ADOPT flag to right the wrong that they made. Once he was in, he immediately lost a Megathron Navy Issue x2 and a Navy Geddon. We were going to do machariels out of spite but it would have been too obvious.


Now that ADOPT know we can hit them where it hurts even when they dock up against us, they have ceased fighting us at all and most are not logging in for more than to change skills. The remainder stay mainly in frigates until they see one of us in local and then they dock, log or both. They wanted to play the metagame, welcome to!

On Battleclinic, we made ADOPT lose a grand total of 43 billion ISK in the ships that we destroyed and more is on the way!

Vito, in response though, we are doing MORE than fine and as i said if it had not been a metagame tactic used by ADOPT, we would still have 90's efficiencies still but they had to stoop to these underhanded methods in order to get any and all kills off of us. Pretty sad when the "owners of highsec" <--- this was said to our spy as he was asking about the alliance, have to resort to metagame tactics to beat a 33 man corp/alliance. We are biting off more than we could chew? No, not really at all huh?


YOU MAD BRO? Its just a game to us bro, where it seems more to you......

It's like they usually say about fantasy MMO's and men playing female characters: "If I'm going to spend alot of time watching this character, it might as well have a good looking ass".
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
#23 - 2011-10-29 16:50:35 UTC
My playstyle and sense of worth is also based on meaningless killboard statistics.

♥ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children ♥
Sh0plifter
Underworld Property Accounting Partnership
#24 - 2011-10-29 17:31:48 UTC
This is not where I was going. X Damn Gandolf for telling me to take that left in Rens.
NightmareX
Pandemic Horde High Sec Division
#25 - 2011-10-29 23:31:30 UTC  |  Edited by: NightmareX
Kai86 wrote:
Vito, bit off more than we could chew? LMAO HARDLY!

You see, here is the funny thing you all aren't realizing.

Efficiency -
Double Tap - 65%
NKING - 40%
ADOPT - 62%

those scores are after 2 weeks of war where we fought all 3 on their terms while outnumbered and grouped together because if we did not they would dock and log out for the evening. Knowing that we like good fights, we have spread ourselves out a little bit more than usual. We recently had a spy implanted into us from ADOPT who's goal was to kill the 100 percent efficiency we had VS ADOPT. He did this by losing a ship on the 4-4 undock and then losing a corpies' as well because of lack or rep/help during that fight. They used this underhanded tactic to get back at us because we dropped them like a bad habit. After the loss we were all feeling a bit ticked off that they would stoop that low so we decided to do the same.

We implanted one of our alts with the sole intent on losing ships under the ADOPT flag to right the wrong that they made. Once he was in, he immediately lost a Megathron Navy Issue x2 and a Navy Geddon. We were going to do machariels out of spite but it would have been too obvious.


Now that ADOPT know we can hit them where it hurts even when they dock up against us, they have ceased fighting us at all and most are not logging in for more than to change skills. The remainder stay mainly in frigates until they see one of us in local and then they dock, log or both. They wanted to play the metagame, welcome to!

On Battleclinic, we made ADOPT lose a grand total of 43 billion ISK in the ships that we destroyed and more is on the way!

Vito, in response though, we are doing MORE than fine and as i said if it had not been a metagame tactic used by ADOPT, we would still have 90's efficiencies still but they had to stoop to these underhanded methods in order to get any and all kills off of us. Pretty sad when the "owners of highsec" <--- this was said to our spy as he was asking about the alliance, have to resort to metagame tactics to beat a 33 man corp/alliance. We are biting off more than we could chew? No, not really at all huh?

Congratulation for being taken as the stupiest corp in EVE's history with that stunt Lol.

Not sure if you know it, but you killed 43 bill isk from your own wallet (something that's ingame) while we lost some % on a freaking killboard (that doesn't really have anything to do with EVE it self). Who's the looser here?

Even if you would have 99.9% kill ratio against us, it still doesn't mean anything, because we all know what your move was so everybody knows that even with 99.9% kill ratio against us, we have still won totally in this case.

So i'm sorry to disapoint your sore ass that you lost the isk while we lost some % kill ratio on a killboard.

And what's most important between those 2 things?

/me runs around and laugh out loud.

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
ScooterPuff Sr
Shenanigans Mining Hub
#26 - 2011-11-03 21:16:34 UTC
Kai86 wrote:
Vito, bit off more than we could chew? LMAO HARDLY!

You see, here is the funny thing you all aren't realizing.

