These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why would anyone fly a Vargur?

Author
hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#121 - 2013-07-26 11:39:53 UTC  |  Edited by: hmskrecik
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Do you even know what empirical means? Something has to be observed or experienced

Strangely, this is precisely what I'm talking about since beginning: I have observed and measured the performance.

Quote:
The evidence I provided with simulation has every factor taken into account, you are free to challenge any point which you feel has not been addressed fully, in fact I encourage it since it will inject some credibility into your posts.

Stats are kind of evidence but they are not empirical. Performance is empirical.

As for having 0 evidence. You accuse me of lying. Thus I asked you, twice, what kind of evidence would you accept. I've got no answer.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#122 - 2013-07-26 11:51:44 UTC
hmskrecik wrote:
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Do you even know what empirical means? Something has to be observed or experienced

Strangely, this is precisely what I'm talking about since beginning: I have observed and measured the performance.

Quote:
The evidence I provided with simulation has every factor taken into account, you are free to challenge any point which you feel has not been addressed fully, in fact I encourage it since it will inject some credibility into your posts.

Stats are kind of evidence but they are not empirical. Performance is empirical.

As for having 0 evidence. You accuse me of lying. Thus I asked you, twice, what kind of evidence would you accept. I've got no answer.


Yes, only YOU have observed this, you have nothing to back yourself except your word which in every way does not match statistical evidence provided by the simulation.

I have provided my evidence through simulation since I don't have the means to record my gameplay, you have provided almost nothing.
Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#123 - 2013-07-26 11:52:48 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
And your fits are a prime example of people who cannot import EFT fits into a real situation, you would never use short range ammo on a sentry sniping fit, your drones hit out to 80km, so do your guns. Spike only.


I didn't say that's not the case, I simply pointed out that the blanket statement of "Domi's better" isn't necessarily true. The very nature of projectiles shows that the further away from the target you get, the lower the dps will be, as they work in falloff (unlike for instance lasers, where you can hold a considerable dps for a very long time). Vargur even gives you a tracking bonus on hull, which makes it a clear close range ship, i.e. an AC boat and even if it weren't, your tractors go out to 40 km or so. That should give you an indication where the ship is ment to use - and in most of that area, it's superior to sentry Domi. That's all I was saying.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#124 - 2013-07-26 11:55:32 UTC
hmskrecik wrote:
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Do you even know what empirical means? Something has to be observed or experienced

Strangely, this is precisely what I'm talking about since beginning: I have observed and measured the performance.

Quote:
The evidence I provided with simulation has every factor taken into account, you are free to challenge any point which you feel has not been addressed fully, in fact I encourage it since it will inject some credibility into your posts.

Stats are kind of evidence but they are not empirical. Performance is empirical.

As for having 0 evidence. You accuse me of lying. Thus I asked you, twice, what kind of evidence would you accept. I've got no answer.


Yes, only YOU have observed this, you have nothing to back yourself except your word which in every way does not match statistical evidence provided by the simulation.

I have provided my evidence through simulation since I don't have the means to record my gameplay, you have provided almost nothing.

You said you were even better than me at simulation and using EFT: time to put your money where your mouth is.

also:

Quote:
It's an opinion because you have nothing concrete to back it up, no numbers, no screenshots, no videos, not even any theory to counter the numbers I gave you earlier in the thread.


I gave you a pretty clear list of things of what I would accept as suitable evidence.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#125 - 2013-07-26 12:04:48 UTC
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
And your fits are a prime example of people who cannot import EFT fits into a real situation, you would never use short range ammo on a sentry sniping fit, your drones hit out to 80km, so do your guns. Spike only.


I didn't say that's not the case, I simply pointed out that the blanket statement of "Domi's better" isn't necessarily true. The very nature of projectiles shows that the further away from the target you get, the lower the dps will be, as they work in falloff (unlike for instance lasers, where you can hold a considerable dps for a very long time). Vargur even gives you a tracking bonus on hull, which makes it a clear close range ship, i.e. an AC boat and even if it weren't, your tractors go out to 40 km or so. That should give you an indication where the ship is ment to use - and in most of that area, it's superior to sentry Domi. That's all I was saying.



