These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Sentry drone fleets, should they stay, or should they go?

First post
Author
Tinu Moorhsum
Random Events
#41 - 2013-07-03 18:18:29 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Dude you know we can't say "we discussed hurbleburbles with CCP and the devs agreed that they're grossly under/overpowered and are gonna be fixed next month"

Why not? Did they not say anything to you in return?


Well it should be obvious. Every second EVE online player has asperger syndrome and if there is one thing you need to do with aspergers is manage expectations.

Whitehound
#42 - 2013-07-03 19:47:46 UTC
Sofia Wolf wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Dude you know we can't say "we discussed hurbleburbles with CCP and the devs agreed that they're grossly under/overpowered and are gonna be fixed next month"

Why not? Did they not say anything to you in return?


Ever head of NDA?

It is not the point. One can say more than just "we talked." but give an indication such as "We talk about XY and how it is bad, and it went surprisingly good." Or one can say "..., and found resistance."

Let me remind you that the discussion is with people who not only make the game, but who know the game, who love it and play it or have been playing it, and it should be pretty easy to get their position on a topic without making it into a poker table.

If this is not within the powers of the CSM then the CSM is not more than a human teleprompter who is reading the forums to CCP. And frankly would this have little to do with an actual discussion.

So, a little bit more than "we discussed it" would be nice. It is not like Slowcats were invented just yesterday and CCP did not know about it already.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#43 - 2013-07-03 20:22:32 UTC
I don't care to try IAs patience by trying to devise hints.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Whitehound
#44 - 2013-07-03 20:27:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
Malcanis wrote:
I don't care to try IAs patience by trying to devise hints.

Then I just thank you for reading the forums to CCP. A job well done! We are proud of you.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Freighdee Katt
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2013-07-03 21:38:10 UTC
Hit sentries with a 50% tracking nerf only while assigned. Call it latency. Problem solved.

EvE is supposed to suck.  Wait . . . what was the question?

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#46 - 2013-07-04 09:31:49 UTC
Ciyrine wrote:
If i assign my sentries to someone with fast lock time can thr drones fire at targets that are outside my targeting range?


yes, providing that it's inside your drone control range (and inside the range of the drones themselves, of course)

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#47 - 2013-07-04 09:33:04 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
I don't care to try IAs patience by trying to devise hints.

Then I just thank you for reading the forums to CCP. A job well done! We are proud of you.


Your problem is not with me but with your misconception about what the CSM does.

If you think all the CSM does is link forum posts to CCP, then by all means run for election next year and find out for yourself.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Chi'Nane T'Kal
Interminatus
#48 - 2013-07-04 09:51:18 UTC
Tinu Moorhsum wrote:
Alpha snipers also do well


Not with TSB's running.

Did you even look at the latest incarnation of N3 domis?
Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#49 - 2013-07-04 10:06:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Caitlyn Tufy
Malcanis wrote:
Actually Mynnna raised the topic.


Why am I not surprised? Big smile

Chi'Nane T'Kal wrote:
Did you even look at the latest incarnation of N3 domis?


These?Big smile
Chi'Nane T'Kal
Interminatus
#50 - 2013-07-04 10:08:16 UTC
Freighdee Katt wrote:
Hit sentries with a 50% tracking nerf only while assigned. Call it latency. Problem solved.


Other problems generated. A few drones on assist (we should avoid assign, as that is used for fighters and completely different) is working as intended, specifically in a game that promotes multiaccounting.

1000 sentries on assist are a problem.


So if you'd introduce a penalty, it should be stacked, for example 1% optimal/tracking/speed penalty for every X drones that assist the target caller.


A fix to the target spectrum breaker advantage on drone boats could be, if it auto-abandons drones whenever it successfully breaks a lock on your ship. At least that way some action (reconnect to lost drones) would be required by the pilot now and then.

Chi'Nane T'Kal
Interminatus
#51 - 2013-07-04 10:10:35 UTC
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:


Exactly.

