These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#3821 - 2012-03-22 19:13:08 UTC
Romar Agent wrote:
Is the voting still on? I would appreciate full WIS, but it would need to a. not try to grill my mainboard b. have some meaningfull content.

Whereas meaningfull for me would be something as simple as a poker table (perhaps like PKR) - just a way to interact with other avatars.


Voting ended, waiting for the results.

I would definitely also be happy to see something small to start.

Issler
Mathias Hex
#3822 - 2012-03-22 23:59:40 UTC
mkint wrote:
You know, if all you barbie rookies were to post in the same threads rather than make a 1-off post in a 1-off thread, you'd look more like an involved part of EVE that has some understanding about the realities of EVE and it's future. All these anti-WIS posters could be completely outnumbered by the barbie-ites, but it won't look that way because the barbie-ites never post in eachothers' threads. All the thread is 1 pro barbie, and dozens of anti-barbie. And over and over and over, because you people spam the same goddamned thread over and over again.


+1 for WIS. add my support for improving and expanding every aspect of gameplay equally aswell. Massive multiplayers should never stop expanding we are paying monthly to play after all.

I recall one night in a nightclub called the matrix, there I was... Mother of god there I am! Holy f**k.

Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3823 - 2012-03-23 00:38:40 UTC
Mathias Hex wrote:
Massive multiplayers should never stop expanding we are paying monthly to play after all.


See the Crucible patch notes for how the game has been expanding without having to add dance emotes.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Ai Shun
#3824 - 2012-03-23 01:00:39 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
How I play the game is none of your business.

Most of your replies in this thread are worthless angry troll posts intended to insult players who don't share your viewpoint and will be reported as such.


And what is his viewpoint? That he doesn't want to see WiS unless it contains meaningful gameplay for everyone. How can you disagree with that?
Taiwanistan
#3825 - 2012-03-23 02:17:57 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:

come on now uncle Taiwanistan just want to get to know you a little better, have a seat right here and tell me why you defend /dance.

Please post proof to support your accusation.


I have never advocated Avatar emote / dancing in this or any other thread.

you do condone it though, as you are always so quick to defend those i rebuke.


Heh, stop trying to put the 'spotlight' on me all the time.

www.thefreedictionary.com/condone
con·done (k n-d n ). tr.v. con·doned, con·don·ing, con·dones. To overlook, forgive, or disregard (an offense) without protest or censure.

Going with that definition of 'Condone', yeah I guess you could say that.

WTF does it matter to you anyway?

It's just another aspect that could be added to the game in which some players may participate. If it is added to the game, doesn't mean you or I have to do it.

So what if CCP has the Avatars do emotes. If some players wanna do emotes, good for them. If CCP does make it happen, I wouldn't mind my Avatar being able to do the 'Middle Finger Salute' or 'Flip The Bird' to various specific players (hint hint) every time I see them.

www.thefreedictionary.com/rebuke
tr.v. re·buked, re·buk·ing, re·bukes. 1. To criticize or reprove sharply; reprimand. See Synonyms at admonish. 2. To check or repress. n. A sharp reproof.

Anyway, you thinking I'm defending those players is incorrect. This thread has been trolled for so long by a select few that whenever an opportunity presents itself, that's the time to 'rebuke the rebuking'.

mmm mmmm mmm sassy is how i like em'
such impotent rage, emote /flip me the finger is all you want to do, no combat, no loss

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#3826 - 2012-03-23 12:36:03 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:

come on now uncle Taiwanistan just want to get to know you a little better, have a seat right here and tell me why you defend /dance.

Please post proof to support your accusation.


I have never advocated Avatar emote / dancing in this or any other thread.

you do condone it though, as you are always so quick to defend those i rebuke.


Heh, stop trying to put the 'spotlight' on me all the time.

www.thefreedictionary.com/condon
con·done (k n-d n ). tr.v. con·doned, con·don·ing, con·dones. To overlook, forgive, or disregard (an offense) without protest or censure

Going with that definition of 'Condone', yeah I guess you could say that.

WTF does it matter to you anyway?

It's just another aspect that could be added to the game in which some players may participate. If it is added to the game, doesn't mean you or I have to do it.

