These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Do Level 4 missions pay too much compared to 1 through 3?

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1301 - 2013-09-09 18:56:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
[quote=Frostys Virpio]

No, it's because they nerfed the supercaps that were used to farm PvE in there..

A Shiney incursion fleet is worth more than several super carriers.

What about a 60 billion isk raven, huh

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#1302 - 2013-09-09 18:57:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
The click my name, go to hide posts and save us both the time.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1303 - 2013-09-09 18:58:06 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:


You guys are as predictable as the rising sun. Any thread you disagree with you try and derail by attempting to shift the argument to something inane then when that doesn’t work you continue to troll until the thread becomes locked. Tippa was shown to be lying by Matrix earlier which didn’t hurt his/her credibility with me because she already had zero.

I realize this is the internet “BONJOUR” but because tipia or yourself type the words it still won’t make it true or factual.

Flame on master trolls.



Fortunately there are no flames or master trolls here. Unfortunately the inane crap being emitted from highsec has driven off the people you highsec pubbies would prefer to ~debate~ with. Clearly if you present an opinion as a fact then you cannot expect other people to forgo doing this. Knowledge, is not something most highsec pubbies have though so this grievous insult to academia continues. You unfortunately fall into that category as well, you have continually substituted your own opinion in place of fact to further your own point and become furious if that wasn't the case. Offering an olive branch to repair the damage done by the blithering highsec masses is also too arduous as can be seen by that guy, who should be banned for role playing per CCP's rules, refusing to change his sig to a new nullsec friendly sig. Unfortunately this cannot be resolved and until it is we will all have to deal with the inane crap coming from highsec.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#1304 - 2013-09-09 18:58:38 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
[quote=Frostys Virpio]

No, it's because they nerfed the supercaps that were used to farm PvE in there..

A Shiney incursion fleet is worth more than several super carriers.

What about a 60 billion isk raven, huh


Wasn't high sec ~safe~ ?

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#1305 - 2013-09-09 18:59:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
No sorry the inane assertion of this thread is that highsec mission running has an issue. An assertion which comes with no proof aside the original poster stating crudely the present and implying there is a problem with it.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1306 - 2013-09-09 19:00:14 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
You guys are as predictable as the rising sun. Any thread you disagree with you try and derail by attempting to shift the argument to something inane then when that doesn’t work you continue to troll until the thread becomes locked. Tippa was shown to be lying by Matrix earlier which didn’t hurt his/her credibility with me because she already had zero.

I realize this is the internet “BONJOUR” but because tipia or yourself type the words it still won’t make it true or factual.

Fortunately there are no flames or master trolls here. Unfortunately the inane crap being emitted from highsec has driven off the people you highsec pubbies would prefer to ~debate~ with. Clearly if you present an opinion as a fact then you cannot expect other people to forgo doing this. Knowledge, is not something most highsec pubbies have though so this grievous insult to academia continues. You unfortunately fall into that category as well, you have continually substituted your own opinion in place of fact to further your own point and become furious if that wasn't the case. Offering an olive branch to repair the damage done by the blithering highsec masses is also too arduous as can be seen by that guy, who should be banned for role playing per CCP's rules, refusing to change his sig to a new nullsec friendly sig. Unfortunately this cannot be resolved and until it is we will all have to deal with the inane crap coming from highsec.

Uh huh.

So basically they held the field, highsec must be buffed

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1307 - 2013-09-09 19:00:45 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


Some new lessons in hypocrisy.


No, this is a new lesson in prejudice, namely yours against pvp types.

What does the fact that exploiters cried about the boomerang bug fix have to do with the fact that it (like high sec lvl 5s) was a bug and that fixing a bug is never a nerf?

The answer is: nothing.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1308 - 2013-09-09 19:01:29 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
[quote=Frostys Virpio]

No, it's because they nerfed the supercaps that were used to farm PvE in there..

A Shiney incursion fleet is worth more than several super carriers.

What about a 60 billion isk raven, huh


Wasn't high sec ~safe~ ?


The exception that proves the rule

~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1309 - 2013-09-09 19:02:58 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
The click my name go to hide posts and save us both the time.


Nope, I will remain to be you conscious, since you don't have one, SOMEONE has to do it. I will also remind you to eat your peas and wash behind your ears as you don't seem honest enough to admit that you need both ruffage and improved hygene.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1310 - 2013-09-09 19:05:14 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:

What about a 60 billion isk raven, huh

Wasn't high sec ~safe~ ?

The exception that proves the rule

~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~

No, it means highsec is not safe

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1311 - 2013-09-09 19:06:34 UTC
I'm glad this thread has proved from beyond a shadow of doubt that highsec must be nerfed.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1312 - 2013-09-09 19:07:06 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:

What about a 60 billion isk raven, huh

Wasn't high sec ~safe~ ?

The exception that proves the rule

~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~

No, it means highsec is not safe


What are you talking about, highsec is safe unless you are impersonating someone.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1313 - 2013-09-09 19:07:41 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
[quote=Frostys Virpio]

No, it's because they nerfed the supercaps that were used to farm PvE in there..

A Shiney incursion fleet is worth more than several super carriers.

What about a 60 billion isk raven, huh


I am impersonating Chribba


How dare you~!

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1314 - 2013-09-09 19:08:35 UTC
Who am I ?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1315 - 2013-09-09 19:08:56 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
I'm glad this thread has proved from beyond a shadow of doubt that highsec must be nerfed.

Quite the opposite.

Unless you mean highsec ganking

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1316 - 2013-09-09 19:12:48 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
I'm glad this thread has proved from beyond a shadow of doubt that highsec must be nerfed.

Quite the opposite.

Unless you mean highsec ganking


No ganking takes place in highsec:

~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#1317 - 2013-09-09 19:21:16 UTC
La Nariz wrote:


The exception that proves the rule

~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~


A meager thousand of kill mails prove the contrary. But hey, they are probably fabricated by those pesky hi seccers!

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1318 - 2013-09-09 19:23:10 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
La Nariz wrote:


The exception that proves the rule

~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~


A meager thousand of kill mails prove the contrary. But hey, they are probably fabricated by those pesky hi seccers!

-Chribba


Dude stop impersonating people, we already know who you are.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#1319 - 2013-09-09 19:23:37 UTC
Oh noes! We better hope CCP doesn't see all this proof about hisecs safety.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1320 - 2013-09-09 19:25:11 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Oh noes! We better hope CCP doesn't see all this proof about hisecs safety.


You better hope not, they see you've been impersonating facts when they're really opinions. ~~~~Highsec is Safe~~~~

1/7 times the ships destroyed of nullsec 7x the income of nullsec, how does it work?

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133