No alpha sniping involved in those kills :).
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#52 - 2013-07-04 10:28:24 UTC
The CSM's favoured change to assigning drones is to limit assigning to squad members.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Whitehound
#53 - 2013-07-04 10:31:32 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
If you think all the CSM does is link forum posts to CCP, then by all means run for election next year and find out for yourself.

I did not say you linked them - I said you read them to CCP!

Do you misquote a lot?? Shocked

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#54 - 2013-07-04 10:41:53 UTC
I always thought the issue was the slowcat itself, and that it cannot be easily overwhelmed by dps alone.

About sentries in general: The assignment of drones to a targetcaller really solves a lot of organization-issues right away :)
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#55 - 2013-07-04 10:42:19 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
The CSM's favoured change to assigning drones is to limit assigning to squad members.


Very sensible suggestion.

.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#56 - 2013-07-04 10:52:14 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
If you think all the CSM does is link forum posts to CCP, then by all means run for election next year and find out for yourself.

I did not say you linked them - I said you read them to CCP!

Do you misquote a lot?? Shocked


So your mental image of what we do is literally reading out loud forum posts to CCP over VOIP? Lol

When we say "we're talking to CCP" we mean "we're in a chat channel with CCP staff". If we want to call attention to forum discussions, a link is how we do it.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Whitehound
#57 - 2013-07-04 11:00:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
Malcanis wrote:
So your mental image of what we do is literally reading out loud forum posts to CCP over VOIP? Lol

When we say "we're talking to CCP" we mean "we're in a chat channel with CCP staff". If we want to call attention to forum discussions, a link is how we do it.

Pretty much, yes. I imagined that you would have occasional face-to-face meetings with them, which I believe you do. But reading forums to CCP over VOIP makes a lot of sense considering how bad fanfest can smell. They would want a bit of distance.

Anyhow, do you have anything you can tell us on how your proposal was received? Or is it just a "thank you" that you get for reading the information to them?

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#58 - 2013-07-04 12:21:32 UTC
Sounds like a perfect way for FC's to get ahead of that which plagues fleets the most: Minions inability to follow primary calls.

About time some more varied chips were thrown on the table though, was getting a bit boring reading about the incessant artillery alpha crap.

As for CSM - CPP comms, who cares when it has no effect? It took more than two years for CCP to realise that Winmatar was broken, it took them five years to realise that FW was broken and so on .. all cases where CSM were specifically asked to present verifiable facts handed to them on a silver platter .. so is the comms broken, CSM lying through their teeth or CCP more inept than even I give them credit for?
Personally hope it is the former as the alternatives are too horrendous to contemplate

PS: I am assuming that drones get their attributes from their owner even when assigned, ie. that the assignee does not influence anything in the way of range, damage, tracking etc. .. that his only contribution is a pointing finger? If not then holy hell, nerf that **** into the ground!
Chi'Nane T'Kal
Interminatus
#59 - 2013-07-04 12:36:36 UTC
Again, drones are NOT assigned. Fighters are assigned, which gives a lot more control over them than just target selection.

Drones ASSIST and as such keep all of their attributes as if their owner controlled them (which he still DOES, btw. except for selecting targets). Only the targeting control is indirectly given to the assisted pilot, the drones will attack whichever target he last activated an offensive modul on.

It gets a bit more complicated with aggressive drone behaviour, but that's it in a nutshell.
Freighdee Katt
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2013-07-04 23:29:20 UTC
Chi'Nane T'Kal wrote:
Freighdee Katt wrote:
Hit sentries with a 50% tracking nerf only while assigned. Call it latency. Problem solved.

Other problems generated.

It doesn't need to apply to flying drones, only sentries. Drone bunnies still work as intended.

There are good reasons to assign flying drones to another ship, so that DPS can focus on DPS and the drone bunny can put all the drones where they need to be. There are no good reasons for farming out sentries from a drone boat, unless you're going AFK. And that's the problem. It's like letting missile boats assign their launchers.

If you wants to shoot, you pushes the button. Or, if you must farm your sentries out, then you take a big hit in combat effectiveness. All they have to do is make that hit just big enough to keep drone boat captains at the wheel. Problem solved.

EvE is supposed to suck.  Wait . . . what was the question?