So what if CCP has the Avatars do emotes. If some players wanna do emotes, good for them. If CCP does make it happen, I wouldn't mind my Avatar being able to do the 'Middle Finger Salute' or 'Flip The Bird' to various specific players (hint hint) every time I see them.

www.thefreedictionary.com/rebuk
tr.v. re·buked, re·buk·ing, re·bukes. 1. To criticize or reprove sharply; reprimand. See Synonyms at admonish. 2. To check or repress. n. A sharp reproof

Anyway, you thinking I'm defending those players is incorrect. This thread has been trolled for so long by a select few that whenever an opportunity presents itself, that's the time to 'rebuke the rebuking'.

mmm mmmm mmm sassy is how i like em'
such impotent rage, emote /flip me the finger is all you want to do, no combat, no loss


Wrong, it's not 'Impotent Rage', more like 'Righteous Indignation'.

Anyway, right after the 'Salute', my team of Avatar Attack Alts (AAA) would quickly dispense some non-consensual PvP action on those various specific players.

Lol
DelBoy Trades
Trotter Independent Traders.
Stealth Alliance
#3827 - 2012-03-23 13:25:57 UTC
I wish this post would **** off, it's been on the front page for too long now. I will give a Dev loads of space money to lock this thread.

Damn nature, you scary!

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#3828 - 2012-03-23 13:35:09 UTC
DelBoy Trades wrote:
I wish this post would **** off, it's been on the front page for too long now. I will give a Dev loads of space money to lock this thread.

I would give the Dev's loads of REAL money to lock you out of this thread.

Lol
Blatant Forum Alt
Doomheim
#3829 - 2012-03-23 17:04:07 UTC
Would you let this thread die? Every time it gets bumped it gets my hopes up, I expect CCP to have finally come to their senses and decided to scrap WiS. It kills me each time I look and this is not the case.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3830 - 2012-03-23 17:14:27 UTC
Blatant Forum Alt wrote:
Would you let this thread die? Every time it gets bumped it gets my hopes up, I expect CCP to have finally come to their senses and decided to scrap WiS. It kills me each time I look and this is not the case.


WiS has been completely ignored at fanfest. That should tell you everything you need to know.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#3831 - 2012-03-23 17:15:06 UTC
Blatant Forum Alt wrote:
Would you let this thread die? Every time it gets bumped it gets my hopes up, I expect CCP to have finally come to their senses and decided to scrap WiS. It kills me each time I look and this is not the case.




Then don,t look ,make it easier on yourself and us

R.S.I2014

Aubrey Addams
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#3832 - 2012-03-23 17:31:39 UTC
Now they clarified.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3833 - 2012-03-23 17:32:50 UTC
Aubrey Addams wrote:
Now they clarified.


Eve is a Core Spaceship Game. Great news!

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Romar Agent
Doomheim
#3834 - 2012-03-23 17:48:41 UTC
So we at least have reposeable character pictures now - better than nothing...
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#3835 - 2012-03-23 17:55:30 UTC
Sleeve tattoos... Yaaaay Straight
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#3836 - 2012-03-23 21:58:11 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Sleeve tattoos... Yaaaay Straight


I guess there is a serious rupture between what looks scifey in Reykjavik and what looks scifey elsewhere. Lol

Meanwhile, I would like to have some actual earrings (chandeliers, hoops, studs, drops...) rather than those silly ear piercings. My main has been missing to put on some silvery chandeliers since Incursion...

Necklaces, bracelets and rings are out of question for our 5-dev A-Team...
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3837 - 2012-03-23 22:56:02 UTC
What the hell is scifey?

Also, thanks again to CCP for clarifying that at its core, Eve is a spaceship game.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Taiwanistan
#3838 - 2012-03-24 03:02:39 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Sleeve tattoos... Yaaaay Straight


I guess there is a serious rupture between what looks scifey in Reykjavik and what looks scifey elsewhere. Lol

Meanwhile, I would like to have some actual earrings (chandeliers, hoops, studs, drops...) rather than those silly ear piercings. My main has been missing to put on some silvery chandeliers since Incursion...

Necklaces, bracelets and rings are out of question for our 5-dev A-Team...

gtfo

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#3839 - 2012-03-24 03:06:22 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:

gtfo


Please show everyone how it's done by following your own advice.
Taiwanistan
#3840 - 2012-03-24 03:10:32 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:

gtfo


Please show everyone how it's done by following your own advice.

don't make me block you buddy if all you got is another NO U

now let's discuss the importance of new earrings

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."