These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Expansions should cost $

First post
Author
cepo
The Terrifying League Of Dog Fort
Deepwater Hooligans
#141 - 2013-07-03 19:38:17 UTC
Nice try, sean decker.
marVLs
#142 - 2013-07-03 20:09:06 UTC
Why again this stupid idea...
Lipbite
Express Hauler
#143 - 2013-07-03 20:12:45 UTC
I'd pay $49.95 for optional WiS expansion.
Zeus Zed
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#144 - 2013-07-03 20:39:14 UTC
The op is prolly the new hire of ccp
Setaceous
Nexus Prima
#145 - 2013-07-03 20:55:35 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
P3ps1 Max wrote:
@Doc Fury

geesh,

1:05 mark "descent percentage of our user base" use plex to play.

- - - - - - - - - -


You didn't say "decent percentage" in your OP now did you? You said a majority, which means more than 50%.

lol just wow



So, you don't understand what words in English mean either?

lol just wow!

No, you should just go back to WoW.




Would people please stop saying this. When someone like the OP leaves WoW, even that community* doesn't want him back.



*a community tarred with the brush of players like the OP, tainted by the worst players being out of the game and shitting up other games Sad
Nery Nebu
Griff-Co
#146 - 2013-07-04 13:49:28 UTC
P3ps1 Max wrote:
A company that comes to mind that is extremely successful with this is Guild Wars 2 (which is a pretty bad ass game) which doesn't charge a cent to play each month. They do however have a **** load of micro-transactions from their market place but those items are not game changing but rather clothing and other cool paraphernalia .

To me Eve is setup for success using this business model.Cool



You know that Guildwars 2 is dieing ??
Aswell as most of the free2play games out there.
The free2play model is not that attractive anymore, as it was in the beginning. Now there are just too much of them.


Subscribtion model is the future.
SKINE DMZ
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#147 - 2013-07-04 14:18:21 UTC
I think op has not thought this through

I disagree

Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#148 - 2013-07-04 14:19:44 UTC
P3ps1 Max wrote:
I've seen quite a few posts regarding this F2P nonsense. The best avenue to take for the company 'imo', is to charge for an expansion(s). With 4 expansions each year with a set price at 19.99$ or 1 expansion with 3 content updates during the year Question

A company that comes to mind that is extremely successful with this is Guild Wars 2 (which is a pretty bad ass game) which doesn't charge a cent to play each month. They do however have a **** load of micro-transactions from their market place but those items are not game changing but rather clothing and other cool paraphernalia .

To me Eve is setup for success using this business model.Cool


No, go away.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#149 - 2013-07-04 14:20:44 UTC
Posting in a CCP EADecker alt thread
Spankijs Omaristos
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#150 - 2013-07-04 14:33:49 UTC
I fully support this!

Cmon' guys n gals, I think We should support CCP!! They bring us great game and we shall support them!


I cant get this, why so many of you have no support for them? You do understand, that moar money they make, the moar content, support etc we get? And everyone is happy?

Are you all really that greedy, that you cant spent 60-80 bucks per year?
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#151 - 2013-07-04 14:40:39 UTC
P3ps1 Max wrote:
I've seen quite a few posts regarding this F2P nonsense. The best avenue to take for the company 'imo', is to charge for an expansion(s). With 4 expansions each year with a set price at 19.99$ or 1 expansion with 3 content updates during the year Question


4 expansions a year which 3 should be considered even patches.

So little content to justify being called an expansion (which introduces major content).

Other games release expansions to introduce huge amounts of new content (in WoW another continent; storyline; new themes). They leave the more minor updates to patches.

5.4 in WoW coming up is but a patch. 5.4 in EvE would be 3 years of development (can wrap all the changes in EvE in 3 years into one WoW patch).

When you start paying for expansions you expect it's worth the $19 or $39 price.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#152 - 2013-07-04 15:06:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Ace Uoweme wrote:
So little content to justify being called an expansion (which introduces major content).

Other games release expansions to introduce huge amounts of new content
That's because other games are about content consumption, whereas EVE is about content generation. As a side-effect, nothing other games do really have any bearing on how expansions work in EVE. For instance, Retribution was one the biggest content patches EVE has had in ages, but if you run on the incorrect assumption that “expansion” = “more stuff”, then you would miss this fact.

This is why one eve expansion = many many years of expansions for those other games: because the developers of those games have to waste all that time thinking up new stuff for people to consume, rather than alter the game to provide huge amounts of new gameplay.

…and that is, once again, why EVE can't have paid-for expansions: because the tools and the gameplay need to be the same for everyone, so the expansions must be mandatory, so you might as well roll the cost up in the subscription.
P3ps1 Max
Deaths Consortium
Pandemic Horde
#153 - 2013-07-04 15:11:08 UTC
Man, two days running strong here on the forums. Keep up the great feedback SmileBlink
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#154 - 2013-07-04 15:13:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
P3ps1 Max wrote:
@Doc Fury

geesh,

1:05 mark "descent percentage of our user base" use plex to play.