[Vargur, level 4]
Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer
Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer
Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer
Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer
Tracking Enhancer II

Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Script
Dread Guristas X-Large Shield Booster
Gist C-Type Shield Boost Amplifier
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Core C-Type 100MN Microwarpdrive
Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Script

800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L
800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L
800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L
800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]
[empty high slot]

Large Ancillary Current Router I
Large Projectile Ambit Extension II

[Dominix, test]
Drone Damage Amplifier II
Drone Damage Amplifier II
Drone Damage Amplifier II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Co-Processor II

Omnidirectional Tracking Link II
Federation Navy Omnidirectional Tracking Link
Dread Guristas X-Large Shield Booster
Large Micro Jump Drive
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

350mm Railgun II, Spike L
350mm Railgun II, Spike L
350mm Railgun II, Spike L
350mm Railgun II, Spike L
350mm Railgun II, Spike L
Drone Link Augmentor II

Large Drone Scope Chip I
Large Processor Overclocking Unit I
Large Algid Hybrid Administrations Unit I


Garde II x5
Curator II x5
Bouncer II x5

Vargur does 712 DPS to 60km, domi does 958 to drone control range @ 84km
hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#126 - 2013-07-26 12:06:59 UTC  |  Edited by: hmskrecik
Tsukino Stareine wrote:

Yes, only YOU have observed this, you have nothing to back yourself except your word which in every way does not match statistical evidence provided by the simulation.

I have provided my evidence through simulation since I don't have the means to record my gameplay, you have provided almost nothing.

You have provided an argument only. The evidence is something which comes from actually playing. EFT graph is a tool, quite a good and useful one, but still a tool only and an indicator at best. It's not and never will be a final proof.

Edit: BTW, not only I have observed. There were other people posting in this thread and reporting Vargur's superior performance in game.

Quote:
You said you were even better than me at simulation and using EFT: time to put your money where your mouth is.

I said I'm better than you at theorycrafting. And I know all too well where it leads, which is why I'm not going to do it. If the EFT is the only proof you could accept, let's leave it that way.

Quote:
Quote:
It's an opinion because you have nothing concrete to back it up, no numbers, no screenshots, no videos, not even any theory to counter the numbers I gave you earlier in the thread.


I gave you a pretty clear list of things of what I would accept as suitable evidence.

You received numbers and denied them. Screenshots can be photoshopped. Videos can be fabricated. If you don't believe my word, why should you believe anything else I have produced?
Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#127 - 2013-07-26 12:08:52 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Vargur does 712 DPS to 60km, domi does 958 to drone control range @ 84km


Kindly read what I wrote.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#128 - 2013-07-26 12:17:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Tsukino Stareine
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Vargur does 712 DPS to 60km, domi does 958 to drone control range @ 84km


Kindly read what I wrote.


I did and it just means the vargur loses out because it has to spend time flying to the rats while the domi is happily sitting at warp in point.

Also notice there's only a 100 paper DPS difference between the two and the vargur starts being outclassed at 27km.

hmskrecik wrote:

You have provided an argument only. The evidence is something which comes from actually playing. EFT graph is a tool, quite a good and useful one, but still a tool only and an indicator at best. It's not and never will be a final proof.

I said I'm better than you at theorycrafting. And I know all too well where it leads, which is why I'm not going to do it. If the EFT is the only proof you could accept, let's leave it that way.

You received numbers and denied them. Screenshots can be photoshopped. Videos can be fabricated. If you don't believe my word, why should you believe anything else I have produced?


ET is an accurate tool and if one knows how to extract the relevant information from it you can create a practically accurate simulation. You said you were better than me at this and have yet to even try. If you feel EFT is erroneous or inaccurate, please point out the parts which you can only determine by "actually flying the ship".

You said vargur completes missions xx% faster than the domi, which is about as good as me saying I'm Bill Gates.

Now all you're doing is making excuses NOT to provide any hard proof because you know it will sway things in favour of the domi.
Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#129 - 2013-07-26 12:34:41 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Vargur does 712 DPS to 60km, domi does 958 to drone control range @ 84km


Kindly read what I wrote.


I did and it just means the vargur loses out because it has to spend time flying to the rats while the domi is happily sitting at warp in point.

