These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2281 - 2012-01-08 19:37:46 UTC
Asuka Solo wrote:
3) The old forums are rife with Testies and Goons *cough* Mittens *cough* threatening to rage quit and demanded CCP focus on space boats and doing things their way... or else. Then again, as a CSM member with the odd 6k members and 4k pets supporting your policies or they risk facing das boot, it's not hard to see why the CSM advocated the changes they did.

The problem with your little conspiracy theory is that what made CCP finally come to their senses and start working on real Eve content again was the number of people canceling their accounts. Mittens could have posted until he was blue in the face but it wouldn't have mattered if there weren't people actually following through with their threats and canceling.

But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2282 - 2012-01-08 19:45:43 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:


But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.


boobs

Dodixie > Hek

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#2283 - 2012-01-08 19:45:49 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:


But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.


I absolutely agree.

It was the right thing for the game.... the Goonswarm game.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2284 - 2012-01-08 19:59:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
Asuka Solo wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:


Was there a point in there someplace, because if so I am missing it. Are you now claiming my posting in this thread is a part of some big conspiracy? Yes, this is an alt, which happens to be 5 years old. I have others much older and younger. I dunno' about you, but I'm one of those players with multiple accounts and alts. I even have some of those dirty industrial alts, and have participated in *gasp* mining as well as PVP and nullsec political faggotry. I also am one of those Pro-FIS people that unsubbed last year when CCP tried to force a cash shop and more broken, unfinished content down our throats under the guise of :excellence:. I came back in December when CCP begged me to via free game time on the cusp of Hilmar's apology.

I'd suggest that you check out the old forums where I was very vocal about the direction of the game and CCP incompetence for most of this character's 5 year life.


I lolled.

1) CCP offers every unsubbed account a reactivation offer after x amount of months. I've received many in between taking breaks from Eve and never threatened to rage quit over an expansion.

2) CCP didn't force a MT cash shop or broken content down your throat. They gave you outfits via breaking down plex and the foundations for WiS (I saw plenty of blogs and posts on what they were and still are planning for WiS, but I never saw a single dev blog saying Incarna will be 100% finished in 1 expansion). But whatever helps keep your justification for extortion/blackmail afloat sugar.

3) The old forums are rife with Testies and Goons *cough* Mittens *cough* threatening to rage quit and demanded CCP focus on space boats and doing things their way... or else. Then again, as a CSM member with the odd 6k members and 4k pets supporting your policies or they risk facing das boot, it's not hard to see why the CSM advocated the changes they did.


Glad I could amuse you, miss 2008 player.

1) Of course, I was not saying they were just begging me to return. I have received many "please come back" offers in the past as well, the timing was pretty hilarious because I got my latest round almost immediately after Hilmar's "apology" letter. I also did not rage quit, I voted with my wallet when my sub(s) expired because CCP no longer provided me with a level of service I found to be worth what I was spending after 4 years of waiting for an improvement to their haphazard half-finished releases because they were not allocating sufficient Dev resources to EVE's core gameplay. I recommend that anyone who is similarly dissatisfied consider unsubbing as an option other than crying, foot-stamping and making demands in the forums. Sometimes this is the only way to drive a point home to an organization that is not providing goods or services of acceptable or advertised quality.

2) We were always told WIS would be optional, and yet we were forced into an :awesome: unpolished/unfinished CQ. Only after numerous players complaining about overheating and overtaxed computers did they make good on making it optional, but in my case I was already gone.

In RE: to the cash shop, no, we were not "forced" into that as implied by my post, but it was definitely an unwanted and unnecessary waste of dev resources and a thinly veiled cash-grab by a desperate company that had overextended its resources. The NeX failed miserably and is still (IMHO) a tremendous waste of Dev resources unless they start listening to what the players want vs. what some beancounters and marketing people want.. As far as your blackmail/extortion bit, you must have me confused with someone else, or you feel superior in some way and need to stroke your own ego.

3) I am not a goon or a "testie", never have been, nor do I associate with basement dwelling neckbeards as you are implying. Nice try at that ad hominem though, it seems to be all that's left in the pro-WIS arsenal these days.

+1 for not crying about not getting an answer in your post or bitching that CCP is ignoring you.

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Astrid Stjerna
Sebiestor Tribe
#2285 - 2012-01-08 20:01:39 UTC
Asuka Solo wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:


But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.


I absolutely agree.

It was the right thing for the game.... the Goonswarm game.



Let's be totally honest, here -- Goonswarm is only objecting because with full station environments, people won't have any reason to decide they're bored and undock into their pewpew layzer blobz.

I can't get rid of my darn signature!  Oh, wait....

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#2286 - 2012-01-08 20:17:25 UTC
Astrid Stjerna wrote:
Asuka Solo wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:


But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.


I absolutely agree.

It was the right thing for the game.... the Goonswarm game.



Let's be totally honest, here -- Goonswarm is only objecting because with full station environments, people won't have any reason to decide they're bored and undock into their pewpew layzer blobz.


There may be some (justifiable) truth in this.

One of the main things that leads some people to completely be turned off by WIS content is that so far it seems to be geared to totally safe area's of game play. No combat, little chance for competitive game play options of any type... somewhat atypical for the EVE universe.

