These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM Malcanis what is your problem ?

First post First post First post
Author
Sway M4G
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#281 - 2013-07-10 14:50:30 UTC
Well if you cant win just block Ugh
Retar Aveymone
DJ's Retirement Fund
Goonswarm Federation
#282 - 2013-07-10 18:24:44 UTC
Malcanis upholds the finest standards of the CSM by correctly and openly sifting good ideas from trash and discarding the trash (this thread)
Retar Aveymone
DJ's Retirement Fund
Goonswarm Federation
#283 - 2013-07-10 18:35:25 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:
I think that thread can be closed, it seems Malcanis and his follower are in dire need of the bullshit he's posting

thanks for explaining to me

everything i said got owned and my dignity is in tatters

this clearly means i was right all along
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#284 - 2013-07-10 19:36:50 UTC
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
I think that thread can be closed, it seems Malcanis and his follower are in dire need of the bullshit he's posting

thanks for explaining to me

everything i said got owned and my dignity is in tatters

this clearly means i was right all along

That seems to be a regular occurrence these days.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

ChYph3r
Omni Defense Corp.
#285 - 2013-07-10 21:55:47 UTC  |  Edited by: ChYph3r
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
Malcanis wrote:


Bullshit. You got scammed and you're trying to get it declared an exploit rather than admit you got tricked.



You have CSM attached to your name and given your attitude, hopefully not for long!

Learn to post with some decorum or give up or position and go back to being just a regular player.

(btw, CSM Malcanis' post was not directed at me, but this kind of post by a CSM needs to stop)



This is the most ridiculous asinine request ever! why don't you f*ck off and go play Disney Online ( http://games.disney.com/ ) you little sniveling butt hurt jacka**!


Mal say Bullshit more so this little prick has more butt hurt!

Want to find all the podcasts around EVE Online visit http://evepodcasts.com @chyph3r  on Twitter

Frying Doom
#286 - 2013-07-11 03:49:41 UTC
Is Malcanis a knob: Yes
Is he blunt and generally offensive: Yes
Is he wrong at times: Yes
Does he ever acknowledge he is wrong: Not that I have ever seen

So in essence he is a jumped up little dictator, that believes he is always right.

And this game is full of them.

Welcome to EvE Online, where you need to be a jerk or the hordes will just crush you.Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
The Network.
#287 - 2013-07-11 07:51:45 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
And this game is full of them.

Case in point ^

wb Frying

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#288 - 2013-07-11 10:57:30 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Is Malcanis a knob: Yes
Is he blunt and generally offensive: Yes
Is he wrong at times: Yes
Does he ever acknowledge he is wrong: Not that I have ever seen

So in essence he is a jumped up little dictator, that believes he is always right.

And this game is full of them.

Welcome to EvE Online, where you need to be a jerk or the hordes will just crush you.Lol


Can you cite an example of me being objectively wrong about something (ie: not just an opinion like whether the Pilgrim is a better looking ship than the Vagabond or whatever), having my error demonstrated to me with actual data, and then not conceding my mistake?

I mean either this happens so frequently that linking several examples should be easy, or so rarely that the event is seared into your memory and linking the examples should still be easy.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#289 - 2013-07-11 11:01:04 UTC
Because sure lots of people have disagreed with me and thrown a tear-filled hissy-fit because I asked them for some information to back up their assertion that there's too much suicide ganking or all hi-sec corps get war-decced or whatever, but until they put some information on the table, it's just "my subjective impression vs your subjective impression", in which case there's no real scope for an outside observer such as yourself to decide who's "wrong".

Anyway: let's see the links.



(Or the tear filled hissy-fit, either is good)

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#290 - 2013-07-11 15:33:23 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:


you just do not want to realize that you have a serious communication issue, well, then just go on like you do...


I'm open to the possibility, but you'll need to bring some more evidence than just your unsupported word, because Harry, you're not exactly coming across as a neutral, objective observer here. You're certainly not too intimidated to disagree with me. Do you consider yourself very much braver than the average forum poster? Can you show any off-site links where people are posting "OMG I wanted to disagree with Malc but he's so fierce and scary I didn't dare!!" ?

What have you got?

(Apart from a single casual post that apparently hurt your pwecious feewings)


I remember you proving me wrong in a thread. It hurt. I really can't do this forum brawling anymore. Can't you see it by yourself? How terrible can you be to others without seeing it?

mama guru
Yazatas.
#291 - 2013-07-11 15:45:16 UTC
Some people in this game really need a lesson in objectivity. Just because something hurt your feelings does not mean you were right all along.

EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's too hard you are too weak.

mmorpg lol
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#292 - 2013-07-11 15:53:00 UTC
I would like to thank Malcanis, Manfred, et al. for the public service that they have been carrying out in this thread.
Frying Doom
#293 - 2013-07-11 22:42:41 UTC
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
And this game is full of them.

Case in point ^

wb Frying

ty

And yes I am one of the above mentioned. I would have to be mad not to claim to be.Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#294 - 2013-07-12 05:48:51 UTC
Still waiting on those examples, Frying.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Frying Doom
#295 - 2013-07-12 13:04:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Malcanis wrote:
Still waiting on those examples, Frying.

Without even bothering to go through your posts

The CSM white paper clearly states
CSM White Paper wrote:
The responsibilities of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman are to handle official communications between the CSM and CCP, and they are expected to be particularly active in interacting with the community. The responsibilities of the Secretary and Vice-Secretary are related to the production of official CSM publications such as the CSM Summit Minutes. Thus, CSM Officers are expected to be the most active members of the CSM.