Also notice there's only a 100 paper DPS difference between the two and the vargur starts being outclassed at 27km.



http://shrani.si/f/3j/cZ/1hHKPxXQ/vargvdomi.jpg

Domi is your fit, Varg is mine, though I'd personally never use an MJD fit without at least one SeBo, given that the targetting range can quickly end up being very messy.
hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#130 - 2013-07-26 12:42:12 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
ET is an accurate tool and if one knows how to extract the relevant information from it you can create a practically accurate simulation. You said you were better than me at this and have yet to even try. If you feel EFT is erroneous or inaccurate, please point out the parts which you can only determine by "actually flying the ship".

I repeat, I'm not saying the EFT is wrong. Only sometimes can be misleading. And my main thesis is that whatever you plan in EFT must be verified in practice. But since you asked so nicely for a bit of theory here you go.

Things you missed are time and tracking.

Time. Domi when moves cannot deploy sentries. So depending on mission and your playing style you have some moments when you're not dealing your optimal DPS. Meanwhile my Vargur shoots for all the time when there is a red cross on the grid (minus EWAR of course). Even if I'm in deep falloff. If they are too far, I load Barrages and shoot again. While shooting I'm moving my ass, so deep falloff becomes shallow falloff, and it becomes such quite fast.

Tracking. Since AC have excellent tracking themselves and it's improved by Marauder bonus, even when hitting in falloff I still score good to perfect hits. Some DPS is wasted but some DPS is gained.

Also having ability to choose damage profile while retaining DPS plays some role too.

Quote:
You said vargur completes missions xx% faster than the domi, which is about as good as me saying I'm Bill Gates.

Both facts are verifiable.

Quote:
Now all you're doing is making excuses NOT to provide any hard proof because you know it will sway things in favour of the domi.

I said I can't be arsed to produce video. And frankly I'm not too motivated to make screenshots either, but if I did, what should such a screenshot show?
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#131 - 2013-07-26 12:45:20 UTC
There are reasons other than damage and range that might make the Dominix an inferior choice. I also hope that fit you listed above is not the one you use on missions.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#132 - 2013-07-26 13:02:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Tsukino Stareine
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:

http://shrani.si/f/3j/cZ/1hHKPxXQ/vargvdomi.jpg

Domi is your fit, Varg is mine, though I'd personally never use an MJD fit without at least one SeBo, given that the targetting range can quickly end up being very messy.


Why is the target on a full horizontal velocity =S?

But nvm, the only ranges that matter really are spawn ranges which can be dictated by both ships.

As you can see the domi has a 44km advantage over the varg and you've quite obviously got implants on the varg and none on the domi ;).

You don't need a sebo on a MJD fit at all, just angle your jump correctly and you will land in range.

hmskrecik wrote:

I repeat, I'm not saying the EFT is wrong. Only sometimes can be misleading. And my main thesis is that whatever you plan in EFT must be verified in practice. But since you asked so nicely for a bit of theory here you go.

Things you missed are time and tracking.

Time. Domi when moves cannot deploy sentries. So depending on mission and your playing style you have some moments when you're not dealing your optimal DPS. Meanwhile my Vargur shoots for all the time when there is a red cross on the grid (minus EWAR of course). Even if I'm in deep falloff. If they are too far, I load Barrages and shoot again. While shooting I'm moving my ass, so deep falloff becomes shallow falloff, and it becomes such quite fast.

Tracking. Since AC have excellent tracking themselves and it's improved by Marauder bonus, even when hitting in falloff I still score good to perfect hits. Some DPS is wasted but some DPS is gained.

Also having ability to choose damage profile while retaining DPS plays some role too.

Both facts are verifiable.

I said I can't be arsed to produce video. And frankly I'm not too motivated to make screenshots either, but if I did, what should such a screenshot show?


Domi doesn't need to move, you MJD and stay in the spot until the cooldown comes back up or the room is clear, whichever happens last. The only time where I won't be shooting is when I'm spooling up my MJD which takes all of 9 seconds, less time than it takes for you to change ammunition.

Tracking cannot make you do more DPS than your ship is fit for. EFT lists best case scenario and the DPS graph is an accurate representation of your DPS at different ranges.

I can choose my damage type too and it takes a far sight shorter time than the 10 second reload of projectiles.

I can't verify the fact I am Bill Gates unless I meet you in person, I can however provide convincing evidence to support this claim.