This would need to be addressed to have a reasonable chance of getting support from a wide cross section of the community again.

Perhaps in station environments should be broken up like the area's of space in EVE are, with high and low area's of security (and game play options available), with those area's varying somewhat depending on what area of space they happen to be in.

This would have to be handled with a delicate hand, as being docked has always denoted nearly complete safety in the past... but for WIS to gain the wide spread appeal that it needs this concept needs to evolve in a way that provides content to those that want to keep that safety and also to those that crave conflict.

And please, lets keep the trolling on both sides to a minimum if possible.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Elginn Sinak
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#2287 - 2012-01-08 20:22:22 UTC
To me , yes, Eve is about spaceships and explosions, but for a truly comprehensive game experience Eve is setup to expand into a fully comprehensive universe. A place where players can open retail shops, design custom clothes, hair, etc for other players and all the extrapolation you want from this idea. Bars with games are a bit boring by themselves, but how about if there were different prizes and gambling on those games, yet you would need to travel to certain systems for certain types of games/prizes.

I completely agree that this part of the game should be optional and that those players that want nothing more than to fly better and better ships and engage in bigger and bigger battles should have exactly what they want as well.

I am VERY excited about the DUST integration (although it's unclear if it will be available for the PC versions of EVE. And again this sort of expanding the perimeters of your potential game-play is what CCP started EVE with the vision of, it's only natural that these extensions and options be added over time.

I predict that given a broad enough spectrum of options for game-play, EVE could develop into a lot more than just a shooter/trader game.

Great work so far CCP :-)
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2288 - 2012-01-08 20:34:24 UTC
Astrid Stjerna wrote:
Asuka Solo wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:


But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.


I absolutely agree.

It was the right thing for the game.... the Goonswarm game.



Let's be totally honest, here -- Goonswarm is only objecting because with full station environments, people won't have any reason to decide they're bored and undock into their pewpew layzer blobz.

Right because we certainly wouldn't be able to find a way to mess with people in an avatar based game... :cripes:
You guys are looking way too hard for reasons why we are against WiS. It's really as simple as we don't want to see the internet spaceship game we enjoy playing fail. Luckily the majority of Eve players agree with us.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#2289 - 2012-01-08 21:53:09 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Astrid Stjerna wrote:
Asuka Solo wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:


But apart from all of that the CSM "advocated the changes they did" because it was the right thing for the game.


I absolutely agree.

It was the right thing for the game.... the Goonswarm game.



Let's be totally honest, here -- Goonswarm is only objecting because with full station environments, people won't have any reason to decide they're bored and undock into their pewpew layzer blobz.

Right because we certainly wouldn't be able to find a way to mess with people in an avatar based game... :cripes:
You guys are looking way too hard for reasons why we are against WiS. It's really as simple as we don't want to see the internet spaceship game we enjoy playing fail. Luckily the majority of Eve players agree with us.


I think in that most of us are in complete agreement.

While many of us would like to see this new area of game play expanded into something worthwhile, none of us want to see that happen at the expense of the rest of the game.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2290 - 2012-01-08 22:03:31 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
While many of us would like to see this new area of game play expanded into something worthwhile, none of us want to see that happen at the expense of the rest of the game.

You're wrong about some of the more...enthusiastic WiS proponents. They do want more WiS nonsense instead of more Eve content.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Gummy Plaude
Doomheim
#2291 - 2012-01-08 23:09:39 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
While many of us would like to see this new area of game play expanded into something worthwhile, none of us want to see that happen at the expense of the rest of the game.

You're wrong about some of the more...enthusiastic WiS proponents. They do want more WiS nonsense instead of more Eve content.


Asking for "EVE content" is just as shadowy as asking for WiS. The great thing about EVE is the variety of activities it has to offer which includes but are not limited to the spaceships. You need to realize that there are peaceful peeps out there chilling with asteroids or docked during months playing the market. Or the politics. Even within the safety of highsec, there are corps been wardecced by higher military forces everyday preventing them from undocking or even tearing apart their projects. For all of them, WiS is just the EVE content they miss.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2292 - 2012-01-08 23:49:12 UTC
Gummy Plaude wrote:
Asking for "EVE content" is just as shadowy as asking for WiS.

No it's not. The reason I use the term "real Eve content" is because back when CCP was still in crazy mode they kept insisting that there was WiS (walking in stations) content and FiS (flying in space) content. After wasting two years ignoring FiS and thousands of people canceling their accounts they woke up to the fact that FiS is what the players want. The success of the crucible expansion and the fact that people aren't leaving the game in droves any longer backs that up.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Flamespar
WarRavens
#2293 - 2012-01-08 23:55:57 UTC
Gummy Plaude wrote:

Asking for "EVE content" is just as shadowy as asking for WiS. The great thing about EVE is the variety of activities it has to offer which includes but are not limited to the spaceships. You need to realize that there are peaceful peeps out there chilling with asteroids or docked during months playing the market. Or the politics. Even within the safety of highsec, there are corps been wardecced by higher military forces everyday preventing them from undocking or even tearing apart their projects. For all of them, WiS is just the EVE content they miss.


