These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Federation and Republic citizens, lets talk about the situation.

Author
Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2013-06-25 18:28:00 UTC
Explain to me how the Federation made those Republic dreadnoughts open fire. That's all I'm asking. Show me irrefutable proof that the Federation put the Republic into a position where the only reasonable option left was violence and murder. Then, sir, I will back down from my assertion that the Republic has everything to prove and little to demand.
Anslo
Scope Works
#42 - 2013-06-25 18:35:16 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
Explain to me how the Federation made those Republic dreadnoughts open fire. That's all I'm asking. Show me irrefutable proof that the Federation put the Republic into a position where the only reasonable option left was violence and murder. Then, sir, I will back down from my assertion that the Republic has everything to prove and little to demand.


They didn't. The Federation's actions in stone walling the Minmatar in such a way, coupled with a few decades of less-than-stellar treatment, led to tension. But no, it was the fault of those who invaded for escalating things to such heights. As I said, reparations are in order, as are apologies. But we must be willing to apologize for our faults as well in keeping them from their Ray.

What happened was wrong, you are correct. That was not the last option. I am not defending their actions. However, I am defending their right to an apology for our actions. No, our action did not deserve a military incursion, and hopefully this will be addressed in the future and rectified. However, this should not be our reason to simply shun them and treat them as children or lesser people.

They have their culture, we have ours. We did not do the simple thing of treating them with respect during a difficult time and working with them. That's it. That's all. Respect. That's all that was needed. Our lack thereof led to their offense, and to action that really had no business or right to be taken. Embargoes? Sure. Heated condemnation from the Tribes? Why not. Giant guns?...no.

In the end, they were wrong to fire, simple as that. But we too, were wrong to act as we did that led to that event. This same, seemingly benign lapse in cultural understanding is what led to our current situation with the Caldari.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2013-06-25 18:42:19 UTC
And in the end their crime was by far and away more heinous and destructive than an alleged century of "disrespect". If we have to answer for hurting some feelings and sensibilities, fine. That's how politics works. But that doesn't come until they answer for ending lives in a brutal, violent, and uncalled for manner. Any leniency in this area is simply a display of weakness, and since the Matari have made it clear that all that matters to them is strength we simply can not bend for them now.
Anslo
Scope Works
#44 - 2013-06-25 18:45:18 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
And in the end their crime was by far and away more heinous and destructive than an alleged century of "disrespect". If we have to answer for hurting some feelings and sensibilities, fine. That's how politics works. But that doesn't come until they answer for ending lives in a brutal, violent, and uncalled for manner. Any leniency in this area is simply a display of weakness, and since the Matari have made it clear that all that matters to them is strength we simply can not bend for them now.


So in your own...rather angry way, you agree with me in that the two need to sit down, at the same time, and talk. It would be nice if we tried to break barriers by acting first however, whether it be an apology or simply just requesting a sit down (which I think all parties can agree on).

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Bryen Verrisai
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2013-06-25 18:58:45 UTC
I have always advocated for reconciliation on this issue. But it must be the Republic that steps forward first and offers significant apologies and penance. The Federation can not "buy" reconciliation over Colelie with apologies for comparatively insignificant slights. The figurative ball is in the Republic's court now.
Anslo
Scope Works
#46 - 2013-06-25 19:01:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Anslo
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
I have always advocated for reconciliation on this issue. But it must be the Republic that steps forward first and offers significant apologies and penance. The Federation can not "buy" reconciliation over Colelie with apologies for comparatively insignificant slights. The figurative ball is in the Republic's court now.


I'll agree to disagree then about who goes first. I still feel both should come together at the same time, and that the Federation should act and say 'let's talk.' Apology or not, at least ask them to sit and talk. But at least you're not one screaming for closed borders or an incursion into their space. So, for that, I give you my utmost respect.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#47 - 2013-06-25 19:05:15 UTC
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
And in the end their crime was by far and away more heinous and destructive than an alleged century of "disrespect". If we have to answer for hurting some feelings and sensibilities, fine. That's how politics works. But that doesn't come until they answer for ending lives in a brutal, violent, and uncalled for manner. Any leniency in this area is simply a display of weakness, and since the Matari have made it clear that all that matters to them is strength we simply can not bend for them now.


There is no display of weakness. We destroyed their fleet. That's a show of strength.

Strength is not prone to rash decisions. It has still been only a little time since the confrontation. Let's wait a little longer.
Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2013-06-25 19:08:43 UTC
Anslo wrote:
The Federation's actions in stone walling the Minmatar in such a way, coupled with a few decades of less-than-stellar treatment, led to tension.


Stone walling the Republic? Decades of less-than-stellar treatment? Can you point me at some examples in the news?

The stone walling argument is one I've heard from the more rabid Republicans. From what I've seen in the news, this isn't actually an allegation that's been made by the Republic. Instead, it's Republic-aligned Empyreans who have been complaining that they haven't been kept informed. I've asked this before (and received no satisfactory answer): can you point me at any examples in the news of the Republic alleging that the Federation has been stone walling it or refusing to share information?