You still haven't provided any statistical evidence that a vargur will outperform a domi in a mission environment fyi. Screenshot evidence would, for me, be:

1. Agent conversation before accepting mission
2. Agent conversation after accepting mission
3. Local chat with timestamps on with you saying "Mission accepted"
3. Screencap of first room to verify it is indeed the correct mission
4. Screencap of mission description with the green "Mission complete" visible (try not to pick any missions that have a item objective to return).

Time must be visible on the neocom in all screenshots, as far as I'm aware there's no way to edit that time bar photoshopping.
Log must be open and visible in every screenshot.

Paikis wrote:
There are reasons other than damage and range that might make the Dominix an inferior choice. I also hope that fit you listed above is not the one you use on missions.


For example?

And why?
hmskrecik
TransMine Group
Gluten Free Cartel
#133 - 2013-07-26 14:32:35 UTC  |  Edited by: hmskrecik
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Domi doesn't need to move, you MJD and stay in the spot until the cooldown comes back up or the room is clear, whichever happens last. The only time where I won't be shooting is when I'm spooling up my MJD which takes all of 9 seconds, less time than it takes for you to change ammunition.

Tracking cannot make you do more DPS than your ship is fit for. EFT lists best case scenario and the DPS graph is an accurate representation of your DPS at different ranges.

I can choose my damage type too and it takes a far sight shorter time than the 10 second reload of projectiles.

If you MJD then you spend on average at least 6 minutes per room while well performing ship cleans it in 5 minutes max. Tracking does not improve DPS but increases chance of critical hits. You can choose your damage but you're loosing some DPS in that.

See? We can do it all day long. And this is the reason I don't want to. I prefer, in your words, to put money where the mouth is and measure final results, which is, how fast the ship is generating... er, money.

And in this department it's YOU who didn't provide any kind of hard evidence. All you did was waving DPS graphs but no actual performance metrics. Afraid of being accused of making numbers up?

Quote:
You still haven't provided any statistical evidence that a vargur will outperform a domi in a mission environment fyi.

Please. I have provided you some statistical data but you have questioned it. So what now? Am I to provide more numbers so more of them you could question? I may be dumb at times, but I'm not that dumb.

Quote:
Screenshot evidence would, for me, be:

1. Agent conversation before accepting mission
2. Agent conversation after accepting mission
3. Local chat with timestamps on with you saying "Mission accepted"
3. Screencap of first room to verify it is indeed the correct mission
4. Screencap of mission description with the green "Mission complete" visible (try not to pick any missions that have a item objective to return).

Time must be visible on the neocom in all screenshots, as far as I'm aware there's no way to edit that time bar photoshopping.
Log must be open and visible in every screenshot.

Quite the hoops just to prove a point... You first. Show me the evidence of your liking of Domi's performance. Only then I will return the favour.
NightmareX
Pandemic Horde High Sec Division
#134 - 2013-07-26 18:12:57 UTC  |  Edited by: NightmareX
Having the longest locking range and some more DPS at longer ranges doesn't mean anything that you will complete the missions faster or earn more isks if you want to loot and salvage the wrecks to earn the extra isks.

There is alot that counter in how you do the missions or earn your isks there.

With a Domi, you have to use an alt to loot and salvage the wrecks to be effective. I can be effective as hell with that alone in my Vargur. I can tractor all of the wrecks to me really fast from 48 km and loot it and salvage them WHILE i kill the npc's / do the missions.

So if you only have one character / account (like i do), a Vargur beats the living crap out of the Dominix in level 4 missions.

Sure, a Dominix is effective when you think about how cheap it is compared to the Vargur. But in the longer run, you will earn tons more isks with the Vargur over the Dominix.

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama

Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#135 - 2013-07-26 20:14:24 UTC
Tsukino Stareine wrote:
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:

http://shrani.si/f/3j/cZ/1hHKPxXQ/vargvdomi.jpg

Domi is your fit, Varg is mine, though I'd personally never use an MJD fit without at least one SeBo, given that the targetting range can quickly end up being very messy.


Why is the target on a full horizontal velocity =S?


To simulate tracking conditions in worst case scenario. Long distance dps is virtually unaffected, but the close range curve takes a dive. It's easier to show how weapons behave in such a situation.

Quote:
As you can see the domi has a 44km advantage over the varg and you've quite obviously got implants on the varg and none on the domi ;)


Not at all, it's a standard Vargur mission fit, no implants were used in either ship. As for range... if you need that, you wouldn't be using a short range weapon, would you?