I agree. The main point, that has been made again and again, is that WiS is another way of experiencing EVE. No-one is asking that CCP focus all their resouces on WiS instead of FiS. Just that it get some Developer time, and that CCP tells us what it's future plans for WiS are.

The WiS haters can't fathom this simple fact. Instead they have to resort to endless 'Space Barbie' rhetoric, and claim that Incarna will doom us all.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2294 - 2012-01-09 03:37:51 UTC
Flamespar wrote:
and that CCP tells us what it's future plans for WiS are.

Why does CCP owe you this information? They have stated in multiple places that WiS isn't dead...just on the backburner while they get things straightened out. You guys aren't able to accept this information and be reasonable about so why do you think CCP is going to come here and take the inevitable abuse?

I'm surprised they haven't locked the thread since the OP's initial question has been answered but they are probably afraid doing so would send some of the more fragile members of the community over the edge.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Kuronaga
The Dead Parrot Shoppe Inc.
The Chicken Coop
#2295 - 2012-01-09 04:16:43 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
and that CCP tells us what it's future plans for WiS are.

Why does CCP owe you this information?


Because we invested money into the companies promises for several years and were let down immensely.

If it was the same situation with FiS you'd be singing a different tune.

In fact, you were.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2296 - 2012-01-09 04:39:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Ladie Harlot
Kuronaga wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
and that CCP tells us what it's future plans for WiS are.

Why does CCP owe you this information?


Because we invested money into the companies promises for several years and were let down immensely.

If it was the same situation with FiS you'd be singing a different tune.

In fact, you were.

You are 100% wrong.

We pay a monthly fee and the only thing CCP owes us is access to the game for the amount of time we pay for. For our subscription fee we aren't owed any future development and anybody who expects it is dumb.

The people who rioted and canceled their accounts were sending a message that if CCP continued to waste time on WiS nonsense that they weren't going to continue to pay every month for access to the game. Fortunately there were enough people that did this that it finally made CCP wake up and change direction.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Disdaine
#2297 - 2012-01-09 04:48:15 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
You are 100% wrong.

We pay a monthly fee and the only thing CCP owes us is access to the game for the amount of time we pay for. For our subscription fee we aren't owed any future development and anybody who expects it is dumb.

The people who rioted and canceled their accounts were sending a message that if CCP continued to waste time on WiS nonsense that they weren't going to continue to pay every month for access to the game. Fortunately there were enough people that did this that it finally made CCP wake up and change direction.


So first you say that we are not to expect any future development at all.

Then you say the riots were about CCP developing WiS.

And here you are complaining about development allocation.

Precious.
Flamespar
WarRavens
#2298 - 2012-01-09 04:51:46 UTC
Disdaine wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
You are 100% wrong.

We pay a monthly fee and the only thing CCP owes us is access to the game for the amount of time we pay for. For our subscription fee we aren't owed any future development and anybody who expects it is dumb.

The people who rioted and canceled their accounts were sending a message that if CCP continued to waste time on WiS nonsense that they weren't going to continue to pay every month for access to the game. Fortunately there were enough people that did this that it finally made CCP wake up and change direction.


So first you say that we are not to expect any future development at all.

Then you say the riots were about CCP developing WiS.

And here you are complaining about development allocation.

Precious.


Lol. Good call.

Though I should point out that finding the holes in Ladies rhetoric is pretty easy.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2299 - 2012-01-09 04:55:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Ladie Harlot
Disdaine wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
You are 100% wrong.

We pay a monthly fee and the only thing CCP owes us is access to the game for the amount of time we pay for. For our subscription fee we aren't owed any future development and anybody who expects it is dumb.

The people who rioted and canceled their accounts were sending a message that if CCP continued to waste time on WiS nonsense that they weren't going to continue to pay every month for access to the game. Fortunately there were enough people that did this that it finally made CCP wake up and change direction.


So first you say that we are not to expect any future development at all.

Then you say the riots were about CCP developing WiS.

And here you are complaining about development allocation.

Precious.

No. As usual you didn't actually read what I wrote.

I said that the riots and people canceling their accounts were doing so because the game had been neglected for two years and we were tired of paying for a broken game that was being neglected while CCP worked on space pants. CCP woke up, started making real Eve content again and then the game was worth paying for again.

I used to say that if Eve, with its new focus on space content, was no longer worth the subscription price for people who can't live without space pants then they should stop paying for it. Why pay for a game you aren't enjoying? But then CCP made up some rule about not advocating for people canceling their accounts so I stopped doing it.

You guys are trying to make this way more complicated than it needs to be.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2300 - 2012-01-09 05:22:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
Kuronaga wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
and that CCP tells us what it's future plans for WiS are.

Why does CCP owe you this information?


Because we invested money into the companies promises for several years and were let down immensely.

If it was the same situation with FiS you'd be singing a different tune.


How is that any different then the letdown to FIS players who have been paying CCP a sub for several years to build EVE the serious internet spaceship game and complete the features they only half-finished while most of the company's resources were diverted during that time to fund WIS/WOD and DUST?

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.