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2013-06-25 19:11:20 UTC
Andrea Okazon wrote:
Bryen Verrisai wrote:
And in the end their crime was by far and away more heinous and destructive than an alleged century of "disrespect". If we have to answer for hurting some feelings and sensibilities, fine. That's how politics works. But that doesn't come until they answer for ending lives in a brutal, violent, and uncalled for manner. Any leniency in this area is simply a display of weakness, and since the Matari have made it clear that all that matters to them is strength we simply can not bend for them now.


There is no display of weakness. We destroyed their fleet. That's a show of strength.

Strength is not prone to rash decisions. It has still been only a little time since the confrontation. Let's wait a little longer.


How long must we wait? It's been almost two months. Show me proof that the Republic feels any contrition over what happened. At the very least, show me some indication that they won't do it again the next time their feelings are hurt.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#50 - 2013-06-25 19:13:01 UTC
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:

How long must we wait? It's been almost two months. Show me proof that the Republic feels any contrition over what happened. At the very least, show me some indication that they won't do it again the next time their feelings are hurt.


No.
Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2013-06-25 19:16:49 UTC
Andrea Okazon wrote:
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:

How long must we wait? It's been almost two months. Show me proof that the Republic feels any contrition over what happened. At the very least, show me some indication that they won't do it again the next time their feelings are hurt.


No.


Exactly!

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Anslo
Scope Works
#52 - 2013-06-25 19:18:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Anslo
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
Stone walling the Republic? Decades of less-than-stellar treatment? Can you point me at some examples in the news?


Surething.

No offer of a joint investigation.

Fleet members stating that information was denied to the Republic before Midular's transfer.

I'm sure if one did a bit more digging, I could find a lot more. We didn't even offer to accept a few of their own investigators.

Quote:
The stone walling argument is one I've heard from the more rabid Republicans. From what I've seen in the news, this isn't actually an allegation that's been made by the Republic. Instead, it's Republic-aligned Empyreans who have been complaining that they haven't been kept informed. I've asked this before (and received no satisfactory answer): can you point me at any examples in the news of the Republic alleging that the Federation has been stone walling it or refusing to share information?


When a fleet of dreads pop in and say that they have no news or updates, and have been denied any news or updates, that says something. The Minmatar aren't rabid animals looking for a fight, like so many people seem to think.

If you really think it's as simple as 'oh their feelings are hurt,' then you need to open your eyes.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2013-06-25 19:41:51 UTC
I think you're misunderstanding the term "stone walling". It refers to a refusal to communicate or engage. Let's look at the sources you cite. I've got to split this into two posts for technical reasons.

Anslo wrote:


Quote:
According to highly placed sources within the Minmatar government, Sanmatar Malaetu Shakor has been in direct contact with Federation President Jacus Roden, making a strongly worded demand that the shooter be extradited to the Minmatar Republic for questioning and trial. The same sources indicate that the President's response was negative, citing internal investigation and damage control at home as the primary reasons.


That sounds like they were talking about it just fine. Roden saying "no, we won't extradite him for these reasons" is not stone walling.

Anslo wrote:


The only mention of Federation-Republic diplomacy here is a comment about popular discontent by Federation Matari in the way the situation was being handled. Simply put, it's not germane.



Neither is there a denial of the same. This is a news piece about the Supreme Court denying extradition of Broteau (complete with rationale, and evidence of continuing discussion between the Federation and the Republic on the crime). Nowhere in it does it offer any specifics about what was, at the time, an ongoing investigation.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2013-06-25 19:42:02 UTC


I assume you're referring to this line:
Quote:
The RSS fleet demanded the Federation Navy stand aside and allow them to proceed further into Federation territory to retrieve the suspect, about whom few details have been released.


This is a news piece reporting on the initial RSS subcapital fleet incursion which attempted to extradite Broteau by force. It was turned back by the Federation Navy and left with no shots being fired.

I suppose you could read that as saying "The RSS demanded the Federation Navy stand aside [...], the RSS also complained that few details have been released about the suspect". Yet I suspect the "about whom few details have been released" is a line the reporter put in to underline that details have not been released to the public.

In any case, if you continue to read the news piece, it also mentions continued communications between the Federation and the Republic. Interestingly, it reminds us that the Tribal Council apologized to the Federation for the incursion. The contrasts between that incursion and the later one is instructional.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Anslo
Scope Works
#55 - 2013-06-25 19:49:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Anslo
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
That sounds like they were talking about it just fine. Roden saying "no, we won't extradite him for these reasons" is not stone walling.

Proceeded by what seems to be not a shred of info related to Midular being provided to the Minmatar.

Quote:
The only mention of Federation-Republic diplomacy here is a comment about popular discontent by Federation Matari in the way the situation was being handled. Simply put, it's not germane.

Which led to a lot of anti-Minmatar sentiment and action perpetuated against Minmatar living within our borders. One of many incidents that have happened even before this disaster.

