These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What is PVP to you and why do you like it?

Author
Sol Kal'orr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2013-07-13 09:33:34 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Market trades are not really PvP imo because they are consentual. Both side agree to the outcome.


I bought up all the 'Item X' in region and now you have to pay 3x market to buy it. Did you consent to that? Sure you can buy it at the new price or go to another region, but either way, I have cost you ISK or time. Seeing as all you can lose in ship pew is ISK or time, I'd call it PVP.
Burl en Daire
M.O.M.S. Corp
#42 - 2013-07-13 09:44:32 UTC
Alavaria wrote:
Skeln Thargensen wrote:
I'm pretty new to PvP myself. I mostly enjoy skulking around in my SB looking for soft targets or black ops fleets.

PvP has taken a new turn in which I shoot torpedos at TEST Alliance Please Ignore (and various pets) structures.

I hear it "generates content" for them when they need to show up for the resulting timer.


This is PvP, PSYOPs is an entertaining form of PvP and it works. These types of PvP are not in other games and to me everything is PvP in one form or another.

Yesterday's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. Hunter S. Thompson

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2013-07-13 09:55:01 UTC
Sol Kal'orr wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Market trades are not really PvP imo because they are consentual. Both side agree to the outcome.


I bought up all the 'Item X' in region and now you have to pay 3x market to buy it. Did you consent to that? Sure you can buy it at the new price or go to another region, but either way, I have cost you ISK or time. Seeing as all you can lose in ship pew is ISK or time, I'd call it PVP.

You may call it anything you wish. It doesnt change it to that.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2013-07-13 10:07:10 UTC
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2013-07-13 11:07:40 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong

In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious.

The generally accepted definition in the gamer community is combat.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#46 - 2013-07-13 11:10:21 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious.


If I drop a fleet of 50 macks on your ass and mine the ice out from under you, it's most certainly PvP.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#47 - 2013-07-13 11:13:05 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong

In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious.

The generally accepted definition in the gamer community is combat.


In the gamer community, yes. In EVE? No. And if you don't think the market counts, then you haven't been on the recieving end of some good market PvP.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2013-07-13 12:17:18 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Infinity Ziona wrote:
In the context of MMOs its not a correct statement. Since everyone is competing for resources one could then say ice mining is PvP which is obviously fallacious.


If I drop a fleet of 50 macks on your ass and mine the ice out from under you, it's most certainly PvP.

No, its not.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
SONS of BANE
#49 - 2013-07-13 12:23:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Seven Koskanaiken
Robert Saint wrote:
BiscuitMonsterr wrote:


PvP all too often looks like 12-yr olds chest-pounding in a sandpit.



I completely agree, and as a father of 5 kids, it's sad that PVP gamers think ganging up on solo players is winning, and they somehow did something amazing.

It's the publisher fault I feel for giving players so much freedom and not adding a more structured and entertaining PVP experience in game.... at least on some level.

I don't think it's actually possible in this game since it's so deeply convicted to open world only after ten years of the same thing, it's not changing.


If you want entertaining pvp then create your own RvB entity with pvp rules that suit you and others who join you. No need to wait for the devs.

But Open world and freedom is pretty much the fundamental basis for the whole game. I don't know why you would play if you disagreed with that aspect?
Norm Tempesta
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#50 - 2013-07-13 12:40:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Norm Tempesta
"If I drop a fleet of 50 macks on your ass and mine the ice out from under you, it's most certainly PvP."

Haha, for some reason a fleet of 50 macks 'on my ass" cracks me up. It might cause a wardec if you did it consistently to the wrong corp, but I don't consider it PVP.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#51 - 2013-07-13 13:29:04 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
anyone who says that any player activity that can be described as being against or opposed to another player is not pvp is objectively wrong


Considering how PvP is so borked, yeah, I can see how PvPers can consider anything PvP.

I mean they gank. That's the sum of MMO PvP. Everything must be PvP then!

At least in a FPS game there's some objective to fight for. A cause.

Guy asleep at a gatecamp for 8hrs only objective is having a ship when he wakes up. Lol

People are putting too much into PvP being "harder" and more "challenging". Even in WoW you can see the difference of an average raider vs an average PvPer...

Raider -- gemmed/enchanted/stats optimized and farms for better gear to get into HM raids.

PvPer -- No gems. No enchants. Never learned to optimize stats. He only wants to farm BGs. PvE is too hard.

Had an arena partner that was a great example that's even seen in EvE. 15 year-old kid. Naga mouse. Got every macro known programmed on it. Learned all of the tricks to look kewl among peers. But in arena, couldn't close...and he's DPS. Blamed everyone else, would even heal me (a healer) because he wasn't playing as a partner anyway -- but the basic arena strats, too hard to learn. He jumped into the BGs and that's all he knows and how he plays. To this day, does the same thing. All that talk and even macros, couldn't get past 1800 rating.