You of course some how managed to miss the comment at 0:49(ish) "someone still has to buy that plex and inject it into the system" but of course since it doesn't support your argument it can be safely ignored.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

P3ps1 Max
Deaths Consortium
Pandemic Horde
#155 - 2013-07-04 15:16:02 UTC  |  Edited by: P3ps1 Max
Samillian wrote:
P3ps1 Max wrote:
@Doc Fury

geesh,

1:05 mark "descent percentage of our user base" use plex to play.



You of course some how managed to miss the comment at 0:49(ish) "someone still has to buy that plex" but of course since it doesn't support your argument it can be safely ignored.






I sincerely believe every plex is purchased by players and injected into the gameRoll

I do sereiously
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#156 - 2013-07-04 15:26:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
P3ps1 Max wrote:
I sincerely believe every plex is purchased by players and injected into the gameRoll

I do sereiously



Please explain why exactly CCP would place plex on the market that has not already been payed for by a player. I'd be interested to hear your explanation for a behaviour that would be contrary to their financial wellbeing.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Hrothgar Nilsson
#157 - 2013-07-04 15:34:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Hrothgar Nilsson
P3ps1 Max wrote:
I've seen quite a few posts regarding this F2P nonsense. The best avenue to take for the company 'imo', is to charge for an expansion(s). With 1 expansion each year with a set price at 19.99$ along with content updates during the year Question

I don't know if you're completely new to this game, but it's not like EverQuest where an expansion unlocks a new continent that you can't travel to if you didn't buy the expansion, or new dungeons you can't play in.

It would simply be completely unmanageable from a coding perspective for CCP, if there were people playing the game stuck at wherever the game was like the last time they'd bothered to upgrade.

EVE "expansions" are completely unlike the typical expansions it seems you're used to, and not giving them to people who didn't pay would make the game a clusterfrak of enormous proportions in terms of managing the game.

I mean seriously... people who hadn't bothered to upgrade to Odyssey would be mining unlimited, non-depleting ice fields, invisible to everybody who had. People would be flying around in untiericided ships, blueprints would have different material requirements depending on what expansion you were on.

Whatever you're thinking of just simply doesn't apply to EVE.
Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
#158 - 2013-07-04 15:46:53 UTC
Posting in stealth "Hi, I am Sean Decker" thread.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#159 - 2013-07-04 15:52:17 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
So little content to justify being called an expansion (which introduces major content).

Other games release expansions to introduce huge amounts of new content
That's because other games are about content consumption, whereas EVE is about content generation. As a side-effect, nothing other games do really have any bearing on how expansions work in EVE. For instance, Retribution was one the biggest content patches EVE has had in ages, but if you run on the incorrect assumption that “expansion” = “more stuff”, then you would miss this fact.

This is why one eve expansion = many many years of expansions for those other games: because the developers of those games have to waste all that time thinking up new stuff for people to consume, rather than alter the game to provide huge amounts of new gameplay.

…and that is, once again, why EVE can't have paid-for expansions: because the tools and the gameplay need to be the same for everyone, so the expansions must be mandatory, so you might as well roll the cost up in the subscription.


Nice try at a save, Tippia, but in the end what CCP generates as content isn't worthy to buy -- not enough content to justify it.

Be it for consumption or generation it's too little to buy. It's a patch.

That's the bottom line.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Xercodo
Cruor Angelicus
#160 - 2013-07-04 15:54:23 UTC
P3ps1 Max wrote:
Samillian wrote:
P3ps1 Max wrote:
@Doc Fury

geesh,

1:05 mark "descent percentage of our user base" use plex to play.



You of course some how managed to miss the comment at 0:49(ish) "someone still has to buy that plex" but of course since it doesn't support your argument it can be safely ignored.






I sincerely believe every plex is purchased by players and injected into the gameRoll

I do sereiously


For the love of... stop this sarcastic **** and accept it.

Yes EVERY SINGLE ONE OF EVERY PLEX EVER IN EXISTENCE WAS BOUGHT BUY REAL MONEY BY SOMEONE.

Here's a run down on how we can tell. Every NPC sell order for anything, be it skills, blueprints, etc have an expiration time of 365 days or similar. This makes then very clearly NPC order as players are only capable of creating orders of 3 months (90 days, 89 days and some change usually being what we see).

There are no NPC sell orders for PLEXes and there never was. There is no where that PLEX can come out of thin air unless a dev were to hack into his own secret playing character.

The problem with the logic of there ever being game-generated PLEX is that every single one would be losing CCP money. It's not logical for them want to ever enable such a thing.

The only exception to every PLEX being paid for is the few events where CCP gives them away as prizes. But these hardly effect the economy much as they tend to throw only 20 or so into an economy of 1,000s of PLEXes.

So no, no one in EVE plays for free except maybe some marketing genius that lives off of buddy invites every month haha.

As for the base of the topic, the expansion part, I refer you back to Tippia's post. We're better off having CCP do it as is. Cutting people off with expansions would be terrible for PR and would drop users by 1000s. If you intend on CCP making the rest of the game free to play and charging JUST for the expansions then you end up running them into the ground unless every expansion is $50, which again, would cause riots.

You also have to consider the effect on the economy this would have. If you ever make EVE free to play then you will inevitably get an influx of players. When you do that you end up with more saturated markets in pretty much every category. You slowly increase inflation as more people run missions and go ratting.

The Drake is a Lie