Efficiency -
Double Tap - 65%
NKING - 40%
ADOPT - 62%

those scores are after 2 weeks of war where we fought all 3 on their terms while outnumbered and grouped together because if we did not they would dock and log out for the evening. Knowing that we like good fights, we have spread ourselves out a little bit more than usual. We recently had a spy implanted into us from ADOPT who's goal was to kill the 100 percent efficiency we had VS ADOPT. He did this by losing a ship on the 4-4 undock and then losing a corpies' as well because of lack or rep/help during that fight. They used this underhanded tactic to get back at us because we dropped them like a bad habit. After the loss we were all feeling a bit ticked off that they would stoop that low so we decided to do the same.

We implanted one of our alts with the sole intent on losing ships under the ADOPT flag to right the wrong that they made. Once he was in, he immediately lost a Megathron Navy Issue x2 and a Navy Geddon. We were going to do machariels out of spite but it would have been too obvious.


Now that ADOPT know we can hit them where it hurts even when they dock up against us, they have ceased fighting us at all and most are not logging in for more than to change skills. The remainder stay mainly in frigates until they see one of us in local and then they dock, log or both. They wanted to play the metagame, welcome to!

On Battleclinic, we made ADOPT lose a grand total of 43 billion ISK in the ships that we destroyed and more is on the way!

Vito, in response though, we are doing MORE than fine and as i said if it had not been a metagame tactic used by ADOPT, we would still have 90's efficiencies still but they had to stoop to these underhanded methods in order to get any and all kills off of us. Pretty sad when the "owners of highsec" <--- this was said to our spy as he was asking about the alliance, have to resort to metagame tactics to beat a 33 man corp/alliance. We are biting off more than we could chew? No, not really at all huh?


i peed a little laughing at this.
'We implanted one of our alts with the sole intent on losing ships under the ADOPT flag to right the wrong that they made. Once he was in, he immediately lost a Megathron Navy Issue x2 and a Navy Geddon. We were going to do machariels out of spite but it would have been too obvious. '
as opposed to screaming - HAHA! we lost our own ships to make you look bad on battleclinic!
oh wait. you did that too.
JackBlasta
Doomheim
#27 - 2011-11-03 21:51:58 UTC
lol God Squad really go out of their way to portray themselves as raging emofags in this thread Roll
Cerisia
Red Phoenix Rising
#28 - 2011-11-03 23:25:03 UTC
JackBlasta wrote:
lol God Squad really go out of their way to portray themselves as raging emofags in this thread Roll



As an uninvolved outsider I can only confirm this statement...
This space for rent..
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#29 - 2011-11-03 23:30:34 UTC
Kai86 wrote:


Some drivel about killboard stats.


Thank you Kai for the unending laughter; I sacrificed 1 Crap-Fit Machariel for 4 Faction BS's, a Battlecruiser and the best lols/tears/more lols I've had since harassing Socratic years ago.
ScooterPuff Sr
Shenanigans Mining Hub
#30 - 2011-11-04 00:24:45 UTC
Xolve wrote:
Kai86 wrote:


Some drivel about killboard stats.


Thank you Kai for the unending laughter; I sacrificed 1 Crap-Fit Machariel for 4 Faction BS's, a Battlecruiser and the best lols/tears/more lols I've had since harassing Socratic years ago.


plz sir can we haz moar
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#31 - 2011-11-04 00:35:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Xolve
ScooterPuff Sr wrote:


plz sir can we haz moar



Guess I should have posted this email earlier... before the Navy Megas and Geddon..

http://i.imgur.com/BxSBt.jpg
ScooterPuff Sr
Shenanigans Mining Hub
#32 - 2011-11-04 01:31:43 UTC
Xolve wrote:
ScooterPuff Sr wrote:


plz sir can we haz moar



Guess I should have posted this email earlier... before the Navy Megas and Geddon..

http://i.imgur.com/BxSBt.jpg

ok 1. lol'd at how your mails prior to that all say kai tears
2. my god that is just awesome.
he should seriously consider mining.
its alot safer and considering how much isk he threw away it may be a good way to make it all back.
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#33 - 2011-11-04 07:32:06 UTC
ScooterPuff Sr wrote:
Xolve wrote:
ScooterPuff Sr wrote:


plz sir can we haz moar



Guess I should have posted this email earlier... before the Navy Megas and Geddon..

http://i.imgur.com/BxSBt.jpg

ok 1. lol'd at how your mails prior to that all say kai tears
2. my god that is just awesome.
he should seriously consider mining.
its alot safer and considering how much isk he threw away it may be a good way to make it all back.





