These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

About the other 3

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#21 - 2011-10-24 13:28:27 UTC
Forlorn Wongraven wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:
caldari next pls.

i wanna see 7 launcher points, 7,7,6 slot lay out if you could


Predicting blaster bonus here...


yeh, they just hate missiles. i love missiles dam them

OMG when can i get a pic here
Ravcharas
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#22 - 2011-10-24 13:29:37 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Sorry to keep you waiting, but our plan is to show one model every week.

When do you plan on releasing the stats?
Kenpachi Viktor
Perkone
Caldari State
#23 - 2011-10-24 13:31:49 UTC
+1 gallente

A war that would’ve involved 20,000 players, 75% of nullsec space, and hundreds of supercapitals was halted not by diplomacy, but by a game mechanic so dreadful that those who have experienced it previously have no desire to do so again. - Fix POS & SOV
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
#24 - 2011-10-24 13:42:30 UTC
I'll be happy if I hear something about a tool that will make it possible to balance the mess in realtime on TQ after these new hulls have been introduced P
Asroha Cloudwalker
Cloudwalker Enterprises
#25 - 2011-10-24 15:21:47 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Sorry to keep you waiting, but our plan is to show one model every week.


So, with releasing these teasers once a week puts the Winter Expansion release sometime in early December?

After Monoclegate, I would think you guys would communicate a little more, and with more substance. You should actually release teasers about the Winter Expansion itself. Lots of us are waiting for that, as that will show us what direction EVE is actually heading, and whether we should extend our subs or not.
Toros Revoke
#26 - 2011-10-24 15:50:04 UTC
So are we going to have these by christmas?
Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2011-10-24 15:54:42 UTC
Gallente plox!
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#28 - 2011-10-24 16:00:42 UTC
Amarr!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
Ager Agemo
Rainbow Ponies Incorporated
#29 - 2011-10-24 16:06:21 UTC
This pls :D

caldari Tier 3 Battlecruiser
8
7
6

Slot layout 8 launchers :D
Bonus to fit the big launchers
BC skill=
5% Explo speed/radius bonus for cruise/torps
7.5% shield boosting bonus

OR

8 hybrids
Bonus to fit large hybrids
7.5% Tracking bonus for large hybrids
7.5% Damage bonus for large hybrids
7.5% Bonus for shield large boosting
:D
pls no resistance buff, drake is already overtanked enought to have another space brick flying around.
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
#30 - 2011-10-24 16:09:59 UTC
The Caldari one should shoot torpedoes that have blasters mounted to them. Twisted

Six months in the hole... it changes a man.
SFM Hobb3s
Perkone
Caldari State
#31 - 2011-10-24 16:18:34 UTC
Asroha Cloudwalker wrote:
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Sorry to keep you waiting, but our plan is to show one model every week.


So, with releasing these teasers once a week puts the Winter Expansion release sometime in early December?

After Monoclegate, I would think you guys would communicate a little more, and with more substance. You should actually release teasers about the Winter Expansion itself. Lots of us are waiting for that, as that will show us what direction EVE is actually heading, and whether we should extend our subs or not.



While not necessarily for the new ships I thought I'd read they plan on putting out some nice videos with the upcoming eve blogs to show how winter is shaping up, so I wouldn't fret about the whole substance thing.

Considering how the summer went, the last few weeks have presented very good outlook for the eve community. Props to them for taking some bold steps.
Denidil
Cascades Mountain Operatives
#32 - 2011-10-24 16:20:48 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Tallianna Avenkarde wrote:
Alas, for I am not a twit Sad could someone please #tweetfleet gallente for me? Lol


Happy to oblige; it's done. Big smile


i second the gallente [not a twitter user]

Tedium and difficulty are not the same thing, if you don't realize this then STFU about game design.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#33 - 2011-10-24 16:34:33 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
caldari next pls.

i wanna see 7 launcher points, 7,7,6 slot lay out if you could


Yeah, if someone could tweet me for Caldari, please, that'd be appreciated. (Meh, Twitter...)

I think though, that 7/6/5, 8/6/4, or 7/7/4 would probably be what it'll get. Unless they plan to diverge from the 18-total slot layout that the Tier 2's (except Myrm) have?