Quote:
Neither is there a denial of the same. This is a news piece about the Supreme Court denying extradition of Broteau (complete with rationale, and evidence of continuing discussion between the Federation and the Republic on the crime). Nowhere in it does it offer any specifics about what was, at the time, an ongoing investigation.

Additionally without mention of any proposed counter offer to the Minmatar to meet them half way. They were simply told, no, no, no.

Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
This is a news piece reporting on the initial RSS subcapital fleet incursion which attempted to extradite Broteau by force. It was turned back by the Federation Navy and left with no shots being fired.
I suppose you could read that as saying "The RSS demanded the Federation Navy stand aside [...], the RSS also complained that few details have been released about the suspect". Yet I suspect the "about whom few details have been released" is a line the reporter put in to underline that details have not been released to the public.
In any case, if you continue to read the news piece, it also mentions continued communications between the Federation and the Republic. Interestingly, it reminds us that the Tribal Council apologized to the Federation for the incursion. The contrasts between that incursion and the later one is instructional.


Weren't you there Shin? Did you see what the RSS said? No doctor would tell them any news about Midular. Not about the investigation or the shooter, just about their Ray of Matar. Same with political channels. They weren't told a damn thing about Midular's condition until well after the fact.

Maybe I'm naive, but this, to me, is not how you treat an ally.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2013-06-25 20:00:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Shintoko Akahoshi
I think you're reading things into those news items that aren't there. I'm looking for instances where members of the Republic government are stating that they are being stonewalled by the Federation government.

This does not include inferences based on things you would like to see in the news items but don't.

This does not include man-in-the-streets commentary.

This does not include capsuleers complaining that the Federation has not released details publicly.

This does not include officers of the RSS stating that the Federation has not shared information with them.

I know I probably sound needlessly harsh, but with a touchy subject such as this, it's important to concentrate not on inference and speculation, but on facts.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Anslo
Scope Works
#57 - 2013-06-25 20:02:11 UTC
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
I think you're reading things into those news items that aren't there. I'm looking for instances where members of the Republic government are stating that they are being stonewalled by the Federation government.

This does not include man-in-the-streets commentary.

This does not include capsuleers complaining that the Federation has not released details publicly.

This does not include officers of the RSS stating that the Federation has not shared information with them.

I know I probably sound needlessly harsh, but with a touchy subject such as this, it's important to concentrate not on inference and speculation, but on facts.


So their grievances, the people of the Republic, who aren't 'official government representatives,' don't count?

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2013-06-25 20:46:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Shintoko Akahoshi
Anslo wrote:
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
I think you're reading things into those news items that aren't there. I'm looking for instances where members of the Republic government are stating that they are being stonewalled by the Federation government.

This does not include man-in-the-streets commentary.

This does not include capsuleers complaining that the Federation has not released details publicly.

This does not include officers of the RSS stating that the Federation has not shared information with them.

I know I probably sound needlessly harsh, but with a touchy subject such as this, it's important to concentrate not on inference and speculation, but on facts.


So their grievances, the people of the Republic, who aren't 'official government representatives,' don't count?


Surely you can distinguish between the Federal government sharing information with the Republic government, and the Federal government making information about an ongoing investigation public.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#59 - 2013-06-26 00:08:22 UTC
Why do you bother, your replies only give his delusions credence. Anslo will never find fault with anyone except his own. His words betray his utter hatred for the Federation and his absolute dedication to his tribal... masters. He seeks their approval like a addict seeks drugs. His kind of loyalty has hobbled the Federation for too long. Leave him to his beach and his crabs.
Erys Charantes
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2013-06-26 11:10:04 UTC
Gabriel Darkefyre wrote:
Realistically, cool heads need to prevail here. The only options being placed on the table up to now are fiery rhetoric by both sides.

Colelie was not a Mistake. Colelie was far more than that. Colelie was a Shambolic Diplomatic SNAFU of the highest possible order. It should never have happened and, as long as a Treaty exists between the Federation and the Republic, it must Never be allowed to happen again.

Broteau's Agenda cannot be allowed to prevail. Our peoples have walked as brothers for so long, let his poison die with him and let us focus on the true enemies of both of our peoples. While we argue, the vultures circle. The Angels, the Serpentis, the Sansha. Threats that we face every day. Division only weakens us and strengthens them.


A bit of a late quote, perhaps, but it echoes my own feelings strongly in the matter... Were there mistakes made by the Federation? Yes, there were. They're hardly perfect. But an attack from a supposedly allied nation? I've made my view on that clear elsewhere. In summary, it's idiocy. As would be the notion of turning aside a long alliance over the affair. You want to know why it's worth keeping it around? Look to your fellow Matari in chains and ask that... Look to the enemies of the Federation, waiting just outside the borders to burn it all down, and ask that. Both have so much to lose, if they're fool enough to let this collapse over an incident of mutual hubris.

Hopefully, though will prevail over impulse. If not, I'll see you on that long, dark road ahead.