The bitter emofag is strong in that one.

I have a few other emails of him sucking on my ego to get me to join Rebirth. and how amazing I am and ****.. I just laughed, pulled my stunt, got kicked, and whyumadbro? and all this happened.

I am jack's smirking revenge.
ScooterPuff Sr
Shenanigans Mining Hub
#34 - 2011-11-05 04:03:50 UTC
Xolve wrote:
ScooterPuff Sr wrote:
Xolve wrote:
ScooterPuff Sr wrote:


plz sir can we haz moar



Guess I should have posted this email earlier... before the Navy Megas and Geddon..

http://i.imgur.com/BxSBt.jpg

ok 1. lol'd at how your mails prior to that all say kai tears
2. my god that is just awesome.
he should seriously consider mining.
its alot safer and considering how much isk he threw away it may be a good way to make it all back.





The bitter emofag is strong in that one.

I have a few other emails of him sucking on my ego to get me to join Rebirth. and how amazing I am and ****.. I just laughed, pulled my stunt, got kicked, and whyumadbro? and all this happened.

I am jack's smirking revenge.


you shoulda ransomed them too*
Meridith Akesia
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#35 - 2011-11-05 07:14:27 UTC
:Chestbeat:
Soraya Nilaighan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#36 - 2011-11-05 08:23:08 UTC
Guys look butt hurt gotta make your own thread when mines epic enough. 33 man corp makes this much drama in a game of 25,000 average player base per day.

If were so bad why Haven't any of you so called awesome pvper's redecced us,

Why aren't you shutting us up in local while your camping us in with your awesome leet fleets.

O wait cause that was us docking you up.
So sad.
really. its ok that your bad it really is.



Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#37 - 2011-11-05 16:27:11 UTC
Soraya Nilaighan wrote:
Guys look butt hurt gotta make your own thread when mines epic enough. 33 man corp makes this much drama in a game of 25,000 average player base per day.

If were so bad why Haven't any of you so called awesome pvper's redecced us,

Why aren't you shutting us up in local while your camping us in with your awesome leet fleets.

O wait cause that was us docking you up.
So sad.
really. its ok that your bad it really is.




All this butthurt stemmed from me getting you fools waxed, then some faggotry about Kai killing his own alt.. in faction ships for the redemption of (LOL) killboard stats..

In the grand scheme of things, I'm the one that ****** you over, you still havn't gotten your Machariel redeemed, and you still havn't dec'd my little one man corp.. Threat fail? I think so.
Soraya Nilaighan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#38 - 2011-11-05 17:14:47 UTC
[
All this butthurt stemmed from me getting you fools waxed, then some faggotry about Kai killing his own alt.. in faction ships for the redemption of (LOL) killboard stats..

In the grand scheme of things, I'm the one that ****** you over, you still havn't gotten your Machariel redeemed, and you still havn't dec'd my little one man corp.. Threat fail? I think so.




[/quote]
a little one man corp with alts apparantly not in the corp so ull just stay logged woopdie do. dec us if your so pro mang o thought so .
Lunas Whisper
Chillwater Ltd
#39 - 2011-11-05 17:17:43 UTC
Soraya Nilaighan wrote:
Guys look butt hurt gotta make your own thread when mines epic enough. 33 man corp makes this much drama in a game of 25,000 average player base per day.

If were so bad why Haven't any of you so called awesome pvper's redecced us,

Why aren't you shutting us up in local while your camping us in with your awesome leet fleets.

O wait cause that was us docking you up.
So sad.
really. its ok that your bad it really is.





Dang, I gotta give him the burn point on this.
sadly
+1
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#40 - 2011-11-05 17:30:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Xolve
Soraya Nilaighan wrote:
[
a little one man corp with alts apparantly not in the corp so ull just stay logged woopdie do. dec us if your so pro mang o thought so .


I'm not an alt nor do I have any, 30 seconds of research on eve-search and you would figure out who I am, if you didn't know- your own CEO raging didn't spell it out for you.

Your threats are weak and empty, your arguments are all invalid; and all you actually do is attempt to ::vicious circle:: forum arguments, when your nothing, your nobody, and you have accomplished nothing.

I'm not the one raging here or chest beating about how pro-sauce and leet I am. You are, you are also representing some lame attempt at meta-gaming vengeance. I'm not the one wronged here, I am the one laughing; 2 threads and countless posts later its beyond amusing that you still have not come to this realization.