Yourself and others elected to the Chairman, someone who would not meet these criteria. Which even with all the hard work of the other CSM members makes CSM 8 look like a joke. It is hard to take CSM8 seriously with a clown at the head of the organization, look at Australia a few years ago, the rest of the world was laughing at us for having someone short enough to be a jockey as Prime minister.

You have given a wishy washy explanation of how you are right, completely denying the fact that the CSM White Paper is there, listing out what the chairman has to do. It is a cold hard fact in pdf form, you deny it, even though you can't get a much more solid fact.

You were wrong as you have been in the past, which is why I will not bother wasting my time going over old threads, which so you were wrong at times, like everyone else because you will just make excuses as to why you are right and the facts are wrong.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
Pandemic Horde
#296 - 2013-07-12 13:37:52 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Still waiting on those examples, Frying.


You're just gonna have to wait then, because it will take time for Frying Doom to come up with a reason why he can't present a shred of evidence to support what he thinks.

You know you're winning Mal, when the opposition has nothing left to throw at you but jealousy and butthurtedness.
mmorpg lol
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#297 - 2013-07-12 13:39:53 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:


The CSM white paper clearly states
CSM White Paper wrote:
The responsibilities of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman are to handle official communications between the CSM and CCP, and they are expected to be particularly active in interacting with the community. The responsibilities of the Secretary and Vice-Secretary are related to the production of official CSM publications such as the CSM Summit Minutes. Thus, CSM Officers are expected to be the most active members of the CSM.


Yourself and others elected to the Chairman, someone who would not meet these criteria. Which even with all the hard work of the other CSM members makes CSM 8 look like a joke. It is hard to take CSM8 seriously with a clown at the head of the organization, look at Australia a few years ago, the rest of the world was laughing at us for having someone short enough to be a jockey as Prime minister.

You have given a wishy washy explanation of how you are right, completely denying the fact that the CSM White Paper is there, listing out what the chairman has to do. It is a cold hard fact in pdf form, you deny it, even though you can't get a much more solid fact.

You were wrong as you have been in the past, which is why I will not bother wasting my time going over old threads, which so you were wrong at times, like everyone else because you will just make excuses as to why you are right and the facts are wrong.


So clearly the CSM is not allowed to choose somebody as chairman who is very good with the interaction between CCP and the CSM, because they are not very good at interacting with the community. The second part is clearly worded as being the most important part. Roll
Manfred Hideous
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#298 - 2013-07-12 13:42:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Manfred Hideous
Frying Doom wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Still waiting on those examples, Frying.

Without even bothering to go through your posts

The CSM white paper clearly states
CSM White Paper wrote:
The responsibilities of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman are to handle official communications between the CSM and CCP, and they are expected to be particularly active in interacting with the community. The responsibilities of the Secretary and Vice-Secretary are related to the production of official CSM publications such as the CSM Summit Minutes. Thus, CSM Officers are expected to be the most active members of the CSM.


Yourself and others elected to the Chairman, someone who would not meet these criteria. Which even with all the hard work of the other CSM members makes CSM 8 look like a joke. It is hard to take CSM8 seriously with a clown at the head of the organization, look at Australia a few years ago, the rest of the world was laughing at us for having someone short enough to be a jockey as Prime minister.

You have given a wishy washy explanation of how you are right, completely denying the fact that the CSM White Paper is there, listing out what the chairman has to do. It is a cold hard fact in pdf form, you deny it, even though you can't get a much more solid fact.

You were wrong as you have been in the past, which is why I will not bother wasting my time going over old threads, which so you were wrong at times, like everyone else because you will just make excuses as to why you are right and the facts are wrong.


Wait, so height is a job requirement in OZ? Peter Dinklage is underwhelmed. You'd prefer a full height sister lovin low IQ mong over a man who is a practical, intellectual, and political genius because he's short?
Frying Doom
#299 - 2013-07-12 13:49:04 UTC
Manfred Hideous wrote:


Wait, so height is a job requirement in OZ? Peter Dinklage is underwhelmed. You'd prefer a full height sister lovin low IQ mong over a man who is a practical, intellectual, and political genius because he's short?

No I would have preferred the politician who didn't end up with an arrest warrant for war crimes, because he was too busy kissing the USAs butt.

He was a laughing stock even though his a lot of his policies were good and subsequently, he over reached.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#300 - 2013-07-12 13:51:39 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Still waiting on those examples, Frying.

Without even bothering to go through your posts

The CSM white paper clearly states
CSM White Paper wrote:
The responsibilities of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman are to handle official communications between the CSM and CCP, and they are expected to be particularly active in interacting with the community. The responsibilities of the Secretary and Vice-Secretary are related to the production of official CSM publications such as the CSM Summit Minutes. Thus, CSM Officers are expected to be the most active members of the CSM.


Yourself and others elected to the Chairman, someone who would not meet these criteria. Which even with all the hard work of the other CSM members makes CSM 8 look like a joke. It is hard to take CSM8 seriously with a clown at the head of the organization, look at Australia a few years ago, the rest of the world was laughing at us for having someone short enough to be a jockey as Prime minister.

You have given a wishy washy explanation of how you are right, completely denying the fact that the CSM White Paper is there, listing out what the chairman has to do. It is a cold hard fact in pdf form, you deny it, even though you can't get a much more solid fact.

You were wrong as you have been in the past, which is why I will not bother wasting my time going over old threads, which so you were wrong at times, like everyone else because you will just make excuses as to why you are right and the facts are wrong.


No sorry buddy, that's not what was asked for, and that's a pretty 3/10 must try harder attempt at a sidetrack by the way. You accused me of never admitting when I am wrong. I call bullshit. Either produce evidence or admit that it's not true.

Where are the links of me refusing to admit error when I am demonstrably wrong as a matter of fact?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016