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#34 - 2011-10-24 16:37:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Nova Fox
If I have to redesign one of my ships again becuase it looks too similar to something put out I'll be mad. However I have seen the concept from CCP the amarrian Battlecruiser I am not sure if it survived but if you want an idea how it looks its a shurnk down amarrian carrier made into battleship instead of drone boat.

Then again the face book winner deserves the spot alot more.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
pussnheels
Viziam
#35 - 2011-10-24 18:33:14 UTC
Will you all please be quit ; it will be the amarrian next because everything else is just less ; not only do we have the best looking ships we also use lazers and we tank armor like real men and women

So no discussion possible it will be amarrian next

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#36 - 2011-10-24 18:44:28 UTC
Ummmm so all these 8-6-7 / 8-7-6 slot predictions are pretty much wishful thinking. These BC's are most certainly not going to have battleship DPS layout, with 7 slot tanks. The whole point is fast and fragile - not tanky battleship wannabes. Currently battleships don't even have 8/7/6 layouts except in extreme cases.

I think more likely we'll see BC's with maybe 4-5 large turrets and some damage bonuses, and fewer slots for tanking than their Tier 2 counterparts. These will not be UBERcanes. They'll be more like harder hitting Muninns and Eagles and Zealots. Snipey ships that rely on speed, evasion, or formation for defense. Frigates should be able to eat them alive if they're to be balanced at all.

Just trying to temper expectations....I think current slot layouts being tossed around this thread are pretty unrealistic.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#37 - 2011-10-24 18:45:21 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
If I have to redesign one of my ships again becuase it looks too similar to something put out I'll be mad. However I have seen the concept from CCP the amarrian Battlecruiser I am not sure if it survived but if you want an idea how it looks its a shurnk down amarrian carrier made into battleship instead of drone boat.

Then again the face book winner deserves the spot alot more.


Well, they did confirm yesterday that the other 3 BC's would indeed be player designs... "hidden gems" in the Deviant Art contest. Which 3, at this point, are anybodys guess.

It's best to show Amarrian next, then Caldari, and save the "revolutionary" Gallante for last.

You can look at that list as building suspense, or in order of importance, whichever you prefer. Big smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
pussnheels
Viziam
#38 - 2011-10-24 18:57:45 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Ummmm so all these 8-6-7 / 8-7-6 slot predictions are pretty much wishful thinking. These BC's are most certainly not going to have battleship DPS layout, with 7 slot tanks. The whole point is fast and fragile - not tanky battleship wannabes. Currently battleships don't even have 8/7/6 layouts except in extreme cases.

I think more likely we'll see BC's with maybe 4-5 large turrets and some damage bonuses, and fewer slots for tanking than their Tier 2 counterparts. These will not be UBERcanes. They'll be more like harder hitting Muninns and Eagles and Zealots. Snipey ships that rely on speed, evasion, or formation for defense. Frigates should be able to eat them alive if they're to be balanced at all.

Just trying to temper expectations....I think current slot layouts being tossed around this thread are pretty unrealistic.

i am pretty sure you will be right

i am pretty much thinking like our own historical battlecruisers but we will not know untill they release the stats


Amarrian first please

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#39 - 2011-10-24 19:38:11 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
If I have to redesign one of my ships again becuase it looks too similar to something put out I'll be mad. However I have seen the concept from CCP the amarrian Battlecruiser I am not sure if it survived but if you want an idea how it looks its a shurnk down amarrian carrier made into battleship instead of drone boat.

Then again the face book winner deserves the spot alot more.


Well, they did confirm yesterday that the other 3 BC's would indeed be player designs... "hidden gems" in the Deviant Art contest. Which 3, at this point, are anybodys guess.

It's best to show Amarrian next, then Caldari, and save the "revolutionary" Gallante for last.

You can look at that list as building suspense, or in order of importance, whichever you prefer. Big smile


I'll be extremly mad if they pick my contest entry as a warship, its purely civillian.
Though the gallente one I seen popping up the Aqulion is worthy of gallente and the face book winner definetly amarrian.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#40 - 2011-10-24 19:45:47 UTC
Tallianna Avenkarde wrote:
Alas, for I am not a twit Sad could someone please #tweetfleet gallente for me? Lol


Same pliiiiiz? Oops