It's not PvP vs PvE. It's about applying yourself to be the best in things that you do. To have that self-respect to be an asset in a group, not just an ass.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Manfred Hideous
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#52 - 2013-07-13 13:38:41 UTC
Besides the obvious shoot people answer, I consider the following to be a form of PVP.

Exploration in null owned or claimed by alliances who aren't blue.
Anything wormhole.
Hauling through null/low. (If you don't agree, try running camps in a T1 hauler; It's fun)
Ratting with reds nearby or in system.


Basically, anything where you know you are risking being shot at. If you're afk hauling through highsec, you're probably not PVPing, though you might run into someone who is anyway.


Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. It might not be *fair* PVP but that doesn't make it less than PVP.
Alpheias
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#53 - 2013-07-13 13:40:57 UTC
Manfred Hideous wrote:
Besides the obvious shoot people answer, I consider the following to be a form of PVP.

Exploration in null owned or claimed by alliances who aren't blue.
Anything wormhole.
Hauling through null/low. (If you don't agree, try running camps in a T1 hauler; It's fun)
Ratting with reds nearby or in system.


Basically, anything where you know you are risking being shot at. If you're afk hauling through highsec, you're probably not PVPing, though you might run into someone who is anyway.


Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model. It might not be *fair* PVP but that doesn't make it less than PVP.


Beautifully put.

Agent of Chaos, Sower of Discord.

Don't talk to me unless you are IQ verified and certified with three references from non-family members. Please have your certificate of authenticity on hand.

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#54 - 2013-07-13 13:46:32 UTC
Manfred Hideous wrote:
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model.


Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP.

Easy kills. For lazy killers.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Alpheias
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#55 - 2013-07-13 13:52:25 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Manfred Hideous wrote:
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model.


Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP.

Easy kills. For lazy killers.


And the alternative in World of Pandacraft is? Pet battles?

I am sincerely asking, since you are such a know-it-all and foretell prophecies like no one else can.

Agent of Chaos, Sower of Discord.

Don't talk to me unless you are IQ verified and certified with three references from non-family members. Please have your certificate of authenticity on hand.

Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2013-07-13 14:00:58 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Manfred Hideous wrote:
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model.


Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP.

Easy kills. For lazy killers.

oh no look at me. I expect people to go against their human condition and fight honourable battles and not bring ICBMs to their knife fights.

no sir, we can't have that! all fights must be at dawn at a 30 pace distance with flintlock pistols. have at thee!

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Manfred Hideous
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2013-07-13 14:12:47 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Manfred Hideous wrote:
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model.


Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP.

Easy kills. For lazy killers.


You must never have PVP'ed then. There are two wars going on right now with fleet fights being has and fun by all, or at least the winning side. There are plenty of people mutually shooting each other in space and many more performing in the subjects I listed earlier.

PVP is what you don't want. You wish that CCP would make ganking impossible and nul/low should have Concord. I've said it before; Perhaps this is not the game for you.

I imagine there are other games in space you could find that wouldn't offend your sensibilities.
Alpheias
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#58 - 2013-07-13 14:14:23 UTC
Manfred Hideous wrote:


I imagine there are other games in space you could find that wouldn't offend your sensibilities.


Star Trek Online?

Agent of Chaos, Sower of Discord.

Don't talk to me unless you are IQ verified and certified with three references from non-family members. Please have your certificate of authenticity on hand.

Solutio Letum
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2013-07-13 14:31:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Solutio Letum
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Manfred Hideous wrote:
Ganking is PVP as far as I am concerned. It perfectly fits the PlayerVSPlayer model.


Ganking is about the only PvP there is in MMOs, which is the sad state of PvP.

Easy kills. For lazy killers.


So if i was to gank your ganking fleet but you also had a gank support fleet waiting incase someone was about the gank you would that make all of us gankers?.......

Ganking is only taking such a uper hand and fisting it into an unsuspecting target, so yes, all of us would technically be gankers. But this is what pvp is about, trying to have a uper hand.

Ganking is only a word that was invented to try to blame the attackers for bringing to much ship or to high of a opposing force.
Linna Baresi
#60 - 2013-07-13 14:57:46 UTC
Robert Saint wrote:
So EVE is a difficult game to figure out, as I try to balance my personal understanding of what Player Vs Player is.

Although, I have my personal view of what PVP, I would very much like to hear what anyone who is brave enough to post in GD.... as would others who read these threads.

Post with your MAIN, otherwise you're missing the point.

1) What is PVP to you?
2) Why do you like it?



1) Player vs Player combat, whether 1v1, in small groups or in large groups, whether in war games or in the open world. I'd like to exclude Arena style combat though... too artificial and static.

2) Fighting humans is entirely different from fighting scripted NPC's, and it's a lot more fun. I like the adrenaline rush of 1v1 and small group PVP. I LOVE outsmarting the other side in large group PVP.

Member of since 2003 fated.europefreeforum.com